Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Black Friday EPYC Turin VPS | Top-up Bonus | from 3.90 EUR

11113151617

Comments

  • Berohost ticket support is insanely good. Very fast and nice. The VPS is great too. 4-core Turin at 2300/6700 (MC slightly lower but it’s faster than the dedis I have lol).

    Will share proper yabs sometime later after the festivities of today. Forgot to share earlier.

    Thanked by 1anakara
  • @cosmossofa said:
    @berohost even replied to my ticket and completed the request today. Great guy!

    @GreenIce said:
    Bero is 100% premium. Experienced slight network unstability a while back - Swapped node and never been a issue since then. Support is fast enough considering it is a 1 man show (atleast at support). Performance seems solid, and prices are fair even without promos.

    They even do custom configs for you via ticket. Nothing to complain about as of right now atleast. Will use bero for my main server for a while, and i highly doubt i need to swap to anything else if nothing changes.

    Yes, he has never let us down.

  • @op23 said:
    Berohost ticket support is insanely good. Very fast and nice. The VPS is great too. 4-core Turin at 2300/6700 (MC slightly lower but it’s faster than the dedis I have lol).

    Will share proper yabs sometime later after the festivities of today. Forgot to share earlier.

    It's great to see you here too! Berohost is a premium service that's highly recommended. I'm using it as one of my main vps.

    Thanked by 1op23
  • @anakara said:

    @op23 said:
    Berohost ticket support is insanely good. Very fast and nice. The VPS is great too. 4-core Turin at 2300/6700 (MC slightly lower but it’s faster than the dedis I have lol).

    Will share proper yabs sometime later after the festivities of today. Forgot to share earlier.

    It's great to see you here too! Berohost is a premium service that's highly recommended. I'm using it as one of my main vps.

    Thank you to all you folks who patiently answered my questions as well. Getting a premium provider at good pricing is getting harder and harder with the hardware pricing nowadays.

    Merry Christmas!

    Thanked by 1anakara
  • 3rd week performance dropped. What I had during 3 months of early 2025 is not different with this one. Week 1-2 got GB6 Single Performance of 2700-2900

    Week 3 drop to 2100-2200 during work hours in Germany and got 2200-2300 during off hours

    It seems very hard to keep @berohost performance all the time as stable as The Real Premium Host.

    Advising customer to move to Dedicated Server is not a clever solution
    I wish and hope @berohost good luck in Oversubscribing Customers

    With Promos etc
    While I had enough and give up ..

    2nd time, no improvement at all

  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member
    edited December 2025

    @riomartin said:
    3rd week performance dropped. What I had during 3 months of early 2025 is not different with this one. Week 1-2 got GB6 Single Performance of 2700-2900

    Week 3 drop to 2100-2200 during work hours in Germany and got 2200-2300 during off hours

    It seems very hard to keep @berohost performance all the time as stable as The Real Premium Host.

    Advising customer to move to Dedicated Server is not a clever solution
    I wish and hope @berohost good luck in Oversubscribing Customers

    With Promos etc
    While I had enough and give up ..

    2nd time, no improvement at all

    2300-2400 is the usual score for a Turin in a non empty vps server.

    If you want more, you should have had chosen ryzen 9950x in the first place. (mine still maintains 3000).

    Or else, as it is advised, move to dedicated.

    You think all these fools, that buying these costly dedi servers from premium providers, buying just to show off how much wealth they have and can overspend?

    Thanked by 2mans_xd DanSummer
  • @riomartin said:
    3rd week performance dropped. What I had during 3 months of early 2025 is not different with this one. Week 1-2 got GB6 Single Performance of 2700-2900

    Week 3 drop to 2100-2200 during work hours in Germany and got 2200-2300 during off hours

    It seems very hard to keep @berohost performance all the time as stable as The Real Premium Host.

    Advising customer to move to Dedicated Server is not a clever solution
    I wish and hope @berohost good luck in Oversubscribing Customers

    With Promos etc
    While I had enough and give up ..

    2nd time, no improvement at all

    Well, what do you expect?

    Even with "dedicated cores", you still share those core cache, memory, disk etc with other people on your node. Not to mention the CPU max clockspeed will go down when people use it concurrently.

    You'd better get 9950x or go dedicated. Or get your budget straight with your expectation.

  • kenjing789kenjing789 Member
    edited December 2025

    @riomartin said:
    3rd week performance dropped. What I had during 3 months of early 2025 is not different with this one. Week 1-2 got GB6 Single Performance of 2700-2900

    Week 3 drop to 2100-2200 during work hours in Germany and got 2200-2300 during off hours

    It seems very hard to keep @berohost performance all the time as stable as The Real Premium Host.

    Advising customer to move to Dedicated Server is not a clever solution
    I wish and hope @berohost good luck in Oversubscribing Customers

    With Promos etc
    While I had enough and give up ..

    2nd time, no improvement at all

    Yes ? You cant expect full cpu power at this price point. Also EPYC or any Datacenter grade CPU tend to lower clock of all core to reduce heat, so even the core dedicated to you, it still lower since you are in shared environment.
    As i remember, you can pay more and actually get a dedicated core, else your cpu is shared with other.

    Tell me which provider give you x4 turin core with 20gb ram nd 200gb storage for 7e/m

  • Hello, I would like to double the bandwidth.
    Invoice #19161227
    Order Number: 8173510260
    Thanks!

  • @kenjing789 said:

    @riomartin said:
    3rd week performance dropped. What I had during 3 months of early 2025 is not different with this one. Week 1-2 got GB6 Single Performance of 2700-2900

    Week 3 drop to 2100-2200 during work hours in Germany and got 2200-2300 during off hours

    It seems very hard to keep @berohost performance all the time as stable as The Real Premium Host.

    Advising customer to move to Dedicated Server is not a clever solution
    I wish and hope @berohost good luck in Oversubscribing Customers

    With Promos etc
    While I had enough and give up ..

    2nd time, no improvement at all

    Yes ? You cant expect full cpu power at this price point. Also EPYC or any Datacenter grade CPU tend to lower clock of all core to reduce heat, so even the core dedicated to you, it still lower since you are in shared environment.
    As i remember, you can pay more and actually get a dedicated core, else your cpu is shared with other.

    Tell me which provider give you x4 turin core with 20gb ram nd 200gb storage for 7e/m

    I had a VPS that I subscribed since 2019, it did not changed on the performance
    It's on the Los Angeles USA

    I had a VPS that I subscribed 2 months ago in Germany that has not changed until now.
    It's not Dedicated Server
    It's not Root Server

    So ?

    The problem is,
    my node got strict limitation rather than burst performance

    If the node shared, it would be wise to fair share instead of strict limit

  • @kkoneko said:

    @riomartin said:
    3rd week performance dropped. What I had during 3 months of early 2025 is not different with this one. Week 1-2 got GB6 Single Performance of 2700-2900

    Week 3 drop to 2100-2200 during work hours in Germany and got 2200-2300 during off hours

    It seems very hard to keep @berohost performance all the time as stable as The Real Premium Host.

    Advising customer to move to Dedicated Server is not a clever solution
    I wish and hope @berohost good luck in Oversubscribing Customers

    With Promos etc
    While I had enough and give up ..

    2nd time, no improvement at all

    Well, what do you expect?

    Even with "dedicated cores", you still share those core cache, memory, disk etc with other people on your node. Not to mention the CPU max clockspeed will go down when people use it concurrently.

    You'd better get 9950x or go dedicated. Or get your budget straight with your expectation.

    I had 9950X in Germany
    This one in BeroHost as a backup

    and it failed on the 3rd week

  • Btw the only reason why 9950x's performance is not degrading is, most people prefer Turin as the deals has more ram and disk space compared to ryzen deals.

    When people start to buy more Ryzen deals, same would happen there also.

    Like I said, some performance drop is expected but Bero needs to monitor their resources and set strict rules so people don't over use the resources.

    But also there is the fact of possible overselling. Right now all 4 of my servers has around 1% steal over time.

  • @riomartin said:

    @kenjing789 said:

    @riomartin said:
    3rd week performance dropped. What I had during 3 months of early 2025 is not different with this one. Week 1-2 got GB6 Single Performance of 2700-2900

    Week 3 drop to 2100-2200 during work hours in Germany and got 2200-2300 during off hours

    It seems very hard to keep @berohost performance all the time as stable as The Real Premium Host.

    Advising customer to move to Dedicated Server is not a clever solution
    I wish and hope @berohost good luck in Oversubscribing Customers

    With Promos etc
    While I had enough and give up ..

    2nd time, no improvement at all

    Yes ? You cant expect full cpu power at this price point. Also EPYC or any Datacenter grade CPU tend to lower clock of all core to reduce heat, so even the core dedicated to you, it still lower since you are in shared environment.
    As i remember, you can pay more and actually get a dedicated core, else your cpu is shared with other.

    Tell me which provider give you x4 turin core with 20gb ram nd 200gb storage for 7e/m

    I had a VPS that I subscribed since 2019, it did not changed on the performance
    It's on the Los Angeles USA

    I had a VPS that I subscribed 2 months ago in Germany that has not changed until now.
    It's not Dedicated Server
    It's not Root Server

    So ?

    The problem is,
    my node got strict limitation rather than burst performance

    If the node shared, it would be wise to fair share instead of strict limit

    What are those VPSs?

    Who are the providers?

    What was the GB6 score of them after you bought?

  • Again same one, New drama, will watch in silent

  • GEMINI GOOGLE RESULTS

    Red Flags in your YABS/GB6 Results

    Since you are worried about "dropping" performance, watch for these specific numbers when you run your test:

    Single-Core below 2,600: This means the provider is likely power-capping the CPU or the node is overheating. The 9275F should never drop this low.
    
    AES-XTS Score Jitter: In the Geekbench sub-scores, look at "AES-XTS." If this is low, the virtualization layer is interfering with the chip's hardware encryption blocks.
    
    Multi-core Variance: If you run GB6 three times and the multi-core score swings by more than 1,000 points, the node is oversubscribed, and you are fighting other users for the L3 cache.
    

    My Verdict

    The EPYC 9275F is arguably the best "anti-lag" chip on the market right now. Because its base clock is so high (4.1 GHz), it doesn't suffer from the "latency spikes" that happen when lower-clocked EPYC chips try to boost from 2.0 GHz to 4.0 GHz.

  • @itachikonoha said:

    @riomartin said:

    @kenjing789 said:

    @riomartin said:
    3rd week performance dropped. What I had during 3 months of early 2025 is not different with this one. Week 1-2 got GB6 Single Performance of 2700-2900

    Week 3 drop to 2100-2200 during work hours in Germany and got 2200-2300 during off hours

    It seems very hard to keep @berohost performance all the time as stable as The Real Premium Host.

    Advising customer to move to Dedicated Server is not a clever solution
    I wish and hope @berohost good luck in Oversubscribing Customers

    With Promos etc
    While I had enough and give up ..

    2nd time, no improvement at all

    Yes ? You cant expect full cpu power at this price point. Also EPYC or any Datacenter grade CPU tend to lower clock of all core to reduce heat, so even the core dedicated to you, it still lower since you are in shared environment.
    As i remember, you can pay more and actually get a dedicated core, else your cpu is shared with other.

    Tell me which provider give you x4 turin core with 20gb ram nd 200gb storage for 7e/m

    I had a VPS that I subscribed since 2019, it did not changed on the performance
    It's on the Los Angeles USA

    I had a VPS that I subscribed 2 months ago in Germany that has not changed until now.
    It's not Dedicated Server
    It's not Root Server

    So ?

    The problem is,
    my node got strict limitation rather than burst performance

    If the node shared, it would be wise to fair share instead of strict limit

    What are those VPSs?

    Who are the providers?

    What was the GB6 score of them after you bought?

    VPSHOSTINGSERVICE - USA
    ADVINSERVERS - NUREMBERG

  • @riomartin said:

    GEMINI GOOGLE RESULTS

    Red Flags in your YABS/GB6 Results

    Since you are worried about "dropping" performance, watch for these specific numbers when you run your test:

    Single-Core below 2,600: This means the provider is likely power-capping the CPU or the node is overheating. The 9275F should never drop this low.
    
    AES-XTS Score Jitter: In the Geekbench sub-scores, look at "AES-XTS." If this is low, the virtualization layer is interfering with the chip's hardware encryption blocks.
    
    Multi-core Variance: If you run GB6 three times and the multi-core score swings by more than 1,000 points, the node is oversubscribed, and you are fighting other users for the L3 cache.
    

    My Verdict

    The EPYC 9275F is arguably the best "anti-lag" chip on the market right now. Because its base clock is so high (4.1 GHz), it doesn't suffer from the "latency spikes" that happen when lower-clocked EPYC chips try to boost from 2.0 GHz to 4.0 GHz.

    Red Flag - AI text

  • @riomartin said:

    GEMINI GOOGLE RESULTS

    Red Flags in your YABS/GB6 Results

    Since you are worried about "dropping" performance, watch for these specific numbers when you run your test:

    Single-Core below 2,600: This means the provider is likely power-capping the CPU or the node is overheating. The 9275F should never drop this low.
    
    AES-XTS Score Jitter: In the Geekbench sub-scores, look at "AES-XTS." If this is low, the virtualization layer is interfering with the chip's hardware encryption blocks.
    
    Multi-core Variance: If you run GB6 three times and the multi-core score swings by more than 1,000 points, the node is oversubscribed, and you are fighting other users for the L3 cache.
    

    My Verdict

    The EPYC 9275F is arguably the best "anti-lag" chip on the market right now. Because its base clock is so high (4.1 GHz), it doesn't suffer from the "latency spikes" that happen when lower-clocked EPYC chips try to boost from 2.0 GHz to 4.0 GHz.

    Maybe according to smart people in here, we should not accept any kind advise from an AI

  • @riomartin said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @riomartin said:

    @kenjing789 said:

    @riomartin said:
    3rd week performance dropped. What I had during 3 months of early 2025 is not different with this one. Week 1-2 got GB6 Single Performance of 2700-2900

    Week 3 drop to 2100-2200 during work hours in Germany and got 2200-2300 during off hours

    It seems very hard to keep @berohost performance all the time as stable as The Real Premium Host.

    Advising customer to move to Dedicated Server is not a clever solution
    I wish and hope @berohost good luck in Oversubscribing Customers

    With Promos etc
    While I had enough and give up ..

    2nd time, no improvement at all

    Yes ? You cant expect full cpu power at this price point. Also EPYC or any Datacenter grade CPU tend to lower clock of all core to reduce heat, so even the core dedicated to you, it still lower since you are in shared environment.
    As i remember, you can pay more and actually get a dedicated core, else your cpu is shared with other.

    Tell me which provider give you x4 turin core with 20gb ram nd 200gb storage for 7e/m

    I had a VPS that I subscribed since 2019, it did not changed on the performance
    It's on the Los Angeles USA

    I had a VPS that I subscribed 2 months ago in Germany that has not changed until now.
    It's not Dedicated Server
    It's not Root Server

    So ?

    The problem is,
    my node got strict limitation rather than burst performance

    If the node shared, it would be wise to fair share instead of strict limit

    What are those VPSs?

    Who are the providers?

    What was the GB6 score of them after you bought?

    VPSHOSTINGSERVICE - USA
    ADVINSERVERS - NUREMBERG

    You didn't mention their GB6 score which didn't change.

    And also their CPU.

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    The EPYC 9275F is only a 24 core CPU. I'd be surprised if the nodes use anything less than 512 GB RAM, more likely 768 GB.

    Their 9950X likely uses 192 GB.

    So they only have 50% more CPU cores but around 400% more RAM.

    There will certainly be more clients per core on the EPYC systems, whereas a bigger drop is expected.

    In any case, complaining about a geekbench of above 2000 at this price point is ridiculous. It's exceptional value.

    You should not compare it to how it can perform but how it performs compared to other things at this price point.

    Sure maybe advinservers retain their relative performance closer to the max capability but if that is still lower than this then who cares? Their costs are also higher for these specifications.

    While YABS is great and fun, it's also becoming too much of a game. Get a system that does the job you need and ignore synthetic benchmarks.

  • @labze said:
    The EPYC 9275F is only a 24 core CPU. I'd be surprised if the nodes use anything less than 512 GB RAM, more likely 768 GB.

    Their 9950X likely uses 192 GB.

    So they only have 50% more CPU cores but around 400% more RAM.

    There will certainly be more clients per core on the EPYC systems, whereas a bigger drop is expected.

    In any case, complaining about a geekbench of above 2000 at this price point is ridiculous. It's exceptional value.

    You should not compare it to how it can perform but how it performs compared to other things at this price point.

    Sure maybe advinservers retain their relative performance closer to the max capability but if that is still lower than this then who cares? Their costs are also higher for these specifications.

    While YABS is great and fun, it's also becoming too much of a game. Get a system that does the job you need and ignore synthetic benchmarks.

    Still <3 the Turin VPS from Black Friday sale.

    Thanked by 2mans_xd Protocol903
  • @labze said:

    It's exceptional value.

    You should not compare it to how it can perform but how it performs compared to other things at this price point.

    Yes, what you're saying is 100% true, but you can't convince this "person" of that, especially with statements that aren't backed by numbers. You can check his comments; you'll see that this kind of attack is typical for any service provider here.

    So, yes nothing will convince him even from experts provider

  • @riomartin said:

    GEMINI GOOGLE RESULTS

    So weird for you to ask AI instead of trusting knowledgeable people from here. Try to find 4 turin/ryzen cores with 20GB ram with the same performance and price.

  • mans_xdmans_xd Member
    edited December 2025

    @barbaros said:

    @labze said:
    The EPYC 9275F is only a 24 core CPU. I'd be surprised if the nodes use anything less than 512 GB RAM, more likely 768 GB.

    Their 9950X likely uses 192 GB.

    So they only have 50% more CPU cores but around 400% more RAM.

    There will certainly be more clients per core on the EPYC systems, whereas a bigger drop is expected.

    In any case, complaining about a geekbench of above 2000 at this price point is ridiculous. It's exceptional value.

    You should not compare it to how it can perform but how it performs compared to other things at this price point.

    Sure maybe advinservers retain their relative performance closer to the max capability but if that is still lower than this then who cares? Their costs are also higher for these specifications.

    While YABS is great and fun, it's also becoming too much of a game. Get a system that does the job you need and ignore synthetic benchmarks.

    Still <3 the Turin VPS from Black Friday sale.

    Don't encourage him to buy from hostbrr
    we will see new drama here

    Thanked by 1barbaros
  • @kkoneko said:

    @riomartin said:

    GEMINI GOOGLE RESULTS

    So weird for you to ask AI instead of trusting knowledgeable people from here. Try to find 4 turin/ryzen cores with 20GB ram with the same performance and price.

    well He said in one of his comments that he expert in Network for 10+ year

    /discussion/comment/4521921/#Comment_4521921):

    edit the url to see the thread

  • @mans_xd said:

    @barbaros said:

    @labze said:
    The EPYC 9275F is only a 24 core CPU. I'd be surprised if the nodes use anything less than 512 GB RAM, more likely 768 GB.

    Their 9950X likely uses 192 GB.

    So they only have 50% more CPU cores but around 400% more RAM.

    There will certainly be more clients per core on the EPYC systems, whereas a bigger drop is expected.

    In any case, complaining about a geekbench of above 2000 at this price point is ridiculous. It's exceptional value.

    You should not compare it to how it can perform but how it performs compared to other things at this price point.

    Sure maybe advinservers retain their relative performance closer to the max capability but if that is still lower than this then who cares? Their costs are also higher for these specifications.

    While YABS is great and fun, it's also becoming too much of a game. Get a system that does the job you need and ignore synthetic benchmarks.

    Still <3 the Turin VPS from Black Friday sale.

    Don't encourage him to buy from hostbrr
    we will see new drama here

    we are late

  • @mans_xd said:

    well He said in one of his comments that he expert in Network for 10+ year

    /discussion/comment/4521921/#Comment_4521921):

    edit the url to see the thread

    Seems like he wasted 10+ years of his life. So miserable.

    Thanked by 2mans_xd DanSummer
  • @riomartin said:
    3rd week performance dropped. What I had during 3 months of early 2025 is not different with this one. Week 1-2 got GB6 Single Performance of 2700-2900

    Week 3 drop to 2100-2200 during work hours in Germany and got 2200-2300 during off hours

    It seems very hard to keep @berohost performance all the time as stable as The Real Premium Host.

    Advising customer to move to Dedicated Server is not a clever solution
    I wish and hope @berohost good luck in Oversubscribing Customers

    With Promos etc
    While I had enough and give up ..

    2nd time, no improvement at all

    Been reading your posts here and in the other thread - you complain too much. You're basically asking for them to keep the server empty just for your benchmarks. Is that correct?

    If you need Geekbench to read the exact same number 24/7, then yeah, the advice you keep shooting down is the right one: get a dedicated server or go the self hosting route where you can control all the variables 24/7. problem solved.

    Thanked by 2mans_xd giang
  • @mans_xd said:

    @mans_xd said:

    @barbaros said:

    @labze said:
    The EPYC 9275F is only a 24 core CPU. I'd be surprised if the nodes use anything less than 512 GB RAM, more likely 768 GB.

    Their 9950X likely uses 192 GB.

    So they only have 50% more CPU cores but around 400% more RAM.

    There will certainly be more clients per core on the EPYC systems, whereas a bigger drop is expected.

    In any case, complaining about a geekbench of above 2000 at this price point is ridiculous. It's exceptional value.

    You should not compare it to how it can perform but how it performs compared to other things at this price point.

    Sure maybe advinservers retain their relative performance closer to the max capability but if that is still lower than this then who cares? Their costs are also higher for these specifications.

    While YABS is great and fun, it's also becoming too much of a game. Get a system that does the job you need and ignore synthetic benchmarks.

    Still <3 the Turin VPS from Black Friday sale.

    Don't encourage him to buy from hostbrr
    we will see new drama here

    we are late

    if you want a stable GB6 get dedicated server or atleast VDS

  • GLWS <3

Sign In or Register to comment.