Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Speedtest or Yabs Speed Tests

xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider

Which do you trust more

Speedtest using the speedtest cli or yabs connection speed test results ?

Comments

  • iperf. So YABS.

    Thanked by 2oloke Carlin0
  • batrabatra Member

    of course yabs

  • YABS is the gold standard of all round benchmarking.

  • xemapsxemaps Member

    I would use both : yabs & speedtest-cli

  • sh97sh97 Member, Host Rep

    I'm biased, but speedtest cli

  • YABS/Iperf.
    I have noticed providers who got DDoS protection that speedtest with speedtest.net such as their cli-script have issues with that. YABS and iperf is no problem. Not sure why tho

  • mustafamw3mustafamw3 Member, Patron Provider, LIR

    Yabs

  • RubbenRubben Member

    @cybertech said:
    YABS is the gold standard of all round benchmarking.

    @jsg is having a heart attack right now reading this

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker
    edited June 2025

    @Rubben said:

    @cybertech said:
    YABS is the gold standard of all round benchmarking.

    @jsg is having a heart attack right now reading this

    Nope, I'm smirking.

    @xHosts said:
    Which do you trust more

    Speedtest using the speedtest cli or yabs connection speed test results ?

    Depends on what one is interested in, as well as the context like enduser on VPS vs. provider looking at pipes. iperf3 (which is used in yabs) may serve well for a provider. speedtest IMO just is a mix of marketing BS and crap.

    As an enduser one usually isn't interested in or ticking in terms of 'pipe' but rather wants to know what a mere mortal enduser can get in terms of actual usage (e.g and in particular http) and some basic latency info (ping) and that's what I wrote my benchmark program for (plus a few other criteria like e.g. being a good neighbour).

    EDIT: btw, what I'm way more interested in, @xHosts, when does your 3 yr promo offer come ? * friendly smile

  • PorlamPorlam Member

    iPerf, so yabs.
    And, I'm making iperf speedtest script.
    https://github.com/GrapeApple0/ipench

  • @xHosts said:
    Which do you trust more

    Speedtest using the speedtest cli or yabs connection speed test results ?

    Some hosts have poor speeds from the servers that YABS uses, either due to bad peering to them specifically or those servers being overly congested from everyone in the world running YABS. If I see subpar speeds with YABS then I will ask for or run a network-speed.xyz test (which uses speedtest-cli), which is more representative of a random sample of hosts my server may communicate with.

  • xHostsxHosts Member, Patron Provider
    edited June 2025

    @jsg said:

    @Rubben said:

    @cybertech said:
    YABS is the gold standard of all round benchmarking.

    @jsg is having a heart attack right now reading this

    Nope, I'm smirking.

    @xHosts said:
    Which do you trust more

    Speedtest using the speedtest cli or yabs connection speed test results ?

    Depends on what one is interested in, as well as the context like enduser on VPS vs. provider looking at pipes. iperf3 (which is used in yabs) may serve well for a provider. speedtest IMO just is a mix of marketing BS and crap.

    As an enduser one usually isn't interested in or ticking in terms of 'pipe' but rather wants to know what a mere mortal enduser can get in terms of actual usage (e.g and in particular http) and some basic latency info (ping) and that's what I wrote my benchmark program for (plus a few other criteria like e.g. being a good neighbour).

    EDIT: btw, what I'm way more interested in, @xHosts, when does your 3 yr promo offer come ? * friendly smile

    I may be doing some long promos soon, working on getting some bulk hardware deals in place with my account manager which has proven more difficult in recent months as the main one I had who had worked for the company 20+ years left at the turn of the year and since then when discussing deals it could be any one of a possible 5 who reply, some are more open to long term deals and agreements on prices while others are more locked on standard pricing.

    I do have a some high bandwidth deals coming in the next few days, using Ryzen 7 CPU's.

    @PineappleM said:

    @xHosts said:
    Which do you trust more

    Speedtest using the speedtest cli or yabs connection speed test results ?

    Some hosts have poor speeds from the servers that YABS uses, either due to bad peering to them specifically or those servers being overly congested from everyone in the world running YABS. If I see subpar speeds with YABS then I will ask for or run a network-speed.xyz test (which uses speedtest-cli), which is more representative of a random sample of hosts my server may communicate with.

    Yes, I have had customers in the past complain yabs displays X but included port states Y when using either speedtest or network-speed all is well. I have even shown a wget file from another provider to show all speeds are as expected but because Yabs displays x and not what they demand they open payment disputes or create a drama.

    I was hoping to get a clear picture like I have so far with replies on what is more reliable because some if Yabs shows something they believe that is 100% fact

    Thanked by 1jsg
This discussion has been closed.