Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

2025 Black Friday / Cyber Monday: FLASH SALE & MEGATHREAD - "The Trade War"

1659660662664665733

Comments

  • @barbarza said:

    @Maki said:

    @lewellyn said:
    I tried to condense it as far as reasonable and impartially. shrug It looked like a misconfiguration, and I concur that the handling of the situation was poor (but that's par for the course around here, and always has been). But it also sounded like everything is resolved now.

    The drama start when the provider accused the customer to be lie, and importantnly the line "Are you bot" is insulting

    I kinda wish I was a bot actually...

    we all bot in parallel universe

    Thanked by 2cz83s tux
  • @beanman109 said:

    @Maki said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @VeloxMedia said: VeloxMedia is only under the group ARPW GROUP, they have no deals with VeloxMedia and we are separate. I can not comment on how they run their business, however we are not limited, we are sole traders and do not need to register on companies house.

    ARPW Group is a Limited Company, I'd imagine any 'companies' you're running under it are considered part of your Limited Company, e.g VeloxMedia

    Regardless of that part of it - even if you are a Sole Trader you're required by UK law to display your registration / the names of all individuals involved for this on your website and invoices.

    VeloxMedia isn't a registered entity with CH in the UK so you're either funneling this money through a Limited Company (ARPW) or your Sole Trader entity in which case you should be displaying your Full Name on your invoices and website.

    https://www.gov.uk/invoicing-and-taking-payment-from-customers/invoices-what-they-must-include

    https://www.legalo.co.uk/blog/website-legal-requirements/

    Does this mean they are illegal?

    I'm not a lawyer but probably

    You can't be a sole trader under a 'group' or another company that's for sure, so money from sales is either going through a Limited Company or a Sole Tradership but it's not clear which as they leave all relevant required info about this off of the website and invoices.

    To give them the benefit of the doubt, ARPWUK LIMITED was only set up in September, and until June 2027 we'll have no way of knowing if they were actually using it or not. In theory, even if they haven't done so yet, they could move all the stuff they planned to do as a sole trader into the company if they do it before their sole trader declarations (April 2026) and the end of their company accounting period (September 2026).

    But honestly, having no visibility into new companies until about 18 months after they start trading is why I default to not trusting providers for anything but a toy VPS until they've been around a few years and I can do some basic checks. Obviously, I hope there are others that are prepared to take the risk, or none of them would survive that long, but it's just not for me.

  • lovelyserverlovelyserver Member
    edited December 2025

    Also some stock available here https://loclix.io/store/let-deals

    I have no idea about any coupons.

    They're really nice, I would love to buy some. But I already bought a lot this bf event, so I'll stick to what I've got.

    Posted initially here by the provider https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4630437/#Comment_4630437

  • @lovelyserver said:
    Also some stock available here https://loclix.io/store/let-deals

    I have no idea about any coupons.

    They're really nice, I would love to buy some. But I already bought a lot this bf event, so I'll stick to what I've got.

    Get the provider out, it need to know our ID Number when we registering

    Thanked by 1cz83s
  • @lovelyserver said:
    Also some stock available here https://loclix.io/store/let-deals

    I have no idea about any coupons.

    They're really nice, I would love to buy some. But I already bought a lot this bf event, so I'll stick to what I've got.

    They have stocks available because they are asking for National ID Code, and that too for ~$10 deal.

    Thanked by 1cz83s
  • @Maki said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @Maki said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @VeloxMedia said: VeloxMedia is only under the group ARPW GROUP, they have no deals with VeloxMedia and we are separate. I can not comment on how they run their business, however we are not limited, we are sole traders and do not need to register on companies house.

    ARPW Group is a Limited Company, I'd imagine any 'companies' you're running under it are considered part of your Limited Company, e.g VeloxMedia

    Regardless of that part of it - even if you are a Sole Trader you're required by UK law to display your registration / the names of all individuals involved for this on your website and invoices.

    VeloxMedia isn't a registered entity with CH in the UK so you're either funneling this money through a Limited Company (ARPW) or your Sole Trader entity in which case you should be displaying your Full Name on your invoices and website.

    https://www.gov.uk/invoicing-and-taking-payment-from-customers/invoices-what-they-must-include

    https://www.legalo.co.uk/blog/website-legal-requirements/

    Does this mean they are illegal?

    I'm not a lawyer but probably

    You can't be a sole trader under a 'group' or another company that's for sure, so money from sales is either going through a Limited Company or a Sole Tradership but it's not clear which as they leave all relevant required info about this off of the website and invoices.

    I see, now all the invoice isn't lawful, does that mean its nulled?

    No, just that they're potentially committing an offence. Likely nothing would happen if it was reported though, except their accounts as a sole trader and company might be examined a bit more thoroughly in the future.

    Thanked by 1Maki
  • @OpaqueRegistrant said:

    @rpqu said:
    Honestly, I don't understand the reason why they put their Director's address.

    I missed the drama but this is quite normal for small office-less companies in many countries. Arguably it's even a good thing because if they're telling all their customers where they live, they'd better not do anything shady.

    If it wasn't for the fact that this address has been used for decades, I would say it could have been a rental.
    But for an entity whose online presence determines sales, I don't think it's a good idea.

    @ralf said:

    @ralf said:

    @rpqu said: Honestly, I don't understand the reason why they put their Director's address.

    I do the same with my company, which is one of the reasons I never reveal here what my company is or what it does!

    The fees have increased now, but it used to cost £13 to register a company yourself, and most accountants would charge upwards of £500 to do it for you. It's a relatively small expense compared to getting year-end accounts done, but when you're first starting a business on tiny seed capital, it can make all the difference.

    Also forgot to say - once your address is listed at Companies House, it's pretty hard to get rid of it. You can superficially do it, e.g. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/removing-your-home-address-from-the-companies-house-register but it takes a long time, is expensive and all the previously filed accounts / charges will still have your address on and not all of them can be changed.

    So, it's a bad idea. Perhaps it would be better to sell to someone else , change your name , then get it back through acquisition?

  • My takeaway from all of this brouhaha is: am I too old already to scratch my head why apparently a number of posters here doesn't know how bundles work and how to order them? Ah, those times of OpenVZ and 256 MB RAM... :)

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @ralf said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @Maki said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @VeloxMedia said: VeloxMedia is only under the group ARPW GROUP, they have no deals with VeloxMedia and we are separate. I can not comment on how they run their business, however we are not limited, we are sole traders and do not need to register on companies house.

    ARPW Group is a Limited Company, I'd imagine any 'companies' you're running under it are considered part of your Limited Company, e.g VeloxMedia

    Regardless of that part of it - even if you are a Sole Trader you're required by UK law to display your registration / the names of all individuals involved for this on your website and invoices.

    VeloxMedia isn't a registered entity with CH in the UK so you're either funneling this money through a Limited Company (ARPW) or your Sole Trader entity in which case you should be displaying your Full Name on your invoices and website.

    https://www.gov.uk/invoicing-and-taking-payment-from-customers/invoices-what-they-must-include

    https://www.legalo.co.uk/blog/website-legal-requirements/

    Does this mean they are illegal?

    I'm not a lawyer but probably

    You can't be a sole trader under a 'group' or another company that's for sure, so money from sales is either going through a Limited Company or a Sole Tradership but it's not clear which as they leave all relevant required info about this off of the website and invoices.

    To give them the benefit of the doubt, ARPWUK LIMITED was only set up in September, and until June 2027 we'll have no way of knowing if they were actually using it or not. In theory, even if they haven't done so yet, they could move all the stuff they planned to do as a sole trader into the company if they do it before their sole trader declarations (April 2026) and the end of their company accounting period (September 2026).

    But honestly, having no visibility into new companies until about 18 months after they start trading is why I default to not trusting providers for anything but a toy VPS until they've been around a few years and I can do some basic checks. Obviously, I hope there are others that are prepared to take the risk, or none of them would survive that long, but it's just not for me.

    Regardless of any of that, in the UK you need to have company registration details available and visible on the invoices and website.

    OR if they really are a sole trader then full name of the registered sole trader on invoices and websites.

    Neither of which appear on invoices as shown from both zGato and myself.

    Thanked by 3Hitori0221 geo tux
  • @rpqu said:

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:

    @rpqu said:
    Honestly, I don't understand the reason why they put their Director's address.

    I missed the drama but this is quite normal for small office-less companies in many countries. Arguably it's even a good thing because if they're telling all their customers where they live, they'd better not do anything shady.

    If it wasn't for the fact that this address has been used for decades, I would say it could have been a rental.
    But for an entity whose online presence determines sales, I don't think it's a good idea.

    @ralf said:

    @ralf said:

    @rpqu said: Honestly, I don't understand the reason why they put their Director's address.

    I do the same with my company, which is one of the reasons I never reveal here what my company is or what it does!

    The fees have increased now, but it used to cost £13 to register a company yourself, and most accountants would charge upwards of £500 to do it for you. It's a relatively small expense compared to getting year-end accounts done, but when you're first starting a business on tiny seed capital, it can make all the difference.

    Also forgot to say - once your address is listed at Companies House, it's pretty hard to get rid of it. You can superficially do it, e.g. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/removing-your-home-address-from-the-companies-house-register but it takes a long time, is expensive and all the previously filed accounts / charges will still have your address on and not all of them can be changed.

    So, it's a bad idea. Perhaps it would be better to sell to someone else , change your name , then get it back through acquisition?

    It's still not easy. As we saw here, CH mess up sometimes and a single director might appear as several records, but that will start changing from this year with identity verification, where in theory each individual can only get a single code that's linked to their ID documents, and that then gets tied to all the companies they're a directory or PSC of. Currently it's only just been rolled out to directors, PSCs are following in the coming months.

    Very old companies (pre-digital) aren't on Companies House, but anything (even dissolved companies) will be available to search online for at least 20 years. So, once your address is on file at CH, you've basically doxxed yourself for as long as you live at that address. The only solution really is to move house! I actually think it's a monumental failing that CH don't warn you of that when first registering a company.

    Thanked by 3x1arch JohnnySac FAT32
  • @lovelyserver said: They're really nice, I would love to buy some.

    thnx

    Thanked by 2lovelyserver cz83s
  • lukast__lukast__ Member, Megathread Squad

    YABS of my Crankbis $6.9/yr VPS, very nice performance for a Xeon:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Dec  3 01:15:02 PM CET 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6240R CPU @ 2.40GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2400.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 19.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)
    Kernel     : 6.12.57+deb13-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Redoubt Networks
    ASN        : AS400304 Redoubt Networks
    Host       : Redoubt Networks
    Location   : Liberty Lake, Washington (WA)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 255.50 MB/s  (63.8k) | 1.24 GB/s    (19.3k)
    Write      | 256.18 MB/s  (64.0k) | 1.24 GB/s    (19.4k)
    Total      | 511.68 MB/s (127.9k) | 2.48 GB/s    (38.8k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.30 GB/s     (2.5k) | 1.37 GB/s     (1.3k)
    Write      | 1.37 GB/s     (2.6k) | 1.46 GB/s     (1.4k)
    Total      | 2.67 GB/s     (5.2k) | 2.83 GB/s     (2.7k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.29 Gbits/sec  | 465 Mbits/sec   | 135 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.35 Gbits/sec  | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 158 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 680 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 2.36 Gbits/sec  | 835 Mbits/sec   | 167 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.68 Gbits/sec  | 2.14 Gbits/sec  | 36.7 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.59 Gbits/sec  | 1.71 Gbits/sec  | 85.6 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 2.26 Gbits/sec  | 779 Mbits/sec   | 182 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.29 Gbits/sec  | 481 Mbits/sec   | 135 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.39 Gbits/sec  | 1.89 Gbits/sec  | 158 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 155 Mbits/sec   | 807 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 2.33 Gbits/sec  | 948 Mbits/sec   | 167 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.68 Gbits/sec  | 2.05 Gbits/sec  | 36.6 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.59 Gbits/sec  | 1.53 Gbits/sec  | 85.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 2.25 Gbits/sec  | 672 Mbits/sec   | 182 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1175                          
    Multi Core      | 2121                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/15367404
    
    YABS completed in 15 min 49 sec
    

    Thank you @sh97 and @crunchbits!

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @lukast__ said:
    YABS of my Crankbis $6.9/yr VPS, very nice performance for a Xeon:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Dec  3 01:15:02 PM CET 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6240R CPU @ 2.40GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2400.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 19.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)
    Kernel     : 6.12.57+deb13-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Redoubt Networks
    ASN        : AS400304 Redoubt Networks
    Host       : Redoubt Networks
    Location   : Liberty Lake, Washington (WA)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 255.50 MB/s  (63.8k) | 1.24 GB/s    (19.3k)
    Write      | 256.18 MB/s  (64.0k) | 1.24 GB/s    (19.4k)
    Total      | 511.68 MB/s (127.9k) | 2.48 GB/s    (38.8k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.30 GB/s     (2.5k) | 1.37 GB/s     (1.3k)
    Write      | 1.37 GB/s     (2.6k) | 1.46 GB/s     (1.4k)
    Total      | 2.67 GB/s     (5.2k) | 2.83 GB/s     (2.7k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.29 Gbits/sec  | 465 Mbits/sec   | 135 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.35 Gbits/sec  | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 158 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 680 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 2.36 Gbits/sec  | 835 Mbits/sec   | 167 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.68 Gbits/sec  | 2.14 Gbits/sec  | 36.7 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.59 Gbits/sec  | 1.71 Gbits/sec  | 85.6 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 2.26 Gbits/sec  | 779 Mbits/sec   | 182 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.29 Gbits/sec  | 481 Mbits/sec   | 135 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.39 Gbits/sec  | 1.89 Gbits/sec  | 158 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 155 Mbits/sec   | 807 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 2.33 Gbits/sec  | 948 Mbits/sec   | 167 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.68 Gbits/sec  | 2.05 Gbits/sec  | 36.6 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.59 Gbits/sec  | 1.53 Gbits/sec  | 85.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 2.25 Gbits/sec  | 672 Mbits/sec   | 182 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1175                          
    Multi Core      | 2121                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/15367404
    
    YABS completed in 15 min 49 sec
    

    Thank you @sh97 and @crunchbits!

    there was a crunchbits $6.9 deal??
    damn im behind on the times

  • @beanman109 said:
    Regardless of any of that, in the UK you need to have company registration details available and visible on the invoices and website.

    It's perfectly legal to use any UK address for the company's registered address. The only requirement is that a government official could theoretically turn up to that address and demand to see all relevant company documents.

    In practice, most companies (even huge ones where their address is well known) have their registered address as their accountants, which is why so many phantom related companies turn up when researching companies.

    For a director's address, the only requirement is that they can receive official mail in a timely manner and act on their legal obligations as a director. Many directors use their accountants or nowadays a mail opening service which scans and emails letters from HMRC and throws away the spam mail (and boy, you get a lot of that!)

    If you know that putting your home address in the registration is a bad idea, it's pretty easy to avoid doing it. But nobody tells you until it's too late.

    Thanked by 4x1arch rpqu boba tux
  • @lukast__ said:
    YABS of my Crankbis $6.9/yr VPS, very nice performance for a Xeon:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Wed Dec  3 01:15:02 PM CET 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6240R CPU @ 2.40GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2400.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 19.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)
    Kernel     : 6.12.57+deb13-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Redoubt Networks
    ASN        : AS400304 Redoubt Networks
    Host       : Redoubt Networks
    Location   : Liberty Lake, Washington (WA)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 255.50 MB/s  (63.8k) | 1.24 GB/s    (19.3k)
    Write      | 256.18 MB/s  (64.0k) | 1.24 GB/s    (19.4k)
    Total      | 511.68 MB/s (127.9k) | 2.48 GB/s    (38.8k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.30 GB/s     (2.5k) | 1.37 GB/s     (1.3k)
    Write      | 1.37 GB/s     (2.6k) | 1.46 GB/s     (1.4k)
    Total      | 2.67 GB/s     (5.2k) | 2.83 GB/s     (2.7k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.29 Gbits/sec  | 465 Mbits/sec   | 135 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.35 Gbits/sec  | 1.84 Gbits/sec  | 158 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 680 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 2.36 Gbits/sec  | 835 Mbits/sec   | 167 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.68 Gbits/sec  | 2.14 Gbits/sec  | 36.7 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.59 Gbits/sec  | 1.71 Gbits/sec  | 85.6 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 2.26 Gbits/sec  | 779 Mbits/sec   | 182 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.29 Gbits/sec  | 481 Mbits/sec   | 135 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.39 Gbits/sec  | 1.89 Gbits/sec  | 158 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 155 Mbits/sec   | 807 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 2.33 Gbits/sec  | 948 Mbits/sec   | 167 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.68 Gbits/sec  | 2.05 Gbits/sec  | 36.6 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.59 Gbits/sec  | 1.53 Gbits/sec  | 85.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 2.25 Gbits/sec  | 672 Mbits/sec   | 182 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1175                          
    Multi Core      | 2121                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/15367404
    
    YABS completed in 15 min 49 sec
    

    Thank you @sh97 and @crunchbits!

    Thanked by 3lukast__ cz83s FAT32
  • I was today years old when I found out I already had a DartNode VPS.
    When the F did I order that?

  • SmokyHostsSmokyHosts Member, Patron Provider

    @chenxuhua said:

    @chenxuhua said:

    @FAT32 said:
    image

    28/11 09:30

    SmokyHosts: $15.97/yr 4GB VPS in US

    • 2 vCPU
    • 4GB RAM
    • 40GB SSD
    • 800GB @ 1Gbps
    • 1 IPv4
    • Location: Buffalo / Los Angeles, US
    • Quantity: 15
    • Coupon code: bf50offvps
    • $15.97/yr or $40.97/3yr

    image


    Reply with your order ID to get:

    • 4TB Bandwidth instead of 800GB
    • Additional 3 months when prepay for 3 years

    Test IP:

    • Buffalo: 107.174.63.26
    • Los Angeles: 104.223.20.158

    Invoice #3198
    Order Number: 3888653114
    Please help me upgrade to 4TB bandwidth, thank you.

    @SmokyHosts

    @chenxuhua
    Thank you for choosing SmokyHosts. We have upgraded the bandwidth allocated to your VPS to 4TB

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @ralf said:

    @beanman109 said:
    Regardless of any of that, in the UK you need to have company registration details available and visible on the invoices and website.

    It's perfectly legal to use any UK address for the company's registered address. The only requirement is that a government official could theoretically turn up to that address and demand to see all relevant company documents.

    In practice, most companies (even huge ones where their address is well known) have their registered address as their accountants, which is why so many phantom related companies turn up when researching companies.

    For a director's address, the only requirement is that they can receive official mail in a timely manner and act on their legal obligations as a director. Many directors use their accountants or nowadays a mail opening service which scans and emails letters from HMRC and throws away the spam mail (and boy, you get a lot of that!)

    If you know that putting your home address in the registration is a bad idea, it's pretty easy to avoid doing it. But nobody tells you until it's too late.

    I'm not talking about the addresses listed I'm talking about how the invoices are literally blank on details other than the random address and a PNG for VeloxMedia which isn't even a registered company.

    They need to have details such as "John Smith t/a VeloxMedia" or list the Limited Company Registered name and registration number.

    When someone purchases from Velox currently these details are completely omitted on the invoice and nowhere to be seen on the website.

    Right now they claim they're a sole trader, but what is that sole trader name? It's nowhere to be seen anywhere

  • @Umcookies said:
    I was today years old when I found out I already had a DartNode VPS.

    When the F did I order that?

    June.

  • @ralf said:

    @Umcookies said:
    I was today years old when I found out I already had a DartNode VPS.

    When the F did I order that?

    June.

    I should've seen that coming....
    Put differently, why did I order a VPS ~6 months ago and have it powered off the entire time.

  • @Umcookies said:
    I should've seen that coming....
    Put differently, why did I order a VPS ~6 months ago and have it powered off the entire time.

    :s

    Thanked by 1cz83s
  • ralfralf Member
    edited December 2025

    @Umcookies said:

    @ralf said:

    @Umcookies said:
    I was today years old when I found out I already had a DartNode VPS.

    When the F did I order that?

    June.

    I should've seen that coming....
    Put differently, why did I order a VPS ~6 months ago and have it powered off the entire time.

    If it helps, I had a VPS with someone (I can't even remember who) and their Debian template didn't work but their Alma did (which I tried just to make sure the install did actually work because Alma was what was pre-configured on it). After the second time Debian had failed, I'd hit their reinstall limit and so I messaged support and they told me they'd fix their template and to check back in a week. 11 months later when the renewal invoice came, I realised I'd forgotten all about it because I'd never even added it to my spreadsheet. So not only powered off, but didn't even have a bootable OS installed.

    Thanked by 1cz83s
  • where is @itsTomHarper ?

    he kept one for me "which i am truly thankful" but last night i started to get some flags.... i asked to cancel this order in pm and as a ticket.

    the unpaid invoice has a faded VeloxMedia and this address

    VeloxMedia
    479 Great Western Road
    Aberdeen
    AB10 6NN

    i have been in LET long enough and was kicked in the balls in Sep. i will not forgive myself if i deny my gut feelings again. Off course i can be stupid and make mistakes but some things happen for a reason.

  • @ralf said:

    @Umcookies said:

    @ralf said:

    @Umcookies said:
    I was today years old when I found out I already had a DartNode VPS.

    When the F did I order that?

    June.

    I should've seen that coming....
    Put differently, why did I order a VPS ~6 months ago and have it powered off the entire time.

    If it helps, I had a VPS with someone (I can't even remember who) and their Debian template didn't work but their Alma did (which I tried just to make sure the VPS did actually work). After the second time Debian had failed, I'd hit their reinstall limit and so I messaged support and they told me they'd fix their template and to check back in a week. 11 months later when the renewal invoice came, I realised I'd forgotten all about it because I'd never even added it to the spreadsheet because I'd never even found out what its IP address was. So not only powered off, but didn't even have a bootable OS installed.

    Kinda sounds like HostSlick's deal from last BF. (If memory serves correctly)
    People were struggling HARD with getting a working OS but Alma worked, then there was a command someone offered to install another OS through Alma.

  • @Umcookies said:

    @ralf said:

    @Umcookies said:

    @ralf said:

    @Umcookies said:
    I was today years old when I found out I already had a DartNode VPS.

    When the F did I order that?

    June.

    I should've seen that coming....
    Put differently, why did I order a VPS ~6 months ago and have it powered off the entire time.

    If it helps, I had a VPS with someone (I can't even remember who) and their Debian template didn't work but their Alma did (which I tried just to make sure the VPS did actually work). After the second time Debian had failed, I'd hit their reinstall limit and so I messaged support and they told me they'd fix their template and to check back in a week. 11 months later when the renewal invoice came, I realised I'd forgotten all about it because I'd never even added it to the spreadsheet because I'd never even found out what its IP address was. So not only powered off, but didn't even have a bootable OS installed.

    Kinda sounds like HostSlick's deal from last BF. (If memory serves correctly)
    People were struggling HARD with getting a working OS but Alma worked, then there was a command someone offered to install another OS through Alma.

    Oh, that's ringing a bell actually. And thinking about it, I have a vague recollection I did a giveaway of some unneeded servers a few months ago, so it might have been 8 or 9 months and only learning I had it when they sent an email about network reconfiguration or downtime...

  • rpqurpqu Member
    edited December 2025

    @ralf said:

    @rpqu said:

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:

    @rpqu said:
    Honestly, I don't understand the reason why they put their Director's address.

    I missed the drama but this is quite normal for small office-less companies in many countries. Arguably it's even a good thing because if they're telling all their customers where they live, they'd better not do anything shady.

    If it wasn't for the fact that this address has been used for decades, I would say it could have been a rental.
    But for an entity whose online presence determines sales, I don't think it's a good idea.

    @ralf said:

    @ralf said:

    @rpqu said: Honestly, I don't understand the reason why they put their Director's address.

    I do the same with my company, which is one of the reasons I never reveal here what my company is or what it does!

    The fees have increased now, but it used to cost £13 to register a company yourself, and most accountants would charge upwards of £500 to do it for you. It's a relatively small expense compared to getting year-end accounts done, but when you're first starting a business on tiny seed capital, it can make all the difference.

    Also forgot to say - once your address is listed at Companies House, it's pretty hard to get rid of it. You can superficially do it, e.g. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/removing-your-home-address-from-the-companies-house-register but it takes a long time, is expensive and all the previously filed accounts / charges will still have your address on and not all of them can be changed.

    So, it's a bad idea. Perhaps it would be better to sell to someone else , change your name , then get it back through acquisition?

    but that will start changing from this year with identity verification, where in theory each individual can only get a single code that's linked to their ID documents, and that then gets tied to all the companies they're a directory or PSC of.
    Very old companies (pre-digital) aren't on Companies House, but anything (even dissolved companies) will be available to search online for at least 20 years. So, once your address is on file at CH, you've basically doxxed yourself for as long as you live at that address. The only solution really is to move house! I actually think it's a monumental failing that CH don't warn you of that when first registering a company.

    Is this ID verification somehow related to UK digital ID?
    CH probably assumed that related individuals knew the liability of registering an entity under an address. And if it's their residence, unhappy customers may visit their home (under the assumption they hadn't changed the company's registered address) despite the operation already moved to another address

  • ralfralf Member
    edited December 2025

    @rpqu said:

    @ralf said:

    @rpqu said:

    @OpaqueRegistrant said:

    @rpqu said:
    Honestly, I don't understand the reason why they put their Director's address.

    I missed the drama but this is quite normal for small office-less companies in many countries. Arguably it's even a good thing because if they're telling all their customers where they live, they'd better not do anything shady.

    If it wasn't for the fact that this address has been used for decades, I would say it could have been a rental.
    But for an entity whose online presence determines sales, I don't think it's a good idea.

    @ralf said:

    @ralf said:

    @rpqu said: Honestly, I don't understand the reason why they put their Director's address.

    I do the same with my company, which is one of the reasons I never reveal here what my company is or what it does!

    The fees have increased now, but it used to cost £13 to register a company yourself, and most accountants would charge upwards of £500 to do it for you. It's a relatively small expense compared to getting year-end accounts done, but when you're first starting a business on tiny seed capital, it can make all the difference.

    Also forgot to say - once your address is listed at Companies House, it's pretty hard to get rid of it. You can superficially do it, e.g. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/removing-your-home-address-from-the-companies-house-register but it takes a long time, is expensive and all the previously filed accounts / charges will still have your address on and not all of them can be changed.

    So, it's a bad idea. Perhaps it would be better to sell to someone else , change your name , then get it back through acquisition?

    but that will start changing from this year with identity verification, where in theory each individual can only get a single code that's linked to their ID documents, and that then gets tied to all the companies they're a directory or PSC of.
    Very old companies (pre-digital) aren't on Companies House, but anything (even dissolved companies) will be available to search online for at least 20 years. So, once your address is on file at CH, you've basically doxxed yourself for as long as you live at that address. The only solution really is to move house! I actually think it's a monumental failing that CH don't warn you of that when first registering a company.

    Is this ID verification somehow related to UK digital ID?
    CH probably assumed that related individuals knew the liability of registering an entity under an address. And if it's their residence, unhappy customers may visit their home under the assumption they hadn't changed the company's registered address despite the operation already moved to another address

    No, it's for company directors and PSCs (persons of significant control) and part of their effort to make company registration fit for purpose. Up until about a year ago you could put in totally bogus details in when registering a company and just tick a box to pinky-promise it was true. You didn't actually do anything with the mail sent to the addresses until it was time to file accounts (12 and a bit months after registering the company), and obviously most people registering fake companies have no intention of actually filing accounts anyway.

    https://changestoukcompanylaw.campaign.gov.uk/identity-verification/
    https://www.gov.uk/guidance/verifying-your-identity-for-companies-house

    Thanked by 2rpqu boba
  • @Umcookies said:

    @ralf said:

    @Umcookies said:
    I was today years old when I found out I already had a DartNode VPS.

    When the F did I order that?

    June.

    I should've seen that coming....
    Put differently, why did I order a VPS ~6 months ago and have it powered off the entire time.

    MY MAN

    a true idler

  • @Decicus said:

    @Umcookies said:

    @ralf said:

    @Umcookies said:
    I was today years old when I found out I already had a DartNode VPS.

    When the F did I order that?

    June.

    I should've seen that coming....
    Put differently, why did I order a VPS ~6 months ago and have it powered off the entire time.

    MY MAN

    a true idler

    At least it was only 6 months, imagine getting a renewal notice for a service you had forgotten about and powered off until you "had time" to set it up.
    Looks at inbox

    Thanked by 3Decicus cz83s FAT32
  • @ralf said:

    @Umcookies said:

    @ralf said:

    @Umcookies said:
    I was today years old when I found out I already had a DartNode VPS.

    When the F did I order that?

    June.

    I should've seen that coming....
    Put differently, why did I order a VPS ~6 months ago and have it powered off the entire time.

    If it helps, I had a VPS with someone (I can't even remember who) and their Debian template didn't work but their Alma did (which I tried just to make sure the install did actually work because Alma was what was pre-configured on it). After the second time Debian had failed, I'd hit their reinstall limit and so I messaged support and they told me they'd fix their template and to check back in a week. 11 months later when the renewal invoice came, I realised I'd forgotten all about it because I'd never even added it to my spreadsheet. So not only powered off, but didn't even have a bootable OS installed.

    Kinda the same thing happened to me. I bought from a Turkish provided in the 2023 BF thread. I don't remember the specifics, but they messed up the OS install and I just kind of forgot to go back after I reported the issue, I just looked and their last post was in December 2023 and google says the business was dissolved in May of this year.

    Thanked by 1cz83s
This discussion has been closed.