Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HostBrr | Two year anniversary deals | AMD EPYC Turin + Block Storage | Flash deals !

1232426282959

Comments

  • FlqFlq Member

    My flash-1 is still pending :'(

    Thanked by 1PineappleM
  • Anyone got a YABS to share for the 9950X VDS?

  • @hyperblast said:
    @labze something is wrong with your windows server-iso / settings! with linux the box hums as i had hoped.

    Whenever you’re bored, can you try mounting your own windows ISO + install virtio drivers?

  • wadhahwadhah Member, Host Rep
    edited April 2025

    @Flq said:
    My flash-1 is still pending :'(

    you should cancel it, i'll grab it, i'm a lot more patient

  • @labze said:

    FLASH DEAL 2 (The lazy one)

    40% OFF RECURRING 9950X VDS

    Coupon: tAxSF4PX

    https://my.hostbrr.com/order/main/packages/9950XP/?group_id=61&currency=EUR

    Coupon is not working :(

  • ZyraZyra Member

    Yabs for FLASH DEAL 2 (The lazy one) (1 core)

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 1 @ 4291.928 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM : 5.7 GiB
    Swap : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk : 72.6 GiB
    Distro : Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS
    Kernel : 5.15.0-138-generic
    VM Type : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:

    ISP : dataforest GmbH
    ASN : AS58212 dataforest GmbH
    Host : dataforest GmbH
    Location : Kriftel, Hesse (HE)
    Country : Germany

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 423.79 MB/s (105.9k) 1.43 GB/s (22.3k)
    Write 424.91 MB/s (106.2k) 1.43 GB/s (22.4k)
    Total 848.70 MB/s (212.1k) 2.87 GB/s (44.8k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 1.46 GB/s (2.8k) 1.42 GB/s (1.3k)
    Write 1.54 GB/s (3.0k) 1.52 GB/s (1.4k)
    Total 3.00 GB/s (5.8k) 2.94 GB/s (2.8k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Clouvider London, UK (10G) 8.19 Gbits/sec 7.69 Gbits/sec 14.1 ms
    Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 8.95 Gbits/sec 8.57 Gbits/sec 8.95 ms
    Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 1.76 Gbits/sec 1.10 Gbits/sec 88.5 ms
    Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 641 Mbits/sec 965 Mbits/sec --
    Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 940 Mbits/sec 1.16 Gbits/sec 135 ms
    Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 2.10 Gbits/sec 1.97 Gbits/sec 84.1 ms
    Edgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 739 Mbits/sec 886 Mbits/sec 189 ms

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Clouvider London, UK (10G) 6.55 Gbits/sec 7.79 Gbits/sec 14.0 ms
    Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 8.87 Gbits/sec 9.03 Gbits/sec 7.92 ms
    Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 1.81 Gbits/sec 2.03 Gbits/sec 88.5 ms
    Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 678 Mbits/sec 1.09 Gbits/sec 162 ms
    Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 969 Mbits/sec 1.26 Gbits/sec 135 ms
    Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 1.96 Gbits/sec 2.23 Gbits/sec 83.2 ms
    Edgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 921 Mbits/sec 929 Mbits/sec 189 ms

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2530
    Multi Core | 2682
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11596537

    YABS completed in 12 min 49 sec

  • FlqFlq Member

    9950X VDS yabs:

    # curl -sL https://yabs.sh | bash -s -- -
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-01-01                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sun 20 Apr 2025 06:27:53 AM JST
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 5 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 4291.916 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 11.7 GiB
    Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk       : 150.0 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 11 (bullseye)
    Kernel     : 5.10.0-20-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : dataforest GmbH
    ASN        : AS58212 dataforest GmbH
    Host       : dataforest GmbH
    Location   : Kriftel, Hesse (HE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 603.91 MB/s (150.9k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.5k)
    Write      | 605.51 MB/s (151.3k) | 1.96 GB/s    (30.6k)
    Total      | 1.20 GB/s   (302.3k) | 3.91 GB/s    (61.1k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.24 GB/s     (4.3k) | 1.65 GB/s     (1.6k)
    Write      | 2.36 GB/s     (4.6k) | 1.76 GB/s     (1.7k)
    Total      | 4.61 GB/s     (9.0k) | 3.41 GB/s     (3.3k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 6.77 Gbits/sec  | 5.78 Gbits/sec  | 14.1 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 8.95 Gbits/sec  | 8.03 Gbits/sec  | 7.97 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.49 Gbits/sec  | 960 Mbits/sec   | 91.8 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 649 Mbits/sec   | 1.11 Gbits/sec  | 162 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 706 Mbits/sec   | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 135 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.69 Gbits/sec  | 1.97 Gbits/sec  | 84.4 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 701 Mbits/sec   | 854 Mbits/sec   | 191 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 8.10 Gbits/sec  | 7.78 Gbits/sec  | 14.1 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.03 Gbits/sec  | 8.48 Gbits/sec  | 7.94 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.68 Gbits/sec  | 2.00 Gbits/sec  | 90.8 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 763 Mbits/sec   | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 162 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.03 Gbits/sec  | 1.22 Gbits/sec  | 135 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.82 Gbits/sec  | 2.24 Gbits/sec  | 83.6 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 923 Mbits/sec   | 933 Mbits/sec   | 187 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 2761                          
    Multi Core      | 4779                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11596547
    
    YABS completed in 11 min 28 sec
    

    However this comes with wrong specs, what I ordered is 9950X-18GBrr - VDS
    :s

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @barbaros said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:

    @maverick said:

    @NET18 said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @NET18 said:

    @NHNHNH000 said:

    @NET18 said: poor server performance

    what? it's gb5 in your previous text not gb6

    Here are the GB5 benchmark results for the EPYC 9655 VPS from another provider

    Refund it back if you don’t like it.

    But what price do you pay for the other provider? Same/similar? Hosts can control CPU limits at the hypervisor level.

    Calling it poor performance is a large stretch, especially when most hosts here don’t even exceed 1000 on GB6.

    Dude, this ain't normal performance at all. The AES-XTS is performing like crap, which proves something's definitely wrong here. The disk read/write speeds are way off too. Maybe you're just used to those crappy low-performance servers

    while you might be onto something, man... you're in full panic mode, just don't forget that you have 7 days to refund, don't take your life because you found a bug in GB or something like that :D

    Here, do this on both your turin's and show how crap this one is, i don't have 2 turins to compare, but you can:

    # openssl speed -evp aes-128-xts
    [...]
    type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
    AES-128-XTS    1129156.79k  3811952.23k  7514381.48k 11155585.71k 13042322.09k 13371479.38k
    

    From Turin from another provider (3 core AMD EPYC 9655)

    type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes
    AES-128-XTS    1206917.75k  3967885.85k  7565387.61k 11079769.43k 12758062.42k 13081133.06k
    

    I see minimal difference.

    u like my intel platinum 8160 @ 2ghz ?

    type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes 16384 bytes
    AES-128-XTS 192370.77k 720906.83k 1900262.01k 3184907.82k 4048213.33k 4141313.29k

    Don't kill that Pentium. Like @Saragoldfarb killed her RPI while YABSing.

    My rpi is now suffering from PTSD. Make sure it's worth the trauma in advance.

    Thanked by 2barbaros beanman109
  • ZyraZyra Member

    @Flq said:
    However this comes with wrong specs, what I ordered is 9950X-18GBrr - VDS

    this looks like the 12GBrr one, 2 cores 12gb ram 150gb nvme

    Thanked by 2PineappleM Flq
  • Interesting that the Turin is nearly as good as the 9950X in single-threaded performance (but has 6x more CPU cores). I marvel at how chip manufacturers continue to achieve generational leaps in CPU performance.

    Thanked by 1maverick
  • @PineappleM said:
    Interesting that the Turin is nearly as good as the 9950X in single-threaded performance (but has 6x more CPU cores). I marvel at how chip manufacturers continue to achieve generational leaps in CPU performance.

    We no longer need desktop class cpu. All in server.

    Thanked by 2maverick PineappleM
  • lukast__lukast__ Member, Megathread Squad
    edited April 2025

    @Zyra said: Single Core | 2530

    Looks rather low for 9950X, especially as it's a VDS, it should be 3000-3500 I think?

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @lukast__ said:

    @Zyra said: Single Core | 2530

    Looks rather low for 9950X, especially as it's a VDS, it should be 3000-3500 I think?

    Yes and no. It might be on the low side but not unreasonably so.

    Do keep in mind that the people that benefit from a VDS is people that need consistently high CPU usage that might otherwise be disallowed on a VPS. The benefit is being allowed to blast the CPU 100% 24/7 if you so desire. The downside of a VDS is that your neighbors are allowed to do the same.

    Even though every core is dedicated to your system in a VDS, the overall performance on the system still drops as overall loads increases. As overall load rises, temperature does too and so the max boost clock of cores reduces.

  • PineappleMPineappleM Member
    edited April 2025

    @lukast__ said:

    @Zyra said: Single Core | 2530

    Looks rather low for 9950X, especially as it's a VDS, it should be 3000-3500 I think?

    When I first got my Linveo 9950X VPS I was getting 3300 (smack in the middle of your range) on a single core, presumably since I was put on an empty-ish node. After the node was filled, it is now at around 2600, which is not far from these VDS YABS. So yes you're right, but for a dedicated server or a fresh node.

    That said, considering a VDS lets you hammer the CPU 100% all the time (i.e. have consistently noisy neighbors), that the GB6 is still achieving 2500 with the CPU under constant load is really good.

  • wheres the flash i need it now

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @cybertech said:

    wheres the flash i need it now

    Thanked by 1maverick
  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member
    edited April 2025

    @PineappleM said:

    @lukast__ said:

    @Zyra said: Single Core | 2530

    Looks rather low for 9950X, especially as it's a VDS, it should be 3000-3500 I think?

    When I first got my Linveo 9950X VPS I was getting 3300 (smack in the middle of your range) on a single core, presumably since I was put on an empty-ish node. After the node was filled, it is now at around 2600, which is not far from these VDS YABS. So yes you're right, but for a dedicated server or a fresh node.

    That said, considering a VDS lets you hammer the CPU 100% all the time (i.e. have consistently noisy neighbors), that the GB6 is still achieving 2500 with the CPU under constant load is really good.

    This is the reason why I am starting to believe VDS has lower money to value ratio than a vps. If noisy neighbor (in terms of cpu usage) could affect your cpu performance from 3000-3500 to 2600; then alternatively vps is rather good option.

    Because you are already using 75-80% only of what a single core can do. But you are paying around $8 or $9 for that.

    Instead of that, go for fair share vps and throttle the cpu to 75% by yourself. In this case, your 75% performance will be guaranteed to because a good provider will throttle the noisy neighbours to 50% if they use the cpu for 100% for longer period.

    This whole VDS just gives 10-15% more priviledge and frees one from throttling the cpu by themselves. But the price becomes way more than what it provides.

    Thanked by 1PineappleM
  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @itachikonoha said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @lukast__ said:

    @Zyra said: Single Core | 2530

    Looks rather low for 9950X, especially as it's a VDS, it should be 3000-3500 I think?

    When I first got my Linveo 9950X VPS I was getting 3300 (smack in the middle of your range) on a single core, presumably since I was put on an empty-ish node. After the node was filled, it is now at around 2600, which is not far from these VDS YABS. So yes you're right, but for a dedicated server or a fresh node.

    That said, considering a VDS lets you hammer the CPU 100% all the time (i.e. have consistently noisy neighbors), that the GB6 is still achieving 2500 with the CPU under constant load is really good.

    This is the reason why I am starting to believe VDS has lower money to value ratio than a vps. If noisy neighbor (in terms of cpu usage) could affect your cpu performance from 3000-3500 to 2600; then alternatively vps is rather good option.

    Because you are already using 75-80% only of what a single core can do. But you are paying around $8 or $9 for that.

    Instead of that, go for fair share vps and throttle the cpu to 75% by yourself. In this case, your 75% performance will be guaranteed to because a good provider will throttle the noisy neighbours to 50% if they use the cpu for 100% for longer period.

    This whole VDS just gives 10-15% more priviledge and frees one from throttling the cpu by themselves. But the price becomes way more than what it provides.

    What vps provider allows one to abuse the cores 24x7 @ 75%?

  • @plumberg said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @lukast__ said:

    @Zyra said: Single Core | 2530

    Looks rather low for 9950X, especially as it's a VDS, it should be 3000-3500 I think?

    When I first got my Linveo 9950X VPS I was getting 3300 (smack in the middle of your range) on a single core, presumably since I was put on an empty-ish node. After the node was filled, it is now at around 2600, which is not far from these VDS YABS. So yes you're right, but for a dedicated server or a fresh node.

    That said, considering a VDS lets you hammer the CPU 100% all the time (i.e. have consistently noisy neighbors), that the GB6 is still achieving 2500 with the CPU under constant load is really good.

    This is the reason why I am starting to believe VDS has lower money to value ratio than a vps. If noisy neighbor (in terms of cpu usage) could affect your cpu performance from 3000-3500 to 2600; then alternatively vps is rather good option.

    Because you are already using 75-80% only of what a single core can do. But you are paying around $8 or $9 for that.

    Instead of that, go for fair share vps and throttle the cpu to 75% by yourself. In this case, your 75% performance will be guaranteed to because a good provider will throttle the noisy neighbours to 50% if they use the cpu for 100% for longer period.

    This whole VDS just gives 10-15% more priviledge and frees one from throttling the cpu by themselves. But the price becomes way more than what it provides.

    What vps provider allows one to abuse the cores 24x7 @ 75%?

    I have tested fair share of different providers by changing cpu usage time to time. Most providers don't mind 75%.

    If you cross that 75%, then their throttle comes in (It happened to me couple of times.)

    But keeping the cpu to 75% throttled myself, it doesn't trigger throttle from providers I used.

    Thanked by 1Penguin
  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @itachikonoha said:

    @plumberg said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @lukast__ said:

    @Zyra said: Single Core | 2530

    Looks rather low for 9950X, especially as it's a VDS, it should be 3000-3500 I think?

    When I first got my Linveo 9950X VPS I was getting 3300 (smack in the middle of your range) on a single core, presumably since I was put on an empty-ish node. After the node was filled, it is now at around 2600, which is not far from these VDS YABS. So yes you're right, but for a dedicated server or a fresh node.

    That said, considering a VDS lets you hammer the CPU 100% all the time (i.e. have consistently noisy neighbors), that the GB6 is still achieving 2500 with the CPU under constant load is really good.

    This is the reason why I am starting to believe VDS has lower money to value ratio than a vps. If noisy neighbor (in terms of cpu usage) could affect your cpu performance from 3000-3500 to 2600; then alternatively vps is rather good option.

    Because you are already using 75-80% only of what a single core can do. But you are paying around $8 or $9 for that.

    Instead of that, go for fair share vps and throttle the cpu to 75% by yourself. In this case, your 75% performance will be guaranteed to because a good provider will throttle the noisy neighbours to 50% if they use the cpu for 100% for longer period.

    This whole VDS just gives 10-15% more priviledge and frees one from throttling the cpu by themselves. But the price becomes way more than what it provides.

    What vps provider allows one to abuse the cores 24x7 @ 75%?

    I have tested fair share of different providers by changing cpu usage time to time. Most providers don't mind 75%.

    If you cross that 75%, then their throttle comes in (It happened to me couple of times.)

    But keeping the cpu to 75% throttled myself, it doesn't trigger throttle from providers I used.

    Cool so if I am hearing you, some providers are cool with you hammering the alloted cores at 75% 24x7?

    Really would love to know the providers. Would you mind sharing them over dm? Thnx

    Thanked by 1Penguin
  • @itachikonoha said:

    @plumberg said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @lukast__ said:

    @Zyra said: Single Core | 2530

    Looks rather low for 9950X, especially as it's a VDS, it should be 3000-3500 I think?

    When I first got my Linveo 9950X VPS I was getting 3300 (smack in the middle of your range) on a single core, presumably since I was put on an empty-ish node. After the node was filled, it is now at around 2600, which is not far from these VDS YABS. So yes you're right, but for a dedicated server or a fresh node.

    That said, considering a VDS lets you hammer the CPU 100% all the time (i.e. have consistently noisy neighbors), that the GB6 is still achieving 2500 with the CPU under constant load is really good.

    This is the reason why I am starting to believe VDS has lower money to value ratio than a vps. If noisy neighbor (in terms of cpu usage) could affect your cpu performance from 3000-3500 to 2600; then alternatively vps is rather good option.

    Because you are already using 75-80% only of what a single core can do. But you are paying around $8 or $9 for that.

    Instead of that, go for fair share vps and throttle the cpu to 75% by yourself. In this case, your 75% performance will be guaranteed to because a good provider will throttle the noisy neighbours to 50% if they use the cpu for 100% for longer period.

    This whole VDS just gives 10-15% more priviledge and frees one from throttling the cpu by themselves. But the price becomes way more than what it provides.

    What vps provider allows one to abuse the cores 24x7 @ 75%?

    I have tested fair share of different providers by changing cpu usage time to time. Most providers don't mind 75%.

    If you cross that 75%, then their throttle comes in (It happened to me couple of times.)

    But keeping the cpu to 75% throttled myself, it doesn't trigger throttle from providers I used.

    DM me the provider names too please

  • @plumberg said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @plumberg said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @lukast__ said:

    @Zyra said: Single Core | 2530

    Looks rather low for 9950X, especially as it's a VDS, it should be 3000-3500 I think?

    When I first got my Linveo 9950X VPS I was getting 3300 (smack in the middle of your range) on a single core, presumably since I was put on an empty-ish node. After the node was filled, it is now at around 2600, which is not far from these VDS YABS. So yes you're right, but for a dedicated server or a fresh node.

    That said, considering a VDS lets you hammer the CPU 100% all the time (i.e. have consistently noisy neighbors), that the GB6 is still achieving 2500 with the CPU under constant load is really good.

    This is the reason why I am starting to believe VDS has lower money to value ratio than a vps. If noisy neighbor (in terms of cpu usage) could affect your cpu performance from 3000-3500 to 2600; then alternatively vps is rather good option.

    Because you are already using 75-80% only of what a single core can do. But you are paying around $8 or $9 for that.

    Instead of that, go for fair share vps and throttle the cpu to 75% by yourself. In this case, your 75% performance will be guaranteed to because a good provider will throttle the noisy neighbours to 50% if they use the cpu for 100% for longer period.

    This whole VDS just gives 10-15% more priviledge and frees one from throttling the cpu by themselves. But the price becomes way more than what it provides.

    What vps provider allows one to abuse the cores 24x7 @ 75%?

    I have tested fair share of different providers by changing cpu usage time to time. Most providers don't mind 75%.

    If you cross that 75%, then their throttle comes in (It happened to me couple of times.)

    But keeping the cpu to 75% throttled myself, it doesn't trigger throttle from providers I used.

    Cool so if I am hearing you, some providers are cool with you hammering the alloted cores at 75% 24x7?

    Really would love to know the providers. Would you mind sharing them over dm? Thnx

    There's no particular providers. Use any and test it. At max, you'll get throttled to lower threshold for a day or two. Then change the parameters.

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @itachikonoha said:

    @plumberg said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @plumberg said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @lukast__ said:

    @Zyra said: Single Core | 2530

    Looks rather low for 9950X, especially as it's a VDS, it should be 3000-3500 I think?

    When I first got my Linveo 9950X VPS I was getting 3300 (smack in the middle of your range) on a single core, presumably since I was put on an empty-ish node. After the node was filled, it is now at around 2600, which is not far from these VDS YABS. So yes you're right, but for a dedicated server or a fresh node.

    That said, considering a VDS lets you hammer the CPU 100% all the time (i.e. have consistently noisy neighbors), that the GB6 is still achieving 2500 with the CPU under constant load is really good.

    This is the reason why I am starting to believe VDS has lower money to value ratio than a vps. If noisy neighbor (in terms of cpu usage) could affect your cpu performance from 3000-3500 to 2600; then alternatively vps is rather good option.

    Because you are already using 75-80% only of what a single core can do. But you are paying around $8 or $9 for that.

    Instead of that, go for fair share vps and throttle the cpu to 75% by yourself. In this case, your 75% performance will be guaranteed to because a good provider will throttle the noisy neighbours to 50% if they use the cpu for 100% for longer period.

    This whole VDS just gives 10-15% more priviledge and frees one from throttling the cpu by themselves. But the price becomes way more than what it provides.

    What vps provider allows one to abuse the cores 24x7 @ 75%?

    I have tested fair share of different providers by changing cpu usage time to time. Most providers don't mind 75%.

    If you cross that 75%, then their throttle comes in (It happened to me couple of times.)

    But keeping the cpu to 75% throttled myself, it doesn't trigger throttle from providers I used.

    Cool so if I am hearing you, some providers are cool with you hammering the alloted cores at 75% 24x7?

    Really would love to know the providers. Would you mind sharing them over dm? Thnx

    There's no particular providers. Use any and test it. At max, you'll get throttled to lower threshold for a day or two. Then change the parameters.

    Sure. More like try till you're caught.

  • @itachikonoha said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @lukast__ said:

    @Zyra said: Single Core | 2530

    Looks rather low for 9950X, especially as it's a VDS, it should be 3000-3500 I think?

    When I first got my Linveo 9950X VPS I was getting 3300 (smack in the middle of your range) on a single core, presumably since I was put on an empty-ish node. After the node was filled, it is now at around 2600, which is not far from these VDS YABS. So yes you're right, but for a dedicated server or a fresh node.

    That said, considering a VDS lets you hammer the CPU 100% all the time (i.e. have consistently noisy neighbors), that the GB6 is still achieving 2500 with the CPU under constant load is really good.

    This is the reason why I am starting to believe VDS has lower money to value ratio than a vps. If noisy neighbor (in terms of cpu usage) could affect your cpu performance from 3000-3500 to 2600; then alternatively vps is rather good option.

    Because you are already using 75-80% only of what a single core can do. But you are paying around $8 or $9 for that.

    Instead of that, go for fair share vps and throttle the cpu to 75% by yourself. In this case, your 75% performance will be guaranteed to because a good provider will throttle the noisy neighbours to 50% if they use the cpu for 100% for longer period.

    This whole VDS just gives 10-15% more priviledge and frees one from throttling the cpu by themselves. But the price becomes way more than what it provides.

    To maximize the benefit, we need to find a discounted VDS with a similar price to a VPS. However, VPS providers often offer discounts as well. How can we break this cycle and make a cost-effective decision?

  • @plumberg said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @plumberg said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @plumberg said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @lukast__ said:

    @Zyra said: Single Core | 2530

    Looks rather low for 9950X, especially as it's a VDS, it should be 3000-3500 I think?

    When I first got my Linveo 9950X VPS I was getting 3300 (smack in the middle of your range) on a single core, presumably since I was put on an empty-ish node. After the node was filled, it is now at around 2600, which is not far from these VDS YABS. So yes you're right, but for a dedicated server or a fresh node.

    That said, considering a VDS lets you hammer the CPU 100% all the time (i.e. have consistently noisy neighbors), that the GB6 is still achieving 2500 with the CPU under constant load is really good.

    This is the reason why I am starting to believe VDS has lower money to value ratio than a vps. If noisy neighbor (in terms of cpu usage) could affect your cpu performance from 3000-3500 to 2600; then alternatively vps is rather good option.

    Because you are already using 75-80% only of what a single core can do. But you are paying around $8 or $9 for that.

    Instead of that, go for fair share vps and throttle the cpu to 75% by yourself. In this case, your 75% performance will be guaranteed to because a good provider will throttle the noisy neighbours to 50% if they use the cpu for 100% for longer period.

    This whole VDS just gives 10-15% more priviledge and frees one from throttling the cpu by themselves. But the price becomes way more than what it provides.

    What vps provider allows one to abuse the cores 24x7 @ 75%?

    I have tested fair share of different providers by changing cpu usage time to time. Most providers don't mind 75%.

    If you cross that 75%, then their throttle comes in (It happened to me couple of times.)

    But keeping the cpu to 75% throttled myself, it doesn't trigger throttle from providers I used.

    Cool so if I am hearing you, some providers are cool with you hammering the alloted cores at 75% 24x7?

    Really would love to know the providers. Would you mind sharing them over dm? Thnx

    There's no particular providers. Use any and test it. At max, you'll get throttled to lower threshold for a day or two. Then change the parameters.

    Sure. More like try till you're caught.

    I beg to differ.

    Most ToS in fair share doesn't write cpu usage as concrete. There are vague terms in these contracts which many providers use it as they like by changing the interpretation.

    When the ToS is vague, as a customer, I have no other way of knowing the fair share except pushing the limits. Once I know, I throttle myself under that threshold.

  • @Motion3549 said:

    @itachikonoha said:

    @PineappleM said:

    @lukast__ said:

    @Zyra said: Single Core | 2530

    Looks rather low for 9950X, especially as it's a VDS, it should be 3000-3500 I think?

    When I first got my Linveo 9950X VPS I was getting 3300 (smack in the middle of your range) on a single core, presumably since I was put on an empty-ish node. After the node was filled, it is now at around 2600, which is not far from these VDS YABS. So yes you're right, but for a dedicated server or a fresh node.

    That said, considering a VDS lets you hammer the CPU 100% all the time (i.e. have consistently noisy neighbors), that the GB6 is still achieving 2500 with the CPU under constant load is really good.

    This is the reason why I am starting to believe VDS has lower money to value ratio than a vps. If noisy neighbor (in terms of cpu usage) could affect your cpu performance from 3000-3500 to 2600; then alternatively vps is rather good option.

    Because you are already using 75-80% only of what a single core can do. But you are paying around $8 or $9 for that.

    Instead of that, go for fair share vps and throttle the cpu to 75% by yourself. In this case, your 75% performance will be guaranteed to because a good provider will throttle the noisy neighbours to 50% if they use the cpu for 100% for longer period.

    This whole VDS just gives 10-15% more priviledge and frees one from throttling the cpu by themselves. But the price becomes way more than what it provides.

    To maximize the benefit, we need to find a discounted VDS with a similar price to a VPS. However, VPS providers often offer discounts as well. How can we break this cycle and make a cost-effective decision?

    There is no breaking of cycle in my eyes. VDS is one product which is neither here nor there. You can't mix it up with different ranges to make up for the loss. I can't see prices going down unless there's some promotion.

    It is one product where people gets mislead a lot. In my experience, it is better to buy a vps of 9950x or turin processor then blast till 60-65% than buying a vds of some weak epyc processor at a higher price. If we go out of LET (where the concept of yabs is a bit rare), people do get mislead a lot.

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    bought thinking it was an actual dedicated core not just a dedicated thread and no refunds for flash sales either so guess i'm stuck with this one now. regret buying the year upfront this time.

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-01-01                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sun Apr 20 04:28:49 AM BST 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 4291.928 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 5.8 GiB
    Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk       : 74.9 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-9-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : IP Interactive
    ASN        : AS214902 Philip Fjaera trading as PFWeb Solutions
    Host       : rootbash.com - IT services
    Location   : Berlin, State of Berlin (BE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 498.66 MB/s (124.6k) | 1.45 GB/s    (22.7k)
    Write      | 499.98 MB/s (124.9k) | 1.46 GB/s    (22.8k)
    Total      | 998.64 MB/s (249.6k) | 2.91 GB/s    (45.5k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.57 GB/s     (3.0k) | 1.42 GB/s     (1.3k)
    Write      | 1.66 GB/s     (3.2k) | 1.51 GB/s     (1.4k)
    Total      | 3.23 GB/s     (6.3k) | 2.93 GB/s     (2.8k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 7.43 Gbits/sec  | 6.66 Gbits/sec  | 15.9 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 9.35 Gbits/sec  | 8.25 Gbits/sec  | 7.92 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.45 Gbits/sec  | 1.34 Gbits/sec  | 97.7 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 507 Mbits/sec   | 1.10 Gbits/sec  | 162 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 892 Mbits/sec   | 838 Mbits/sec   | 145 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.58 Gbits/sec  | 1.97 Gbits/sec  | 83.7 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 864 Mbits/sec   | 668 Mbits/sec   | 197 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 2606                          
    Multi Core      | 2664                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/11599615
    
    YABS completed in 9 min 27 sec
    
  • @beanman109 it was written vCore I think.

    Put it up for transfer later. I may buy it if I have the cash.

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad
    edited April 2025

    @itachikonoha said:
    @beanman109 it was written vCore I think.

    Put it up for transfer later. I may buy it if I have the cash.

    'Dedicated' vCore to me still implies a virtual core, eg 1 whole core virtualized.
    this is the 3rd VDS flash sale i've bought in the last month and the other 2 while advertised as 1c or 2c always had both threads per core.

    transfers and refunds are not avilable for flash sales so i don't really have any other options for it
    it'll idle then go in the bin and teach me a lesson to read specs better i guess

  • @beanman109 said:

    @itachikonoha said:
    @beanman109 it was written vCore I think.

    Put it up for transfer later. I may buy it if I have the cash.

    'Dedicated' vCore to me still implies a virtual core, eg 1 whole core virtualized.
    this is the 3rd VDS flash sale i've bought in the last month and the other 2 while advertised as 1c or 2c always had both threads per core.

    transfers and refunds are not avilable for flash sales so i don't really have any other options for it
    it'll idle then go in the bin and teach me a lesson to read specs better i guess

    Performance is still nice, though. I hope you can find a way to utilize the resources.

Sign In or Register to comment.