Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Which server OS do you prefer?

hugsinhugsin Member

Hi guys,

I’m curious about your standard workflow when you first receive a new bare‑metal or virtual server.

  1. Reinstallation method
    Do you typically use a low‑level tool or script—such as a dd‑based image writer—to completely wipe and reinstall the OS? If so, what does your automation look like (e.g., custom Bash scripts, Ansible playbooks, PXE boot setups)?

  2. Operating system preference
    Which server OS do you prefer out of the box, and why? For example:

  • Ubuntu Server (e.g., LTS releases)
  • CentOS / Rocky Linux / AlmaLinux
  • Debian
  • Fedora Server
  • Windows Server
  • Others (please specify)
Which server OS do you prefer?
  1. Which server OS do you prefer?164 votes
    1. CentOS
        5.49%
    2. Debian
      65.24%
    3. Windows
        3.66%
    4. Ubuntu
      21.34%
    5. Others
        4.27%
  2. Do you typically use a low‑level tool or script—such as a `dd`‑based image writer—to completely wipe164 votes
    1. yes
      20.73%
    2. no
      79.27%
«1

Comments

  • sliixsliix Member

    Ubuntu | No
    At the end of the day, depends on use case.

  • RubbenRubben Member

    i love almalinux because i can larp as a 'professional enterprise linux sysadmin™'

  • hugsinhugsin Member

    @sliix said:
    Ubuntu | No
    At the end of the day, depends on use case.

    it's true

  • wadhahwadhah Member, Host Rep

    The only sensible option is Debian for general use and Alpine for small containers and less than 1gb ram servers

  • I use Fedora on most of my servers. Or a flavour of RHEL if i need to build packages for RHEL.

  • kuroitkuroit Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    Debian 12.

    Saw an article about Xubuntu the other day, reviews?

    Thanked by 1admax
  • wadhahwadhah Member, Host Rep

    @kuroit said: Saw an article about Xubuntu the other day, reviews?

    It's just Ubuntu but way more lightweight

    Thanked by 1admax
  • nick_nick_ Member

    I use Debian for servers and Ubuntu for desktops.

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    OS/2 warp 4

    Thanked by 1niknar1900
  • bushonobushono Member

    Debian and Alpine...

    Thanked by 1Ed_Chd
  • JencyJency Member
    edited May 2025

    I prefer AlmaLinux because it’s stable, secure, and works well for web hosting. It’s fully compatible with control panels like cPanel, DirectAdmin, and Webuzo.

  • ailiceailice Member

    The penguin-one

    Thanked by 1tjn
  • started from CentOS, after they stopped switched to debian and never looked back.

    Thanked by 2Ed_Chd concept
  • PVE :)

  • it used to be Ubuntu but now it's Debian on servers

    Thanked by 1Ed_Chd
  • MikeAMikeA Member, Patron Provider
    edited May 2025

    @Rubben said:
    i love almalinux because i can larp as a 'professional enterprise linux sysadmin™'

    slander

    Edit: whole business runs almalinux.

    Thanked by 1Ed_Chd
  • TrKTrK Member

    Debian thx!

    Thanked by 1Ed_Chd
  • I understand that Debian's smaller size and reduced bloat are appealing and more stable, but I find the package manager somewhat confusing and prefer to avoid compiling software from source. Therefore, I use Ubuntu.

  • orangevpsorangevps Member, Patron Provider

    AlmaLinux of course.

  • HajtHajt Member

    Ubuntu/Debian

  • RubbenRubben Member

    @MikeA said:

    @Rubben said:
    i love almalinux because i can larp as a 'professional enterprise linux sysadmin™'

    slander

    Edit: whole business runs almalinux.

    be nice to me or I’m making more ads for ExtraVM

  • debian

  • Been using Ubuntu on servers for so long that I would need a good reason to switch.

  • rcy026rcy026 Member

    Depends on the use case of course, but most often Debian/Ubuntu or some BSD. Sometimes RHEL or a derivate due to licensing or support.

    Installation is most often from a plain iso, but I have a bunch of shellscripts that automates some common tasks that I simply paste into console or fetch via scp. Again, depends a lot of the use case.

  • Debian or NixOS

  • Ubuntu

  • tentortentor Member, Host Rep

    @hugsin said: Do you typically use a low‑level tool or script—such as a dd‑based image writer—to completely wipe

    Makes sense only for bare-metal servers, but if supported (trim capability), I always prefer blkdiscard. For very sensitive details you should've had it encrypted at rest (LUKS for FDE or application-specific encryption for partial encryption) and not care about wiping at all.

  • Depending on the mood, it's either Debian or Ubuntu

  • szymonpszymonp Member

    Usually the debian image provider by the host, when I need windows I'll use a reinstallation script to get windows running in my native language

  • alfatarsosalfatarsos Member, Host Rep
    edited May 2025

    Roughly 90% of my systems are on Debian, the remainder 10% AlmaLinux. I am interested in learning more about FreeBSD now.

    I've attempted to install Ubuntu Server only once onto a production server some 5 months ago - because of the long support promised and live patching... - and that has gone horribly wrong: Ubuntu managed to break a package internally (!) at the networking level; created stupid difficulties on bridging the v4 connectivity to NAT64 on some Debian installs; and ultimately caused an entire server to grind to a halt at the disk level.

    Even Debian Unstable is better than Ubuntu. Canonical is seriously getting their foot wrong.

    Never, never again. Been with Debian at that server since that and it's absolute peace.

Sign In or Register to comment.