Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

AdvinServers Nuremberg Total Outage

I have been very reluctant to using LET providers for a long time because I'm just not that interested in services with 90% uptime. Well, I recently decided to give AdvinServers a try because they seemed somewhat professional and while performance seemed promising, their entire Nuremberg location just went offline for 30 minutes and counting.

Prefix 45.61.161.0/24 doesn't route anywhere anymore.

I guess time to boycott LET providers again?

«1

Comments

  • vpsricvpsric Member
    edited May 2025

    Boy... it's twice within a week

    I just want to know what exactly happened

  • MumblyMumbly Member

    It's not that bad ... I mean they don't have "regular" outages or anything like that.

    99.976%
    Last 90 days

    Thanked by 1PineappleM
  • why would you boycott everyone here over a provider subnet routing issue? has @Advin said anything?

    Thanked by 1PineappleM
  • zedzed Member

    Jumping ship over a single issue seems a bit dramatic man, and Advin does seem to be one of the more respectable setups here. Take a beat and see what shakes out.

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran
    edited May 2025

    Thanked by 3admax host_c Devsom
  • cloudblastcloudblast Member, Patron Provider

    90% is quite far from 99.96% and advin is known to be a serious provider, sometimes even the good ones hit a rough patch. What matters is how they respond, and from what I’ve seen, Advin does take this stuff seriously.

  • vpsricvpsric Member

    @cloudblast said:
    90% is quite far from 99.96% and advin is known to be a serious provider, sometimes even the good ones hit a rough patch. What matters is how they respond, and from what I’ve seen, Advin does take this stuff seriously.

    Man, can you please kindly recommend some other serious provider?

  • @vpsric said:

    @cloudblast said:
    90% is quite far from 99.96% and advin is known to be a serious provider, sometimes even the good ones hit a rough patch. What matters is how they respond, and from what I’ve seen, Advin does take this stuff seriously.

    Man, can you please kindly recommend some other serious provider?

    Maybe racknerd? I always felt like they're the only ones who respond in the first 20 mins of a new ticket.

  • @ArrowBoi said:

    @vpsric said:

    @cloudblast said:
    90% is quite far from 99.96% and advin is known to be a serious provider, sometimes even the good ones hit a rough patch. What matters is how they respond, and from what I’ve seen, Advin does take this stuff seriously.

    Man, can you please kindly recommend some other serious provider?

    Maybe racknerd? I always felt like they're the only ones who respond in the first 20 mins of a new ticket.

    True that. And also greencloud @NDTN

    Thanked by 1vastness4594
  • @ArrowBoi said:
    Maybe racknerd? I always felt like they're the only ones who respond in the first 20 mins of a new ticket.

    I'd rather host with iHostArt than Alpharacks.

  • post-incident review please.

  • vpsricvpsric Member
    edited May 2025

    @amaeva080 said:

    @ArrowBoi said:

    @vpsric said:

    @cloudblast said:
    90% is quite far from 99.96% and advin is known to be a serious provider, sometimes even the good ones hit a rough patch. What matters is how they respond, and from what I’ve seen, Advin does take this stuff seriously.

    Man, can you please kindly recommend some other serious provider?

    Maybe racknerd? I always felt like they're the only ones who respond in the first 20 mins of a new ticket.

    True that. And also greencloud @NDTN

    Ok , thank you both
    I got racknerd before, and now greencloudvps while something bad happened.
    But I still use greencloudvps as backup option

  • advinserversadvinservers Member, Patron Provider
    edited May 2025

    We apologize. There was an issue with a piece of network equipment in Nuremberg which has now been scheduled for replacement.

    We will send out an RFO soon to all customers in Nuremberg. The downtime was approximately 1hr.

  • RubbenRubben Member

    @advinservers said:
    We apologize. There was an issue with a piece of network equipment in Nuremberg which has now been scheduled for replacement.

    We will send out an RFO soon to all customers in Nuremberg.

    This is one of the reasons why you are rubben approved. No bullshitting, just doing your job.

    Thanked by 1PineappleM
  • There's too much hyperbole here, I have a server online from the Nuremberg area. About last year? There have been two reboots due to hardware issues with the machine, no major drops so far. This is probably the first longer term issue.

    If you haven't had problems for long since you purchased it, that's certainly unfortunate, bro, and deserves sympathy.

    But that's no reason for you to flaunt a mind that didn't graduate elementary school. Way too typical of the attribution fallacy.

  • @Rubben said:

    @advinservers said:
    We apologize. There was an issue with a piece of network equipment in Nuremberg which has now been scheduled for replacement.

    We will send out an RFO soon to all customers in Nuremberg.

    This is one of the reasons why you are rubben approved. No bullshitting, just doing your job.

    no fuck him and everyone else on this bloody forum how dare anything occur. where's the LET manager for every host?

  • RubbenRubben Member

    @unsafetypin said:

    @Rubben said:

    @advinservers said:
    We apologize. There was an issue with a piece of network equipment in Nuremberg which has now been scheduled for replacement.

    We will send out an RFO soon to all customers in Nuremberg.

    This is one of the reasons why you are rubben approved. No bullshitting, just doing your job.

    no fuck him and everyone else on this bloody forum how dare anything occur. where's the LET manager for every host?

    sybau

    Thanked by 2unsafetypin itzgeo
  • @Rubben said:

    @unsafetypin said:

    @Rubben said:

    @advinservers said:
    We apologize. There was an issue with a piece of network equipment in Nuremberg which has now been scheduled for replacement.

    We will send out an RFO soon to all customers in Nuremberg.

    This is one of the reasons why you are rubben approved. No bullshitting, just doing your job.

    no fuck him and everyone else on this bloody forum how dare anything occur. where's the LET manager for every host?

    sybau

    yes sir

  • advinserversadvinservers Member, Patron Provider

    Thanks for the support! However, please don’t attack OP, it is a genuine/valid concern and something that we’re working on improving.

  • If you want nothing less than 100.00% uptime then pay the exorbitant prices that AWS/Azure charge you. LET providers are for those who can tolerate some problems (including downtime) in exchange for far more affordable prices.

    Thanked by 3jsg yoursunny Devsom
  • @PineappleM said:
    If you want nothing less than 100.00% uptime then pay the exorbitant prices that AWS/Azure charge you. LET providers are for those who can tolerate some problems (including downtime) in exchange for far more affordable prices.

    Agree.

    Thanked by 1PineappleM
  • MikeAMikeA Member, Patron Provider

    @PineappleM said: 100.00% uptime then pay the exorbitant prices that AWS/Azure charge you

    Ironically I run a monitoring server on AWS US East and experience routing issues more than any other non-billion dollar networks I use. Sometimes have to disable monitoring alerts on my Amazon stuff. Kinda unrelated but there's really never a 100% flawless option.

    Thanked by 2PineappleM host_c
  • @MikeA said:

    @PineappleM said: 100.00% uptime then pay the exorbitant prices that AWS/Azure charge you

    Ironically I run a monitoring server on AWS US East and experience routing issues more than any other non-billion dollar networks I use. Sometimes have to disable monitoring alerts on my Amazon stuff. Kinda unrelated but there's really never a 100% flawless option.

    What the support said? is it like Contabo "Nothing wrong on our side".

  • RubbenRubben Member

    @PineappleM said:
    If you want nothing less than 100.00% uptime then pay the exorbitant prices that AWS/Azure charge you. LET providers are for those who can tolerate some problems (including downtime) in exchange for far more affordable prices.

    OR, ideally, you could pay $10.08/y for a Tencent Cloud Lighthouse VPS and enjoy the same reliability and uptime without going bankrupt.

  • host_chost_c Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad
    edited May 2025

    @EndlessGravity

    I have seen LET providers beat the uptime compared to BIG players any day of the week/moth/year.

    For example:

    In 2024, Google experienced several outages across its services in Europe. These outages affected Google Cloud and Google Workspace products, with some incidents impacting specific regions and zones within Europe. Notably, a power failure in the europe-west3 region in October led to a partial shutdown of the europe-west3-c zone, affecting multiple Google Cloud services.
    Here's a more detailed look at some of the outages:

    October 23, 2024:
    A power failure in the europe-west3 region led to a partial shutdown of the europe-west3-c zone, affecting multiple Google Cloud services for 7 hours and 39 minutes.

    August 12, 2024:
    Multiple Google Cloud and Google Workspace products experienced connectivity issues in europe-west2 for 40 minutes.

    August 3, 2024:

    Multiple product outages were reported in europe-west9-a, lasting 1 hour and 57 minutes.

    May 16, 2024:
    A bug in routine maintenance led to connectivity issues and service disruptions for multiple Google Cloud products, lasting 2 hours and 48 minutes.

    Other outages:
    There were also instances of individual services like Gmail experiencing outages, such as issues with attachments and server unavailability errors.

    MSFT was even worse, remember _CLOWN_Strike?

    PS:

    Did any of the affected customers get some "compensation boss" ? :D

  • @host_c said:
    @EndlessGravity

    I have seen LET providers beat the uptime compared to BIG players any day of the week/moth/year.

    For example:

    In 2024, Google experienced several outages across its services in Europe. These outages affected Google Cloud and Google Workspace products, with some incidents impacting specific regions and zones within Europe. Notably, a power failure in the europe-west3 region in October led to a partial shutdown of the europe-west3-c zone, affecting multiple Google Cloud services.
    Here's a more detailed look at some of the outages:

    October 23, 2024:
    A power failure in the europe-west3 region led to a partial shutdown of the europe-west3-c zone, affecting multiple Google Cloud services for 7 hours and 39 minutes.

    August 12, 2024:
    Multiple Google Cloud and Google Workspace products experienced connectivity issues in europe-west2 for 40 minutes.

    August 3, 2024:

    Multiple product outages were reported in europe-west9-a, lasting 1 hour and 57 minutes.

    May 16, 2024:
    A bug in routine maintenance led to connectivity issues and service disruptions for multiple Google Cloud products, lasting 2 hours and 48 minutes.

    Other outages:
    There were also instances of individual services like Gmail experiencing outages, such as issues with attachments and server unavailability errors.

    MSFT was even worse, remember _CLOWN_Strike?

    PS:

    Did any of the affected customers get some "compensation boss" ? :D

    I agree. Even with all the redundancies (from spare nodes to spare power to spare fiber), accidents happen. Yet despite this, if a business if highly dependent on online stability, it's best to geographically decentralize the deployment to multiple servers and configure a replication and automated transfer of data at the business level, it's unrealistic to throw all the problems to the service provider.

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • Even Cloudflare, which proxies 20% of the internet, has outages sometimes. You can have the most redundant systems in the world and still have issues. It all depends on how quickly the outage is fixed.

    Thanked by 2Fourplex itzgeo
  • FourplexFourplex Member, Host Rep
    edited May 2025

    Outages happen for both big and small providers.

    I self-hosted Postfix for 11.5+ years (including now) and worked for Microsoft close to Exchange for 5 years before starting Fourplex. Both had outages. But who had the worse outages? Microsoft.

    In fact, my Postfix was mostly on LET VPSes and it's rock-solid. I use Postfix/Dovecot for both my personal and business email (but separate servers).

    Thanked by 1host_c
  • DediRockDediRock Member, Patron Provider

    Every provider is different, always good to try and get to know the owners of them.

    Thanked by 3Fourplex host_c itzgeo
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad
    edited May 2025

    Guys obviously redundancy will be a lot better with the big clouds. The fact that some LET providers have higher uptime in the last 3 months than some GCP service had means jack shit.

    Better just be honest.

    Thanked by 1barbaros
Sign In or Register to comment.