Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Free VPS for Open Source Developers

Free VPS for Open Source Developers

enter image description here

Now that the Black Friday Frenzy is over settle down with a Free **Open Source Software Virtual Private Server.

Absolutely FREE, no catches, no credits, no price bumps.
Server locations and end dates are always on our website at https://fossvps.org and are currently :-

  • UK Fareham courtesy of Onlyservers till 25th January 2026
  • US Buffalo Courtesy of MSATT till 22nd November 2026
  • Romania Bucharest courtesy of Hosteroid till 6th March 2026
  • Moldova Chisinau courtesy of Alexhost till 30th January 2026

Rules for a free VPS

Free and open source software developers only.
White hat only, Not for commercial use, No service level agreement but we are good. Ephemeral. Could disappear at any moment! Don't be a dick rules, No excessive high cpu, disk or bandwidth
Clueless™ Administrator!

If you would like a VPS, just complete this form asking what you are developing and preferably some links to your previous developments.
Warnings

  • Multiple registrations will get you banned
  • Good reputation on this forum (no history, no server - sorry)
  • Failing to accept the verification email will lock you out from re-applying
  • Email address (purely for admin emails), don't make a request if you wish to be anonymous

Acceptance will give you 2 VCPU, 4GiB Ram, 64GiB hdd and provide NAT + IPv6 /96 access with either Ubuntu, Debian or Alpine in your preferred location. The servers won't last forever (check website) but we will always give you as much notice as possible, it all depends on our fantastic donors.

We are genuinely doing this to help you so please no abuse as it messes it up for everyone.


«1

Comments

  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    We genuinely want to support the community, so want to hear your views as to what we could be doing better.

    This is a great opportunity for anyone not experienced with IPv6 to start playing. Don't worry you still have NAT IPv4 so have access to the server.

    For my use, I install zerotier inside the vm which gives it a v4 address on my private network. Then all the vms at other locations are able to communicate with each other securely. They could of course be doing this using v6 but its all about creating secure networks etc.

    I am also considering building a FOSSVPS reverse proxy to map to your vm port 80 / 443.
    Also considering providing free domain name mapped to vm.

    But without your support and feedback none of this is going to happen and our great donors will also lose interest.

    My key point anyone registering needs to trust us and we need to trust you so this is not an anonymous service.

    Thanked by 2shayneeo zejjnt
  • I wonder how big the demand is. Even though your offer is generous everyone and their mother is loaded with some $7-10/year cheap deals based on Black Friday and similar threads. Perhaps the ephemeral nature is less attractive. Or the actual FOSS practicing students who would like to learn and can't afford to buy their own VPS don't visit LET.

  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    @jnd said:
    I wonder how big the demand is. Even though your offer is generous everyone and their mother is loaded with some $7-10/year cheap deals based on Black Friday and similar threads. Perhaps the ephemeral nature is less attractive. Or the actual FOSS practicing students who would like to learn and can't afford to buy their own VPS don't visit LET.

    Fair points.
    However that was why I just introduced our US server which I am personally paying for. I paid for a year in advance to make things easier for people but did not want to make a song and dance about it :*

    Thanked by 2jnd zejjnt
  • ✅ Service Update — Backend & DNS Improvements Completed Yesterday

    Here’s a summary of the backend and DNS development work completed yesterday for int.yt:

    🛠️ Backend Improvements
    1️⃣ Migrated backend to a new PostgreSQL setup

    Installed and configured PostgreSQL 16

    Created new database + role for the backend

    Fixed schema ownership and permissions

    Imported existing tables (users, sessions, subdomains)

    Added missing columns (created_at, updated_at)

    Verified full database connectivity from the backend

    Result:
    ✔️ Database migrations clean
    ✔️ All backend features functioning normally

    2️⃣ PowerDNS & DNS Management Enhancements
    PowerDNS configuration

    Reconfigured PowerDNS authoritative server

    Updated API authentication

    Verified all DNS zone operations via dnsedit.py

    Zone & record updates

    Added/replaced:

    MX records for ImprovMX

    SPF TXT record

    Verification TXT record

    Confirmed zone propagation and correct formatting for TXT/MX entries

    Ensured backend → PDNS sync works for subdomain creation

    Result:
    ✔️ DNS updates apply instantly
    ✔️ Email forwarding integrations work with proper MX/SPF
    ✔️ DNS scripting and API communication stable

    3️⃣ Backend API environment updates

    Updated .env with:

    New DATABASE_URL

    PowerDNS API URL + key

    Correct server IPs for A/NS records

    Verified:

    /health endpoint

    Login + signup

    Subdomain creation flow

    Session handling

    Result:
    ✔️ Backend is running with clean config
    ✔️ DNS + DB features validated end-to-end

    4️⃣ General stability improvements

    Cleaned up database permissions

    Standardized DNS record formatting

    Tested dynamic subdomain creation end-to-end

    Over all FOSSVPS is great for non-profit VPS performance is very good
    THX to FOSSVPS

    INTENT FREE DOMAIN
    https://int.yt/
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    [email protected]

    Thanked by 2msatt shayneeo
  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    @hottyrespect said: Over all FOSSVPS is great for non-profit VPS performance is very good

    THX to FOSSVPS

    Great to hear your comment. Thank you for joining and hopefully your project will keep on growing which is what we are here for.
    Mike

  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    @msatt said: Good reputation on this forum (no history, no server - sorry)

    Have had a number of requests without any reputation. We really want to have as many clients as possible benefitting from these free VMs but this rule is important.

  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    @hottyrespect Viewing your (great) website, the things you are doing are of benefit to the community (thank you). I wonder if it is worth considering some collaboration between FOSSVPS and int.yt?
    I mentioned earlier

    @msatt said: Also considering providing free domain name mapped to vm.

    Would this sort of thing be of interest to your project and our community?

  • Yeah sure
    We are open for collaboration
    Can you please explain clearly what type of collaboration in detail

  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    Lets see what we can sort out together. @hottyrespect sent you an email :)
    Anyone else have suggestions for improvements, sponsorship or help please let us know, we really want your views.
    Mike

  • yeah sure :smiley:

    Thanked by 1msatt
  • Beautiful to see a collab on the first page of the thread haha.
    My Alexhost VPS has been working flawlessly both before and after the Proxmox migration; better than some other paid VPS actually.
    Eternally grateful for this service, I hope the runtime will be extended :)

    Thanked by 2shayneeo msatt
  • @zejjnt said:
    Beautiful to see a collab on the first page of the thread haha.
    Eternally grateful for this service, I hope the runtime will be extended :)

    Thank you for your kind comments. Your feedback really encourage us to continue the work.

    My Alexhost VPS has been working flawlessly both before and after the Proxmox migration; better than some other paid VPS actually.

    Though I am a volunteer in this project, my comments would not be fair to you guys, but I think that is true, FOSSVPS just works flawlessly.

    Thanked by 1zejjnt
  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    @zejjnt said: My Alexhost VPS has been working flawlessly both before and after the Proxmox migration; better than some other paid VPS actually.

    Thank you @zejjnt, @Alexhost / FOSSVPS <3
    We hope they will keep their sponsorship as it really is appreciated.
    This is a community and the more we work together the better it becomes for everyone.
    Registrations are still open.

    Thanked by 1zejjnt
  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    Been having some 'internal' discussions and interested in your views.

    1. Is trust an issue when registering with us (we want your email address) or do you consider paying a business more trustworthy?
    2. Is a static IPv4 really important - we provide NAT and full IPv6 / 96
    3. How important are 'snapshots' - we are pretty stable.

    Thanks for your time, your comments will shape how we move forward.
    Mike

  • zejjntzejjnt Member
    edited December 2025

    @msatt said:
    Been having some 'internal' discussions and interested in your views.

    1. Is trust an issue when registering with us (we want your email address) or do you consider paying a business more trustworthy?
    2. Is a static IPv4 really important - we provide NAT and full IPv6 / 96
    3. How important are 'snapshots' - we are pretty stable.

    Thanks for your time, your comments will shape how we move forward.
    Mike

    1. Equal for me
    2. Yes, absolutely - in my case. It very much varies from user to user and many do not have that need.
      As I am behind CGNAT at home the odds are against me from the start -.-
    3. It is extremely nice to have, but with free or cheap services I am not used to having them and I backup everything manually already.
      It would be nice if I had to stop doing that some time during my life lol; snapshots are awesome :)
    Thanked by 1msatt
  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    Comments I have received (elsewhere) say -

    Get rid of 'Ephemeral. Could disappear at any moment!' - now that I am paying for a server this statement is no longer completely true. We have this statement as we don't know what our other very kind donors will decide for the future. One thing for certain is when we know, you will know.

    Get rid of 'Clueless™ Administrator!' - This is a remnant from when Tom was running the service and I know that he is certainly not clueless and nor am I. So going forward it won't be mentioned.

    Another comment was 'There is nothing free. You either pay with money or with your data' - this is something I STRONGLY disagree with. This is free and your data is your own. We / I have no interest. We trust you are Open Source and your data / projects are your own.

    I want the community to benefit from this, I can only afford one server so we really need our very kind donors and plenty of support.

    Thanks
    Mike

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    @zejjnt said:

    @msatt said:
    Been having some 'internal' discussions and interested in your views.

    1. Is trust an issue when registering with us (we want your email address) or do you consider paying a business more trustworthy?
    2. Is a static IPv4 really important - we provide NAT and full IPv6 / 96
    3. How important are 'snapshots' - we are pretty stable.

    Thanks for your time, your comments will shape how we move forward.
    Mike

    1. Equal for me
    2. Yes, absolutely - in my case. It very much varies from user to user and many do not have that need.
      As I am behind CGNAT at home the odds are against me from the start -.-
    3. It is extremely nice to have, but with free or cheap services I am not used to having them and I backup everything manually already.
      It would be nice if I had to stop doing that some time during my life lol; snapshots are awesome :)

    Thanks for the comments they are appreciated :)
    1 - Trust is important, which is why I am being as open as possible. Not sure most companies would be the same.

    2 - Coincidentally I am also behind a CGNAT at home. (Please excuse me if you are already doing this or similar) - my main router runs OpenWRT and has zerotier installed. All of my VPSs have zerotier installed so I can access everything over a VPN. It does not matter if the VPS is IPv6, static IPv4 or NAT as long as it can talk to the internet the VPN works. Also any firewall blocks don't matter as zerotier is on the VPS. It really is a good solution.
    Of course I appreciate things like web access so I use NPM (nginx proxy manager) which also has the VPN so NPM proxies all of my sites e.g. Proxmox etc providing ssl and acl controls.

    3 - Totally understand about low cost / free and limited service. However I do have the storage and like you understand how to backup. As we are using Proxmox it has PBS (Proxmox Backup Server) which makes it extremely simple to automate the backup system. I was thinking that perhaps having a backup taken every two days. PBS only records changes on backup, so keeping a weekly and monthly backup does not create a big overhead.

    I would really like to create a dashboard to allow snapshot control (using Proxmox API) but I simply don't have the time or enough expertise. So afraid that option would be 'soon' ;)
    HTH all the best
    Mike

    Thanked by 1yeungon
  • Hi @msatt

    Thanks for your great help. I got the VPS located at Moldova from you.

    I think I made a wrong request about Ip config. I should pick Static IP4 instead, given that KiwiPanel is a web-based VPS manager.

    Could you please assign a static IP4 to the VPS.

    Project https://github.com/kiwipanel/kiwipanel

    Cheer

    Vuong ([email protected])

    Thanked by 1vuanhson
  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    Much quicker to re-register and choose the correct option. I have removed the lockout (allowing re-registration) and everything will be built correctly.
    Have fun with your panel.
    Mike

    Thanked by 1yeungon
  • @msatt said:
    Much quicker to re-register and choose the correct option. I have removed the lockout (allowing re-registration) and everything will be built correctly.
    Have fun with your panel.
    Mike

    Thanks Mike, got the updated one with ip4.

    Thanked by 1msatt
  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    I have been busy and wanted to say, we are getting into alpha testing of a big new feature at FOSSVPS giving our NAT users some great benefits.... Won't say more apart from you should have it 'soon' (New Year or earlier).
    Happy Christmas / Holidays everyone.
    Mike

    Thanked by 3jcn50 yeungon zejjnt
  • DewlanceVPSDewlanceVPS Member, Patron Provider

    Unable to access your website.

    Error code: SEC_ERROR_REVOKED_CERTIFICATE
    Browser blocked your visit to this site because the certificate provided for fossvps has been revoked and isn't trusted anymore.

    Thanked by 1msatt
  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    Thanks @DewlanceVPS - I am puzzled. I can only assume there is some caching issue. The cert is fine and checked locally and externally. There have been some re-issuing recently so a stale cache seems the most likely problem.
    Mike

  • @msatt said:
    Thanks @DewlanceVPS - I am puzzled. I can only assume there is some caching issue. The cert is fine and checked locally and externally. There have been some re-issuing recently so a stale cache seems the most likely problem.
    Mike

    Found this: https://certificate.revocationcheck.com/fossvps.org

  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    @cmeerw Thanks - need some help. Not really sure I understand what that link is saying - is it a Cloudflare problem (which we don't use)?

  • @msatt said:
    @cmeerw Thanks - need some help. Not really sure I understand what that link is saying - is it a Cloudflare problem (which we don't use)?

    http://e8.c.lencr.org/6.crl contains a revocation record (use openssl crl -in 6.crl -text -noout on that file):

        Serial Number: 06718ADF0B9DC350C39427657195A2B57D85
            Revocation Date: Dec 21 17:42:02 2025 GMT
    

    (and that's the fossvps.org certificate)

    but not sure why it got revoked.

  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    @cmeerw Thanks again.
    Perhaps me being stupid - if I had two sites both containing *.fossvps.org certs could that create a revocation?

  • @msatt said:
    @cmeerw Thanks again.
    Perhaps me being stupid - if I had two sites both containing *.fossvps.org certs could that create a revocation?

    If you generated a new wildcard when you setup the 2nd site, perhaps you revoked the one in use on the 1st site. Should be easy to compare them and see.

    Not being stupid, none of us were born knowing this stuff man.

  • msattmsatt Member, Host Rep

    @zed said: Not being stupid, none of us were born knowing this stuff man.

    Very kind / polite :)
    Only requested creation of cert (done by Nginx Proxy Manager) - no idea about revocation.
    As the certs are on different VMs they would not be the same but I would assume they should both be valid? Or does letsencrypt only allow the latest cert to be valid and revokes others?

  • @msatt said:

    @zed said: Not being stupid, none of us were born knowing this stuff man.

    Very kind / polite :)
    Only requested creation of cert (done by Nginx Proxy Manager) - no idea about revocation.
    As the certs are on different VMs they would not be the same but I would assume they should both be valid? Or does letsencrypt only allow the latest cert to be valid and revokes others?

    Honestly I haven't touched LetsEncrypt in a while, but I have a vague memory that there was a switch or flag when you wanted to use a duplicate of an existing cert vs. generating a new one (and .. I'd think? would revoke the existing?). I'm old and my memory is suspect and you're probably not even using the tooling I was at the time, so grain of salt etc.

    I'm surprised and vaguely annoyed that people who might have a better idea aren't chiming in.

    If nothing else look at the certs on both servers (even via browser, whatever) and compare in case I'm babbling nonsense in my old age and wasting your time.

Sign In or Register to comment.