Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

ColoCrossing Database Breach

1293032343539

Comments

  • nohavpsnohavps Member, Host Rep
    edited May 2025

    .

  • nohavpsnohavps Member, Host Rep
    edited May 2025

    delete please

  • zedzed Member

    Hmmm, plot twist. If this is the basis of the cc hack, wouldn't cc loudly point it out? I admit I'm a little confused now, who can eli5?

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @zed said:
    Hmmm, plot twist. If this is the basis of the cc hack, wouldn't cc loudly point it out? I admit I'm a little confused now, who can eli5?

    And of course there is also the hotfix released by Virtualizor on May 28 resolving API and firewall security weaknesses.

    Thanked by 1zed
  • zGatozGato Member
    edited May 2025

    For full context see

    @jbiloh don't want to derail the other thread, so here's my original message:
    I think most of us would still like a clear explanation on what happened and the steps that have been taking to prevent it from happening again in the future.

    You guys really have an insanely big infrastructure and offer dirt cheap VPSs. You guys can do insane stuff at your scale, but still decide to throw it all into the garbage because of these stupid things. I'm really not trying to throw shit but giving my honest opinion. It's a bit more of work, but CC can improve by a lot because the hard stuff is already done. You literally own whole datacenters...
    At your scale, you can offer stuff like unmetered bandwidth for absurd prices since it's basically pennies for you with such gigantic contracts you must have with Cogent, GTT, Telia, ... That's literally a main selling point most other providers can't easily beat.

    Besides what really happened, the lack of communication and straight up lies in the emails is just a no no for me. Be upfront about it, don't try to use vague words. Or the community will do what they're best at.

    Really, people in your team like @Ernie have been super nice to me and I have no plans into ditching ColoCrossing anytime soon.

    By the way, in the "tasks" table, there's literally everything plaintext. Some providers I know of just prune that whole table from time to time (e.g. 24h). Take it as a recommendation, instead of blaming Virtualizor for their (obvious) bad security practice(s).
    Or just ditch them in the first place.

  • jbilohjbiloh Administrator, Veteran

    @zGato said:
    For full context see

    @jbiloh don't want to derail the other thread, so here's my original message:
    I think most of us would still like a clear explanation on what happened and the steps that have been taking to prevent it from happening again in the future.

    You guys really have an insanely big infrastructure and offer dirt cheap VPSs. You guys can do insane stuff at your scale, but still decide to throw it all into the garbage because of these stupid things. I'm really not trying to throw shit but giving my honest opinion. It's a bit more of work, but CC can improve by a lot because the hard stuff is already done. You literally own whole datacenters...
    At your scale, you can offer stuff like unmetered bandwidth for absurd prices since it's basically pennies for you with such gigantic contracts you must have with Cogent, GTT, Telia, ... That's literally a main selling point most other providers can't easily beat.

    Besides what really happened, the lack of communication and straight up lies in the emails is just a no no for me. Be upfront about it, don't try to use vague words. Or the community will do what they're best at.

    Really, people in your team like @Ernie have been super nice to me and I have no plans into ditching ColoCrossing anytime soon.

    By the way, in the "tasks" table, there's literally everything plaintext. Some providers I know of just prune that whole table from time to time (e.g. 24h). Take it as a recommendation, instead of blaming Virtualizor for their (obvious) bad security practice(s).
    Or just ditch them in the first place.

    Appreciate the feedback.

    Lessons have been learned no doubt. A third party firm was brought in to review everything and changes have been made to improve security further within the platform. Obviously I am thankful for Virtualizor's assistance during the recovery and that they have released a hotfix plus more improvements coming.

    It is true that ColoCloud is a very tiny part of ColoCrossing from a revenue perspective, but all customers are important. The team at ColoCloud and the overall enterprise always want to do right by the customers and provide a service worth buying.

    Thanked by 1zGato
  • @Hosteroid said:
    There has been sent official email by Virtualizor/Softaculous..

    Dear Customer,

    We are writing to inform you of a security incident concerning our employee productivity monitoring system.

    It has come to our attention that screenshots taken at regular intervals from our support employee(s) systems were inadvertently stored in a publicly accessible folder. These screenshots may have contained sensitive customer information, including server passwords submitted through our support systems between January and February 2025.

    While the likelihood of any specific password appearing in these screenshots is low, we strongly recommend that you change your server passwords immediately if you submitted them via any of our support channels during this time.

    However, we want to reassure you that there is no known or reported vulnerability in any of our software products.
    None of our infrastructure has been compromised.

    Steps We Are Taking to Mitigate Future Risk:

    • We are introducing a secure method across all products for customers to grant support access using public/private key authentication, eliminating the need to share passwords.
    • All root logins in Virtualizor and Webuzo will trigger an email notification with the IP address of the login attempt.
    • We will display a warning in the Admin Panel if a password is older than 3 months, suggesting a reset.
    • API keys will include a recommendation to restrict access to specific IPs.
    • Our support system will send a follow-up email prompting password resets once a ticket is closed.

    Important Note Regarding Password Storage:
    We have seen some misinformation regarding how we store passwords. Please be assured that all end-user passwords are securely hashed and never stored in plain text.

    Recommended Customer Action:
    We strongly advise all customers to reset any passwords submitted through our support systems (including ticket and chat) as a best practice—not just for our systems, but across any support platform you use.

    We sincerely apologize for this incident and appreciate your prompt attention and understanding as we work to enhance our systems and security protocols.

    Regards,
    The Softaculous Team

    I thought I'd seen/read this email about Virtualizor Live Chat being compromised before, but it seems the wording is slightly different this time, (although the subject/content is pretty much the same):
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/202897/virtualizor-live-chat-compromised

  • @jbiloh said:
    It is true that ColoCloud is a very tiny part of ColoCrossing from a revenue perspective, but all customers are important. The team at ColoCloud and the overall enterprise always want to do right by the customers and provide a service worth buying.

    If "all customers are important", shouldn't ColoCrossing be informing them that their personal data and passwords have leaked?

  • sh97sh97 Member, Host Rep

    @jbiloh would CC offer SLA credits as per the website?
    https://www.colocrossing.com/datacenters/critical-operations/

    Thanked by 2admax geo
  • VeraselVerasel Member

    @sh97 said:
    @jbiloh would CC offer SLA credits as per the website?
    https://www.colocrossing.com/datacenters/critical-operations/

    IMHO, it wouldn't fall under SLA because of force de majeure.

    Considering almost everyone here provides some type of hosting services, I would imagine people would show some empathy and understanding. Absolutely no one wants to experience blackmail/extortion... especially when it's libelous and slanderous as well... I think a lot of people are just happy with the fact that CC team are working on stabilizing everything and making sure it doesn't happen again, and you really can't ask for anything more than that... You are responsible for backups, and you can easily migrate somewhere else if you aren't happy. But, for those that understand that some things really are out of our hands (if you have employees, etc. who also make decisions such as deciding on what vendors to use for billing, automatization, etc.) and all we can do is minimize the damage as much as possible... which was done to begin with (by shutting the nodes down physically).

    We aren't PR experts so I don't see why the official response would matter as much.. after all, it's quite obvious that it was an attack. With or without a response, we are still left with the same situation... so a thorough post-mortem would certainly be helpful, but wouldn't change anything, people would still hate..

  • zedzed Member

    @Verasel said: almost everyone here provides some type of hosting services

    wut?

  • RubbenRubben Member
    edited May 2025

    @zed said:

    @Verasel said: almost everyone here provides some type of hosting services

    wut?

    now that the cat is out of the bag i guess its time to reveal gaysex.host my new dmca ignor, bdsm allowed hosting service starting from $7/year

  • zedzed Member

    Are you guys really all providers begging for $7/yr deals? LOL

    Thanked by 1darkimmortal
  • VeraselVerasel Member

    @zed said:

    @Verasel said: almost everyone here provides some type of hosting services

    wut?

    Majority of the people responding in this topic provide some type of hosting services.

    Am I wrong?

  • chen369chen369 Member

    What is every one doing when they need VNC access on a host that uses this Virtualizor junk?

    This ColoCrossing blocked all VNC and now I can't fucking unlock my luks disk. Fuck

  • defaultdefault Veteran
    edited May 2025

    I am going to call it. I hereby kindly request for ColoCrossing to be banned from LET or at least have all its provider tag removed. The provider has failed to properly inform customers and publicly apologise with full transparency about the situation. This behaviour should have been banned from LowEndTalk, just like other providers have been banned in the past. Preferential treatment should not be granted - all providers should be equal on this community. It has been 1 week since this thread was started - plenty of time, while we're at page 32.

    Tagging administrators and moderators of LET: @trewq / @jbiloh / @FAT32 / @hawc / @Jord / @netomx / @angstrom / @DP / @Arkas

  • GravelyGravely Member

    Someone hit Mr > @default said:

    I am going to call it. I hereby kindly request for ColoCrossing to be banned from LET or at least have all its provider tag removed. The provider has failed to properly inform customers and publicly apologise with full transparency about the situation. This behaviour should have been banned from LowEndTalk, just like other providers have been banned in the past. Preferential treatment should not be granted - all providers should be equal on this community. It has been 1 week since this thread was started - plenty of time, while we're at page 32.

    Tagging administrators and moderators of LET: @trewq / @jbiloh / @FAT32 / @hawc / @Jord / @netomx / @angstrom / @DP / @Arkas

    Could not agree more.

    Thanked by 1default
  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    @default said: The provider has failed to properly inform customers and publicly apologise with full transparency about the situation.

    They did notify customers and they did publicly apologize, so...

    Thanked by 1jsg
  • zGatozGato Member
    edited May 2025

    @dotdotnetworks could it be that you're using the emails from the CC breach to send spam?

    Never registered in your page, and never got any email from you previous to this. Email matches the one I use with ColoCrossing.

  • zGatozGato Member
    edited May 2025

    @raindog308 said:

    @default said: The provider has failed to properly inform customers and publicly apologise with full transparency about the situation.

    They did notify customers and they did publicly apologize, so...

    I completely missed where they notified customers about their personal data being leaked (emails and full names, besides root passwords, vnc passwords, ...). Can you help me out with that?

  • @zGato said:
    @dotdotnetworks could it be that you're using the emails from the CC breach to send spam?

    Never registered in your page, and never got any email from you previous to this. Email matches the one I use with ColoCrossing.

    Wow

  • chen369chen369 Member

    Welll! Time to bring out the popcorn! its about to go down! @dotdotnetworks What do you say about this?

  • zedzed Member

    @zGato said:

    @raindog308 said:

    @default said: The provider has failed to properly inform customers and publicly apologise with full transparency about the situation.

    They did notify customers and they did publicly apologize, so...

    I completely missed where they notified customers about their personal data being leaked (emails and full names, besides root passwords, vnc passwords, ...). Can you help me out with that?

    Yes, wtf @raindog308 they've not acknowledged the data running free in the wild at all and downplayed it in both(?) public comments. Are you even reading this thread? I understand if you haven't been, it's about 97% spam and bullshit, but I think you're mistaken.

    Anyway, calling for a ban is funny and all but I don't think that's realistic. What should be required is proper acknowledgement of what actually happened and notifications to affected customers. I don't care about the apology part but I'm not a customer, they might care about that bit.

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran
    edited May 2025

    @zGato said: I completely missed where they notified customers about their personal data being leaked (emails and full names, besides root passwords, vnc passwords, ...). Can you help me out with that?

    The email notification they sent does mention emails...?

    But anyway, CC is capable of speaking for themselves. I was just pointing out that saying they hadn't informed customers or hadn't apologized at all is inaccurate. Any deficiencies in such notifications are a different story.

  • raindog308raindog308 Administrator, Veteran

    @zed said: Are you even reading this thread? I understand if you haven't been, it's about 97% spam and bullshit,

  • zGatozGato Member
    edited May 2025

    @raindog308 said:

    @zGato said: I completely missed where they notified customers about their personal data being leaked (emails and full names, besides root passwords, vnc passwords, ...). Can you help me out with that?

    The email notification they sent does mention emails...?

    But anyway, CC is capable of speaking for themselves. I was just pointing out that saying they hadn't informed customers or hadn't apologized at all is inaccurate. Any deficiencies in such notifications are a different story.

    "The issue was identified on May 24th and stemmed from a vulnerability in a Single Sign-On (SSO) feature. While this did not impact the ColoCloud billing system (WHMCS) or expose any personal or payment information, the attacker was able to access limited system metadata, email addresses and used our mail server API to send an unauthorized message to ColoCloud customers."

    Doesn't seem like they take email addresses as "personal" information...
    either way, what about full names?

    What I understand from your comment is: let's just say we got hacked. What got hacked? who knows. But we said we got hacked. And that's fine enough.

  • defaultdefault Veteran
    edited May 2025

    @zGato said:
    @dotdotnetworks could it be that you're using the emails from the CC breach to send spam?

    Never registered in your page, and never got any email from you previous to this. Email matches the one I use with ColoCrossing.

    It is possible this would need its own thread, because I feel a smell of popcorn.


    Meanwhile this thread is about ColoCrossing leaking info of many customers. impacting their services as well as other accounts of customers by leaking private information, all without any consequences on the provider tag.

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    Good luck wishing any action be taken...

    It will happen when sun will rise in the west and set in the east.

    Any time now.

  • analoganalog Member

    Looking forward to their sweep everything under the rug low low prices upcoming sale!

  • TrKTrK Member

    @Verasel said:

    @zed said:

    @Verasel said: almost everyone here provides some type of hosting services

    wut?

    Majority of the people responding in this topic provide some type of hosting services.

    Am I wrong?

    You are always spot on for some reasons.

Sign In or Register to comment.