Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

IPv6 Hall of Shame

I noticed that free IPv6 is often requested. Made me think about how much does it actually cost for the poeple who do not need IPv6. I asked AI to get a rough estimate and this is what I got: "The average increase in price for a VPS due to the provision of free IPv6 can typically range from about 10% to 20%, depending on the specific costs attributed to infrastructure, maintenance, and configuration." Perhaps @PulsedMedia can be of use to give some specific numbers.

«1345

Comments

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    We noticed that dedicated IPv4 is often requested. Made us think about how much does it actually cost for the people who do not need IPv4. I asked AI to get a rough estimate and this is what I got: "The average increase in price for a VPS due to the provision of dedicated IPv4 can typically range from about 30% to 50%, depending on the specific costs attributed to infrastructure, maintenance, and configuration." Perhaps @mxmla can be of use to give some specific numbers.

  • @yoursunny said:
    We noticed that dedicated IPv4 is often requested. Made us think about how much does it actually cost for the people who do not need IPv4. I asked AI to get a rough estimate and this is what I got: "The average increase in price for a VPS due to the provision of dedicated IPv4 can typically range from about 30% to 50%, depending on the specific costs attributed to infrastructure, maintenance, and configuration." Perhaps @mxmla can be of use to give some specific numbers.

    Did you notice that you often get discounts for IPv6 only VPS and not so for IPv4 only? For example hetzner gives 50 cents discount for IPv6 only VPS.

  • I noticed that free gay porn is often requested. Made me think about how much does it actually cost for the people who do not need gay porn. I asked AI to get a rough estimate and this is what I got: “The average increase in price for a VPS due to the provision of free gay porn can typically range from about 10% to 20%, depending on the specific costs attributed to infrastructure, maintenance, and configuration.”
    Perhaps @Rubben can be of use to give some specific numbers.

  • @Void said: Perhaps @Rubben can be of use to give some specific numbers.

    @oloke r femboy and @emgh atch might also be of some help

  • @Void said:
    I noticed that free gay porn is often requested. Made me think about how much does it actually cost for the people who do not need gay porn. I asked AI to get a rough estimate and this is what I got: “The average increase in price for a VPS due to the provision of free gay porn can typically range from about 10% to 20%, depending on the specific costs attributed to infrastructure, maintenance, and configuration.”
    Perhaps @Rubben can be of use to give some specific numbers.

    Are you saying your are bi or not bi? You are free to store any porn on your VPS just make sure the provider does not snoop on your data. Also ask for discount depending on if you are IPv4 only or IPv6 only.

  • @yoursunny said:
    We noticed that dedicated IPv4 is often requested. Made us think about how much does it actually cost for the people who do not need IPv4. I asked AI to get a rough estimate and this is what I got: "The average increase in price for a VPS due to the provision of dedicated IPv4 can typically range from about 30% to 50%, depending on the specific costs attributed to infrastructure, maintenance, and configuration." Perhaps @mxmla can be of use to give some specific numbers.

    @yoursunny you so mean ! no 7$ for you this Halloween !

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • There are people who have kink for IPv6less networking. Perhaps @beanman109 can give you more details about that.

    Thanked by 2oloke barbarza
  • HostSlickHostSlick 🚩 Host Rep Tag Suspended
    edited November 2025

    Ipv6 cost almost nothing. Just a bit more complicated and sometimes confusing with numbering
    RIPE gives you /29 ipv6 with your LIR account. And since you probably hold ipv4 Space anyway as a Provider you have basically no Cost

    Otherwise from Hardware.....

    Even my old Cisco 6509 from 2003 (or earlier) could do and Routed ipv6 until i swapped it Out for a Juniper MX960 Premium3 later on could do ipv6 Just fine.

    Just Sometimes its just big fuck up with virtualizor and how it handles V6.
    (Dont know About Other panels, im gonna replace that anyway with virtfusion next year)

  • @jnd said:
    There are people who have kink for IPv6less networking. Perhaps @beanman109 can give you more details about that.

    I mentioned @PulsedMedia because I remember he talked about it and if I remember it correctly they didn't implement IPv6 because not many of their users require it, so it would increase the prices for everyone. The cost will generally not be the same for every provider.

  • @maxxxxx said:
    I asked AI to get a rough estimate and this is what I got: "The average increase in price for...

    Asking AI for an estimate........

  • can we get this moved to the dumb post hall of shame

  • @Ballinwrld said:

    @maxxxxx said:
    I asked AI to get a rough estimate and this is what I got: "The average increase in price for...


    Asking AI for an estimate........

    I'm not planning to start a VPS company or anything similar. So it's okish for a first rough guess. I think IPv6 is a bit more complicated than changing the link on a website. If you didn't notice some people are waiting for days for @SeFlow to change the link on the website.

    @zed said:
    can we get this moved to the dumb post hall of shame

    As far as I know IPv6 transition costs outweigh the benefits for most companies. That's one of the main reasons I don't use it anywhere in production except in few special cases, even if it's offered for free everywhere it's more work for practically no benefits.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • fastcat_serversfastcat_servers Member, Host Rep
    edited November 2025

    "I asked AI" why do so many people think they don't appear embarrassingly goofy when they attach this to their statements? Very pro AI, but I just can't help but think that. I see it on social media all the time.

    The answer to your concern isn't specific to hosting, but the wider IT world. Customers hardly want IPv6, providers hardly want to manage it. I think the consensus has settled on "I don't know it, care to learn, or find it particularly useful and it might be an attack surface if I have it enabled with what I presume is sane configuration"

  • @maxxxxx said: As far as I know IPv6 transition costs outweigh the benefits for most companies. That's one of the main reasons I don't use it anywhere in production except in few special cases, even if it's offered for free everywhere it's more work for practically no benefits.

    You're not wrong, but there are lots of variables. Like there's probably not enough customers demanding v6 for it to be worth any actual expense to a host who's so far completely ignored it's existence, but what expense is there really if you're a host coming up now?

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • I noticed that $7/yr deal is often requested. Made me think about how much does it actually cost for the poeple who do not need $7/yr deals. I asked AI to get a rough estimate and this is what I got: "The average increase in price for a VPS due to the provision at $7/yr can typically range from about 0-100% monopoly moolah, depending on the specific Deadpool ambitious and stupidity of the community, host and all those in the middle involved."

    Perhaps @DediRock can be of use to give some specific numbers about how much $$$ he’s made this quarter on LET.

  • my LET password is an IPV6. The first IPV6 that I had....

    Thanked by 1Frameworks
  • stable_geniusstable_genius Member
    edited November 2025

    @fastcat_servers said:
    "I asked AI" why do so many people think they don't appear embarrassingly goofy when they attach this to their statements? Very pro AI, but I just can't help but think that. I see it on social media all the time.

    The answer to your concern isn't specific to hosting, but the wider IT world. Customers hardly want IPv6, providers hardly want to manage it. I think the consensus has settled on "I don't know it, care to learn, or find it particularly useful and it might be an attack surface if I have it enabled with what I presume is sane configuration"

    ipv6 an additional attack surface? How so??? Only if you have disabled ipv4, then ipv6 will be your sole attack surface but one that will be very hard to exploit.

    If you have ipv4 enabled only a totally insane mind would try to attack you using ipv6.

  • @HostSlick said:
    Ipv6 cost almost nothing. Just a bit more complicated and sometimes confusing with numbering
    RIPE gives you /29 ipv6 with your LIR account. And since you probably hold ipv4 Space anyway as a Provider you have basically no Cost

    Otherwise from Hardware.....

    Even my old Cisco 6509 from 2003 (or earlier) could do and Routed ipv6 until i swapped it Out for a Juniper MX960 Premium3 later on could do ipv6 Just fine.

    Just Sometimes its just big fuck up with virtualizor and how it handles V6.
    (Dont know About Other panels, im gonna replace that anyway with virtfusion next year)

    Time is money.

    The headache configuring IPv6 is time/money.

  • @JosephF said:
    Time is money.

    The headache configuring IPv6 is time/money.

    You should enable ipv6, ipv6 is widely recognized as an instant karma booster.

  • maxxxxxmaxxxxx Member
    edited November 2025

    @fastcat_servers said:
    "I asked AI" why do so many people think they don't appear embarrassingly goofy when they attach this to their statements? Very pro AI, but I just can't help but think that. I see it on social media all the time.

    I'm not pro or against AI but I find it often useful for initial research knowing it might be wrong, but still. In this case I remembered the discussion PulsedMedia had so I knew there's costs involved that can increase the price. I'm not aware of any formal study on this specific topic, tho I didn't look for it much to be honest, so as far I am concerned it's as good as guess as any and it does not seem unrealistic at least to me.

    Thanked by 1fastcat_servers
  • @zed said:

    @maxxxxx said: As far as I know IPv6 transition costs outweigh the benefits for most companies. That's one of the main reasons I don't use it anywhere in production except in few special cases, even if it's offered for free everywhere it's more work for practically no benefits.

    You're not wrong, but there are lots of variables. Like there's probably not enough customers demanding v6 for it to be worth any actual expense to a host who's so far completely ignored it's existence, but what expense is there really if you're a host coming up now?

    Depends what kind of a host you are. For smaller hosts renting dedicated servers or just small software routers there's not much cost, but that's because the cost is already passed on from upstream.

    What about if you're starting not so small and need hardware routers? From what I remember from PulsedMedia those can be very expensive and are bought to last for decade or two at least or even more.

  • @DrNutella said:
    I noticed that $7/yr deal is often requested. Made me think about how much does it actually cost for the poeple who do not need $7/yr deals. I asked AI to get a rough estimate and this is what I got: "The average increase in price for a VPS due to the provision at $7/yr can typically range from about 0-100% monopoly moolah, depending on the specific Deadpool ambitious and stupidity of the community, host and all those in the middle involved."

    Perhaps @DediRock can be of use to give some specific numbers about how much $$$ he’s made this quarter on LET.

    Isn't this a bit silly. They will cut costs on support and you'll have to wait for it forever or they'll just cram more users on the same node or they will just deadpool.

  • @maxxxxx said:

    @zed said:

    @maxxxxx said: As far as I know IPv6 transition costs outweigh the benefits for most companies. That's one of the main reasons I don't use it anywhere in production except in few special cases, even if it's offered for free everywhere it's more work for practically no benefits.

    You're not wrong, but there are lots of variables. Like there's probably not enough customers demanding v6 for it to be worth any actual expense to a host who's so far completely ignored it's existence, but what expense is there really if you're a host coming up now?

    Depends what kind of a host you are. For smaller hosts renting dedicated servers or just small software routers there's not much cost, but that's because the cost is already passed on from upstream.

    What about if you're starting not so small and need hardware routers? From what I remember from PulsedMedia those can be very expensive and are bought to last for decade or two at least or even more.

    No I was unclear I guess. If you're old and established you probably have hardware you're trying not to replace, but if you're a new guy anything you buy will have had support for years already.

  • maxxxxxmaxxxxx Member
    edited November 2025

    @stable_genius said:

    @fastcat_servers said:
    "I asked AI" why do so many people think they don't appear embarrassingly goofy when they attach this to their statements? Very pro AI, but I just can't help but think that. I see it on social media all the time.

    The answer to your concern isn't specific to hosting, but the wider IT world. Customers hardly want IPv6, providers hardly want to manage it. I think the consensus has settled on "I don't know it, care to learn, or find it particularly useful and it might be an attack surface if I have it enabled with what I presume is sane configuration"

    ipv6 an additional attack surface? How so??? Only if you have disabled ipv4, then ipv6 will be your sole attack surface but one that will be very hard to exploit.

    If you have ipv4 enabled only a totally insane mind would try to attack you using ipv6.

    For most use cases when you will need IPv4 and you decide to use dual stack IPv6 becomes additional attack surface. Good thing about IPv6 is that it has a lot of addresses, bad thing is, it has a lot of addresses. Another good thing is that it typically operates without NAT, bad thing is, it typically operates without NAT exposing individual devices directly to the internet.

  • I noticed that strict "fair use" CPU limits are often criticized. Made me think about how much we actually save because the majority of people order a VPS and end up idling it. I asked AI to estimate the price difference if everyone actually utilized their resources 100% of the time, and this is what I got: "The low cost of shared hosting relies on oversubscription; if providers had to guarantee active resources for every user without banking on idle time, the average price for a standard VPS would likely increase by 300% to 500%."

  • @itachikonoha said:
    my LET password is an IPV6. The first IPV6 that I had....

    b00b::babe::b00b

  • @zed said:

    @maxxxxx said:

    @zed said:

    @maxxxxx said: As far as I know IPv6 transition costs outweigh the benefits for most companies. That's one of the main reasons I don't use it anywhere in production except in few special cases, even if it's offered for free everywhere it's more work for practically no benefits.

    You're not wrong, but there are lots of variables. Like there's probably not enough customers demanding v6 for it to be worth any actual expense to a host who's so far completely ignored it's existence, but what expense is there really if you're a host coming up now?

    Depends what kind of a host you are. For smaller hosts renting dedicated servers or just small software routers there's not much cost, but that's because the cost is already passed on from upstream.

    What about if you're starting not so small and need hardware routers? From what I remember from PulsedMedia those can be very expensive and are bought to last for decade or two at least or even more.

    No I was unclear I guess. If you're old and established you probably have hardware you're trying not to replace, but if you're a new guy anything you buy will have had support for years already.

    Sure. But isn't it a lot more expensive to support both protocols. Also, you can look at NIST SP 800-119, a lot of things need to be done specific to IPv6 and that's additional time and cost. I'm not sure that as of today everything is as well supported on IPv6 as it is on IPv4.

  • stable_geniusstable_genius Member
    edited November 2025

    @maxxxxx said:
    For most use cases when you will need IPv4 and you decide to use dual stack IPv6 becomes additional attatck surface. Good thing about IPv6 is that it has a lot of addresses, bad thing is, it has a lot of addresses. Another good thing is that it typically operates without NAT, bad thing is, it typically operates without NAT exposing individual devices directly to the internet.

    You can realistically scan the whole ipv4 internet but you cannot scan the whole ipv6 internet, you can only realistically scan a very tiny subset.of ipv6.

    Besides, why try to break into a house through the roof (ipv6) if the owner has left the windows open (ipv4)?

    Thanked by 2Ballinwrld tentor
  • @stable_genius said:

    @maxxxxx said:
    For most use cases when you will need IPv4 and you decide to use dual stack IPv6 becomes additional attatck surface. Good thing about IPv6 is that it has a lot of addresses, bad thing is, it has a lot of addresses. Another good thing is that it typically operates without NAT, bad thing is, it typically operates without NAT exposing individual devices directly to the internet.

    You can scan realistically the whole ipv4 internet but you cannot scan the whole ipv6 internet, you can only realistically scan a very tiny subset.of ipv6.

    That's true but it is completely irrelevant because it does not mean those kind of attacks will go away on IPv6 just that tactics used for network reconnaissance have changed for IPv6. That's actually one of the things explained in NIST SP 800-119.

    Thanked by 1OpaqueRegistrant
  • edited November 2025

    @maxxxxx said:

    @yoursunny said:
    We noticed that dedicated IPv4 is often requested. Made us think about how much does it actually cost for the people who do not need IPv4. I asked AI to get a rough estimate and this is what I got: "The average increase in price for a VPS due to the provision of dedicated IPv4 can typically range from about 30% to 50%, depending on the specific costs attributed to infrastructure, maintenance, and configuration." Perhaps @mxmla can be of use to give some specific numbers.

    Did you notice that you often get discounts for IPv6 only VPS and not so for IPv4 only? For example hetzner gives 50 cents discount for IPv6 only VPS.

    That's because IPv4 addresses cost money and IPv6 addresses don't. HTH

    @maxxxxx said:
    Sure. But isn't it a lot more expensive to support both protocols. Also, you can look at NIST SP 800-119, a lot of things need to be done specific to IPv6 and that's additional time and cost. I'm not sure that as of today everything is as well supported on IPv6 as it is on IPv4.

    It's only more expensive if you're using ancient routers and you have to upgrade all your routers to make it work.

This discussion has been closed.