Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Directadmin Hosting | Shared $9.99/year | Reseller $99.99/year

2»

Comments

  • @SadaoMaou said:

    @NewbieInTraining said:
    There any dangerous to not using CloudLinux in shared hosting? Like is everything still properly segmented between customers so one hacked customer can't affect another? Same question about LVE limits, isn't this asking for customer A to negatively affect customer B? Great pricing though.

    @LittleCreek please reply if you can I also have same question.

    It’s best to submit a support ticket

    Thanked by 1lovelyserver
  • TimboJonesTimboJones Member
    edited November 2025

    Probably won't end up using this. My friend gets charged $35 per IT request (updating DNS) so this makes it not worth it. Just want to go back to "set and forget" and not deal with more IP changes.

    From the welcome email:

    We occasionally move clients from one server to another so that servers do not become overloaded and to keep clients on up to date servers.

  • LittleCreekLittleCreek Member, Patron Provider

    @TimboJones said:
    Probably won't end up using this. My friend gets charged $35 per IT request (updating DNS) so this makes it not worth it. Just want to go back to "set and forget" and not deal with more IP changes.

    From the welcome email:

    We occasionally move clients from one server to another so that servers do not become overloaded and to keep clients on up to date servers.

    Most clients never even notice if they get moved because we manage the ip changes if it ever happens.

  • @LittleCreek said:

    @TimboJones said:
    Probably won't end up using this. My friend gets charged $35 per IT request (updating DNS) so this makes it not worth it. Just want to go back to "set and forget" and not deal with more IP changes.

    From the welcome email:

    We occasionally move clients from one server to another so that servers do not become overloaded and to keep clients on up to date servers.

    Most clients never even notice if they get moved because we manage the ip changes if it ever happens.

    That's if the nameservers are changed. This is just used for web hosting, so DNS to webgui is the only thing to be configured and usually doesn't change for years at other providers.

    I think I've only ever ran one shared hosting with their nameservers, otherwise it's always just using the assigned IPs to be needed to be configured at domain registrar.

  • LittleCreekLittleCreek Member, Patron Provider

    @TimboJones said:
    That's if the nameservers are changed. This is just used for web hosting, so DNS to webgui is the only thing to be configured and usually doesn't change for years at other providers.

    I think I've only ever ran one shared hosting with their nameservers, otherwise it's always just using the assigned IPs to be needed to be configured at domain registrar.

    It can be years here too. But its my opinion that you should used the web host's nameservers. Then if something bad happens the host can take care of it quickly. Using the registrar is also another point of failure. I have previously spent a lot of time troubleshooting only to find out its not my problem at all. Its at the registrar. The client doesn't know the difference. He only knows his website is down and he thinks I am to blame. Convincing him otherwise is nearly impossible.

  • Litespeed? OLS? Apache? which one?

  • hcjhcj Member

    @LittleCreek Any chance the LET Shared option will be available again?

  • out of stock

  • LittleCreekLittleCreek Member, Patron Provider

    @adanforest said:
    Litespeed? OLS? Apache? which one?

    Apache.

  • LittleCreekLittleCreek Member, Patron Provider

    @hcj said:
    @LittleCreek Any chance the LET Shared option will be available again?

    @hcj
    @faizfaiz

    Back in stock again. I only allow a few at a time because I want to make sure nothing is overloaded.

    Thanked by 1hcj
  • the About Us link is not working, just want to see some information about this hosting company.

Sign In or Register to comment.