Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Great news from FOSSVPS.org: More VPS Giveaways!

1246712

Comments

  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider

    A helpful gentleman asked me:

    Do the OS in the guest VM boot or they are crashing?

    My reply:

    Since I can't connect via the Qemu console, I can't see the boot messages. Maybe they are using 100% CPU continuously trying to boot? Maybe they start booting but the network isn't working, and they continuously try the network? My experience is that the network issues time out after a while (even though dmesg says "no limit") and the VPS boots without network. Thus, my guess is that it's not a network issue which is causing the high %CPU usage on some VPSes.


    Is my guess correct that it's not a network issue causing the high %CPU?

  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider
    edited September 2025

    Here's a Yabs from inside the VPS that I just made. Its IPv4 is one from the newly assigned group. The results seem pretty good, especially considering that quite a few of the existing VMs are running 100% CPU. These results are -- if memory serves -- consistent with earlier Yabs when the node was not stressed.

    ubuntu@vmXX:~$ curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Sep 23 17:56:42 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 31 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2800.002 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 96.8 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-71-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Alexhost SRL
    ASN        : AS200019 ALEXHOST SRL
    Host       : Alexhost SRL
    Location   : Chisinau, Chișinău Municipality (CU)
    Country    : Moldova
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 235.13 MB/s  (58.7k) | 1.79 GB/s    (28.0k)
    Write      | 235.76 MB/s  (58.9k) | 1.80 GB/s    (28.1k)
    Total      | 470.89 MB/s (117.7k) | 3.59 GB/s    (56.2k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.01 GB/s     (3.9k) | 2.01 GB/s     (1.9k)
    Write      | 2.11 GB/s     (4.1k) | 2.15 GB/s     (2.1k)
    Total      | 4.12 GB/s     (8.0k) | 4.16 GB/s     (4.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 274 Mbits/sec   | 280 Mbits/sec   | 51.7 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 277 Mbits/sec   | 286 Mbits/sec   | 39.9 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 270 Mbits/sec   | 168 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 240 Mbits/sec   | 237 Mbits/sec   | 153 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 248 Mbits/sec   | 128 Mbits/sec   | 183 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 88.9 Mbits/sec  | 252 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 42.6 Mbits/sec  | 136 Mbits/sec   | 227 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 264 Mbits/sec   | 283 Mbits/sec   | 51.7 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 264 Mbits/sec   | 283 Mbits/sec   | 39.8 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 265 Mbits/sec   | 111 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 239 Mbits/sec   | 227 Mbits/sec   | 153 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 239 Mbits/sec   | 125 Mbits/sec   | 183 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 242 Mbits/sec   | 262 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 226 Mbits/sec   | 79.2 Mbits/sec  | 227 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 545                           
    Multi Core      | 1828                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14019774
    
    YABS completed in 18 min 52 sec
    ubuntu@vmXX:~$ 
    
  • @Not_Oles said:
    Here's a Yabs from inside the VPS that I just made. Its IPv4 is one from the newly assigned group. The results seem pretty good, especially considering that quite a few of the existing VMs are running 100% CPU. These results are -- if memory serves -- consistent with earlier Yabs when the node was not stressed.

    ubuntu@vmXX:~$ curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Sep 23 17:56:42 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 31 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2800.002 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 96.8 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-71-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Alexhost SRL
    ASN        : AS200019 ALEXHOST SRL
    Host       : Alexhost SRL
    Location   : Chisinau, Chișinău Municipality (CU)
    Country    : Moldova
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 235.13 MB/s  (58.7k) | 1.79 GB/s    (28.0k)
    Write      | 235.76 MB/s  (58.9k) | 1.80 GB/s    (28.1k)
    Total      | 470.89 MB/s (117.7k) | 3.59 GB/s    (56.2k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.01 GB/s     (3.9k) | 2.01 GB/s     (1.9k)
    Write      | 2.11 GB/s     (4.1k) | 2.15 GB/s     (2.1k)
    Total      | 4.12 GB/s     (8.0k) | 4.16 GB/s     (4.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 274 Mbits/sec   | 280 Mbits/sec   | 51.7 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 277 Mbits/sec   | 286 Mbits/sec   | 39.9 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 270 Mbits/sec   | 168 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 240 Mbits/sec   | 237 Mbits/sec   | 153 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 248 Mbits/sec   | 128 Mbits/sec   | 183 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 88.9 Mbits/sec  | 252 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 42.6 Mbits/sec  | 136 Mbits/sec   | 227 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 264 Mbits/sec   | 283 Mbits/sec   | 51.7 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 264 Mbits/sec   | 283 Mbits/sec   | 39.8 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 265 Mbits/sec   | 111 Mbits/sec   | 104 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 239 Mbits/sec   | 227 Mbits/sec   | 153 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 239 Mbits/sec   | 125 Mbits/sec   | 183 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 242 Mbits/sec   | 262 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 226 Mbits/sec   | 79.2 Mbits/sec  | 227 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 545                           
    Multi Core      | 1828                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14019774
    
    YABS completed in 18 min 52 sec
    ubuntu@vmXX:~$ 
    
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Sep 23 07:20:57 PM CEST 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 1 days, 12 hours, 6 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2800.002 MHz
    AES-NI     : ^T Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ^T Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 2.0 GiB
    Disk       : 98.3 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.12.38+deb12-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ^T Online / ^T Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Alexhost SRL
    ASN        : AS200019 ALEXHOST SRL
    Host       : Alexhost SRL
    Location   : Chisinau, Chi^Yin^Cu Municipality (CU)
    Country    : Moldova
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 226.15 MB/s  (56.5k) | 1.51 GB/s    (23.6k)
    Write      | 226.74 MB/s  (56.6k) | 1.52 GB/s    (23.8k)
    Total      | 452.89 MB/s (113.2k) | 3.03 GB/s    (47.4k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.87 GB/s     (3.6k) | 1.87 GB/s     (1.8k)
    Write      | 1.97 GB/s     (3.8k) | 2.00 GB/s     (1.9k)
    Total      | 3.85 GB/s     (7.5k) | 3.88 GB/s     (3.7k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 279 Mbits/sec   | 284 Mbits/sec   | 50.9 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 281 Mbits/sec   | 286 Mbits/sec   | 39.1 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 273 Mbits/sec   | 200 Mbits/sec   | 111 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 235 Mbits/sec   | 233 Mbits/sec   | 153 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 251 Mbits/sec   | 151 Mbits/sec   | 185 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 257 Mbits/sec   | 251 Mbits/sec   | 121 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 205 Mbits/sec   | 78.9 Mbits/sec  | 227 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 278 Mbits/sec   | 278 Mbits/sec   | 50.9 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 279 Mbits/sec   | 283 Mbits/sec   | 39.1 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 253 Mbits/sec   | 139 Mbits/sec   | 111 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 253 Mbits/sec   | 238 Mbits/sec   | 153 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 247 Mbits/sec   | 171 Mbits/sec   | 185 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 254 Mbits/sec   | 259 Mbits/sec   | 124 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 222 Mbits/sec   | 103 Mbits/sec   | 227 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 564
    Multi Core      | 1725
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14019055
    
    YABS completed in 19 min 30 sec
    
    
    ----------
    
    
    Retrieving speedtest.net configuration...
    Testing from Alexhost (xxxxx)...
    Retrieving speedtest.net server list...
    Selecting best server based on ping...
    Hosted by Orange Moldova SA (Chisinau) [0.85 km]: 27.629 ms
    Testing download speed................................................................................
    Download: 171.12 Mbit/s
    Testing upload speed......................................................................................................
    Upload: 285.53 Mbit/s
    
    
    ----------
    
    wget -O /dev/null https://proof.ovh.net/files/1Gb.dat 2>&1 | grep -o '[0-9.]\+ [KMGT]*B/s'
    21.3 MB/s
    
    
    ----------
    
    sudo hdparm -tT /dev/vda1
    
    /dev/vda1:
     Timing cached reads:   20146 MB in  1.99 seconds = 10126.22 MB/sec
     Timing buffered disk reads: 1124 MB in  3.01 seconds = 373.85 MB/sec
    
    ----------
    
                                                      My traceroute  [v0.95]
    foss.0b.yt (xxxxx) -> sunet.se (37.156.192.50)                                             2025-09-23T21:02:44+0200
    Keys:  Help   Display mode   Restart statistics   Order of fields   quit
                                                                                      Packets               Pings
     Host                                                                           Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
     1. _gateway (xxxxx)                                                       0.0%    53    8.7   9.1   1.1  95.2  14.9
     2. 10.200.200.1 (10.200.200.1)                                                  0.0%    53    0.3   2.0   0.3  46.9   6.9
     3. ae1-823.rt.trb.csn.md.retn.net (87.245.236.92)                               0.0%    53    0.8   1.1   0.5  15.3   2.1
     4. ae1-1.rt.tc1.sto.se.retn.net (87.245.232.51)                                 0.0%    53   36.4  36.5  36.4  36.7   0.1
     5. netnod-ix-stockholm-blue-1500.sunet.se (194.68.128.19)                       0.0%    52   36.6  36.7  36.5  37.1   0.1
     6. stockholm-tug-r11.sunet.se (86.104.202.138)                                  0.0%    52   36.6  36.7  36.6  36.8   0.1
     7. tug-dc-sw1.sunet.se (130.242.3.215)                                          0.0%    52   36.8  36.7  36.6  36.9   0.1
     8. tug-dc-sw2.sunet.se (130.242.3.229)                                          0.0%    52   39.4  36.8  36.7  39.4   0.4
     9. tug-lb-1.sunet.se (130.242.126.195)                                          0.0%    52   36.6  36.7  36.6  37.5   0.1
    10. sunet.se (37.156.192.50)                                                     0.0%    52   36.8  36.7  36.5  37.7   0.1
    

    (SUnet is the Swedish University computer NETwork, just used it as an example to get a bit of a longer route and to a rock solid node).

    If I can assist in any way do not hesistate to reach out! I might take a while to answer from time to time but when I'm here I'm here :P

    Thanked by 1Not_Oles
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider
    edited September 2025

    @zejjnt

    Thanks very much! Now we know for sure (almost! :)) that at least 4 VMs are working: my test VM, @FrankCastle, the new VM I just made, and yours. That's great!

    Thanks especially for your offer to help!

    Now that we know (probably! :)) that I can make new VPSes with the newly assigned IPv4s, and now that we know several VMs survived the netplan adjustment, reversion, and the reboot -- the question on the table is why are so many (8, 9?) VMs running 100% CPU apparently without console or WAN connectivity (haven't tested more than @Starnberg's)?

    Thanked by 1zejjnt
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider
    # Found in output of systemctl status libvirtd
    
    invalid XATTR timestamp detected on /var/lib/libvirt/images/vmXX.qcow2
    secdriver=dac ubuntu8.8 (Ubuntu)
    
    invalid XATTR timestamp detected on /var/lib/libvirt/images/vmXX.qcow2
    secdriver=dac ubuntu8.8 (Ubuntu)
    
    invalid XATTR timestamp detected on /var/lib/libvirt/images/vmXX.qcow2
    secdriver=dac ubuntu8.8 (Ubuntu)
    
    invlid XATTR timestamp detected on /var/lib/libvirt/images/vmXX.qcow2
    secdriver=dac
    
    # google: libvirtd invalid XATTR timestamp detected
    Restart libvirtd: Sometimes, restarting the libvirtd service can resolve transient issues:
    
    
    root@alexhost:~/vm-seed/vmXX-LET-@Starnberg# date; systemctl restart libvirtd
    Tue Sep 23 02:46:53 UTC 2025
    root@alexhost:~/vm-seed/vmXX-LET-@Starnberg# ping6 -c 2 xxxx:xxxx::xxxx
    PING xxxx:xxxx::xxxx (xxxx:xxxx::xxxx) 56 data bytes
    From xxxx:xxxx::xxxx icmp_seq=1 Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
    From xxxx:xxxx::xxxx icmp_seq=2 Destination unreachable: Address unreachable
    
    --- xxxx:xxxx::xxxx ping statistics ---
    2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1054ms
    
    root@alexhost:~/vm-seed/vmXX-LET-@Starnberg# ping -c 2 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
    PING xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) 56(84) bytes of data.
    From xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
    From xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
    
    --- 176.123.6.52 ping statistics ---
    2 packets transmitted, 0 received, +2 errors, 100% packet loss, time 1048ms
    pipe 2
    root@alexhost:~/vm-seed/vmXX-LET-@Starnberg# 
    

    So, restarting libvirtd didn't fix network connectivity on @Starnberg's VPS.

    More ideas, please! :)

    Thanked by 1zejjnt
  • @Not_Oles said: More ideas, please!

    Thanks for looking into this as well!

    I am currently still downloading the image, will be able to look into it tomorrow. In the meantime, please don't invest too much time into the issue with my VPS - unless there's others having issues as well. I'll try to figure out what's up with the image, and would propose to take it from there once I have a better understanding as to whether it's an issue with the image, or when I cannot find anything wrong with it.

    Thanks!

    Signing off for the day, have a good rest of the day whoever still has more hours to go until then!

    Thanked by 2Not_Oles zejjnt
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider

    @FrankCastle said: I wiped mine and went with a different OS which appears to have resolved those issues. Had I left things as they were I'd probably still be in the same boat as everyone else it seems like.

    OpenBSD fixes everything!

    Personally, I would suggest reinstalling the hypervisor after everyone has the opporunity to get their data off if they want it. Start over fresh!

    I haven't even turned off the 100% CPU VPSes. I thought maybe I might get lucky and find a fix.

    The issue with starting over fresh is that freshness might leave the issue intact and hiding, ready to pop up again soon.

    Where is the libvirt genius when we need him? :)

    I want to try again to make a Debian VPS, which now might be working. I want to go through my VM creation procedure, and post it, so everybody can see everything and suggest improvements. It would be nice to setup, as @cmeerw kindly suggested, a unix socket interface for user accessible consoles.

    But, yeah, it might be getting time to refresh! Unless someone has a better idea!

    Thanked by 2zejjnt Starnberg
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider

    @Starnberg said:

    @Not_Oles said: More ideas, please!

    Thanks for looking into this as well!

    I am currently still downloading the image, will be able to look into it tomorrow. In the meantime, please don't invest too much time into the issue with my VPS - unless there's others having issues as well. I'll try to figure out what's up with the image, and would propose to take it from there once I have a better understanding as to whether it's an issue with the image, or when I cannot find anything wrong with it.

    Thanks!

    Signing off for the day, have a good rest of the day whoever still has more hours to go until then!

    Excellent! Have a good sleep! Thanks for all your help and kindness! <3

    Thanked by 2zejjnt Starnberg
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider

    Given the lack of good ideas about the high %CPU VPSes, and in the absence of objection, I propose to shut them down, perhaps as soon as tomorrow.

    One thing we might try is reverting one of the high CPU VPSes to its fresh snapshot. Maybe they all will work again if reverted. Otherwise I guess they could be reinstalled.

    In the future, we could make snapshots after users finish their basic installs. With "basic" snapshots we could revert to an installed state.

    I made a second new Ubuntu 24.04 VPS with another of the newly assigned IPv4s. It works great and will be assigned to someone, along with more, soon. You can see a list of the requests at https://fossvps.org/list.html.

    Thanks everyone! :) Thanks Alexhost! :)

  • Hello @Not_Oles
    Debian 12

    I want to use the free VPS to host my personal website (as alternatives to the one I am paying for).

    Here is some of my past project:

    This is my github profile: https://github.com/ShayNeeo

    I will ensure my request will not be use for any business-related case.
    I can pm ssh key

    I can wait till there are mode VPSes available.

    Thanks @alexhost, thanks Not_Oles!

    Thanked by 1Not_Oles
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider
    edited September 2025

    @shayneeo

    Hello! Nice to meet you!

    Your application is accepted. I will add you to the list at https://fossvps.org/list.html.

    Would you be okay with IPv6-only in Chisinau, or do you need IPv4? Thanks Alexhost! <3

    I have been wanting to try making a few more IPv6-only VPSes in London. Maybe you might like IPv6-only in London? That server has a pretty good network. Thanks OnlyServers! <3

    Here are a few additional non-FOSSVPS possibilities which might be of interest to you. Two dedicated servers: an E3-1240 v5 in Bucharest running NetBSD, and a dual E5-2683 V4 in Texas running Debian sid. Besides these dedis, I could share a couple of new, fast Ryzen 9 9950X VPSes in the US, one running self-built NetBSD-current, the other running Debian sid.

    Please go ahead when you have time and email or PM your ssh public key.

    Thanks for your request! Nice work on your projects! :star:

    Thanked by 2Starnberg shayneeo
  • shayneeoshayneeo Member
    edited September 2025

    @Not_Oles said:
    @shayneeo

    Hello! Nice to meet you!

    Your application is accepted. I will add you to the list at https://fossvps.org/list.html.

    Would you be okay with IPv6-only in Chisinau, or do you need IPv4? Thanks Alexhost! <3

    I have been wanting to try making a few more IPv6-only VPSes in London. Maybe you might like IPv6-only in London? That server has a pretty good network. Thanks OnlyServers! <3

    Here are a few additional non-FOSSVPS possibilities which might be of interest to you. Two dedicated servers: an E3-1240 v5 in Bucharest running NetBSD, and a dual E5-2683 V4 in Texas running Debian sid. Besides these dedis, I could share a couple of new, fast Ryzen 9 9950X VPSes in the US, one running self-built NetBSD-current, the other running Debian sid.

    Please go ahead when you have time and email or PM your ssh public key.

    Thanks for your request! Nice work on your projects! :star:

    I sent the public key to you.

    And yeah I want to thanks OnlyServers too. Because I am likely to receive the VPS from OnlyServers.

    Thank you for providing such a good services for developers around the Internet.

    Thanked by 1Not_Oles
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider

    Hello!

    At the moment there are 27 VPSes configured on the Chisinau server.

    I don't know why, but 8 VPSes seemed to be running continuously at high %CPU following recent update and revert of the netplan. As far as I am aware, the remaining 19 VPSes are working fine.

    All 8 of the overperforming VPSes have been shutdown. From here at LET, @Aphelios, @seoky, @rickey, @thenet, and @BreakaWD are down.

    Do you gentlemen want me to attempt restoring your VPSes from your "fresh" snapshots? Attempting the restore will destroy whatever happened subsequent to the snapshot. Alternatively, we could rebuild your VPSes from scratch. Please let me know.

    Or, maybe, someone has a better idea about how to adjust the overperforming VPSes?

    Thanks! Sorry for the issue! :) Thanks to Alexhost! <3

    Tom

  • @Not_Oles said:
    Hello!

    At the moment there are 27 VPSes configured on the Chisinau server.

    I don't know why, but 8 VPSes seemed to be running continuously at high %CPU following recent update and revert of the netplan. As far as I am aware, the remaining 19 VPSes are working fine.

    All 8 of the overperforming VPSes have been shutdown. From here at LET, @Aphelios, @seoky, @rickey, @thenet, and @BreakaWD are down.

    Do you gentlemen want me to attempt restoring your VPSes from your "fresh" snapshots? Attempting the restore will destroy whatever happened subsequent to the snapshot. Alternatively, we could rebuild your VPSes from scratch. Please let me know.

    Or, maybe, someone has a better idea about how to adjust the overperforming VPSes?

    Thanks! Sorry for the issue! :) Thanks to Alexhost! <3

    Tom

    Yes, I’ve noticed the VPS is unreachable. It’s likely the deployed application is failing and repeatedly restarting, which is driving CPU usage through the roof. Could you please rebuild the VPS for me? Thanks.

    Thanked by 1Not_Oles
  • @Not_Oles said:
    Hello!

    At the moment there are 27 VPSes configured on the Chisinau server.

    I don't know why, but 8 VPSes seemed to be running continuously at high %CPU following recent update and revert of the netplan. As far as I am aware, the remaining 19 VPSes are working fine.

    All 8 of the overperforming VPSes have been shutdown. From here at LET, @Aphelios, @seoky, @rickey, @thenet, and @BreakaWD are down.

    Do you gentlemen want me to attempt restoring your VPSes from your "fresh" snapshots? Attempting the restore will destroy whatever happened subsequent to the snapshot. Alternatively, we could rebuild your VPSes from scratch. Please let me know.

    Or, maybe, someone has a better idea about how to adjust the overperforming VPSes?

    Thanks! Sorry for the issue! :) Thanks to Alexhost! <3

    Tom

    Hi @Not_Oles,

    I've noticed that my VPS has been shut down, but weirdly on Hetrix it hasn't shown any high cpu usage, as seen here on the screenshot:

    Could you please check what has exactly happened there? Also, could you please add my other key, ssh-ed25519 AAAAC3NzaC1lZDI1NTE5AAAAIBDoJsBKotHRqRQCSi+oj4bi9DHfcHuAtIMlgt4aPMhy [email protected] ? It’s fine to reset it to the snapshot, but I’d appreciate if you could let me know what happened to the original VPS.

    Thanks a lot!

    Thanked by 1Not_Oles
  • @Not_Oles said:
    Hello!

    At the moment there are 27 VPSes configured on the Chisinau server.

    I don't know why, but 8 VPSes seemed to be running continuously at high %CPU following recent update and revert of the netplan. As far as I am aware, the remaining 19 VPSes are working fine.

    All 8 of the overperforming VPSes have been shutdown. From here at LET, @Aphelios, @seoky, @rickey, @thenet, and @BreakaWD are down.

    Do you gentlemen want me to attempt restoring your VPSes from your "fresh" snapshots? Attempting the restore will destroy whatever happened subsequent to the snapshot. Alternatively, we could rebuild your VPSes from scratch. Please let me know.

    Or, maybe, someone has a better idea about how to adjust the overperforming VPSes?

    Thanks! Sorry for the issue! :) Thanks to Alexhost! <3

    Tom

    Thanks for the heads-up, Tom. A rebuild is totally fine for me. Appreciate you sorting it out!

    Thanked by 2Starnberg Not_Oles
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider

    @Aphelios said: Yes, I’ve noticed the VPS is unreachable. It’s likely the deployed application is failing and repeatedly restarting, which is driving CPU usage through the roof. Could you please rebuild the VPS for me? Thanks.

    Hi @Aphelios!

    I rebuilt your VPS as requested. Yabs run inside your newly created VPS is below.

    I double checked that I can get in to your newly recreated VPS via ssh with both IPv4 and IPv6.

    The VPS has your ssh key so you should be able to get in with the same user name and IP addresses as before. As you know, there will be new host ssh keys, so you will have to adjust your known_hosts file.

    Password login is disabled.

    Please feel free to remove my keys and to change the password.

    When you have a chance, please post here again to let us know whether you can get in okay and if everything seems working as expected.

    When you have finished your basic install, please consider asking me to make a snapshot so that maybe you won't have to reinstall again in the hopefully unlikely event of more issues.

    I hope you have fun on your VPS!

    Thanks very much, as always! Best wishes!

    Tom

    ubuntu@vmXX:~$ curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu Sep 25 20:01:07 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2800.002 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 96.8 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-71-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Alexhost SRL
    ASN        : AS200019 ALEXHOST SRL
    Host       : Alexhost SRL
    Location   : Chisinau, Chișinău Municipality (CU)
    Country    : Moldova
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 213.47 MB/s  (53.3k) | 1.91 GB/s    (29.9k)
    Write      | 214.03 MB/s  (53.5k) | 1.92 GB/s    (30.1k)
    Total      | 427.50 MB/s (106.8k) | 3.84 GB/s    (60.0k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.07 GB/s     (4.0k) | 2.10 GB/s     (2.0k)
    Write      | 2.18 GB/s     (4.2k) | 2.25 GB/s     (2.1k)
    Total      | 4.25 GB/s     (8.3k) | 4.35 GB/s     (4.2k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 284 Mbits/sec   | 246 Mbits/sec   | 46.6 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | busy            | busy            | 40.1 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 268 Mbits/sec   | 170 Mbits/sec   | 102 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 237 Mbits/sec   | 243 Mbits/sec   | 153 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 233 Mbits/sec   | 140 Mbits/sec   | 179 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 266 Mbits/sec   | 260 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 223 Mbits/sec   | 95.0 Mbits/sec  | 228 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 281 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 46.5 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 283 Mbits/sec   | 284 Mbits/sec   | 39.8 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 261 Mbits/sec   | 110 Mbits/sec   | 102 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 255 Mbits/sec   | 235 Mbits/sec   | 153 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 239 Mbits/sec   | 132 Mbits/sec   | 179 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 243 Mbits/sec   | 257 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 236 Mbits/sec   | 117 Mbits/sec   | 230 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 589                           
    Multi Core      | 1812                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14069602
    
    YABS completed in 18 min 42 sec
    ubuntu@vmXX:~$ 
    
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider

    @rickey said:

    @Not_Oles said:
    Hello!

    At the moment there are 27 VPSes configured on the Chisinau server.

    I don't know why, but 8 VPSes seemed to be running continuously at high %CPU following recent update and revert of the netplan. As far as I am aware, the remaining 19 VPSes are working fine.

    All 8 of the overperforming VPSes have been shutdown. From here at LET, @Aphelios, @seoky, @rickey, @thenet, and @BreakaWD are down.

    Do you gentlemen want me to attempt restoring your VPSes from your "fresh" snapshots? Attempting the restore will destroy whatever happened subsequent to the snapshot. Alternatively, we could rebuild your VPSes from scratch. Please let me know.

    Or, maybe, someone has a better idea about how to adjust the overperforming VPSes?

    Thanks! Sorry for the issue! :) Thanks to Alexhost! <3

    Tom

    Hi @Not_Oles,

    I've noticed that my VPS has been shut down, but weirdly on Hetrix it hasn't shown any high cpu usage, as seen here on the screenshot:

    Could you please check what has exactly happened there? Also, could you please add my other key, ssh-ed25519 AAAAC3NzaC1lZDI1NTE5AAAAIBDoJsBKotHRqRQCSi+oj4bi9DHfcHuAtIMlgt4aPMhy [email protected] ? It’s fine to reset it to the snapshot, but I’d appreciate if you could let me know what happened to the original VPS.

    Thanks a lot!

    Hi @rickey!

    How should I check exactly what has happened with your VPS?

    With one of the troubled VPSes, the client took a copy of the qcow2 image, the seed.iso, the libvirt xml file, and the backing image. He set everything up in a test environment and did a lot of detective work, but without any definitive result.

    I have looked through everything shallowly with my limited technical skills. I haven't found the root cause.

    I do not know why your VPS and several others were running high CPU. I wish I did know!

    One thing I could do is give you also a copy of your qcow2 image, seed.iso, xml file, and the backing image. Then you would be able to go through and investigate.

    Reverting to the snapshot would change the qcow2 image, so I have not reverted, wanting to save the original state or as much as I could in case you wanted to check it.

    Additionally, none of the other stressed VPSes have successfully reverted to their snapshots. Not even one of the several I tried successfully reverted. After reverting, they go rapidly to very high CPU again.

    For this current situation, based on several trials with different VPSes, reverting to snapshot seems not useful. So I now prefer to go directly to rebuilding from scratch. Of course it's no problem to add your additional ssh key.

    But before I rebuild, do you want copies of your existing files?

    Thanks very much! Sorry for the inconvenience!

    Best!

    Tom

    Thanked by 1rickey
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider

    @seoky Thanks for your message! You are the next rebuild. Maybe this evening, maybe tomorrow morning. I will post here when your VPS is again ready. Best wishes for sure! Tom

    Thanked by 1seoky
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider

    @seoky

    Here is a Yabs from your newly rebuilt VPS. Looks like it might be okay.

    Login should be the same as before. I double checked that your VPS reboots okay and that I can access via ssh on both IPv4 and IPv6.

    My ssh keys are there together with your key. Please feel free to remove my keys.

    Password login is disabled. No need for password for sudo. Default user password same as before. Please feel free to change the password.

    When you have a chance, please post here to let us know if you get in okay and if everything seems okay to you. If you have trouble I will try to assist.

    If you want, when you get your basic install done, please consider letting me know. We can shut down and make another snapshot.

    Sorry about the inconvenience! Thanks for your patience and kindness!

    Best!

    Tom

    ubuntu@vm5:~$ curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu Sep 25 22:57:34 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 7 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2800.002 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 96.8 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-71-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Alexhost SRL
    ASN        : AS200019 ALEXHOST SRL
    Host       : Alexhost SRL
    Location   : Chisinau, Chișinău Municipality (CU)
    Country    : Moldova
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 219.97 MB/s  (54.9k) | 1.97 GB/s    (30.8k)
    Write      | 220.55 MB/s  (55.1k) | 1.98 GB/s    (30.9k)
    Total      | 440.53 MB/s (110.1k) | 3.95 GB/s    (61.7k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.14 GB/s     (4.1k) | 2.22 GB/s     (2.1k)
    Write      | 2.25 GB/s     (4.4k) | 2.37 GB/s     (2.3k)
    Total      | 4.39 GB/s     (8.5k) | 4.59 GB/s     (4.4k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 279 Mbits/sec   | 286 Mbits/sec   | 46.8 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | busy            | busy            | 39.9 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 273 Mbits/sec   | 146 Mbits/sec   | 109 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 241 Mbits/sec   | 245 Mbits/sec   | 149 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 242 Mbits/sec   | 115 Mbits/sec   | 185 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 228 Mbits/sec   | 241 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 123 Mbits/sec   | 33.0 Mbits/sec  | 225 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | 275 Mbits/sec   | 46.8 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 281 Mbits/sec   | 283 Mbits/sec   | 39.6 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 261 Mbits/sec   | 133 Mbits/sec   | 109 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 258 Mbits/sec   | 248 Mbits/sec   | 149 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 247 Mbits/sec   | 136 Mbits/sec   | 185 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 245 Mbits/sec   | 251 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 233 Mbits/sec   | 100 Mbits/sec   | 225 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 585                           
    Multi Core      | 1794                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14071877
    
    YABS completed in 19 min 19 sec
    ubuntu@vm5:~$ 
    
    Thanked by 1seoky
  • @Not_Oles said:

    @rickey said:

    @Not_Oles said:
    Hello!

    At the moment there are 27 VPSes configured on the Chisinau server.

    I don't know why, but 8 VPSes seemed to be running continuously at high %CPU following recent update and revert of the netplan. As far as I am aware, the remaining 19 VPSes are working fine.

    All 8 of the overperforming VPSes have been shutdown. From here at LET, @Aphelios, @seoky, @rickey, @thenet, and @BreakaWD are down.

    Do you gentlemen want me to attempt restoring your VPSes from your "fresh" snapshots? Attempting the restore will destroy whatever happened subsequent to the snapshot. Alternatively, we could rebuild your VPSes from scratch. Please let me know.

    Or, maybe, someone has a better idea about how to adjust the overperforming VPSes?

    Thanks! Sorry for the issue! :) Thanks to Alexhost! <3

    Tom

    Hi @Not_Oles,

    I've noticed that my VPS has been shut down, but weirdly on Hetrix it hasn't shown any high cpu usage, as seen here on the screenshot:

    Could you please check what has exactly happened there? Also, could you please add my other key, ssh-ed25519 AAAAC3NzaC1lZDI1NTE5AAAAIBDoJsBKotHRqRQCSi+oj4bi9DHfcHuAtIMlgt4aPMhy [email protected] ? It’s fine to reset it to the snapshot, but I’d appreciate if you could let me know what happened to the original VPS.

    Thanks a lot!

    Hi @rickey!

    How should I check exactly what has happened with your VPS?

    With one of the troubled VPSes, the client took a copy of the qcow2 image, the seed.iso, the libvirt xml file, and the backing image. He set everything up in a test environment and did a lot of detective work, but without any definitive result.

    I have looked through everything shallowly with my limited technical skills. I haven't found the root cause.

    I do not know why your VPS and several others were running high CPU. I wish I did know!

    One thing I could do is give you also a copy of your qcow2 image, seed.iso, xml file, and the backing image. Then you would be able to go through and investigate.

    Reverting to the snapshot would change the qcow2 image, so I have not reverted, wanting to save the original state or as much as I could in case you wanted to check it.

    Additionally, none of the other stressed VPSes have successfully reverted to their snapshots. Not even one of the several I tried successfully reverted. After reverting, they go rapidly to very high CPU again.

    For this current situation, based on several trials with different VPSes, reverting to snapshot seems not useful. So I now prefer to go directly to rebuilding from scratch. Of course it's no problem to add your additional ssh key.

    But before I rebuild, do you want copies of your existing files?

    Thanks very much! Sorry for the inconvenience!

    Best!

    Tom

    Hi @Not_Oles,

    rebuilding the VPS from scratch sounds like the most reasonable solution. The VPS hasn't had any important data, so I wouldn't want to waste yours and mine time on recovering the files.

    Thank you for adding my second ssh key. Please go ahead with the rebuild.

  • @Not_Oles said:
    @seoky

    Here is a Yabs from your newly rebuilt VPS. Looks like it might be okay.

    Login should be the same as before. I double checked that your VPS reboots okay and that I can access via ssh on both IPv4 and IPv6.

    My ssh keys are there together with your key. Please feel free to remove my keys.

    Password login is disabled. No need for password for sudo. Default user password same as before. Please feel free to change the password.

    When you have a chance, please post here to let us know if you get in okay and if everything seems okay to you. If you have trouble I will try to assist.

    If you want, when you get your basic install done, please consider letting me know. We can shut down and make another snapshot.

    Sorry about the inconvenience! Thanks for your patience and kindness!

    Best!

    Tom

    ubuntu@vm5:~$ curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu Sep 25 22:57:34 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 7 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2800.002 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 96.8 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-71-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Alexhost SRL
    ASN        : AS200019 ALEXHOST SRL
    Host       : Alexhost SRL
    Location   : Chisinau, Chișinău Municipality (CU)
    Country    : Moldova
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 219.97 MB/s  (54.9k) | 1.97 GB/s    (30.8k)
    Write      | 220.55 MB/s  (55.1k) | 1.98 GB/s    (30.9k)
    Total      | 440.53 MB/s (110.1k) | 3.95 GB/s    (61.7k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.14 GB/s     (4.1k) | 2.22 GB/s     (2.1k)
    Write      | 2.25 GB/s     (4.4k) | 2.37 GB/s     (2.3k)
    Total      | 4.39 GB/s     (8.5k) | 4.59 GB/s     (4.4k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 279 Mbits/sec   | 286 Mbits/sec   | 46.8 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | busy            | busy            | 39.9 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 273 Mbits/sec   | 146 Mbits/sec   | 109 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 241 Mbits/sec   | 245 Mbits/sec   | 149 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 242 Mbits/sec   | 115 Mbits/sec   | 185 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 228 Mbits/sec   | 241 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 123 Mbits/sec   | 33.0 Mbits/sec  | 225 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | 275 Mbits/sec   | 46.8 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 281 Mbits/sec   | 283 Mbits/sec   | 39.6 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 261 Mbits/sec   | 133 Mbits/sec   | 109 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 258 Mbits/sec   | 248 Mbits/sec   | 149 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 247 Mbits/sec   | 136 Mbits/sec   | 185 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 245 Mbits/sec   | 251 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 233 Mbits/sec   | 100 Mbits/sec   | 225 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 585                           
    Multi Core      | 1794                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14071877
    
    YABS completed in 19 min 19 sec
    ubuntu@vm5:~$ 
    

    I might have messed something up, I attempted an OS reinstall, and now the VPS is unreachable (no ping, no SSH). Would you be able to check or see what's going on?

  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider
    edited September 2025

    @seoky Hello!

    Your VPS is back to using high CPU.

    So far, the VPS images have been made with qemu-img's "-b" backing store flag. This saves disk space. However, my guess is that backing store might break some internal OS reinstalls and perhaps also some Docker installs.

    I might try rebuilding your VPS without the backing store. It might work better for you that way.

    I will post again when the rebuild and testing are done.

    Best wishes!

    Tom

  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider

    @seoky

    Your VPS now is remade without the backing store. In other words, you have the full Ubuntu cloud image within your own qcow2.

    Your keys and password remain the same as before.

    Please let me know if you can get in and if everything seems okay.

    If you want, when you get your basic install done, we can make a snapshot. If you have any questions or problems, I will try to help.

    Have fun with your VPS!

    Best wishes!

    Tom

    ubuntu@vmXX:~$ curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri Sep 26 19:54:46 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 11 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2800.002 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 96.8 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.3 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-71-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Alexhost SRL
    ASN        : AS200019 ALEXHOST SRL
    Host       : Alexhost SRL
    Location   : Chisinau, Chișinău Municipality (CU)
    Country    : Moldova
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 202.55 MB/s  (50.6k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 203.08 MB/s  (50.7k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.5k)
    Total      | 405.63 MB/s (101.4k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.8k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.10 GB/s     (4.1k) | 2.16 GB/s     (2.1k)
    Write      | 2.21 GB/s     (4.3k) | 2.30 GB/s     (2.2k)
    Total      | 4.32 GB/s     (8.4k) | 4.46 GB/s     (4.3k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 282 Mbits/sec   | 255 Mbits/sec   | 94.2 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | busy            | busy            | 73.7 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 278 Mbits/sec   | 144 Mbits/sec   | 103 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 236 Mbits/sec   | 237 Mbits/sec   | 153 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 252 Mbits/sec   | 95.6 Mbits/sec  | 183 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 256 Mbits/sec   | 249 Mbits/sec   | 122 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 44.6 Mbits/sec  | 42.8 Mbits/sec  | 227 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 248 Mbits/sec   | 152 Mbits/sec   | 98.4 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 211 Mbits/sec   | 274 Mbits/sec   | 89.4 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 244 Mbits/sec   | 96.2 Mbits/sec  | 103 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 247 Mbits/sec   | 241 Mbits/sec   | 153 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 245 Mbits/sec   | 188 Mbits/sec   | 182 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 248 Mbits/sec   | 229 Mbits/sec   | 122 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 229 Mbits/sec   | 124 Mbits/sec   | 224 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 567                           
    Multi Core      | 1768                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14093929
    
    YABS completed in 19 min 2 sec
    ubuntu@vmXX:~$ 
    
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider

    Hi @JohnDoherty!

    Welcome to LET!

    To answer your question about the "catch," please take a look at the Rules and Warnings section at https://fossvps.org/.

    If you have more questions, please post again.

    Best wishes!

    Tom

  • why is your fish story hosted on google?

  • I arrived at this thread when looking a vps for a tiny non-profit org.
    I have to say I find all this issue quite intriguing. My suspicion is at some driver code interaction with the network. Perhaps a spinlock which is never exited. That would explain that a different OS (OpenBSD). or even a different flavor of Linux not showing it.
    Still, that doesn't explain why other VPS using the same template and host didn't suffer that.

    Regarding debugging, you mention taking a copy of the qcow2 image, the seed.iso, the libvirt xml file, and the backing image. But I think it misses an important piece: a memory dump. The ideal scenario would be to trace what is being run which uses 100% CPU. Is it a userland process? A kernel thread? On which function?

    Not that such debugging would be necessarily easy, though, specially if needing to replicate it on a different environment- But it seems more promising than trying to replicate the issue from just the disk. If the bug is triggered by something external (such as certain network packet), it may never be reproduced locally.

    Thanked by 1Not_Oles
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider
    edited September 2025

    @Jollie said: The ideal scenario would be to trace what is being run which uses 100% CPU. Is it a userland process? A kernel thread? On which function?

    Your suggested scenario sounds like a good idea. It's above my current skill level, but I could try. Unfortunately, the 100% issue has not shown up on any VPS at all during my initial testing. Nor has any issue appeared on the VPS which I have used for testing since the original server install.

    The assigned VPSes are private to the assignees, so I wouldn't go delving into their memory without permission.

    Perhaps I should add that several clients have mentioned issues with Docker and also with scripts which internally reinstall to another OS.

    Recently I have switched to making the VPSes without using the backing store. Now all the new Ubuntu VPSes work great. As you can see I have been posting Yabs from all the newly made VPSes.

    If I see the 100% issue appear on a VPS which I am working on, then we can run memory testing.

    Thanks very much for your helpful comments! I appreciate them very much!

  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider

    Update

    The FOSSVPS website has been updated to show the total of 47 previously assigned VPSes (up from the September 12 count of 40) and the total of 5 VPSes currently available for assignment.

    The FOSSVPS Request List has been updated to move Assigned VPSes to the bottom so that the list of Pending and Accepted Requests at the top of the page is easier to read. If you have a Pending or an Accepted Request, please double check that your Request appears on the List.

    Thanks everyone!

    Thanked by 1BasToTheMax
  • Not_OlesNot_Oles Member, Patron Provider

    @Not_Oles said: All 8 of the overperforming VPSes have been shutdown. From here at LET, @Aphelios, @seoky, @rickey, @thenet, and @BreakaWD are down.

    VPSes for @Aphelios and @seoky have been rebuilt. Can you guys get in to your new VPSes? How are they doing?

    @rickey is next for rebuild.

    @thenet and @BreakaWD Do you want me to rebuild your VPSes?

    Thanks everyone!

Sign In or Register to comment.