Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

servaRICA Black Friday 2025, Dedicated GPU, Unlimited Storage, loads of resources for VDS and more

1235

Comments

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    @rpqu said:
    I'm interested in KVM slim 4c,16g. But it's $88/y, so $1.833/c/m.
    Is it possible to request custom storage to lower annual cost? I think I only need 100gb

    With the slices plans it is hard to change the each component alone
    as we do slice the server to X slices depending on their core count (we reserve few cores to the server itself and we rent the rest)

    since cpu, ram and disk is dedicated we get very few vms per server (many servers has less than 5 or 10 vms ) so a chance to get someone else asking for extra nvme space that match what you want less is very slim
    So if we give you less NVMe this space will not be used and will be wasted

  • Just ran a test. Decent Performance! :)
    Great offer!
    (lives in Canada and internet works pretty well too)

    ServaRICA Speedtest
    Download533.58Mbps Upload982.96Mbps Ping9.20ms Jitter0.42ms
    IP Address: ... - Bell Canada, CA (500 km)

    `Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 12 minutes
    Processor : AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 6 @ 2395.498 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 23.5 GiB
    Swap : 0.0 KiB
    Disk : 1.4 TiB
    Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel : 6.1.0-41-cloud-amd64
    VM Type : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

    IPv4 Network Information:

    ISP : Rica Web Services
    ASN : AS26832 Rica Web Services
    Host : Servarica
    Location : Montreal, Quebec (QC)
    Country : Canada

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 301.61 MB/s (75.4k) 3.61 GB/s (56.4k)
    Write 302.40 MB/s (75.6k) 3.63 GB/s (56.7k)
    Total 604.01 MB/s (151.0k) 7.24 GB/s (113.1k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 4.58 GB/s (8.9k) 4.71 GB/s (4.6k)
    Write 4.82 GB/s (9.4k) 5.03 GB/s (4.9k)
    Total 9.40 GB/s (18.3k) 9.75 GB/s (9.5k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
    ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 1.22 Gbits/sec | 1.72 Gbits/sec | 77.0 ms
    Eranium | Amsterdam, NL (100G) | 1.72 Gbits/sec | 2.21 Gbits/sec | 83.9 ms
    Uztelecom | Tashkent, UZ (10G) | 1.04 Gbits/sec | 900 Mbits/sec | 173 ms
    Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 488 Mbits/sec | 577 Mbits/sec | 237 ms
    Clouvider | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy | 2.22 Gbits/sec | 73.8 ms
    Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 5.70 Gbits/sec | 6.09 Gbits/sec | 10.0 ms
    Edgoo | Sao Paulo, BR (1G) | 1.40 Gbits/sec | 1.55 Gbits/sec | 118 ms
    -> RAM Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
    RAM single thread read: 44232.91 MB/s
    RAM single thread write: 19828.65 MB/s
    -> sysbench CPU (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
    1 thread: 1628 Scores
    All threads: 9769 Scores

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1403
    Multi Core | 6103
    `

    Thanked by 2tux servarica_hani
  • Basic System Information:
    
    ---------------------------------
    
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core Processor
    
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2395.498 MHz
    
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    
    RAM        : 15.6 GiB
    
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    
    Disk       : 492.1 GiB
    
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-37-cloud-amd64
    
    VM Type    : KVM
    
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    
    ---------------------------------
    
    ISP        : Rica Web Services
    
    ASN        : AS26832 Rica Web Services
    
    Host       : Cogent Communications
    
    Location   : Montreal, Quebec (QC)
    
    Country    : Canada
    
    
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    
    ---------------------------------
    
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
    
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    
    Read       | 259.46 MB/s  (64.8k) | 1.54 GB/s    (24.0k)
    
    Write      | 260.14 MB/s  (65.0k) | 1.54 GB/s    (24.2k)
    
    Total      | 519.61 MB/s (129.9k) | 3.09 GB/s    (48.2k)
    
               |                      |                     
    
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
    
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    
    Read       | 3.28 GB/s     (6.4k) | 3.88 GB/s     (3.7k)
    
    Write      | 3.45 GB/s     (6.7k) | 4.13 GB/s     (4.0k)
    
    Total      | 6.74 GB/s    (13.1k) | 8.01 GB/s     (7.8k)
    
    
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    
    ---------------------------------
    
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.59 Gbits/sec  | 1.75 Gbits/sec  | 76.6 ms        
    
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.77 Gbits/sec  | 2.35 Gbits/sec  | 79.9 ms        
    
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 913 Mbits/sec   | 168 ms         
    
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 613 Mbits/sec   | 660 Mbits/sec   | 254 ms         
    
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.53 Gbits/sec  | 2.16 Gbits/sec  | 73.2 ms        
    
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 6.42 Gbits/sec  | 5.26 Gbits/sec  | 9.89 ms        
    
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.15 Gbits/sec  | 1.54 Gbits/sec  | 119 ms         
    
    
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    
    ---------------------------------
    
    Test            | Value                         
    
                    |                               
    
    Single Core     | 939                           
    
    Multi Core      | 3154                          
    
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23949303
    
    
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    
    ---------------------------------
    
    Test            | Value                         
    
                    |                               
    
    Single Core     | 1293                          
    
    Multi Core      | 3892                          
    
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/15382248
    
    
    
    YABS completed in 12 min 20 sec
    
    Thanked by 1servarica_hani
  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited December 2025

    @servarica_hani said:
    so a chance to get someone else asking for extra nvme space that match what you want less is very slim
    So if we give you less NVMe this space will not be used and will be wasted

    Ok. Thank you for your explanation. I'll go back to you if I don't find more attractive offer

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider
    edited December 2025

    Just a note
    our dedicated GPU plans are active now (NVIDIA P40 24GB NVram)
    if you order now you will get it same day
    Bee dedicated GPU VPS Intel E5-2580v4 6 - 30GB 400GB NVMe - 100TB/M on 10Gbps $79
    https://clients.servarica.com/store/bf-2025-dedicated-servers/bee-dedicated-gpu-vps

    try it and let me know what you use it for and how it perform based on the price

    Thanked by 1sliix
  • # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Dec  9 14:28:53 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2395.498 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 246.0 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-37-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Rica Web Services
    ASN        : AS26832 Rica Web Services
    Host       : Rica Web Services
    Location   : Montreal, Quebec (QC)
    Country    : Canada
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 267.10 MB/s  (66.7k) | 2.74 GB/s    (42.8k)
    Write      | 267.81 MB/s  (66.9k) | 2.75 GB/s    (43.1k)
    Total      | 534.91 MB/s (133.7k) | 5.50 GB/s    (86.0k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 4.59 GB/s     (8.9k) | 5.91 GB/s     (5.7k)
    Write      | 4.83 GB/s     (9.4k) | 6.31 GB/s     (6.1k)
    Total      | 9.42 GB/s    (18.4k) | 12.22 GB/s   (11.9k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.75 Gbits/sec  | 1.51 Gbits/sec  | 76.7 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.66 Gbits/sec  | 2.35 Gbits/sec  | 83.6 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 974 Mbits/sec   | 1.05 Gbits/sec  | 174 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 549 Mbits/sec   | 492 Mbits/sec   | 377 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 2.48 Gbits/sec  | 80.7 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 6.37 Gbits/sec  | 6.27 Gbits/sec  | 9.51 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.34 Gbits/sec  | 1.55 Gbits/sec  | 119 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | 1.72 Gbits/sec  | 76.6 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.59 Gbits/sec  | 2.08 Gbits/sec  | 83.5 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 931 Mbits/sec   | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 174 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 653 Mbits/sec   | 560 Mbits/sec   | 373 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.65 Gbits/sec  | 2.43 Gbits/sec  | 80.7 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 8.02 Gbits/sec  | 6.47 Gbits/sec  | 9.51 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.47 Gbits/sec  | 1.47 Gbits/sec  | 119 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1312                          
    Multi Core      | 2393                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/15476255
    
    YABS completed in 13 min 34 sec

    disk performance is awesome, gb6 has also been consistent , i feel bad idling this

    Thanked by 1servarica_hani
  • would love to see something like this in EU DC

    Thanked by 1Edginess
  • Is this expected behavior?
    During downloads, the HDD write speed remains continuously at only a few hundred KB/s, rather than dropping occasionally.
    I understand that HDDs are not ideal for PT / torrent workloads, but is it normal for the write throughput to stay at such a low level even when downloading a single torrent?

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    @yitiantiandeshuo said:
    Is this expected behavior?
    During downloads, the HDD write speed remains continuously at only a few hundred KB/s, rather than dropping occasionally.
    I understand that HDDs are not ideal for PT / torrent workloads, but is it normal for the write throughput to stay at such a low level even when downloading a single torrent?

    Is this Xen VPS or KVM
    but honestly even for xen this is too low
    please open a ticket and the team must investigate

    Thanks

    Thanked by 1yitiantiandeshuo
  • @servarica_hani said:

    @yitiantiandeshuo said:
    Is this expected behavior?
    During downloads, the HDD write speed remains continuously at only a few hundred KB/s, rather than dropping occasionally.
    I understand that HDDs are not ideal for PT / torrent workloads, but is it normal for the write throughput to stay at such a low level even when downloading a single torrent?

    Is this Xen VPS or KVM
    but honestly even for xen this is too low
    please open a ticket and the team must investigate

    Thanks

    hank you for the reply. My service is a KVM-based Chimera Hybrid -1. The disk I/O issue has improved significantly over the past two days; it is possible that during the first few days there were neighboring instances performing heavy operations. In any case, it currently appears acceptable.

    However, there are still some unusual issues, particularly regarding IPv6. Before my machine was deployed, I submitted a ticket requesting IPv6 support. Yes, it was configured for me very quickly, and I could see IPv6 immediately upon first boot. However, at the same time, a burst of traffic peaking at 4–5 GB/s was continuously sent to my IP address. Although the system load on my machine did not increase, it consumed a significant amount of bandwidth.

    I shut the machine down immediately, but when I powered it back on the following night, the same issue occurred again. After reporting this problem, the latest response I received was a suggestion to disable IPv6 and wait for feedback from the network team.

  • @yitiantiandeshuo said:

    @servarica_hani said:

    @yitiantiandeshuo said:
    Is this expected behavior?
    During downloads, the HDD write speed remains continuously at only a few hundred KB/s, rather than dropping occasionally.
    I understand that HDDs are not ideal for PT / torrent workloads, but is it normal for the write throughput to stay at such a low level even when downloading a single torrent?

    Is this Xen VPS or KVM
    but honestly even for xen this is too low
    please open a ticket and the team must investigate

    Thanks

    hank you for the reply. My service is a KVM-based Chimera Hybrid -1. The disk I/O issue has improved significantly over the past two days; it is possible that during the first few days there were neighboring instances performing heavy operations. In any case, it currently appears acceptable.

    However, there are still some unusual issues, particularly regarding IPv6. Before my machine was deployed, I submitted a ticket requesting IPv6 support. Yes, it was configured for me very quickly, and I could see IPv6 immediately upon first boot. However, at the same time, a burst of traffic peaking at 4–5 GB/s was continuously sent to my IP address. Although the system load on my machine did not increase, it consumed a significant amount of bandwidth.

    I shut the machine down immediately, but when I powered it back on the following night, the same issue occurred again. After reporting this problem, the latest response I received was a suggestion to disable IPv6 and wait for feedback from the network team.

    Any update on the ipv6/high inbound traffic issue? I'm thinking of getting a high HDD storage VPS from them. Probably don't need Ipv6, but weird network issues like that would be concerning to me in general.

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider
    edited December 2025

    @yitiantiandeshuo said:

    @servarica_hani said:

    @yitiantiandeshuo said:
    Is this expected behavior?
    During downloads, the HDD write speed remains continuously at only a few hundred KB/s, rather than dropping occasionally.
    I understand that HDDs are not ideal for PT / torrent workloads, but is it normal for the write throughput to stay at such a low level even when downloading a single torrent?

    Is this Xen VPS or KVM
    but honestly even for xen this is too low
    please open a ticket and the team must investigate

    Thanks

    hank you for the reply. My service is a KVM-based Chimera Hybrid -1. The disk I/O issue has improved significantly over the past two days; it is possible that during the first few days there were neighboring instances performing heavy operations. In any case, it currently appears acceptable.

    However, there are still some unusual issues, particularly regarding IPv6. Before my machine was deployed, I submitted a ticket requesting IPv6 support. Yes, it was configured for me very quickly, and I could see IPv6 immediately upon first boot. However, at the same time, a burst of traffic peaking at 4–5 GB/s was continuously sent to my IP address. Although the system load on my machine did not increase, it consumed a significant amount of bandwidth.

    I shut the machine down immediately, but when I powered it back on the following night, the same issue occurred again. After reporting this problem, the latest response I received was a suggestion to disable IPv6 and wait for feedback from the network team.

    @twain said:
    Any update on the ipv6/high inbound traffic issue? I'm thinking of getting a high HDD storage VPS from them. Probably don't need Ipv6, but weird network issues like that would be concerning to me in general.

    It seems i missed this message before
    the IPv6 issue should have been fixed after it was reported by some users (some mouse storage users still have the issue but will be fixed in few days )
    We have implemented a fix and we are working on adding more robust solution for the whole network that should eliminate future network issues like this in the future

    Thanked by 1MaxLagomorph
  • @servarica_hani
    is VPS activation instant after order for new users, or does it usually take some time?

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    @markz said:
    @servarica_hani
    is VPS activation instant after order for new users, or does it usually take some time?

    no instance
    we do review it manually so it can take couple of hours

    Thanked by 1markz
  • Well I finally came back and my onboarding experience with the Chimera instance I got was extremely sub-optimal.

    Whilst it was eventually resolved... I am once again not entirely pleased.

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • @MaxTakeba said: not entirely pleased

    Any more details as to why?

  • @JohnFilch123 said:

    @MaxTakeba said: not entirely pleased

    Any more details as to why?

    Not that I think it matters as it is resolved but sure.

    At first when the VPS was finally provisioned (as approval is manual still... Why? I'm not a new customer by any means) it didn't create from an alma8 template (which their templates are out of date... Almalinux 10 has been out for a good while now). I gave it almost an hour, ticket sent to recreate it on another template. Got an entirely different VPS that built within minutes.

    Then my HDD was missing... Okay... I asked for it to be added and mounted... no... You need to add it in a disks menu within WHCMS sigh instructions are vague but yes it worked, but after waiting hours to even get it to the point where I could install something and properly set it up, it was basically bed time and I went to sleep kinda mad.

    Am I being a slight bitch? Yes... However ServaRica is also the same company that wanted my Root Passport to turn on AMD-V that is a host feature... And they couldn't because Xen... Which is why we have KVM/Proxmox now. This was very messy.

    The templates need a lot of work, both from the product and the OS side.

    Thanked by 1Murv
  • @MaxTakeba said: Not that I think it matters as it is resolved but sure.

    Thanks. Nothing criminal but yes, unpleasant. Great they solved it.

  • Hello, I’ve created ticket #318351. Please respond.

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    @MaxTakeba said:

    @JohnFilch123 said:

    @MaxTakeba said: not entirely pleased

    Any more details as to why?

    Not that I think it matters as it is resolved but sure.

    At first when the VPS was finally provisioned (as approval is manual still... Why? I'm not a new customer by any means) it didn't create from an alma8 template (which their templates are out of date... Almalinux 10 has been out for a good while now). I gave it almost an hour, ticket sent to recreate it on another template. Got an entirely different VPS that built within minutes.

    Then my HDD was missing... Okay... I asked for it to be added and mounted... no... You need to add it in a disks menu within WHCMS sigh instructions are vague but yes it worked, but after waiting hours to even get it to the point where I could install something and properly set it up, it was basically bed time and I went to sleep kinda mad.

    Am I being a slight bitch? Yes... However ServaRica is also the same company that wanted my Root Passport to turn on AMD-V that is a host feature... And they couldn't because Xen... Which is why we have KVM/Proxmox now. This was very messy.

    The templates need a lot of work, both from the product and the OS side.

    noted ,
    will share it with team and fix those issue
    Thanks for letting us know

    Thanks

    Thanked by 1MaxTakeba
  • @servarica_hani said:

    @MaxTakeba said:

    @JohnFilch123 said:

    @MaxTakeba said: not entirely pleased

    Any more details as to why?

    Not that I think it matters as it is resolved but sure.

    At first when the VPS was finally provisioned (as approval is manual still... Why? I'm not a new customer by any means) it didn't create from an alma8 template (which their templates are out of date... Almalinux 10 has been out for a good while now). I gave it almost an hour, ticket sent to recreate it on another template. Got an entirely different VPS that built within minutes.

    Then my HDD was missing... Okay... I asked for it to be added and mounted... no... You need to add it in a disks menu within WHCMS sigh instructions are vague but yes it worked, but after waiting hours to even get it to the point where I could install something and properly set it up, it was basically bed time and I went to sleep kinda mad.

    Am I being a slight bitch? Yes... However ServaRica is also the same company that wanted my Root Passport to turn on AMD-V that is a host feature... And they couldn't because Xen... Which is why we have KVM/Proxmox now. This was very messy.

    The templates need a lot of work, both from the product and the OS side.

    noted ,
    will share it with team and fix those issue
    Thanks for letting us know

    Thanks

    Did you want the ticket as a reference?

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    @MaxTakeba said:

    @servarica_hani said:

    @MaxTakeba said:

    @JohnFilch123 said:

    @MaxTakeba said: not entirely pleased

    Any more details as to why?

    Not that I think it matters as it is resolved but sure.

    At first when the VPS was finally provisioned (as approval is manual still... Why? I'm not a new customer by any means) it didn't create from an alma8 template (which their templates are out of date... Almalinux 10 has been out for a good while now). I gave it almost an hour, ticket sent to recreate it on another template. Got an entirely different VPS that built within minutes.

    Then my HDD was missing... Okay... I asked for it to be added and mounted... no... You need to add it in a disks menu within WHCMS sigh instructions are vague but yes it worked, but after waiting hours to even get it to the point where I could install something and properly set it up, it was basically bed time and I went to sleep kinda mad.

    Am I being a slight bitch? Yes... However ServaRica is also the same company that wanted my Root Passport to turn on AMD-V that is a host feature... And they couldn't because Xen... Which is why we have KVM/Proxmox now. This was very messy.

    The templates need a lot of work, both from the product and the OS side.

    noted ,
    will share it with team and fix those issue
    Thanks for letting us know

    Thanks

    Did you want the ticket as a reference?

    yes please share the ticket in pm or here

    As We agreed on some measures to make the instructions more clear but the team not sure about the template issue
    Also for asking for password it is mainly due to pressure by me to make tickets resolve faster as I was hoping to get the tickets answers with less number of back and forth . This created this issue but we talked about this before to not ask for passwords unless it is really needed

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    Hi everyone,

    Note: We’ll be announcing new plans in the coming days that will be very competitive given the current market situation — stay tuned.

    This is a heads-up that we will be updating most of our plan prices later this week.

    If you’re planning to order any Slim or Fat Slices, we recommend placing your order now before the new pricing takes effect.

    Important:

    The price change applies only to new orders placed after the increase.

    Any existing plans ordered at the old pricing will remain at the old price as usual.

    Why the price change?

    Unfortunately, we can no longer maintain the old pricing due to significant increases in hardware costs:

    RAM is now costing us approximately 5× more than it did 6 months ago.

    NVMe storage is now costing us about 3× more than it did 6 months ago.

    We have not increased prices until now because we were still using hardware purchased before these major price hikes. Since our costs had not increased at that time, we did not pass any additional costs on to our users.

    However, our previous stock is nearly depleted, and we now need to purchase hardware at current market prices. As a result, the updated pricing will apply to new orders only.

    New Pricing Details

    Slim Slices
    Old price: $1.50 per slice
    New price: $2.50 per slice

    Pricing formula:
    $2 base per VPS + (number of slices × slice price)

    Examples:
    4 Slim Slices: was $8 → now $12
    8 Slim Slices: was $14 → now $22

    Fat Slices
    Old price: $2.00 per slice
    New price: $3.50 per slice

    Pricing formula:
    $2 base per VPS + (number of slices × slice price)

    Examples:
    4 Fat Slices: was $10 → now $16
    8 Fat Slices: was $18 → now $30

    Dedicated Servers

    Dedicated server pricing will increase by 50%.

    If you anticipate needing additional slices, now is the best time to order and lock in the current pricing.

    We will continue offering the old prices until the remaining stock is sold out — expected to be only a few days.

    Thank you for your continued support.

  • Time for me to finally buy it!

    Thanked by 1Sharmaishaan72
  • edited February 18

    @servarica_hani said:
    Hi everyone,

    Note: We’ll be announcing new plans in the coming days that will be very competitive given the current market situation — stay tuned.

    This is a heads-up that we will be updating most of our plan prices later this week.

    If you’re planning to order any Slim or Fat Slices, we recommend placing your order now before the new pricing takes effect.

    Important:

    The price change applies only to new orders placed after the increase.

    Any existing plans ordered at the old pricing will remain at the old price as usual.

    Why the price change?

    Unfortunately, we can no longer maintain the old pricing due to significant increases in hardware costs:

    RAM is now costing us approximately 5× more than it did 6 months ago.

    NVMe storage is now costing us about 3× more than it did 6 months ago.

    We have not increased prices until now because we were still using hardware purchased before these major price hikes. Since our costs had not increased at that time, we did not pass any additional costs on to our users.

    However, our previous stock is nearly depleted, and we now need to purchase hardware at current market prices. As a result, the updated pricing will apply to new orders only.

    New Pricing Details

    Slim Slices
    Old price: $1.50 per slice
    New price: $2.50 per slice

    Pricing formula:
    $2 base per VPS + (number of slices × slice price)

    Examples:
    4 Slim Slices: was $8 → now $12
    8 Slim Slices: was $14 → now $22

    Fat Slices
    Old price: $2.00 per slice
    New price: $3.50 per slice

    Pricing formula:
    $2 base per VPS + (number of slices × slice price)

    Examples:
    4 Fat Slices: was $10 → now $16
    8 Fat Slices: was $18 → now $30

    Dedicated Servers

    Dedicated server pricing will increase by 50%.

    If you anticipate needing additional slices, now is the best time to order and lock in the current pricing.

    We will continue offering the old prices until the remaining stock is sold out — expected to be only a few days.

    Thank you for your continued support.

    any chance of new hardware? , maybe in a new lineup..?

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    any chance of new hardware? , maybe in a new lineup..?

    yes the new offers will be based on EPYC Milan
    I have the CPUs , servers and ram etc but not yet installed

    They are excellent offers with a lot of work to make them happen on the price they will be offered on

    Thanked by 1Sharmaishaan72
  • one day late to the price hike :'(

  • Hello something left in stocks or It's too late?

  • @2oldheroes said: one day late to the price hike

    same

  • servarica_haniservarica_hani Member, Patron Provider

    stay tuned for our slices v3 offers
    will publish them very soon

Sign In or Register to comment.