Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Honest Review about MassiveGRID

2»

Comments

  • wadhahwadhah Member, Host Rep

    @unsafetypin said:

    @labze said: PayPal has a quite high fixed fee, $0.39 I think + some percentage.

    So in this case if I like a provider -- what is the best method of paying them in most cases to ensure they lose the least amount of money to their payment processor? For instance I pay contractors for work using checks vs credit cards because they let me know credit card processing kills their profit margins on some jobs that don't have high margins.

    I think, and both providers here can correct me, the best would be crypto, then CC (not through paypal).

  • @wadhah said: I think, and both providers here can correct me, the best would be crypto, then CC (not through paypal).

    huh i thought crypto processing fees and exchange fees are wildly high but i might have been wrong on that?

    Thanked by 1techdragon
  • @unsafetypin said:

    @labze said: PayPal has a quite high fixed fee, $0.39 I think + some percentage.

    So in this case if I like a provider -- what is the best method of paying them in most cases to ensure they lose the least amount of money to their payment processor? For instance I pay contractors for work using checks vs credit cards because they let me know credit card processing kills their profit margins on some jobs that don't have high margins.

    You would need to ask them. Some are using payment processors to accept bank transfers which will incur costs and others aren't, for example.

  • wadhahwadhah Member, Host Rep

    @unsafetypin said:

    @wadhah said: I think, and both providers here can correct me, the best would be crypto, then CC (not through paypal).

    huh i thought crypto processing fees and exchange fees are wildly high but i might have been wrong on that?

    Depends on the coin and the payment processor but I believe a fair few are competing with CC costs

  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @unsafetypin said:

    @labze said: PayPal has a quite high fixed fee, $0.39 I think + some percentage.

    So in this case if I like a provider -- what is the best method of paying them in most cases to ensure they lose the least amount of money to their payment processor? For instance I pay contractors for work using checks vs credit cards because they let me know credit card processing kills their profit margins on some jobs that don't have high margins.

    It will depend on specifically what they have available, but checks/ACH (in US) or money orders. Crypto (pending network fees/coin/their ability to save/spend/convert) usually a close 2nd if not tied.

    The rest? Mostly almost all the same, but maybe pay longer-term up front. You'll see almost all providers give you a flat discount for annual+ and a big portion of that is processing fees when we're talking LE-world (the other portion is "we don't have to go back to marketing this or worrying about it for 12+ months").

    The other way to make up for it? Genuinely recommend providers you like where you see a fit. That is worth so much more. I don't mean shilling, but active on Reddit? Forums? Private groups? Throw them out there, send people their way.

    @wadhah said:
    Related but not to this discussion, is 0.40$ a month for four years sustainable for an ipv4 deal? whatever it might be, owned hardware, IPs, nuclear power plants etc?

    post processing fees they would get what, 0.35$/m?

    Honestly? Short answer: No.

    Long answer: It depends, but probably no. Are you running a budget and shifting marketing spend from Google/Meta/Whatever to a partially-subsidized LE-deal? Do you value your/your employee's time? Is there a limitation on this to get people onto your platform and help you improve it in exchange for heavily discounted services, or are you trying to build a full-fledged business 40c/user at a time?

    If you were to own the IP space, you'd be out ~$8k (average) for a /24. You can sell 253 VMs with that space, bringing you back about $1200/yr @ 0.40c/mo. That's 6.5 years to pay back just your IPv4 space while having to maintain customer support, hardware, network, etc for 253 services all for the remaining $0.

    That's a lot of inaccurate assumptions such as you actually get the 0.40 into your account (you don't) and that the entirety of the funds goes towards your IPv4 space. You can also just rent a /24 out (and do nothing else but rent it) for almost the exact same price, maybe more. No overhead besides billing them once a year.

    I know our cheapest plans w/IPv4 (anything that was sold in a qty above 5) were closer to the ~$0.97/mo range I believe. More than double, and this was mainly treated as a few things:
    1. Money put towards subsidizing potential customers (and people giving us good, healthy feedback) rather than into Google
    2. Hardware was already long owned, free and clear, otherwise not doing much (at that time)
    3. Rackspace already existed, and speaking to us specifically: we were filling in the 1U-4U of space left over in racks that consisted of almost entirely GPU chassis. Those chassis need overhead of ~1.5-2kW minimum to be racked, so we often used to end up with a few U and ~600-1kW of "stranded power and space". It was being paid for no matter what by us because 9 GPU chassis already lived in that rack but you can't fit/balance a 10th.

    Why not extend some deals? In the above case, I could make the argument that the power/space was $0, the already-owned hardware idle being "monetized" had a $0 cost-basis and our only real expenses would be bandwidth, IPv4, and support. I massively underestimated support/abuse burden. I wouldn't be surprised if MassiveGRID did something similar to what I did, and in certain (limited) circumstances it can be beneficial.

    However to your original question: No, I do not believe you can build an entire business around that long term. It's a tool, to be used to help you construct a building.

  • i just used their server 10 days, and whole say server was down, just asking them to refund, they also ask me to provide 2 month free, did not allow it. just got refund.

    Thanked by 1sucre13
  • i just used their server 10 days, and whole say server was down, just asking them to refund, they also ask me to provide 2 month free, did not allow it. just got refund.> @cosmossofa said:

    @Blembim said:
    M A S S I V E

    M A S S I V E G R E E D

    G R A V E

  • wadhahwadhah Member, Host Rep
    edited March 2025

    @crunchbits said:

    @unsafetypin said:

    @labze said: PayPal has a quite high fixed fee, $0.39 I think + some percentage.

    So in this case if I like a provider -- what is the best method of paying them in most cases to ensure they lose the least amount of money to their payment processor? For instance I pay contractors for work using checks vs credit cards because they let me know credit card processing kills their profit margins on some jobs that don't have high margins.

    It will depend on specifically what they have available, but checks/ACH (in US) or money orders. Crypto (pending network fees/coin/their ability to save/spend/convert) usually a close 2nd if not tied.

    The rest? Mostly almost all the same, but maybe pay longer-term up front. You'll see almost all providers give you a flat discount for annual+ and a big portion of that is processing fees when we're talking LE-world (the other portion is "we don't have to go back to marketing this or worrying about it for 12+ months").

    The other way to make up for it? Genuinely recommend providers you like where you see a fit. That is worth so much more. I don't mean shilling, but active on Reddit? Forums? Private groups? Throw them out there, send people their way.

    @wadhah said:
    Related but not to this discussion, is 0.40$ a month for four years sustainable for an ipv4 deal? whatever it might be, owned hardware, IPs, nuclear power plants etc?

    post processing fees they would get what, 0.35$/m?

    Honestly? Short answer: No.

    Long answer: It depends, but probably no. Are you running a budget and shifting marketing spend from Google/Meta/Whatever to a partially-subsidized LE-deal? Do you value your/your employee's time? Is there a limitation on this to get people onto your platform and help you improve it in exchange for heavily discounted services, or are you trying to build a full-fledged business 40c/user at a time?

    If you were to own the IP space, you'd be out ~$8k (average) for a /24. You can sell 253 VMs with that space, bringing you back about $1200/yr @ 0.40c/mo. That's 6.5 years to pay back just your IPv4 space while having to maintain customer support, hardware, network, etc for 253 services all for the remaining $0.

    That's a lot of inaccurate assumptions such as you actually get the 0.40 into your account (you don't) and that the entirety of the funds goes towards your IPv4 space. You can also just rent a /24 out (and do nothing else but rent it) for almost the exact same price, maybe more. No overhead besides billing them once a year.

    I know our cheapest plans w/IPv4 (anything that was sold in a qty above 5) were closer to the ~$0.97/mo range I believe. More than double, and this was mainly treated as a few things:
    1. Money put towards subsidizing potential customers (and people giving us good, healthy feedback) rather than into Google
    2. Hardware was already long owned, free and clear, otherwise not doing much (at that time)
    3. Rackspace already existed, and speaking to us specifically: we were filling in the 1U-4U of space left over in racks that consisted of almost entirely GPU chassis. Those chassis need overhead of ~1.5-2kW minimum to be racked, so we often used to end up with a few U and ~600-1kW of "stranded power and space". It was being paid for no matter what by us because 9 GPU chassis already lived in that rack but you can't fit/balance a 10th.

    Why not extend some deals? In the above case, I could make the argument that the power/space was $0, the already-owned hardware idle being "monetized" had a $0 cost-basis and our only real expenses would be bandwidth, IPv4, and support. I massively underestimated support/abuse burden. I wouldn't be surprised if MassiveGRID did something similar to what I did, and in certain (limited) circumstances it can be beneficial.

    However to your original question: No, I do not believe you can build an entire business around that long term. It's a tool, to be used to help you construct a building.

    Thank you for taking the time to write that, I know your time is not cheap.

    As a somewhat new hosting hobbyist some of the things you mentioned have never crossed my mind and they make a lot of sense now that I see it.

    I massively underestimated support/abuse burden. I wouldn't be surprised if MassiveGRID did something similar to what I did

    I absolutely believe they did. Especially the abuse part. I wish them luck but honestly don't have a lot of hope.

    Thanked by 1crunchbits
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @eupsagony said:

    If you could read my entire post you would see it's a review and not a kid complaint only. I've posted proof and reports, and I'm being honest when I talk about it.

    I did read your entire post and "posting proof and reports" doesn't turn a complaint into a review.

    For last, I know they are very cheap, and no, it's not the 50 cent service i'm using. Also, we should all agree about the fact they are NOT H/A as they advertise themselves.

    I don't know which product(s) you've got but with their still active massive sales/promo thread here I was led to think that you're "reviewing" that super-cheap product.
    Pro tip: when "reviewing" something one should clearly say what one is "reviewing".

    I don't care about the price, but at least they should in first sight be honest and say that their network is crap. Probably is not even their fault but it's their upstream provider

    I agree - in theory. In real life though sellers have a strong tendency to not be honest in promos.

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @labze said:

    I think that's a very weird take. When a provider advertises high availability and enterprise grade performance then the provider itself sets the expectations of the level of service provided.

    Absolutely. But can you show me a seller running a promo here who clearly and openly paint a clear and honest picture of their product incl. the ugly spots? I won't hold my breath ...

    This is their own statement: "Unmatched High Availability: Downtime? What's that? Our H/A is enabled automatically to keep your services running smoothly 24/7."

    So what? As far as I can think back LET is and always was a SALES platform and providers bragging, and even spreading flat-out lies is "just normal". And most users with a working brain know that (and have given up on telling LET leadership to create a more balanced playground).

    Yes, it's ugly, really really ugly but it's what it is.

    Is it really acceptable for you to totally dismiss this just because the service is cheap?

    If it weren't I wouldn't have dismissed it. Here it was all about how ridiculously cheap their offer was/is.

    In my opinion no, if your offer can't deliver what's promised then either increase the price so it is sustainable or change the advertisement to match what can be expected.

    In mine as well - but not here. This is LET.

    Everything else is false advertisement and shouldn't be exempt from complaints just because of the price.

    Of bloody course it is false advertisement! OTOH though it's so dirt cheap that even when it became obvious that MG's product and service are definitely not H/A, quite the contrary, people continued buying, buying, buying.

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider
    edited March 2025

    @jsg said: Absolutely. But can you show me a seller running a promo here who clearly and openly paint a clear and honest picture of their product incl. the ugly spots? I won't hold my breath ...

    >

    I'd say most well established providers are pretty truthful about what is being offered. I would be interested in you, for example, pointing out any offer I made that isn't honest.

    @jsg said: So what? As far as I can think back LET is and always was a SALES platform and providers bragging, and even spreading flat-out lies is "just normal". And most users with a working brain know that (and have given up on telling LET leadership to create a more balanced playground).

    Maybe instead of relying on the leadership to take actions we should stop attacking people who post a negative review just because the service is cheap thus we should accept the poor results? :-)

    @jsg said: Of bloody course it is false advertisement! OTOH though it's so dirt cheap that even when it became obvious that MG's product and service are definitely not H/A, quite the contrary, people continued buying, buying, buying.

    >

    And as stated previously, it makes sense that people buy. If they don't deadpool then it is a great offer for what it is. Even with subpar performance and questionable stability it is an amazing offer for many use-cases. They do not need to sugarcoat it, but unfortunately they did, which is why a negative review such as this has full merit.

    Thanked by 2Mumbly hobofl
  • @jsg said: So what? As far as I can think back LET is and always was a SALES platform and providers bragging, and even spreading flat-out lies is "just normal". And most users with a working brain know that (and have given up on telling LET leadership to create a more balanced playground).

    Yes, it's ugly, really really ugly but it's what it is.

    Preach it brotha!

    LET = Corporate backed, sales platform masquerading as a "community."

    LES = A true, low end niche community with some of the friendliest and most helpful people on the internet.

    I really do wish LES would pick up steam from this steaming pile.

  • @unsafetypin said:

    @wadhah said: I think, and both providers here can correct me, the best would be crypto, then CC (not through paypal).

    huh i thought crypto processing fees and exchange fees are wildly high but i might have been wrong on that?

    actually if you use a selfhosted instance of BTCPayServer (Namecheap does for example), you pay only the blockchain fee, in case of LTC is less than 5 cents, for BTC is somewhere around 30 cents for 10$ transaction

    Thanked by 2wadhah unsafetypin
  • just my two cents.
    Where y'all coming here means that either you are:
    hobbyist looking for cheap servers and understand the risk
    sales/owner of vps company looking to see the market and looking for strategies to sell leftover capacity
    just looking around with some cash to spend and got nothing else to do
    developer looking for a new playground
    a bot
    There you go, all buyers should understand the basic purpose coming in here with all the risk. Thats why I am happy to see some companies already been here for a few years and still alive. Thats a very good sign of a good company.

    So, I know i am buying MG services, and also know it comes with the risk, that's why I mitigate the risk by sync backup to another server on another company. Does it eliminate the whole risk? Nope. At least that's what I am hoping for. :)

  • JasonMJasonM Member
    edited March 2025

    OP, I had warned earlier that massiveGrid will be a massiveScam.
    the earlier you get out from it and go to reliable, affordable (not cheap) provider the better. Many providers are there on LET here. choose from them. Else use the vps only for non-production sites or as a VPN only.

  • nohavpsnohavps Member, Host Rep

    @crunchbits said:

    @unsafetypin said:

    @labze said: PayPal has a quite high fixed fee, $0.39 I think + some percentage.

    So in this case if I like a provider -- what is the best method of paying them in most cases to ensure they lose the least amount of money to their payment processor? For instance I pay contractors for work using checks vs credit cards because they let me know credit card processing kills their profit margins on some jobs that don't have high margins.

    It will depend on specifically what they have available, but checks/ACH (in US) or money orders. Crypto (pending network fees/coin/their ability to save/spend/convert) usually a close 2nd if not tied.

    The rest? Mostly almost all the same, but maybe pay longer-term up front. You'll see almost all providers give you a flat discount for annual+ and a big portion of that is processing fees when we're talking LE-world (the other portion is "we don't have to go back to marketing this or worrying about it for 12+ months").

    The other way to make up for it? Genuinely recommend providers you like where you see a fit. That is worth so much more. I don't mean shilling, but active on Reddit? Forums? Private groups? Throw them out there, send people their way.

    @wadhah said:
    Related but not to this discussion, is 0.40$ a month for four years sustainable for an ipv4 deal? whatever it might be, owned hardware, IPs, nuclear power plants etc?

    post processing fees they would get what, 0.35$/m?

    Honestly? Short answer: No.

    Long answer: It depends, but probably no. Are you running a budget and shifting marketing spend from Google/Meta/Whatever to a partially-subsidized LE-deal? Do you value your/your employee's time? Is there a limitation on this to get people onto your platform and help you improve it in exchange for heavily discounted services, or are you trying to build a full-fledged business 40c/user at a time?

    If you were to own the IP space, you'd be out ~$8k (average) for a /24. You can sell 253 VMs with that space, bringing you back about $1200/yr @ 0.40c/mo. That's 6.5 years to pay back just your IPv4 space while having to maintain customer support, hardware, network, etc for 253 services all for the remaining $0.

    That's a lot of inaccurate assumptions such as you actually get the 0.40 into your account (you don't) and that the entirety of the funds goes towards your IPv4 space. You can also just rent a /24 out (and do nothing else but rent it) for almost the exact same price, maybe more. No overhead besides billing them once a year.

    I know our cheapest plans w/IPv4 (anything that was sold in a qty above 5) were closer to the ~$0.97/mo range I believe. More than double, and this was mainly treated as a few things:
    1. Money put towards subsidizing potential customers (and people giving us good, healthy feedback) rather than into Google
    2. Hardware was already long owned, free and clear, otherwise not doing much (at that time)
    3. Rackspace already existed, and speaking to us specifically: we were filling in the 1U-4U of space left over in racks that consisted of almost entirely GPU chassis. Those chassis need overhead of ~1.5-2kW minimum to be racked, so we often used to end up with a few U and ~600-1kW of "stranded power and space". It was being paid for no matter what by us because 9 GPU chassis already lived in that rack but you can't fit/balance a 10th.

    Why not extend some deals? In the above case, I could make the argument that the power/space was $0, the already-owned hardware idle being "monetized" had a $0 cost-basis and our only real expenses would be bandwidth, IPv4, and support. I massively underestimated support/abuse burden. I wouldn't be surprised if MassiveGRID did something similar to what I did, and in certain (limited) circumstances it can be beneficial.

    However to your original question: No, I do not believe you can build an entire business around that long term. It's a tool, to be used to help you construct a building.

    I agree with you 100%

    We've been in this LET community for several months now.

    We can see that many providers are looking for a great deal just to sell a certain amount, gather as much as they can, and then close their business after three months.

    Imagine prices of 8 GB for $5, or almost a dollar for 1 GB, minus the processor costs, IP costs, and personnel costs. It doesn't add up. If you look at their AS, just one block is impossible to pay salaries, taxes, etc.

    I think that today, a cup of coffee costs more than having your website or online business!

    Thanked by 1wadhah
  • @JasonM said:
    OP, I had warned earlier that massiveGrid will be a massiveScam.
    the earlier you get out from it and go to reliable, affordable (not cheap) provider the better. Many providers are there on LET here. choose from them. Else use the vps only for non-production sites or as a VPN only.

    I already have 2 backup plans. I use MG only for non critical business, however I find it unacceptable the uptime and quality of their service, no matter how much you pay.

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    I LOVE NUYEK

    Thanked by 1ZachNuyek
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    Sorry wrong thread

  • ashish168527ashish168527 Member
    edited March 2025

    I was about to get one and just saw this thread

    Thanked by 1eupsagony
  • ZachNuyekZachNuyek 🚩 Host Rep Tag Suspended

    @emgh said:
    Sorry wrong thread

    :D

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • The quality of the VPS is terrible, this is a scam. The VPS has constant downtime and is unusable. Installing the OS took several hours, and installing the panel also took hours. The support is bad as well. Do not use services from here.

    Thanked by 1eupsagony
  • jndjnd Member

    Just the fact that the super discounted plans are still available to buy when they should be gone weeks ago is highly suspicious. They no longer reply to extend the 4th year (which is still very optimistic proposition), the promised upgrades aren't happening.

    Sure it's cheap to buy when you count it per year for 4 years but if they go under within a year you just paid $25-$30 for substandard product which isn't worth it. Another issue is that super cheap price attracts a lot of abusers which make the machines crawl anyway.

    Thanked by 1whiterider
Sign In or Register to comment.