Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
25% Recurring Discount on NVMe VPS
Try EnsoVPN - Reliable VPN - 1-Day Free Trial
K.N Cloud — High-Performance KVM VPS in Miami,Frankfurt and Amsterdam
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
CloudLinux
Try EnsoVPN - Fast & Private VPN - 1-Day Free Trial
K.N Cloud | Linux Cloud Instances in US-MIA, DE-FRA and NL-AMS

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › Offers
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HostBrr | March Madness Deals - EPYC 2 GB VPS €15/year | 2 vCore 8 GB RAM €4/month | 10 Gbps!

12467…11

Comments

  • bananapen1bananapen1 Member

    Can i buy block storagefor it how much is it

  • paulskerpaulsker Member

    Just placed an order number 67d7cfc14c3f3.
    Thanks

  • MohamadSYMohamadSY Member

    Invoice# 51993 :wink:

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    Hmm, guess the CPU

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2146
    Multi Core | 106866

    Thanked by 7lukast__ sh97 hyperblast nick_ nullnothere nghialele ravi
  • lukast__lukast__ Member, Megathread Squad

    @labze said:
    Hmm, guess the CPU

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2146
    Multi Core | 106866

    Turin? 👀

    Thanked by 2hyperblast nullnothere
  • QuenFeaQuenFea Member

    @labze said:
    Hmm, guess the CPU

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2146
    Multi Core | 106866

    AMD EPYC 9655 2600 MHz（192 Core） ;)

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited March 2025

    @labze said:
    Hmm, guess the CPU

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2146
    Multi Core | 106866

    epy/i/c!

    AMD Epyc 9965

  • fifofifo Member

    2x EPYC 9655s

  • maverickmaverick Member

    @labze said:
    Hmm, guess the CPU

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2146
    Multi Core | 106866

    AMD EPYC 9575F maybe?

  • kobee24kobee24 Member

    Any result of traceroute or nexttrace to China? If RTT is less than 200ms, I’d consider this offer.

  • sh97sh97 Member, Host Rep

    @kobee24 said:
    Any result of traceroute or nexttrace to China? If RTT is less than 200ms, I’d consider this offer.

    ===================================================================================
Network                        | Details
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chengdu - China Telecom        | 274ms [No Loss]
61.139.2.69                    | AS214902 AS58212 AS6453 AS4134
Standard Line                  | China Telecom Backbone via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beijing - CERNET               | 280ms [No Loss]
101.6.15.66                    | AS12586 AS58212 AS1299 AS4538
Unknown Line                   | Path not recognized via AS4538
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai - China Telecom       | 262ms [No Loss]
106.4.158.58                   | AS12586 AS58212 AS6453 AS4134
Standard Line                  | China Telecom Backbone via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chengdu - China Mobile         | 214ms [20% loss]
211.137.96.205                 | AS214902 AS58212 AS6453 AS9808 AS58453
Standard Line                  | China Mobile International via AS9808
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beijing - China Telecom        | 217ms [20% loss]
219.141.136.12                 | AS214902 AS58212 AS6453 AS4134 AS4847
Standard Line                  | China Telecom Backbone via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beijing - China Unicom         | 175ms [No Loss]
202.106.50.1                   | AS12586 AS58212 AS199524 AS3257 AS4837 AS4808
Standard Line                  | China Unicom Backbone 169 via GTT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guangzhou - China Unicom       | 182ms [No Loss]
210.21.196.6                   | AS12586 AS58212 AS199524 AS1299 AS4837 AS17816 AS17623
Standard Line                  | China Unicom Backbone 169 via Arelion
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guangzhou - China Mobile       | 264ms [No Loss]
120.196.165.24                 | AS214902 AS58212 AS6453 AS58453 AS9808
Standard Line                  | China Mobile International via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai - China Mobile        | 289ms [No Loss]
223.111.101.29                 | AS214902 AS58212 AS6453 AS58453 AS9808 AS56046
Standard Line                  | China Mobile International via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guangzhou - China Telecom      | 257ms [No Loss]
58.60.188.222                  | AS12586 AS58212 AS6453 AS4134
Standard Line                  | China Telecom Backbone via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beijing - China Mobile         | 235ms [No Loss]
221.179.155.161                | AS214902 AS58212 AS6453 AS9808 AS56048
Unknown Line                   | Path not recognized via AS56048
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chengdu - China Unicom         | 174ms [No Loss]
119.6.6.6                      | AS12586 AS58212 AS6453 AS4837
Standard Line                  | China Unicom Backbone 169 via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai - China Unicom        | 141ms [No Loss]
221.194.154.193                | AS12586 AS58212 AS6453 AS4837
Standard Line                  | China Unicom Backbone 169 via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Thanked by 2kobee24 aas86134000
  • kobee24kobee24 Member

    @sh97 said:

    @kobee24 said:
    Any result of traceroute or nexttrace to China? If RTT is less than 200ms, I’d consider this offer.

    ===================================================================================
Network                        | Details
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chengdu - China Telecom        | 274ms [No Loss]
61.139.2.69                    | AS214902 AS58212 AS6453 AS4134
Standard Line                  | China Telecom Backbone via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beijing - CERNET               | 280ms [No Loss]
101.6.15.66                    | AS12586 AS58212 AS1299 AS4538
Unknown Line                   | Path not recognized via AS4538
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai - China Telecom       | 262ms [No Loss]
106.4.158.58                   | AS12586 AS58212 AS6453 AS4134
Standard Line                  | China Telecom Backbone via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chengdu - China Mobile         | 214ms [20% loss]
211.137.96.205                 | AS214902 AS58212 AS6453 AS9808 AS58453
Standard Line                  | China Mobile International via AS9808
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beijing - China Telecom        | 217ms [20% loss]
219.141.136.12                 | AS214902 AS58212 AS6453 AS4134 AS4847
Standard Line                  | China Telecom Backbone via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beijing - China Unicom         | 175ms [No Loss]
202.106.50.1                   | AS12586 AS58212 AS199524 AS3257 AS4837 AS4808
Standard Line                  | China Unicom Backbone 169 via GTT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guangzhou - China Unicom       | 182ms [No Loss]
210.21.196.6                   | AS12586 AS58212 AS199524 AS1299 AS4837 AS17816 AS17623
Standard Line                  | China Unicom Backbone 169 via Arelion
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guangzhou - China Mobile       | 264ms [No Loss]
120.196.165.24                 | AS214902 AS58212 AS6453 AS58453 AS9808
Standard Line                  | China Mobile International via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai - China Mobile        | 289ms [No Loss]
223.111.101.29                 | AS214902 AS58212 AS6453 AS58453 AS9808 AS56046
Standard Line                  | China Mobile International via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guangzhou - China Telecom      | 257ms [No Loss]
58.60.188.222                  | AS12586 AS58212 AS6453 AS4134
Standard Line                  | China Telecom Backbone via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beijing - China Mobile         | 235ms [No Loss]
221.179.155.161                | AS214902 AS58212 AS6453 AS9808 AS56048
Unknown Line                   | Path not recognized via AS56048
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chengdu - China Unicom         | 174ms [No Loss]
119.6.6.6                      | AS12586 AS58212 AS6453 AS4837
Standard Line                  | China Unicom Backbone 169 via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shanghai - China Unicom        | 141ms [No Loss]
221.194.154.193                | AS12586 AS58212 AS6453 AS4837
Standard Line                  | China Unicom Backbone 169 via TATA
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thanks! It’s acceptable for me.

  • snow2ksnow2k Member

    @labze said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @hyperblast said:
    yabs please

    for turin vps

    ETA 1-2 weeks

    What are the packages and prices?

  • smarty24smarty24 Member

    @labze - invoice 52296 - thanks for the additional bandwith :)

  • drunkendogdrunkendog Member

    Invoice 51997, thanks

  • aasimkasseraasimkasser Member

    5X bandwidth

    My invoice:
    52222

  • snevskysnevsky Member

    Invoice #52310
    Thanks

  • drunkendogdrunkendog Member

    Invoice 52312 as well, thanks

  • borngreatborngreat Member

    Does this VPS offer support windows?

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @borngreat said:
    Does this VPS offer support windows?

    Yes, just don't pick a 1 vCore package.

    Thanked by 1COLBYLICIOUS
  • borngreatborngreat Member

    Invoice #: 52314 Please add 5X bandwidth. Thank you.

  • Protocol903Protocol903 Member

    can someone give me yabs with GB6 for "ECO Memory-Optimized 8GB", please?

    Perhaps @labze if possible?

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @labze said:
    Hmm, guess the CPU

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2146
    Multi Core | 106866

    please tell us which cpu it is! @labze

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @hyperblast said:

    @labze said:
    Hmm, guess the CPU

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2146
    Multi Core | 106866

    please tell us which cpu it is! @labze

    2x EPYC 9655

    Upcoming VDS packages.

    Thanked by 10sh97 Marin maverick lukast__ hyperblast cainyxues n1njax sliix nick_ edrebe
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member

    @labze said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @labze said:
    Hmm, guess the CPU

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2146
    Multi Core | 106866

    please tell us which cpu it is! @labze

    2x EPYC 9655

    Upcoming VDS packages.

    next 9965? lowend-highhopes!

  • aasimkasseraasimkasser Member

    5X bandwidth

    My invoice:
    52222

    @labze

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited March 2025

    @labze said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @labze said:
    Hmm, guess the CPU

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2146
    Multi Core | 106866

    please tell us which cpu it is! @labze

    2x EPYC 9655

    Upcoming VDS packages.

    only vds on this beast?
    dataforest or Michael Sebastian Schinzel trading as IP-Projects GmbH

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider

    @hyperblast said:

    @labze said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @labze said:
    Hmm, guess the CPU

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2146
    Multi Core | 106866

    please tell us which cpu it is! @labze

    2x EPYC 9655

    Upcoming VDS packages.

    only vds on this beast?
    dataforest or Michael Sebastian Schinzel trading as IP-Projects GmbH

    Getting in both locations. Will also offer normal VPS. > @hyperblast said:

    @labze said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @labze said:
    Hmm, guess the CPU

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2146
    Multi Core | 106866

    please tell us which cpu it is! @labze

    2x EPYC 9655

    Upcoming VDS packages.

    next 9965? lowend-highhopes!

    Idk, 9965 performs worse than 9965 per core.

    Thanked by 2lukast__ hyperblast
  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited March 2025

    @labze said: Idk, 9965 performs worse than 9965 per core.

    sounds logical because logic is logic. ;)

    anyway, 9655 from dataforest... count me in!

    Thanked by 2dataforest COLBYLICIOUS
  • Rot32Rot32 Member

    Invoice #52384

This discussion has been closed.