Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

I am looking for a VPS that will give the lowest ping to these IP addreses. The VPS locationİstanbul

Gearswars12Gearswars12 Member
edited September 2025 in Requests

43.157.23.98
49.51.155.26
49.51.152.14
I am looking for a VPS that will give the lowest ping to these IP addresses. The VPS location should
İstanbul

«1

Comments

  • according to https://globalping.io/
    for your IP 43.157.23.98, the best one is Gcore. It gives a ping of 34 ms.
    you can test other ips by yourself

    Thanked by 1sh97
  • I would recommend Markahost, they have low ping to those IPs.

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker
    edited September 2025

    Considering that (at least most) turkish providers seem to have limited and/or cumbersome payment options (not their fault, just the laws there it seems) I'd look at close-by countries. I presume that AlphaVPS / @AlexBarakov (in Bulgaria) has something tasty to offer. Just have a look.

    Edit: I just pinged the first 2 IPs above (from an AlphaVPS box) and saw 25 ms +.0.5 ms.

  • HosteroidHosteroid Member, Patron Provider

    @Gearswars12 said:
    43.157.23.98
    49.51.155.26
    49.51.152.14
    I am looking for a VPS that will give the lowest ping to these IP addresses. The VPS location should
    İstanbul

    Hello, you can check from our locations via looking glass: https://looking.house/companies/hosteroid-uk/looking-glass

    Vienna
    PING 49.51.155.26 (49.51.155.26) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=13.5 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=13.6 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=13.5 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=13.7 ms
    
    --- 49.51.155.26 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3006ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.490/13.562/13.667/0.070 ms
    
    Start: 2025-09-23T05:34:13-0400
    HOST: vie-lg.hosteroid.uk                  Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
      1.|-- 185.75.241.129                        0.0%     3    2.6   2.0   1.5   2.6   0.5
      2.|-- 212.69.191.121                        0.0%     3   46.5  29.8   0.6  46.5  25.4
      3.|-- xe-2-0-0.tcr1.itx.vie.core.as8218.eu  0.0%     3    0.6   0.6   0.6   0.7   0.1
      4.|-- ae3.tcr1.itx5.fra.core.as8218.eu      0.0%     3   13.4  13.3  13.1  13.5   0.2
      5.|-- de-cix02.v4.tencent.com               0.0%     3   14.3  15.2  14.3  16.6   1.2
      6.|-- ???                                  100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
      7.|-- ???                                  100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
      8.|-- ???                                  100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
      9.|-- ???                                  100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
     10.|-- 49.51.155.26                          0.0%     3   13.7  13.7  13.6  13.7   0.1
    
     Amsterdam
     PING 43.157.23.98 (43.157.23.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=8.80 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=9.01 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=8.90 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=8.84 ms
    
    --- 43.157.23.98 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 8.798/8.889/9.011/0.079 ms
    
    Start: 2025-09-23T05:36:02-0400
    HOST: ams-lg.hosteroid.uk                           Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
      1.|-- 185.75.242.1                                   0.0%     3    0.8   0.6   0.5   0.8   0.2
      2.|-- et2.1.core.eqx-am5.royalehosting.net           0.0%     3    0.8   4.2   0.5  11.3   6.1
      3.|-- po4091.1.edge.core.drt-ams5.royalehosting.net  0.0%     3    0.7   0.7   0.6   0.7   0.0
      4.|-- 0.bb.core.drt-ams17.royalehosting.net          0.0%     3    1.0   1.1   1.0   1.1   0.0
      5.|-- adm-b3-link.ip.twelve99.net                    0.0%     3    1.3   2.1   1.3   3.7   1.4
      6.|-- adm-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net                  33.3%     3    1.9   2.2   1.9   2.5   0.4
      7.|-- ffm-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net                   0.0%     3    8.5   8.6   8.5   8.8   0.2
      8.|-- ffm-b11-link.ip.twelve99.net                   0.0%     3    8.3   8.4   8.3   8.6   0.2
      9.|-- oriental-ic-376189.ip.twelve99-cust.net        0.0%     3   12.5  12.2   8.9  15.1   3.1
     10.|-- ???                                           100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
     11.|-- ???                                           100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
     12.|-- ???                                           100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
     13.|-- ???                                           100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
     14.|-- 43.157.23.98                                   0.0%     3    9.0   9.0   9.0   9.1   0.1
    
    Thanked by 1oloke
  • LumaDockLumaDock Member, Patron Provider

    @Gearswars12 said:
    43.157.23.98
    49.51.155.26
    49.51.152.14
    I am looking for a VPS that will give the lowest ping to these IP addresses. The VPS location should
    İstanbul

    Hi! We have our own data center in Bucharest, Romania. You can check your ping on https://lg.lumadock.com

  • @LumaDock said:

    @Gearswars12 said:
    43.157.23.98
    49.51.155.26
    49.51.152.14
    I am looking for a VPS that will give the lowest ping to these IP addresses. The VPS location should
    İstanbul

    Hi! We have our own data center in Bucharest, Romania. You can check your ping on https://lg.lumadock.com

    First of all, thank you for your kind comment.
    My main goal is to get the lowest latency VPS from Istanbul to Bulgaria.
    The lowest possible latency VPS.
    Then, the lowest possible VPS from Bulgaria to Frankfurt.
    I'm in Istanbul. If I can get from here to Bulgaria in 10-15 ms, and then to Frankfurt in 10-15 ms or less, that could be a solution for me.

  • @Hosteroid said:

    @Gearswars12 said:
    43.157.23.98
    49.51.155.26
    49.51.152.14
    I am looking for a VPS that will give the lowest ping to these IP addresses. The VPS location should
    İstanbul

    Hello, you can check from our locations via looking glass: https://looking.house/companies/hosteroid-uk/looking-glass

    Vienna
    PING 49.51.155.26 (49.51.155.26) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=13.5 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=13.6 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=13.5 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=13.7 ms
    
    --- 49.51.155.26 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3006ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 13.490/13.562/13.667/0.070 ms
    
    Start: 2025-09-23T05:34:13-0400
    HOST: vie-lg.hosteroid.uk                  Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
      1.|-- 185.75.241.129                        0.0%     3    2.6   2.0   1.5   2.6   0.5
      2.|-- 212.69.191.121                        0.0%     3   46.5  29.8   0.6  46.5  25.4
      3.|-- xe-2-0-0.tcr1.itx.vie.core.as8218.eu  0.0%     3    0.6   0.6   0.6   0.7   0.1
      4.|-- ae3.tcr1.itx5.fra.core.as8218.eu      0.0%     3   13.4  13.3  13.1  13.5   0.2
      5.|-- de-cix02.v4.tencent.com               0.0%     3   14.3  15.2  14.3  16.6   1.2
      6.|-- ???                                  100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
      7.|-- ???                                  100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
      8.|-- ???                                  100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
      9.|-- ???                                  100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
     10.|-- 49.51.155.26                          0.0%     3   13.7  13.7  13.6  13.7   0.1
     
     Amsterdam
     PING 43.157.23.98 (43.157.23.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=8.80 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=9.01 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=8.90 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=8.84 ms
    
    --- 43.157.23.98 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3004ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 8.798/8.889/9.011/0.079 ms
    
    Start: 2025-09-23T05:36:02-0400
    HOST: ams-lg.hosteroid.uk                           Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
      1.|-- 185.75.242.1                                   0.0%     3    0.8   0.6   0.5   0.8   0.2
      2.|-- et2.1.core.eqx-am5.royalehosting.net           0.0%     3    0.8   4.2   0.5  11.3   6.1
      3.|-- po4091.1.edge.core.drt-ams5.royalehosting.net  0.0%     3    0.7   0.7   0.6   0.7   0.0
      4.|-- 0.bb.core.drt-ams17.royalehosting.net          0.0%     3    1.0   1.1   1.0   1.1   0.0
      5.|-- adm-b3-link.ip.twelve99.net                    0.0%     3    1.3   2.1   1.3   3.7   1.4
      6.|-- adm-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net                  33.3%     3    1.9   2.2   1.9   2.5   0.4
      7.|-- ffm-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net                   0.0%     3    8.5   8.6   8.5   8.8   0.2
      8.|-- ffm-b11-link.ip.twelve99.net                   0.0%     3    8.3   8.4   8.3   8.6   0.2
      9.|-- oriental-ic-376189.ip.twelve99-cust.net        0.0%     3   12.5  12.2   8.9  15.1   3.1
     10.|-- ???                                           100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
     11.|-- ???                                           100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
     12.|-- ???                                           100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
     13.|-- ???                                           100.0     3    0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0   0.0
     14.|-- 43.157.23.98                                   0.0%     3    9.0   9.0   9.0   9.1   0.1
    

    First of all, thank you for your kind comment.
    My main goal is to get the lowest latency VPS from Istanbul to Bulgaria.
    The lowest possible latency VPS.
    Then, the lowest possible VPS from Bulgaria to Frankfurt.
    I'm in Istanbul. If I can get from here to Bulgaria in 10-15 ms, and then to Frankfurt in 10-15 ms or less, that could be a solution for me.

  • @jsg said:
    Considering that (at least most) turkish providers seem to have limited and/or cumbersome payment options (not their fault, just the laws there it seems) I'd look at close-by countries. I presume that AlphaVPS / @AlexBarakov (in Bulgaria) has something tasty to offer. Just have a look.

    Edit: I just pinged the first 2 IPs above (from an AlphaVPS box) and saw 25 ms +.0.5 ms.

    First of all, thank you for your kind comment.
    My main goal is to get the lowest latency VPS from Istanbul to Bulgaria.
    The lowest possible latency VPS.
    Then, the lowest possible VPS from Bulgaria to Frankfurt.
    I'm in Istanbul. If I can get from here to Bulgaria in 10-15 ms, and then to Frankfurt in 10-15 ms or less, that could be a solution for me.

  • @concept said:
    I would recommend Markahost, they have low ping to those IPs.

    First of all, thank you for your kind comment.
    My main goal is to get the lowest latency VPS from Istanbul to Bulgaria.
    The lowest possible latency VPS.
    Then, the lowest possible VPS from Bulgaria to Frankfurt.
    I'm in Istanbul. If I can get from here to Bulgaria in 10-15 ms, and then to Frankfurt in 10-15 ms or less, that could be a solution for me.

  • @TOMAS111 said:
    according to https://globalping.io/
    for your IP 43.157.23.98, the best one is Gcore. It gives a ping of 34 ms.
    you can test other ips by yourself

    First of all, thank you for your kind comment.
    My main goal is to get the lowest latency VPS from Istanbul to Bulgaria.
    The lowest possible latency VPS.
    Then, the lowest possible VPS from Bulgaria to Frankfurt.
    I'm in Istanbul. If I can get from here to Bulgaria in 10-15 ms, and then to Frankfurt in 10-15 ms or less, that could be a solution for me.

  • DediRockDediRock Member, Patron Provider

    If its a Turkish provider that will work best, go with SPDnet, Cahit is a really cool guy, always in good communication.

    Thanked by 1tarisu
  • conceptconcept Member
    edited September 2025

    I think it would be helpful to know what ISP you have. It is possible there is a host in Frankfurt or EU that has peering with your ISP meaning direct connection.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • You are in Istanbul.Could you recommend some VPS providers in Istanbul?I need the TR VPS.

  • DigitalFyreDigitalFyre Member, Patron Provider

    Amsterdam

    PING 43.157.23.98 (43.157.23.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=8.04 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=8.12 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=8.07 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=8.07 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=8.08 ms
    --- 43.157.23.98 ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4006ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 8.044/8.075/8.115/0.022 ms
    

    Frankfurt

    PING 43.157.23.98 (43.157.23.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=1.36 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=1.34 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=1.28 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=1.34 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=1.34 ms
    --- 43.157.23.98 ping statistics ---
    5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.283/1.331/1.356/0.025 ms
    
  • zejjntzejjnt Member
    edited September 2025

    My Frankfurt based @EthernetServers VPS goes pretty hard here I see lol.

    ╰─λ ping -c 10 43.157.23.98
    PING 43.157.23.98 (43.157.23.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=1.35 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=1.28 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=1.27 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=1.26 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=1.25 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=1.24 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=7 ttl=55 time=1.28 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=8 ttl=55 time=1.26 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 time=1.48 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=10 ttl=55 time=1.30 ms
    
    --- 43.157.23.98 ping statistics ---
    20 packets transmitted, 20 received, 0% packet loss, time 19009ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.241/1.297/1.484/0.065 ms
    
    
    ╰─λ ping -c 10  49.51.155.26
    PING 49.51.155.26 (49.51.155.26) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=1.25 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=1.26 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=1.16 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=1.16 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=5 ttl=55 time=1.16 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=6 ttl=55 time=1.17 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=7 ttl=55 time=1.18 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=8 ttl=55 time=1.21 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=9 ttl=55 time=1.31 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=10 ttl=55 time=1.23 ms
    
    --- 49.51.155.26 ping statistics ---
    10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9005ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 1.155/1.208/1.306/0.048 ms
    
    
    ╰─λ ping -c 10  49.51.152.14
    PING 49.51.152.14 (49.51.152.14) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=1 ttl=53 time=0.734 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=2 ttl=53 time=0.644 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=3 ttl=53 time=0.663 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=4 ttl=53 time=0.735 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=5 ttl=53 time=0.686 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=6 ttl=53 time=0.696 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=7 ttl=53 time=0.645 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=8 ttl=53 time=0.670 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=9 ttl=53 time=0.645 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=10 ttl=53 time=0.675 ms
    
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @Gearswars12 said:

    @jsg said:
    Considering that (at least most) turkish providers seem to have limited and/or cumbersome payment options (not their fault, just the laws there it seems) I'd look at close-by countries. I presume that AlphaVPS / @AlexBarakov (in Bulgaria) has something tasty to offer. Just have a look.

    Edit: I just pinged the first 2 IPs above (from an AlphaVPS box) and saw 25 ms +.0.5 ms.

    First of all, thank you for your kind comment.
    My main goal is to get the lowest latency VPS from Istanbul to Bulgaria.
    The lowest possible latency VPS.
    Then, the lowest possible VPS from Bulgaria to Frankfurt.
    I'm in Istanbul. If I can get from here to Bulgaria in 10-15 ms, and then to Frankfurt in 10-15 ms or less, that could be a solution for me.

    First, sorry, I didn't know AlphaVPS's ping result is so poor. I had a closer look into it and found that they route their traffic to your 3 IPs (and possibly to TR in general) via NL-IX, which obviously is unfortunate. Usually they are an excellent provider - which includes listening to customers - so they'd highly likely be willing to improve their routes to TR.

    As you said

    Then, the lowest possible VPS from Bulgaria to Frankfurt.

    I checked 3 VPS in have in Germany and it shows that there are quite good/fast connections between DE and TR.

    Contabo shows (avg) 5.5 ms
    Hostbrrr (@labze I think) shows 1.25 ms
    MassiveGrid shows 1.6 ms (note: I'm a bit astonished because their VPS are as ultra-crappy as they are ultra-cheap)

    Obviously Hostbrrr is the best choice among the 3 because (a) best result, and (b) quite cheap (and (c) quite generous traffic volume).

    Note though that ping alone doesn't tell you all there is to know, so be sure to check for transfer speed with actual data like http as well!

  • @jsg said:

    @Gearswars12 said:

    @jsg said:
    Considering that (at least most) turkish providers seem to have limited and/or cumbersome payment options (not their fault, just the laws there it seems) I'd look at close-by countries. I presume that AlphaVPS / @AlexBarakov (in Bulgaria) has something tasty to offer. Just have a look.

    Edit: I just pinged the first 2 IPs above (from an AlphaVPS box) and saw 25 ms +.0.5 ms.

    First of all, thank you for your kind comment.
    My main goal is to get the lowest latency VPS from Istanbul to Bulgaria.
    The lowest possible latency VPS.
    Then, the lowest possible VPS from Bulgaria to Frankfurt.
    I'm in Istanbul. If I can get from here to Bulgaria in 10-15 ms, and then to Frankfurt in 10-15 ms or less, that could be a solution for me.

    First, sorry, I didn't know AlphaVPS's ping result is so poor. I had a closer look into it and found that they route their traffic to your 3 IPs (and possibly to TR in general) via NL-IX, which obviously is unfortunate. Usually they are an excellent provider - which includes listening to customers - so they'd highly likely be willing to improve their routes to TR.

    As you said

    Then, the lowest possible VPS from Bulgaria to Frankfurt.

    I checked 3 VPS in have in Germany and it shows that there are quite good/fast connections between DE and TR.

    Contabo shows (avg) 5.5 ms
    Hostbrrr (@labze I think) shows 1.25 ms
    MassiveGrid shows 1.6 ms (note: I'm a bit astonished because their VPS are as ultra-crappy as they are ultra-cheap)

    Obviously Hostbrrr is the best choice among the 3 because (a) best result, and (b) quite cheap (and (c) quite generous traffic volume).

    Note though that ping alone doesn't tell you all there is to know, so be sure to check for transfer speed with actual data like http as well!

    The alpha VPS didn't work. On the contrary, it shows a higher ping rate.
    Could you show me how you tested it? I'm surprised you saw 1ms between Turkey and Germany.

    I think the IP I gave above is a gaming IP, and you're all pinging them, or you misunderstood my question.
    The VPS in Istanbul will ping those IP addresses. Otherwise, if you ping from Frankfurt or nearby, it will show 1ms anyway.

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @Gearswars12

    So, it seems your OP was confusing and/or I misunderstood you.

    I don't have a VPS in Turkey anymore and am out of this thread.

  • tarisutarisu Member, Host Rep

    Hi there,

    Our results to these IP addresses:

    ping 43.157.23.98
    PING 43.157.23.98 (43.157.23.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    ^C
    --- 43.157.23.98 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3006ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.657/33.689/33.732/0.029 ms
    
    ping 49.51.155.26
    PING 49.51.155.26 (49.51.155.26) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=33.8 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=33.8 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=33.8 ms
    ^C
    --- 49.51.155.26 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3005ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.734/33.758/33.788/0.019 ms
    
    ping 49.51.152.14
    PING 49.51.152.14 (49.51.152.14) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=34.5 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=34.5 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=34.4 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=34.5 ms
    

    Feel free checking our solutions in Turkey/Istanbul location.

    https://tarisu.com

    Regards :blush:

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • tarisutarisu Member, Host Rep

    @DediRock said:
    If its a Turkish provider that will work best, go with SPDnet, Cahit is a really cool guy, always in good communication.

    no tarisu?? :disappointed:

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • @tarisu said:
    Hi there,

    Our results to these IP addresses:

    ping 43.157.23.98
    PING 43.157.23.98 (43.157.23.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    ^C
    --- 43.157.23.98 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3006ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.657/33.689/33.732/0.029 ms
    
    ping 49.51.155.26
    PING 49.51.155.26 (49.51.155.26) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=33.8 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=33.8 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=33.8 ms
    ^C
    --- 49.51.155.26 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3005ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.734/33.758/33.788/0.019 ms
    
    ping 49.51.152.14
    PING 49.51.152.14 (49.51.152.14) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=34.5 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=34.5 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=34.4 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=34.5 ms
    

    Feel free checking our solutions in Turkey/Istanbul location.

    https://tarisu.com

    Regards :blush:

    So, can you give me the address of your Istanbul server? How much latency does it show compared to a standard modem?

    This is a good value, but I also need to see how long it takes to reach your Istanbul VPS from my own network.

  • tarisutarisu Member, Host Rep

    @Gearswars12 said:

    @tarisu said:
    Hi there,

    Our results to these IP addresses:

    ping 43.157.23.98
    PING 43.157.23.98 (43.157.23.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    ^C
    --- 43.157.23.98 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3006ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.657/33.689/33.732/0.029 ms
    
    ping 49.51.155.26
    PING 49.51.155.26 (49.51.155.26) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=33.7 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=33.8 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=33.8 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=33.8 ms
    ^C
    --- 49.51.155.26 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3005ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 33.734/33.758/33.788/0.019 ms
    
    ping 49.51.152.14
    PING 49.51.152.14 (49.51.152.14) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=34.5 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=34.5 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=34.4 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=34.5 ms
    

    Feel free checking our solutions in Turkey/Istanbul location.

    https://tarisu.com

    Regards :blush:

    So, can you give me the address of your Istanbul server? How much latency does it show compared to a standard modem?

    This is a good value, but I also need to see how long it takes to reach your Istanbul VPS from my own network.

    You can use 93.180.134.114 and 31.14.10.1 IP addresses for test.

  • tarisutarisu Member, Host Rep
    edited September 2025

    @jsg said:
    Considering that (at least most) turkish providers seem to have limited and/or cumbersome payment options (not their fault, just the laws there it seems) I'd look at close-by countries. I presume that AlphaVPS / @AlexBarakov (in Bulgaria) has something tasty to offer. Just have a look.

    Edit: I just pinged the first 2 IPs above (from an AlphaVPS box) and saw 25 ms +.0.5 ms.

    Cause of security reasons most provider does not accept Crypto payments, also Paypal & Stripe is blocked. (But we have Paypal & Stripe, no worries :smiley: )

  • balhostbalhost Member, Patron Provider
    edited September 2025

    We can provide Istanbul location servers, You can check ping from our Looking Glass;

    https://lg.balhost.net.tr

    PING 43.157.23.98 (43.157.23.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=42 time=38.3 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=42 time=38.4 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=3 ttl=42 time=38.4 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=4 ttl=42 time=38.2 ms
    
    --- 43.157.23.98 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3005ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.155/38.291/38.372/0.085 ms
    
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @balhost said:
    We can provide Istanbul location servers, You can check ping from our Looking Glass;

    https://lg.balhost.net.tr

    PING 43.157.23.98 (43.157.23.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=42 time=38.3 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=42 time=38.4 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=3 ttl=42 time=38.4 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=4 ttl=42 time=38.2 ms
    
    --- 43.157.23.98 ping statistics ---
    4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3005ms
    rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.155/38.291/38.372/0.085 ms
    

    I had - and tested - a VPS from you and wasn't particularly unhappy. But your payment options drove me away.

  • balhostbalhost Member, Patron Provider

    @jsg said:

    I had - and tested - a VPS from you and wasn't particularly unhappy. But your payment options drove me away.

    Hi, we have mastercard/visa & crypto payments available, which would be better to add? Stripe maybe?

  • ping 43.157.23.98
    PING 43.157.23.98 (43.157.23.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=41 time=35.0 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=41 time=35.1 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=3 ttl=41 time=35.0 ms

    ping 49.51.155.26
    PING 49.51.155.26 (49.51.155.26) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=1 ttl=42 time=34.5 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=2 ttl=42 time=34.5 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.155.26: icmp_seq=3 ttl=42 time=34.6 ms

    ping 49.51.152.14
    PING 49.51.152.14 (49.51.152.14) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=1 ttl=42 time=37.8 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=2 ttl=42 time=37.6 ms
    64 bytes from 49.51.152.14: icmp_seq=3 ttl=42 time=37.6 ms

    from @AK_KWH nat vps

    Thanked by 1oloke
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @balhost said:

    @jsg said:

    I had - and tested - a VPS from you and wasn't particularly unhappy. But your payment options drove me away.

    Hi, we have mastercard/visa & crypto payments available, which would be better to add? Stripe maybe?

    PayPal or no deal, sorry.

  • VVVManagerVVVManager Member, Host Rep

    3v-Hosting, Netherlands location:

    ping 43.157.23.98
    PING 43.157.23.98 (43.157.23.98) 56(84) bytes of data.
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 time=7.85 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 time=7.85 ms
    64 bytes from 43.157.23.98: icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 time=7.81 ms

Sign In or Register to comment.