All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Are People Still Interested in NAT VPS? Share Your Thoughts!
Hi everyone,
I’m curious to hear from the community about the current interest in NAT VPS offerings.
A few questions for discussion:
- Are people still looking for NAT VPS solutions in 2025?
- What features are most important to you in a NAT VPS? (e.g., IPv6 support, number of forwarded ports, control panel, pricing, etc.)
- Would you prefer having both IPv6 and NAT IPv4, or just one of them? Why?
- What locations or regions are you most interested in for hosting a NAT VPS?
- Are there any specific use cases or projects you have in mind that make NAT VPS appealing?
I’d love to hear your experiences, preferences, and suggestions. If you’re currently using a NAT VPS, what do you like or dislike about it? And if you’re considering one, what would be your ideal setup?
Looking forward to your replies!
Comments
For me, IPv6 support is the main priority, though not a strict requirement. Other features like the number of forwarded ports or the control panel are secondary.
The only reason to buy a NAT VPS is that it's cheaper than a non-NAT. Otherwise, why put up with the hassle?
Is saving a few bucks on non-NAT that significant, with non-NAT VPSes routinely being sold for $1-a-month or less?
Obviously the answer will vary but for me (and I suspect a lot of people) the NAT price advantage is no longer significant enough. But I could be wrong.
i am interested in $3-4 NAT for VPN use.
anything more would rather go for IPv4 at $5-7.
Agree, when you can find decent spec vps for less than $15/yr and even cheaper with some of these promotions why would you ever bother with nat nonsense?
Also how often do you see nat offers anymore? I bet sales have fallen off dramatically, if they were ever "great".
Only if it's $1-2/year recurring.
People are not generally interested in free services. Nat is free almost, you pay just for dox.
The price of some NAT VPSs are equal the price of IPv4 or IPv6 VPSs, why do I need to buy NAT VPS?
Yes, I love NAT VPS for very simple things like light apps or proxy. Also great to have exotic jurisdictions.
If this is the case then yes, non-NAT is obviously more interesting but it is not always easy to grab super cheap like $3/y VPS servers.
how do i make nat vepees
Only if it is $20.25/month recurring, ephemeral (might disappear at any moment), no SLA, not for business use.
Yes, as long as it's properly discounted: -$1/month with everything else being equal. From provider PoV, IPv6 is practically free; IPv4 costs ~$0.5/month.
For NAT VPS, I don't even need port forwarding, as I'd use cloudflared and/or head/tailscale for such instances anyway. OTOH, missing IPv6 support typically indicates that the provider doesn't know what he's doing.
I agree with this sentiment.
Better IPv4 deals exist than current NAT ones IMHO. You’ll get cheap NAT for 128MB but it’s not even a good deal TBH. Highway robbery for bargain bin shopper.
im interested in nat vps in 2025
I have a number of NAT VPS; IPv6 is a must have. Used for backups, monitoring, and testing. 20 forwarded ports seems a reasonable number. South America and also most of Africa would be interesting.
I need a NAT VPS with very strong CPU, 20 ports are enough.