New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
Hello @e2bs2k1,
Okay, got it, thank you. I am still waiting on an answer from my team on the cost model CPU. Thank you for the comment.
I think it might be a virtualizor bug.
Not sure - you can investigate more, but faced this same issue with RareCloud.
When I initially got the VPS, Passthrough and Virtualization was enabled, but once I reinstalled, it shows up as QEMU and Virt was disabled.
Thanks for that @sh97
@DediRock
Thanks for the v4 cpu.
root@dedirock-49793017:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 79 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v4 @ 2.60GHz stepping : 1 microcode : 0xb000040 cpu MHz : 2599.996 cache size : 35840 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 1 core id : 0 cpu cores : 1 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 20 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon rep_good nopl xtopology cpuid tsc_known_freq pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 fma cx16 pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault invpcid_single pti ssbd ibrs ibpb stibp tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid ept_ad fsgsbase tsc_adjust bmi1 hle avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid rtm rdseed adx smap xsaveopt arat umip md_clear flush_l1d arch_capabilities vmx flags : vnmi preemption_timer posted_intr invvpid ept_x_only ept_ad ept_1gb flexpriority apicv tsc_offset vtpr mtf vapic ept vpid unrestricted_guest vapic_reg vid shadow_vmcs pml bugs : cpu_meltdown spectre_v1 spectre_v2 spec_store_bypass l1tf mds swapgs taa mmio_stale_data bhi ibpb_no_ret bogomips : 5199.99 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management:Same problem on dedirock-65129932. Would you be so kind to set the proper cpu-models so that AES-NIS and VM-x/AMD-V work, please.
Hey @Rise9349 sorry about this, I wen't ahead and responded to your ticket in our portal. I wanted to offer what I think is the best solution here. Thank you for the above information, I will have my guys look into it.
Thanks
How do you guys use the storage server with such slow disk(~4.5M/s write)?
@Rise9349
@jcn50
Hey @e2bs2k1 sorry about this speed, not ideal for sure. My guys are looking into things. For now I did go ahead and respond to your open ticket to offer a solution for the time being, thank you very much for you patience.
Okay guys, my network problems are solved after moving my node to another host, which resulted in the need to wipe data and reinstall.
Unfortunately disk performance is now way beyond bad:
Thu Dec 18 17:07:15 UTC 2025
Basic System Information:
Uptime : 0 days, 3 hours, 25 minutes
Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
CPU cores : 1 @ 2599.996 MHz
AES-NI : ❌ Disabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
RAM : 962.1 MiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 1004.8 GiB
Distro : Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
Kernel : 6.14.0-37-generic
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
IPv4 Network Information:
ISP : HostPapa
ASN : AS36352 HostPapa
Host : HostPapa
Location : Buffalo, New York (NY)
Country : United States
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/mapper/vg0-lv--0):
iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
Geekbench test failed and low memory was detected. Add at least 1GB of SWAP or use GB4 in tead (higher compatibility with low memory systems).
YABS completed in 23 min 49 sec
The best I could get was 21 Megabytes per Second DISK speed.
I now understand why they offered a refund.. well... acccepted!
They failed to remove the old RDNS-entries after delete the vm on the old host and creating it on the new one. They failed again with the new vm's records after terminating the contract due to being unable to deliver a proper service.
Would not recommend.
@DediRock
consider impl SSD-cache on the hdd array, 50G:1G ratio should improve a lot without too much cost, though the ssd price is increasing rapidly. But is the only way if you want to provide the service.
Hello @e2bs2k1 ok thank you for that info, I will relay to our Sys Admin.
I am not: I've never ordered DediRock' storage offer/server... so I can't say. But they seem to be willing to change your node to another one until you're satisfied with the performance.
They have changed 2 times. The latest change was good for 2days,then become unusable, for some unknown reason.
You can either:
I'm done with them(no insulting here).
They offered full refund and I accepted.
I haven't seen those speeds since my 386 system and 30mb hard disk and I think that was faster....