Searching for a VDS

Comments

• anakara Member

  January 2025

  @itachikonoha said:

  @anakara said:

  @dev_vps said:

  @anakara said:

  @dev_vps said:
  @anakara
  Most likely a VPS with 30 to 50% cpu resource permitted per 24 hour period

  Thank you, that seems like a pretty good price, right? Or do you have any similar suggestions?

  Do you need VDS?
  100% cpu vCores… unmetered??

  I'm looking at a cheap price.:)

  For cheap price with high performance, there is also prohosting24 genoa servers (shared vps: 4C/16gb ram/200gb storage). Those are sold out but if you want one, you can open a ticket. If they have availability due to non renewal, they provide one.

  I sent them a ticket, but no one responded after 1 day. Support seems a bit slow
• 17hoason2 Member

  March 2025

  @itachikonoha said:
  Mainly required for FFMPEG encoding (either via windows handbrake or ubuntu ffmpeg encoder)

  Currently using berohost ryzen 9950x vps 2 core 6gb ram but since it's shared, so I can't run it for a longer time.

  Opted for vds of with epyc 7642 2 core but while the yabs runs over 2500 GB6, in case of ffmpeg encoding it seems to be very slow (around avg 10 fps low in the vds than the berohost vps server for the same file in same environment with similar config except cpu) .

  So currently searching for a new one where I could run the CPU 100% without worrying about throttling.

  Budget is around 10$ per month. 2 core is enough. Location does not matter. Bandwidth preferably around 10tb

  I am starting to ignore YABS because in terms of encoding, the real picture seems to be different. I just want to try different ones to check which could suit my needs.

  heelo , may i ask which provider are u using right now ?
• itachikonoha Member

  March 2025

  @17hoason2 I tried different ones but balance in terms of value for money and performance I found was, netcup root server 1000.

  At 8.24 euro, RS1000 is a beast in that category. The berohost ryzen 9950x (5.9 euro per month) beats it in terms of performance but former has 512 GB while berohost has 50 GB.

  Due to storage restrictions, I chose netcup and happy with its performance. Very stable, solid server.

  Thanked by 1skimply153
• skimply153 Member

  March 1

  @itachikonoha said:
  @17hoason2 I tried different ones but balance in terms of value for money and performance I found was, netcup root server 1000.

  At 8.24 euro, RS1000 is a beast in that category. The berohost ryzen 9950x (5.9 euro per month) beats it in terms of performance but former has 512 GB while berohost has 50 GB.

  Due to storage restrictions, I chose netcup and happy with its performance. Very stable, solid server.

  RS 1000 G12
  AMD EPYC™ 9645
  8 GB DDR5 RAM (ECC)
  4 dedicated cores
  256 GB NVMe
  Is this the one you are currently using?
• itachikonoha Member

  March 1

  @skimply153 said:

  @itachikonoha said:
  @17hoason2 I tried different ones but balance in terms of value for money and performance I found was, netcup root server 1000.

  At 8.24 euro, RS1000 is a beast in that category. The berohost ryzen 9950x (5.9 euro per month) beats it in terms of performance but former has 512 GB while berohost has 50 GB.

  Due to storage restrictions, I chose netcup and happy with its performance. Very stable, solid server.

  RS 1000 G12
  AMD EPYC™ 9645
  8 GB DDR5 RAM (ECC)
  4 dedicated cores
  256 GB NVMe
  Is this the one you are currently using?

  It was Genoa at that time. I am not using netcup anymore (performance got worse).

  Currently back to berohost.

  Thanked by 1skimply153