Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Aurologic accused of being a major actor in enabling cybercrime

emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

In a new report by Insikt Group, they accuse that our very own LET Patron Provider Aurologic takes part in:

  • Enabling sanctioned entities: Continuing to provide upstream connectivity to Aeza International Ltd despite US and UK sanctions
  • Complicity over negligence: Operating as a central hub for numerous "threat activity enablers" (TAEs) and bulletproof hosting providers, with the report questioning whether this represents willful complicity rather than mere negligence
  • Fraudulent registrations: Providing upstream connectivity to fraudulently registered networks that used stolen identities of legitimate companies (metaspinner, Lanedo, VSVK)
  • Systematic inaction: Maintaining a purely reactive, legally-minimal approach to abuse complaints while high concentrations of malicious infrastructure (malware C2 servers, ransomware, infostealers, disinformation campaigns) persist on downstream networks
  • Creating a safe haven: The report suggests aurologic's "neutrality" stance and limited enforcement effectively makes it an attractive, stable upstream provider for cybercriminals, with CEO Joseph Hofmann's own statements ("I can kick everyone out, but then at some point I won't make any sales") suggesting business considerations override security concerns

Obviously, rely on the full report and not my quickly summarized bullet points. They're best effort and just my understanding of accusations. Not meant to be taken as facts.

Full report here: https://www.recordedfuture.com/research/malicious-infrastructure-finds-stability-with-aurologic-gmbh

«13456717

Comments

This discussion has been closed.