Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
Home β€Ί General
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Velox media under new management

14041434546184

Comments

  • ralfralf Member
    edited December 2025

    @jsg said:
    @ralf and some others

    Further discussing with you makes no sense IMO because you insist on considering your feelings, interpretations and partial relevant knowledge to be facts.

    Just give it a rest man.

    Example:

    ralf said:
    He told us explicitly that he reads the stripe mails that are intended for Lewis.

    That is a crime in UK law, but like I said, whether is ever a legal issue for him or not is up to Lewis.

    Even assuming that the first statement is correct, it still is questionable,

    I have zero idea why you refuse to believe his actual statements of facts and consider them to be just speculation. HE SAID THIS.

    among other reasons for the assumption, stated as if a fact, that (a) the stripe emails were intended for Lewis (as opposed e.g. for anyone holding that account) or "the company",

    THERE IS NO COMPANY. Lewis was a sole trader.

    and (b) that Lewis had not given permission - which from what I can see, is just speculation,

    Sure, and I said several times that this is only a problem for "Eric" if Lewis chooses to make it so.

    and (c) that Eric even could have access to that account and/or those emails in the first place without explicit or implicit permission.

    Again. He told us he read them.

    And we/you actually know in between very little and almost nothing. What, for example, if Lewis did not provide or not only provide access to that email account but rather simply copied those message for Eric?

    He didn't. Eric said he had access to them after taking over the account.

    As I already said multiple times, details are important and "X told that he read emails intended for Y" can mean lots of things, ranging from "he illegally and intentionally hacked that account (and then read the messages)" to "Y copied those messages and gave them to X".

    I never said he hacked into that account. I simply stated the law as it stands. Unauthorised access to someone else's e-mail is an offence. Hacking is not required. If it happens by accident, not a crime. Continuing to access to when you know you're not supposed to have access, a crime.

    To find out those relevant and sometimes decisive details is one of the reasons for investigations and cross examinations. Without those details what you quoted (him saying) carries very little information and weight, far, far less than you seem to think.

    Dude, why do you keep trying to frame this as a court case with cross examinations?

    He told us he did something. That something breaks the law. Whether he gets prosecuted for that is entirely another matter.

    Also you play judge or at the very least legal expert yet again with your second statement.

    I'm not playing judge. I'm just telling you what the law says.

    Whatever, it doesn't make sense to discuss on that basis. But hey, enjoy your witch hunt ...

    Hey, enjoy your shilling.

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @ralf said:
    [lots ...]
    Hey, enjoy your shilling.

    Not joining a witch hunt != shilling.

  • Just bought a VPS from Velox and then found this thread.. πŸ˜”πŸ˜”πŸ˜”

    Thanked by 1whiterider
  • @axelking said:
    Just bought a VPS from Velox and then found this thread.. πŸ˜”πŸ˜”πŸ˜”

    You could request a refund or try to believeπŸ™

  • I am buying one now.

    Just for fun. Just to see what shits could be thrown at me as a customer. Not interested in the vps but the drama yes.

    Thanked by 3JohnnySac zed tentor
  • @itachikonoha said:
    I am buying one now.

    Just for fun. Just to see what shits could be thrown at me as a customer. Not interested in the vps but the drama yes.

    That's a hero attitude. Be careful to not spend a lot of money. Welcome as part of the drama!

  • @kadidala said: If I were a new customer, I would hesitate and think twice before purchasing your services, rather than trusting you with my money.

    that the reason they seem to re-brand into new entity in new year. Velox Media brand is so tarnished now here on this forum that it will be hard to get new leads.

  • @axelking said:
    Just bought a VPS from Velox and then found this thread.. πŸ˜”πŸ˜”πŸ˜”

    Did you get a proper invoice now? Since this id > @itachikonoha said:

    I am buying one now.

    Just for fun. Just to see what shits could be thrown at me as a customer. Not interested in the vps but the drama yes.

    Have you got a proper invoices with all the required data? Or these are still trash?

  • lol, who bought a 30gb for 30/yr?! We’re down to one available from two… πŸ˜‚

    Thanked by 1JasonM
  • @truemagic said:
    Just out of curiosity , are Lewis and @itsTomHarper the same person now that we've pretty much confirmed that Eric is only dealing with Lewis?

    Also curious if we sussed that out…given Velox Media was supposedly a sole trader.

    Feels like we have 3 identities that are all the same person right now.

    Didn’t include this in my previous comment, but I’m bemused about the amount of effort Eric put in to excusing giving a background as to who they are, blaming Xmas and time spent on DDOS etc, versus just writing a one or two paragraph background that would have surely taken less time than the constant defensive posts.

    Thanked by 1fly056
  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    @itachikonoha said:
    I am buying one now.

    Just for fun. Just to see what shits could be thrown at me as a customer. Not interested in the vps but the drama yes.

    With every purchase, you get to chargeback, good choice.

  • @AlteredParadox said:
    lol, who bought a 30gb for 30/yr?! We’re down to one available from two… πŸ˜‚

    It could be @itachikonoha who ordered something earlier.

  • morasantikamorasantika Member
    edited December 2025

    anyone issued dispute Via PP ,, after down more than 10hrs. now server very unstable

  • Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    Thanked by 1default
  • @zed said:
    Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    But would it be fair to chargeback while the service is working? We may complain of scammers, but we must be careful not become scammers ourselves in the process.

    Thanked by 1zed
  • @default said:

    @zed said:
    Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    But would it be fair to chargeback while the service is working? We may complain of scammers, but we must be careful not become scammers ourselves in the process.

    Well do you have a service provided by Lewi? Most just got a free server provided by Eric that has nothing to do with Lewi

  • @default said:

    @zed said:
    Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    But would it be fair to chargeback while the service is working? We may complain of scammers, but we must be careful not become scammers ourselves in the process.

    You bought a VM that is managed by a UK sole trader and that was the contract. Is it still managed by Lewi, a UK sole trader? You didn't agree that the contract was changed and the VM should be managed by a US citizen, right?

    The contract was not honored, so you can open a dispute or chargeback, even if the VM is still online.

  • @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @zed said:
    Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    But would it be fair to chargeback while the service is working? We may complain of scammers, but we must be careful not become scammers ourselves in the process.

    Well do you have a service provided by Lewi? Most just got a free server provided by Eric that has nothing to do with Lewi

    In this conversation about ownership and intent and money, we tend to forget that our contracts are customers are within a brand named "VeloxMedia". Yes, the brand might have changed ownership, but the contract and obligations stay. By doing a chargeback we scam this tarnished brand, because so far the service was provided so far, while we change our mind asking for money back without any legal grounds for breaking said contract.

    It is a mess. I am not defending the providers (both new and old) in any way, shape or form. I don't want to turn into a scammer myself either. Chargeback won't solve anything, it might only end up in making me look bad in my own eyes.

    Thanked by 1tof
  • @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @zed said:
    Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    But would it be fair to chargeback while the service is working? We may complain of scammers, but we must be careful not become scammers ourselves in the process.

    Well do you have a service provided by Lewi? Most just got a free server provided by Eric that has nothing to do with Lewi

    In this conversation about ownership and intent and money, we tend to forget that our contracts are customers are within a brand named "VeloxMedia". Yes, the brand might have changed ownership, but the contract and obligations stay. By doing a chargeback we scam this tarnished brand, because so far the service was provided so far, while we change our mind asking for money back without any legal grounds for breaking said contract.

    It is a mess. I am not defending the providers (both new and old) in any way, shape or form. I don't want to turn into a scammer myself either. Chargeback won't solve anything, it might only end up in making me look bad in my own eyes.

    You have no contract with "VeloxMedia" and you never had! Lewi was a sole trader. You have a contract with Lewi trading as "VeloxMedia".

  • @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @zed said:
    Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    But would it be fair to chargeback while the service is working? We may complain of scammers, but we must be careful not become scammers ourselves in the process.

    Well do you have a service provided by Lewi? Most just got a free server provided by Eric that has nothing to do with Lewi

    In this conversation about ownership and intent and money, we tend to forget that our contracts are customers are within a brand named "VeloxMedia". Yes, the brand might have changed ownership, but the contract and obligations stay. By doing a chargeback we scam this tarnished brand, because so far the service was provided so far, while we change our mind asking for money back without any legal grounds for breaking said contract.

    It is a mess. I am not defending the providers (both new and old) in any way, shape or form. I don't want to turn into a scammer myself either. Chargeback won't solve anything, it might only end up in making me look bad in my own eyes.

    You have no contract with "VeloxMedia" and you never had! Lewi was a sole trader. You have a contract with Lewi trading as "VeloxMedia".

    But Lewi sold the business, or gave it away - at least this is what was stated publicly. This sale included the contracts too. We all know businesses, contracts, customers, data, servers, all can be sold legally nowadays. Almost anything can be measured in imaginary currencies nowadays.

  • @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @zed said:
    Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    But would it be fair to chargeback while the service is working? We may complain of scammers, but we must be careful not become scammers ourselves in the process.

    Well do you have a service provided by Lewi? Most just got a free server provided by Eric that has nothing to do with Lewi

    In this conversation about ownership and intent and money, we tend to forget that our contracts are customers are within a brand named "VeloxMedia". Yes, the brand might have changed ownership, but the contract and obligations stay. By doing a chargeback we scam this tarnished brand, because so far the service was provided so far, while we change our mind asking for money back without any legal grounds for breaking said contract.

    It is a mess. I am not defending the providers (both new and old) in any way, shape or form. I don't want to turn into a scammer myself either. Chargeback won't solve anything, it might only end up in making me look bad in my own eyes.

    You have no contract with "VeloxMedia" and you never had! Lewi was a sole trader. You have a contract with Lewi trading as "VeloxMedia".

    The correct legal term is Lewis Edwards Trading As Velox Media.

  • @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @zed said:
    Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    But would it be fair to chargeback while the service is working? We may complain of scammers, but we must be careful not become scammers ourselves in the process.

    Well do you have a service provided by Lewi? Most just got a free server provided by Eric that has nothing to do with Lewi

    In this conversation about ownership and intent and money, we tend to forget that our contracts are customers are within a brand named "VeloxMedia". Yes, the brand might have changed ownership, but the contract and obligations stay. By doing a chargeback we scam this tarnished brand, because so far the service was provided so far, while we change our mind asking for money back without any legal grounds for breaking said contract.

    It is a mess. I am not defending the providers (both new and old) in any way, shape or form. I don't want to turn into a scammer myself either. Chargeback won't solve anything, it might only end up in making me look bad in my own eyes.

    You have no contract with "VeloxMedia" and you never had! Lewi was a sole trader. You have a contract with Lewi trading as "VeloxMedia".

    But Lewi sold the business, or gave it away - at least this is what was stated publicly. This sale included the contracts too. We all know businesses, contracts, customers, data, servers, all can be sold legally nowadays. Almost anything can be measured in imaginary currencies nowadays.

    No, Lewi couldn't sell the contracts as they were contracts done with a sole trader. There never was a real company. Even Eric confirmed this himself, dunno, why you are not seeing this. If you don't know what can be done and what is legal, why not inform yourself before posting false statements?

    You cannot sell who I have a contract with! Either I have a contract with a company and that company can be selled so the company still exists or if I have a contract with a sole trader, I need to be informed and accept a new contract with a new entity!

  • @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @zed said:
    Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    But would it be fair to chargeback while the service is working? We may complain of scammers, but we must be careful not become scammers ourselves in the process.

    Well do you have a service provided by Lewi? Most just got a free server provided by Eric that has nothing to do with Lewi

    In this conversation about ownership and intent and money, we tend to forget that our contracts are customers are within a brand named "VeloxMedia". Yes, the brand might have changed ownership, but the contract and obligations stay. By doing a chargeback we scam this tarnished brand, because so far the service was provided so far, while we change our mind asking for money back without any legal grounds for breaking said contract.

    It is a mess. I am not defending the providers (both new and old) in any way, shape or form. I don't want to turn into a scammer myself either. Chargeback won't solve anything, it might only end up in making me look bad in my own eyes.

    You have no contract with "VeloxMedia" and you never had! Lewi was a sole trader. You have a contract with Lewi trading as "VeloxMedia".

    But Lewi sold the business, or gave it away - at least this is what was stated publicly. This sale included the contracts too. We all know businesses, contracts, customers, data, servers, all can be sold legally nowadays. Almost anything can be measured in imaginary currencies nowadays.

    No, Lewi couldn't sell the contracts as they were contracts done with a sole trader. [...]

    Now I am no legal expert or lawyer, but from a simple question to multiple AI services, all of them say the same: a sole trader can sell or transfer their business activity to another company according to UK legislation.

  • @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @zed said:
    Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    But would it be fair to chargeback while the service is working? We may complain of scammers, but we must be careful not become scammers ourselves in the process.

    Well do you have a service provided by Lewi? Most just got a free server provided by Eric that has nothing to do with Lewi

    In this conversation about ownership and intent and money, we tend to forget that our contracts are customers are within a brand named "VeloxMedia". Yes, the brand might have changed ownership, but the contract and obligations stay. By doing a chargeback we scam this tarnished brand, because so far the service was provided so far, while we change our mind asking for money back without any legal grounds for breaking said contract.

    It is a mess. I am not defending the providers (both new and old) in any way, shape or form. I don't want to turn into a scammer myself either. Chargeback won't solve anything, it might only end up in making me look bad in my own eyes.

    You have no contract with "VeloxMedia" and you never had! Lewi was a sole trader. You have a contract with Lewi trading as "VeloxMedia".

    But Lewi sold the business, or gave it away - at least this is what was stated publicly. This sale included the contracts too. We all know businesses, contracts, customers, data, servers, all can be sold legally nowadays. Almost anything can be measured in imaginary currencies nowadays.

    No, Lewi couldn't sell the contracts as they were contracts done with a sole trader. [...]

    Now I am no legal expert or lawyer, but from a simple question to multiple AI services, all of them say the same: a sole trader can sell or transfer their business activity to another company according to UK legislation.

    Well if you really want to bring in the AI, I'm rather talking to laywers but whatever. You need to include all information in your question

  • defaultdefault Veteran
    edited December 2025

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @zed said:
    Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    But would it be fair to chargeback while the service is working? We may complain of scammers, but we must be careful not become scammers ourselves in the process.

    Well do you have a service provided by Lewi? Most just got a free server provided by Eric that has nothing to do with Lewi

    In this conversation about ownership and intent and money, we tend to forget that our contracts are customers are within a brand named "VeloxMedia". Yes, the brand might have changed ownership, but the contract and obligations stay. By doing a chargeback we scam this tarnished brand, because so far the service was provided so far, while we change our mind asking for money back without any legal grounds for breaking said contract.

    It is a mess. I am not defending the providers (both new and old) in any way, shape or form. I don't want to turn into a scammer myself either. Chargeback won't solve anything, it might only end up in making me look bad in my own eyes.

    You have no contract with "VeloxMedia" and you never had! Lewi was a sole trader. You have a contract with Lewi trading as "VeloxMedia".

    But Lewi sold the business, or gave it away - at least this is what was stated publicly. This sale included the contracts too. We all know businesses, contracts, customers, data, servers, all can be sold legally nowadays. Almost anything can be measured in imaginary currencies nowadays.

    No, Lewi couldn't sell the contracts as they were contracts done with a sole trader. [...]

    Now I am no legal expert or lawyer, but from a simple question to multiple AI services, all of them say the same: a sole trader can sell or transfer their business activity to another company according to UK legislation.

    Well if you really want to bring in the AI, I'm rather talking to laywers but whatever. You need to include all information in your question

    Your request is wrong. This has nothing to do with:

    1. customer consent - this is not needed to sell a business activity.
    2. stop of business - business is not stopped, but quite active. My service still works.
    3. signature - there is no signature needed in this online environment.

    Your request was made complicated on purpose to obtain a biased result. And please try to use AI answer with your own words, as in filtering it with your brain. Don't just dump the whole blob here.

  • @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @zed said:
    Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    But would it be fair to chargeback while the service is working? We may complain of scammers, but we must be careful not become scammers ourselves in the process.

    Well do you have a service provided by Lewi? Most just got a free server provided by Eric that has nothing to do with Lewi

    In this conversation about ownership and intent and money, we tend to forget that our contracts are customers are within a brand named "VeloxMedia". Yes, the brand might have changed ownership, but the contract and obligations stay. By doing a chargeback we scam this tarnished brand, because so far the service was provided so far, while we change our mind asking for money back without any legal grounds for breaking said contract.

    It is a mess. I am not defending the providers (both new and old) in any way, shape or form. I don't want to turn into a scammer myself either. Chargeback won't solve anything, it might only end up in making me look bad in my own eyes.

    You have no contract with "VeloxMedia" and you never had! Lewi was a sole trader. You have a contract with Lewi trading as "VeloxMedia".

    But Lewi sold the business, or gave it away - at least this is what was stated publicly. This sale included the contracts too. We all know businesses, contracts, customers, data, servers, all can be sold legally nowadays. Almost anything can be measured in imaginary currencies nowadays.

    No, Lewi couldn't sell the contracts as they were contracts done with a sole trader. [...]

    Now I am no legal expert or lawyer, but from a simple question to multiple AI services, all of them say the same: a sole trader can sell or transfer their business activity to another company according to UK legislation.

    You can but it requires consent.

  • So what option would you select for PayPal dispute reason? And what details would you add for the ticket?

  • @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @NotFoundException said:

    @default said:

    @zed said:
    Guys just stop with this entitled behavior, they have whole teams of people standing by to take care of your issues. Just wait til the chargeback period is over.

    But would it be fair to chargeback while the service is working? We may complain of scammers, but we must be careful not become scammers ourselves in the process.

    Well do you have a service provided by Lewi? Most just got a free server provided by Eric that has nothing to do with Lewi

    In this conversation about ownership and intent and money, we tend to forget that our contracts are customers are within a brand named "VeloxMedia". Yes, the brand might have changed ownership, but the contract and obligations stay. By doing a chargeback we scam this tarnished brand, because so far the service was provided so far, while we change our mind asking for money back without any legal grounds for breaking said contract.

    It is a mess. I am not defending the providers (both new and old) in any way, shape or form. I don't want to turn into a scammer myself either. Chargeback won't solve anything, it might only end up in making me look bad in my own eyes.

    You have no contract with "VeloxMedia" and you never had! Lewi was a sole trader. You have a contract with Lewi trading as "VeloxMedia".

    But Lewi sold the business, or gave it away - at least this is what was stated publicly. This sale included the contracts too. We all know businesses, contracts, customers, data, servers, all can be sold legally nowadays. Almost anything can be measured in imaginary currencies nowadays.

    No, Lewi couldn't sell the contracts as they were contracts done with a sole trader. [...]

    Now I am no legal expert or lawyer, but from a simple question to multiple AI services, all of them say the same: a sole trader can sell or transfer their business activity to another company according to UK legislation.

    Well if you really want to bring in the AI, I'm rather talking to laywers but whatever. You need to include all information in your question

    Your request is wrong. This has nothing to do with:

    1. customer consent - this is not needed to sell a business activity.
    2. stop of business - business is not stopped, but quite active. My service still works.
    3. signature - there is no signature needed in this online environment.

    Your request was made complicated on purpose to obtain a biased result. And please try to use AI answer with your own words, as in filtering it with your brain. Don't just dump the whole blob here.

    1. Yes it's needed if activity is sold from one entity ("business") to another entity ("business")
    2. What are you even on about "Lewis Edwards Trading As Velox Media", who you have the contract with, is stopped. So the sole trader "business" is stopped.
    3. Signature could also be a checkbox in online terms
  • @steliospavlidis said:
    So what option would you select for PayPal dispute reason? And what details would you add for the ticket?

    "I received an item that wasn't as described", sole trader went out of business before the term end, data was transferred to another legal entity without notice and consent and contract was not honored as the VM is now managed by US entity rather than UK entity.

Sign In or Register to comment.