Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

I got lucky by KUROIT!! <3 FREE UPGRADE TO 5950X

Basic System Information:

Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 6 minutes
Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor
CPU cores : 2 @ 3393.624 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 3.8 GiB
Swap : 2.0 GiB
Disk : 49.9 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel : 6.1.0-9-amd64
VM Type : KVM
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:

ISP : Host Universal Pty Ltd
ASN : AS136557 Host Universal Pty Ltd
Host : Kuroit
Location : Singapore, North West (03)
Country : Singapore

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):

Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
Read 66.64 MB/s (16.6k) 697.21 MB/s (10.8k)
Write 66.79 MB/s (16.6k) 700.88 MB/s (10.9k)
Total 133.43 MB/s (33.3k) 1.39 GB/s (21.8k)
Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
------ --- ---- ---- ----
Read 1.03 GB/s (2.0k) 1.13 GB/s (1.1k)
Write 1.09 GB/s (2.1k) 1.20 GB/s (1.1k)
Total 2.13 GB/s (4.1k) 2.33 GB/s (2.2k)

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

Test | Value
|
Single Core | 296
Multi Core | 497
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14482339

YABS completed in 25 min 2 sec

(I skipped Internet speed test)

Thanks @kuroit :)

Thanked by 1oloke
«1

Comments

  • woinokizwoinokiz Member
    edited October 2025

    Why so low?

    It's just ~500

    This CPU could give far better performance?

  • CloudCone’s ancient E312* CPUs might ‘win’… but only because the other one’s already asleep 😴💻

  • @woinokiz said:
    Why so low?

    It's just ~500

    This CPU could give far better performance?

    Exactly, all my important stuff has crashed. :( I am unable to use this server, no response from Kuroit here on LET, will open a ticket in a bit.

  • The GB6 score is awful.

  • @anubhavhirani said:

    @woinokiz said:
    Why so low?

    It's just ~500

    This CPU could give far better performance?

    Exactly, all my important stuff has crashed. :( I am unable to use this server, no response from Kuroit here on LET, will open a ticket in a bit.

    So, you came here first before opening a ticket

    Sigh...at least discuss it with them first.

    Thanked by 2sh97 commercial
  • @Fritz said:
    The GB6 score is awful.

    But they quoted this as "UPGRADE"

  • @hennaboy said:

    @anubhavhirani said:

    @woinokiz said:
    Why so low?

    It's just ~500

    This CPU could give far better performance?

    Exactly, all my important stuff has crashed. :( I am unable to use this server, no response from Kuroit here on LET, will open a ticket in a bit.

    So, you came here first before opening a ticket

    Sigh...at least discuss it with them first.

    Ticket has been opened, waiting for response.

  • HostDZireHostDZire Member, Patron Provider

    Thats the problem with Ryzen, easy to abuse due to less no of cores.

  • my vps with ancient e5 also faster lol

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • olokeoloke Member, Host Rep

    On a serious note, this must be some kind of mistake during migration. Hope they'll be able fix it quickly.

    My Kuroit has been very stable (over 120 days uptime) and never encountered performance issues.
    @kuroit @ManishPant what went wrong here?

  • allthemtingsallthemtings Member, Megathread Squad

    @oloke said:

    On a serious note, this must be some kind of mistake during migration. Hope they'll be able fix it quickly.

    My Kuroit has been very stable (over 120 days uptime) and never encountered performance issues.
    @kuroit @ManishPant what went wrong here?

  • kuroitkuroit Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    Thank you for reaching out to LowEndSupport!
    Your IO wait and CPU steal has been doubled hahaha :D

    On a serious note, Just replied to the ticket, really sorry for the issue.
    Moving all VMs to different 5950X node shortly.

  • @kuroit said:
    Thank you for reaching out to LowEndSupport!
    Your IO wait and CPU steal has been doubled hahaha :D

    On a serious note, Just replied to the ticket, really sorry for the issue.
    Moving all VMs to different 5950X node shortly.

    Hahaha 😂 looking forward to solution, it was working perfect with 3900X, no problems ever, I am not liking the upgrade 🤭😢

  • Will there be free upgrade to other regions too :#

  • @woinokiz said:
    Why so low?

    It's just ~500

    This CPU could give far better performance?

    because he is just lucky NOT SUPER LUCKY !

  • @hennaboy said:

    @anubhavhirani said:

    @woinokiz said:
    Why so low?

    It's just ~500

    This CPU could give far better performance?

    Exactly, all my important stuff has crashed. :( I am unable to use this server, no response from Kuroit here on LET, will open a ticket in a bit.

    So, you came here first before opening a ticket

    Sigh...at least discuss it with them first.

    he wanted to share his luck 1st with LET, what's wrong about that ?

  • @cold said:

    @hennaboy said:

    @anubhavhirani said:

    @woinokiz said:
    Why so low?

    It's just ~500

    This CPU could give far better performance?

    Exactly, all my important stuff has crashed. :( I am unable to use this server, no response from Kuroit here on LET, will open a ticket in a bit.

    So, you came here first before opening a ticket

    Sigh...at least discuss it with them first.

    he wanted to share his luck 1st with LET, what's wrong about that ?

    It is good to inform here and see if other user ever faced this problem and there is a solution out there or if I am doing something wrong. Looking forward to solution now.

  • @kuroit said:
    Thank you for reaching out to LowEndSupport!
    Your IO wait and CPU steal has been doubled hahaha :D

    You should do it.

  • @anubhavhirani said:

    @cold said:

    @hennaboy said:

    @anubhavhirani said:

    @woinokiz said:
    Why so low?

    It's just ~500

    This CPU could give far better performance?

    Exactly, all my important stuff has crashed. :( I am unable to use this server, no response from Kuroit here on LET, will open a ticket in a bit.

    So, you came here first before opening a ticket

    Sigh...at least discuss it with them first.

    he wanted to share his luck 1st with LET, what's wrong about that ?

    It is good to inform here and see if other user ever faced this problem and there is a solution out there or if I am doing something wrong. Looking forward to solution now.

    Hosting companies might make mistakes, or see an issue but claim it’s actually fine.

    Its always the best to file a ticket and wait for an answer, there is no need to publicly bash companies if they are not even aware of the issue at the first place.

    If they said your GB6 results are fine, or nothing much they can do, then it would be perfect drama thread for LET.

  • @barbaros said:

    @anubhavhirani said:

    @cold said:

    @hennaboy said:

    @anubhavhirani said:

    @woinokiz said:
    Why so low?

    It's just ~500

    This CPU could give far better performance?

    Exactly, all my important stuff has crashed. :( I am unable to use this server, no response from Kuroit here on LET, will open a ticket in a bit.

    So, you came here first before opening a ticket

    Sigh...at least discuss it with them first.

    he wanted to share his luck 1st with LET, what's wrong about that ?

    It is good to inform here and see if other user ever faced this problem and there is a solution out there or if I am doing something wrong. Looking forward to solution now.

    Hosting companies might make mistakes, or see an issue but claim it’s actually fine.

    Its always the best to file a ticket and wait for an answer, there is no need to publicly bash companies if they are not even aware of the issue at the first place.

    If they said your GB6 results are fine, or nothing much they can do, then it would be perfect drama thread for LET.

    Purpose of the post was to check with other Kuroit customers, since nobody else made the post, I dropped a DM to @ Kuroit when they changed the node but never heard back, didn't go to official channel until today.

    Here is the DM I sent 2 days back:

  • @anubhavhirani said:

    @cold said:

    @hennaboy said:

    @anubhavhirani said:

    @woinokiz said:
    Why so low?

    It's just ~500

    This CPU could give far better performance?

    Exactly, all my important stuff has crashed. :( I am unable to use this server, no response from Kuroit here on LET, will open a ticket in a bit.

    So, you came here first before opening a ticket

    Sigh...at least discuss it with them first.

    he wanted to share his luck 1st with LET, what's wrong about that ?

    It is good to inform here and see if other user ever faced this problem and there is a solution out there or if I am doing something wrong. Looking forward to solution now.

    I disagree. Perhaps, if they had not responded to a ticket but you can contact them in numerous ways to get it resolved before coming here.

    Ive had a server with them before you can get hold of someone generally within a few minutes.

  • So, instead of creating ticket you are DMing on LET? Sir this is LowEndSupport. If you want real support better create them a real ticket

    Thanked by 2hennaboy tentor
  • @barbaros said:
    So, instead of creating ticket you are DMing on LET? Sir this is LowEndSupport. If you want real support better create them a real ticket

    Things have already settled down, they are working on it. No harm informing here that upgrade is actually a downgrade so other users on same node get informed too and see how things are working out for them.

  • @anubhavhirani said:

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 6 minutes
    Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 2 @ 3393.624 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 3.8 GiB
    Swap : 2.0 GiB
    Disk : 49.9 GiB
    Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel : 6.1.0-9-amd64
    VM Type : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

    IPv4 Network Information:

    ISP : Host Universal Pty Ltd
    ASN : AS136557 Host Universal Pty Ltd
    Host : Kuroit
    Location : Singapore, North West (03)
    Country : Singapore

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 66.64 MB/s (16.6k) 697.21 MB/s (10.8k)
    Write 66.79 MB/s (16.6k) 700.88 MB/s (10.9k)
    Total 133.43 MB/s (33.3k) 1.39 GB/s (21.8k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 1.03 GB/s (2.0k) 1.13 GB/s (1.1k)
    Write 1.09 GB/s (2.1k) 1.20 GB/s (1.1k)
    Total 2.13 GB/s (4.1k) 2.33 GB/s (2.2k)

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 296
    Multi Core | 497
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14482339

    YABS completed in 25 min 2 sec

    (I skipped Internet speed test)

    Thanks @kuroit :)

    Congrats, great upgrade! I love it.

    My Netcup Piko is now officially faster in a single-core test than an AMD Ryzen 9 5950X VPS.

    :D

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Yet-Another-Bench-Script

    v2025-01-01

    https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Do 6. Feb 16:31:08 CET 2025

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 1 minutes
    Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores : 1 @ 2294.608 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM : 941.5 MiB
    Swap : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk : 29.4 GiB
    Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel : 6.1.0-30-amd64
    VM Type : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:

    ISP : netcup GmbH
    ASN : AS197540 netcup GmbH
    Host : NETCUP-GMBH
    Location : Nuremberg, Bavaria (BY)
    Country : Germany

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 54.36 MB/s (13.5k) 769.55 MB/s (12.0k)
    Write 54.47 MB/s (13.6k) 773.60 MB/s (12.0k)
    Total 108.84 MB/s (27.2k) 1.54 GB/s (24.1k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 776.46 MB/s (1.5k) 903.63 MB/s (882)
    Write 817.72 MB/s (1.5k) 963.81 MB/s (941)
    Total 1.59 GB/s (3.1k) 1.86 GB/s (1.8k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Clouvider London, UK (10G) 1.00 Gbits/sec 839 Mbits/sec 21.3 ms
    Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 1.09 Gbits/sec 951 Mbits/sec 17.1 ms
    Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 1.01 Gbits/sec 784 Mbits/sec 103 ms
    Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 939 Mbits/sec 754 Mbits/sec 161 ms
    Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) busy busy 156 ms
    Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 1.01 Gbits/sec 733 Mbits/sec 99.2 ms
    Edgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 902 Mbits/sec 419 Mbits/sec 198 ms

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Clouvider London, UK (10G) 1.00 Gbits/sec 811 Mbits/sec 21.3 ms
    Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 1.05 Gbits/sec 932 Mbits/sec 17.0 ms
    Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 1.01 Gbits/sec 687 Mbits/sec 103 ms
    Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 947 Mbits/sec 717 Mbits/sec 161 ms
    Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 961 Mbits/sec busy 156 ms
    Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 997 Mbits/sec 796 Mbits/sec 99.1 ms
    Edgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 860 Mbits/sec 726 Mbits/sec 202 ms

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 383
    Multi Core | 317
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10357832

    YABS completed in 36 min 2 sec

  • @xvps said:

    @anubhavhirani said:

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 6 minutes
    Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 2 @ 3393.624 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 3.8 GiB
    Swap : 2.0 GiB
    Disk : 49.9 GiB
    Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel : 6.1.0-9-amd64
    VM Type : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

    IPv4 Network Information:

    ISP : Host Universal Pty Ltd
    ASN : AS136557 Host Universal Pty Ltd
    Host : Kuroit
    Location : Singapore, North West (03)
    Country : Singapore

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 66.64 MB/s (16.6k) 697.21 MB/s (10.8k)
    Write 66.79 MB/s (16.6k) 700.88 MB/s (10.9k)
    Total 133.43 MB/s (33.3k) 1.39 GB/s (21.8k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 1.03 GB/s (2.0k) 1.13 GB/s (1.1k)
    Write 1.09 GB/s (2.1k) 1.20 GB/s (1.1k)
    Total 2.13 GB/s (4.1k) 2.33 GB/s (2.2k)

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 296
    Multi Core | 497
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14482339

    YABS completed in 25 min 2 sec

    (I skipped Internet speed test)

    Thanks @kuroit :)

    Congrats, great upgrade! I love it.

    My Netcup Piko is now officially faster in a single-core test than an AMD Ryzen 9 5950X VPS.

    :D

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Yet-Another-Bench-Script

    v2025-01-01

    https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Do 6. Feb 16:31:08 CET 2025

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 1 minutes
    Processor : QEMU Virtual CPU version 2.5+
    CPU cores : 1 @ 2294.608 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM : 941.5 MiB
    Swap : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk : 29.4 GiB
    Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel : 6.1.0-30-amd64
    VM Type : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:

    ISP : netcup GmbH
    ASN : AS197540 netcup GmbH
    Host : NETCUP-GMBH
    Location : Nuremberg, Bavaria (BY)
    Country : Germany

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 54.36 MB/s (13.5k) 769.55 MB/s (12.0k)
    Write 54.47 MB/s (13.6k) 773.60 MB/s (12.0k)
    Total 108.84 MB/s (27.2k) 1.54 GB/s (24.1k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 776.46 MB/s (1.5k) 903.63 MB/s (882)
    Write 817.72 MB/s (1.5k) 963.81 MB/s (941)
    Total 1.59 GB/s (3.1k) 1.86 GB/s (1.8k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Clouvider London, UK (10G) 1.00 Gbits/sec 839 Mbits/sec 21.3 ms
    Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 1.09 Gbits/sec 951 Mbits/sec 17.1 ms
    Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 1.01 Gbits/sec 784 Mbits/sec 103 ms
    Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 939 Mbits/sec 754 Mbits/sec 161 ms
    Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) busy busy 156 ms
    Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 1.01 Gbits/sec 733 Mbits/sec 99.2 ms
    Edgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 902 Mbits/sec 419 Mbits/sec 198 ms

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Clouvider London, UK (10G) 1.00 Gbits/sec 811 Mbits/sec 21.3 ms
    Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 1.05 Gbits/sec 932 Mbits/sec 17.0 ms
    Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 1.01 Gbits/sec 687 Mbits/sec 103 ms
    Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 947 Mbits/sec 717 Mbits/sec 161 ms
    Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 961 Mbits/sec busy 156 ms
    Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 997 Mbits/sec 796 Mbits/sec 99.1 ms
    Edgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 860 Mbits/sec 726 Mbits/sec 202 ms

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 383
    Multi Core | 317
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10357832

    YABS completed in 36 min 2 sec

    😭💀

  • @barbaros said:
    So, instead of creating ticket you are DMing on LET? Sir this is LowEndSupport. If you want real support better create them a real ticket

    Most of the time publication in public gets faster response.

  • @Fritz said:

    @barbaros said:
    So, instead of creating ticket you are DMing on LET? Sir this is LowEndSupport. If you want real support better create them a real ticket

    Most of the time publication in public gets faster response.

    Yeah but you hurt the brand damage in return of getting faster response

  • Thanks for the review

    Thanked by 1anubhavhirani
  • 24 hours later:

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 431
    Multi Core | 612
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14499549

Sign In or Register to comment.