Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

OVH VPS adds new regions in Europe and the US

1235710

Comments

  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited September 2025

    I also found out that the vps in localzone is currently the only product by OVH not under status monitoring by OVH: the public cloud in local zones is monitored under public cloud, vps should be monitored under bare metal cloud but those in local zones are not. So your are ending up in a desert there.

  • @OhJohn said:
    .... Or open a refund ticket if you want to keep your sanity.

    where i find the refund ticket
    OVH is a labyrinth

    Thanked by 1marcopolio
  • @vpsTQ said: where i find the refund ticket

    I never had to do a refund ticket before, so I do not know. Maybe search for site:ovhcloud.com "claims request".

    @vpsTQ said: OVH is a labyrinth

    So true.

    Thanked by 2marcopolio satorik
  • support ticket is way to request refund

  • Hm, are those vps really just lxc containers?

  • Well since they removed installation fee refund are not that easy anymore they are checking for eligibility now

  • Well they gave me a refund for the VPS-2 with the Haswell CPU, as soon as I said they should have put that on the website, since it´s misleading, took about 5 minutes, back to my good and old Epyc with 4vcpu and 4GB of ram

  • @GeekZilla said:
    Well they gave me a refund for the VPS-2 with the Haswell CPU, as soon as I said they should have put that on the website, since it´s misleading, took about 5 minutes, back to my good and old Epyc with 4vcpu and 4GB of ram

    I thought the Haswell thing was just what they expose the vCpu as from the hypervisor, but the actual CPU is more recent than that.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4501688/#Comment_4501688

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @Neoon said:
    VM Type : MICROSOFT

    Yuck! With 400 or 500 Mb/s I'm really OK, but that hypervisor? Just yuck!

    Btw., does anyone know whether ISO-installs are supported?

    Based on what I saw so far, my preliminary summary is this:

    • if your use case is very processor bound, maybe get one.
    • if your use case is disk-IO bound, stay away.
    • if your use case is network bound, but not heavy, maybe get one
    • anyway you'll have to live with OVH's way of doing things (often differently and/or weirdly)

    All in all doesn't look very tasty to me, although I had some interest and hopes for Marseille, CZ and CH.

    Thanks in particular to @Neoon and @OhJohn.

  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited September 2025

    @jsg said: Btw., does anyone know whether ISO-installs are supported?

    No, not supported.

    I'm also not really sure if that is a real MS hypervisor (like hyper v) or fake. The errors I'm seeing on that broken VIE hypervisor look for a layman in virtualization like me really like some lxc fucked up, but who knows what OVH is doing there....

    @jsg said: often differently and/or weirdly

    Yepp.

    @jsg said: although I had some interest and hopes for Marseille, CZ and CH

    CZ and CH are ok, Marseille is really not what anyone dreamed of. At the moment Marseille is a "Paris with extra latency" location.

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • @OhJohn said:

    @jsg said: Btw., does anyone know whether ISO-installs are supported?

    No, not supported.

    I'm also not really sure if that is a real MS hypervisor (like hyper v) or fake. The errors I'm seeing on that broken VIE hypervisor look for a layman in virtualization like me really like some lxc fucked up, but who knows what OVH is doing there....

    @jsg said: often differently and/or weirdly

    Yepp.

    @jsg said: although I had some interest and hopes for Marseille, CZ and CH

    CZ and CH are ok, Marseille is really not what anyone dreamed of. At the moment Marseille is a "Paris with extra latency" location.

    I don't think they use Hyper V.
    I have a vague memory that i read once that Yabs reports Windows when the VM has some integration with a Windows guest activated or something ?

  • Also don't think it's Hyper-V. And atm I do not get why I get those Kernel errors from the Host, I always thought that would be more isolated if you do not use a halfway solution like lxc. (Also those are typical lxc errors).
    Maybe they have their own internal hypervisor development based on sth. else?

  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited September 2025

    Wonders will never cease.

    After I renamed the vps on the broken hypervisor in VIE into hypervisor-is-dead the support department finally contacted me again. Unfortunately I've just ordered a replacement as I did not had any positive signs from them or any communications since days.

    Now I bet they will refuse the requested refund as "everything is working now". Lol.

  • I currently have a VPS-3 in GRA with OVH, but found the single core performance pretty poor (YABS gave a score around 900). Out of curiosity I decided to spin up an instance in Dublin Ireland Local Zone, and pretty impressive single core and io:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri Sep 19 09:31:57 UTC 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 5 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 3095.350 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 15.6 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 96.8 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.2 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-54-generic
    VM Type    : MICROSOFT
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : OVH SAS
    ASN        : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host       : OVH Hosting Limited
    Location   : Dublin, Leinster (L)
    Country    : Ireland
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 305.52 MB/s  (76.3k) | 1.07 GB/s    (16.7k)
    Write      | 306.33 MB/s  (76.5k) | 1.07 GB/s    (16.8k)
    Total      | 611.86 MB/s (152.9k) | 2.14 GB/s    (33.5k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.02 GB/s     (1.9k) | 1.00 GB/s      (984)
    Write      | 1.07 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.07 GB/s     (1.0k)
    Total      | 2.09 GB/s     (4.0k) | 2.08 GB/s     (2.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 4.33 Gbits/sec  | 3.94 Gbits/sec  | 10.6 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 12.8 Gbits/sec  | 8.14 Gbits/sec  | 17.6 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 713 Mbits/sec   | 1.33 Gbits/sec  | 106 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 478 Mbits/sec   | 1.38 Gbits/sec  | 165 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 844 Mbits/sec   | 1.67 Gbits/sec  | 140 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.48 Gbits/sec  | 3.06 Gbits/sec  | 79.5 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 866 Mbits/sec   | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 189 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 6.70 Gbits/sec  | 5.45 Gbits/sec  | 10.9 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 3.12 Gbits/sec  | 14.2 Gbits/sec  | 17.6 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.19 Gbits/sec  | 2.74 Gbits/sec  | 107 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 950 Mbits/sec   | 1.39 Gbits/sec  | 165 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.04 Gbits/sec  | 1.58 Gbits/sec  | 140 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.40 Gbits/sec  | 3.10 Gbits/sec  | 79.6 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 940 Mbits/sec   | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 192 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2008
    Multi Core      | 6470
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13911483
    
    YABS completed in 11 min 47 sec
    
  • I think OVH uses Openstack nova for their hypervisor

    Thanked by 1OhJohn
  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited September 2025

    @aeng193 said: Out of curiosity I decided to spin up an instance in Dublin Ireland Local Zone

    Thank you for showing that those public cloud instances do not have that heavy i/o throttling that those vps-in-localzone do have. But than again: the price for your instance per month would be ~14 times the vps-1-in-localzone price...

    Edit: wait: if I read the ovh pages about public cloud correctly: do they have unmetered bw on those machines? With 10gps? I thought that one you have (be-X) would be capped to 1gps?

  • @OhJohn said:

    @aeng193 said: Out of curiosity I decided to spin up an instance in Dublin Ireland Local Zone

    Thank you for showing that those public cloud instances do not have that heavy i/o throttling that those vps-in-localzone do have. But than again: the price for your instance per month would be ~14 times the vps-1-in-localzone price...

    Yep, definately not worth the price premium!

    Edit: wait: if I read the ovh pages about public cloud correctly: do they have unmetered bw on those machines? With 10gps? I thought that one you have (be-X) would be capped to 1gps?

    That caught my attention as well after looking at the benchmarks - order screen states 1000Mbit/s...maybe thats the gauranteed minumum? Seems unlikely though - my second thought was someone forgot to turn on throttling ;)

    Thanked by 1OhJohn
  • @concept said:
    I think OVH uses Openstack nova for their hypervisor

    Cockpit reports that it's Openstack.

    I'm not an expert at all but according to Wikipedia, it seems that Nova "interfaces" with the hypervisor, which is usually KVM but can also be Xen, Hyper-V etc.

  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited September 2025
     Vancouver, BC    33.77 ms    N/A     369.15 Mbps    394.04 Mbps    TELUS - Vancouver, BC
     Calgary, AB      65.89 ms    N/A     373.62 Mbps    394.52 Mbps    Shaw Communications - Calgary, AB
     Winnipeg, MB     26.47 ms    0.0%    372.84 Mbps    394.12 Mbps    Voyageur Internet - Winnipeg, MB
     Toronto, ON      63.05 ms    0.0%    369.79 Mbps    396.93 Mbps    Bell Canada - Toronto, ON
     Montreal, QC     42.66 ms    0.0%    365.19 Mbps    391.97 Mbps    Rogers Wireless - Montréal, QC
    
     New York, NY     47.34 ms    0.0%    373.17 Mbps    393.02 Mbps    Surfshark Ltd - New York, NY
     Ashburn, VA      42.10 ms    0.0%    373.31 Mbps    392.32 Mbps    Rackdog - Ashburn, VA
     Durham, NC       47.24 ms    0.0%    368.27 Mbps    395.30 Mbps    Spectrum - Durham, NC
     Atlanta, GA      33.76 ms    0.0%    368.23 Mbps    391.98 Mbps    Clouvider Ltd - Atlanta, GA
     Miami, FL        65.40 ms    0.0%    372.00 Mbps    389.61 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Miami, FL
     Dallas, TX       19.12 ms    0.0%    368.01 Mbps    392.54 Mbps    Hivelocity - Dallas, TX
     Houston, TX      50.35 ms    N/A     368.56 Mbps    404.97 Mbps    Comcast - Houston, TX
     Kansas, MO       29.13 ms    0.0%    374.24 Mbps    396.16 Mbps    Nocix - Kansas City, MO
     Minneapolis, MN  22.88 ms    0.0%    367.92 Mbps    392.62 Mbps    US Internet - Minneapolis, MN
     Chicago, IL      20.11 ms    0.0%    370.70 Mbps    392.73 Mbps    Hivelocity - Chicago, IL
     Cleveland, OH    61.14 ms    0.0%    375.27 Mbps    397.55 Mbps    Cleveland Broadband - Cleveland, OH
     Albuquerque, NM  52.56 ms    N/A     367.89 Mbps    399.93 Mbps    Comcast - Albuquerque, NM
     Denver, CO       58.15 ms    0.0%    379.21 Mbps    396.06 Mbps    T-Mobile Fiber | Intrepid - Denver, CO
     Portland, OR     47.09 ms    N/A     380.80 Mbps    393.65 Mbps    CenturyLink - Portland, OR
     Las Vegas, NV    54.46 ms    N/A     372.19 Mbps    394.10 Mbps    Boost Mobile - Las Vegas, NV
     Salt Lake, UT    45.71 ms    0.0%    366.81 Mbps    397.79 Mbps    Novva Data Centers - Salt Lake City, UT
     Phoenix, AZ      49.09 ms    0.0%    374.87 Mbps    397.19 Mbps    Xiber LLC - Phoenix, AZ
     Los Angeles, CA  51.04 ms    0.0%    367.37 Mbps    401.63 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
     San Jose, CA     58.80 ms    0.0%    362.46 Mbps    395.43 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - San Jose, CA
     Spokane, WA      38.57 ms    0.0%    367.57 Mbps    389.22 Mbps    Crunchbits - Spokane, WA
     Seattle, WA      31.11 ms    0.0%    365.68 Mbps    391.55 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Seattle, WA
    
     Hermosillo, MX   68.17 ms    0.0%    366.49 Mbps    395.10 Mbps    Megacable - Hermosillo
     Guadalajara, MX  71.38 ms    N/A     375.92 Mbps    100.03 Mbps    AT&T México - Guadalajara
     Mexico City, MX  47.96 ms    N/A     367.83 Mbps    398.48 Mbps    INFINITUM - Ciudad de México
    

    Another local zone one from the pretty useless Marseille class. Why are they are engaged in local IX if everything is backhauled through Washington/Oregon, Virginia, Dallas or even BHS instead?

    Thanked by 1loay
  • Are the localzone VPSs still being routed through the bigger datacentres?

  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited September 2025

    @barbarza said: Are the localzone VPSs still being routed through the bigger datacentres?

    Some yes, some not (and - yeah, as always - also depends on the route.): you get good apples (e.g. PRG/MAD), somewhat good (e.g. VIE/ZRH/BRU/AMS) and bad ones, e.g. MRS. MRS is practically Paris plus extra latency (even for a route to Marseille) as eveything seems to go via Paris.

    (above list is for Europe, right now I'm testing NA and everything is normally a bit worse over there, just try to guess the location of the above nws test)

    As those local zones are pretty fresh (I mean the real public cloud local zones, not the vps in local zones that are even fresher) this might improve in the future. Also don't know if e.g. public cloud has better connections/routes as well or just better pipes.

    Thanked by 3barbarza loay satorik
  • GeekZillaGeekZilla Member
    edited September 2025

    @fredo1664 said:

    @GeekZilla said:
    Well they gave me a refund for the VPS-2 with the Haswell CPU, as soon as I said they should have put that on the website, since it´s misleading, took about 5 minutes, back to my good and old Epyc with 4vcpu and 4GB of ram

    I thought the Haswell thing was just what they expose the vCpu as from the hypervisor, but the actual CPU is more recent than that.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4501688/#Comment_4501688

    Well, all I know is that performance of the 6 CORE VPS2 was 4-5x slower, cpu wise, than the 4 core AMD Epyc. But due to the extra 20Gb of space and 12GB of ram, the VPS-2 and others on this new 2026 line should be fine for those who need extra memory in their setup.

    • For some reason Geekbench is blocked or being blocked from uploading results. So had to compare using sysbench.
  • VPS-1 - Locale SPAIN

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-04-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Sep 22 18:28:03 CEST 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 3 days, 6 hours, 51 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 3095.348 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 7.8 GiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 73.7 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-39-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : MICROSOFT
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : OVH SAS
    ASN        : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host       : OVH Hispano
    Location   : Madrid, Madrid (MD)
    Country    : Spain
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 3.98 MB/s      (995) | 63.69 MB/s     (995)
    Write      | 4.00 MB/s     (1.0k) | 64.11 MB/s    (1.0k)
    Total      | 7.99 MB/s     (1.9k) | 127.81 MB/s   (1.9k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 97.69 MB/s     (190) | 96.45 MB/s      (94)
    Write      | 102.88 MB/s    (200) | 102.88 MB/s    (100)
    Total      | 200.58 MB/s    (390) | 199.33 MB/s    (194)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 381 Mbits/sec   | 342 Mbits/sec   | 25.0 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 386 Mbits/sec   | 341 Mbits/sec   | 29.5 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 372 Mbits/sec   | 231 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 294 Mbits/sec   | 240 Mbits/sec   | 175 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 348 Mbits/sec   | 128 Mbits/sec   | 152 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 363 Mbits/sec   | 257 Mbits/sec   | 100 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 344 Mbits/sec   | 156 Mbits/sec   | 209 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 383 Mbits/sec   | 327 Mbits/sec   | 24.9 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 371 Mbits/sec   | 330 Mbits/sec   | 29.4 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 366 Mbits/sec   | 189 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 347 Mbits/sec   | 248 Mbits/sec   | 175 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 350 Mbits/sec   | 179 Mbits/sec   | 152 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 354 Mbits/sec   | 274 Mbits/sec   | 100 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 57.0 Mbits/sec  | 64.4 Mbits/sec  | 213 ms 
    
  • @aeng193 said: Out of curiosity I decided to spin up an instance in Dublin Ireland Local Zone, and pretty impressive single core and io

    These are monthly right? You paid for one month to test?

  • @network said:
    These are monthly right? You paid for one month to test?

    You can choose different billing cycles.

  • There may be a limitation only on the fio/yabs test. I don't know if it's possible.
    When I test fio test for 4k and yabs, like others did, it is very slow.
    But In real app, when testing redis benchmark, there is no performance degradation at all in aof/bg save which need fsync performance. The same goes for RabbitMQ Quorum Queue.

  • nielsleemansnielsleemans Member, Host Rep

    Does anyone have issues with connecting to external mail ports?
    For example, telnet smtp.gmail.com 587 can't connect from my Brussels VPS, while I have no problems with my Gravelines VPS.

    I have no firewalls installed and iptables is completely open.
    OVH claims that they don't block anything.

  • OhJohnOhJohn Member
    edited October 2025

    @nielsleemans said: Does anyone have issues with connecting to external mail ports?

    Checked and confirmed, cannot telnet to 587 from Brussels but can from Gravelines.

    I think all the mail ports are closed on localzones, e.g. 25 as well.

  • nielsleemansnielsleemans Member, Host Rep

    @OhJohn said:

    @nielsleemans said: Does anyone have issues with connecting to external mail ports?

    Checked and confirmed, cannot telnet to 587 from Brussels but can from Gravelines.

    I think all the mail ports are closed on localzones, e.g. 25 as well.

    Thanks for confirming! I've had to reopen tickets multiple times.

  • Oooo kurwa and it's cheap 🙊

    Thanks

Sign In or Register to comment.