Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

GreenCloud | #1 TOP PROVIDER 2024 SALE | DOUBLE PROMOTIONS with GENOA/9950x | +$2000 GIVEAWAYS

1504505507509510810

Comments

  • @brauni said:

    @pkr said:
    I am looking for 6666 plan 50% discount in EU.... I hope next deals are for this...

    there was one not too far back, missed it myself sadly

    Some people are too quick to grab these deals.

  • ShadowLurkerShadowLurker Member
    edited February 2025

    tokyo storage would be my guess !! (just a guessing game)

  • Can anyone tell me what is the meaning of 10 (5-5) in these deals.

  • @pkr said:
    Can anyone tell me what is the meaning of 10 (5-5) in these deals.

    5 uses for VIP group, 5 uses for everyone else

    Thanked by 1FAT32
  • @pkr said:
    Can anyone tell me what is the meaning of 10 (5-5) in these deals.

    I think 10 in total
    5 for VIP
    5 for "normal" Users

    Thanked by 1FAT32
  • @pkr said:
    Can anyone tell me what is the meaning of 10 (5-5) in these deals.

    It's about the amount for vip and non vip.

  • Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    Thanked by 1nghialele
  • ShadowLurkerShadowLurker Member
    edited February 2025

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    VIP is based on the posts / thanks & other contributions not via donation :smile:

  • @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    Thanked by 1FAT32
  • @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    Should just disable reselling (i know they did by now).
    Most offers are only for Active Accounts (on GC) anyways

  • @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    What other approaches you have in mind?

    Thanked by 3nghialele FAT32 ariq01
  • @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    It's also to give people who are active on the forum a better shot.

  • @pkr said: What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    That's why these deals are non-transferable.

  • @plumberg said:

    @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    What other approaches you have in mind?

    I think it's moar

  • I > @plumberg said:

    @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    What other approaches you have in mind?

    I do not have domain expertise; GCV might have to handle such cases. However, heavy transfer fee (e.g. $1000) would have kept bots away. For resellers, they could monitor resource usage.

    Thanked by 1FAT32
  • @pkr said:
    I do not have domain expertise; GCV might have to handle such cases. However, heavy transfer fee (e.g. $1000) would have kept bots away. For resellers, they could monitor resource usage.

    i think it also limits scalpers who aren't a part of LET

    Thanked by 3JohnnySac FAT32 ariq01
  • wadhahwadhah Member, Host Rep
    edited February 2025

    @pkr said:
    I > @plumberg said:

    @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    What other approaches you have in mind?

    I do not have domain expertise; GCV might have to handle such cases. However, heavy transfer fee (e.g. $1000) would have kept bots away. For resellers, they could monitor resource usage.

    I'm sorry a thousand dollar transfer fee? For a 60~dollar a year vps? That's better than the current system with forbids transfers all together?

    Thanked by 1JohnnySac
  • @wadhah said:

    @pkr said:
    I > @plumberg said:

    @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    What other approaches you have in mind?

    I do not have domain expertise; GCV might have to handle such cases. However, heavy transfer fee (e.g. $1000) would have kept bots away. For resellers, they could monitor resource usage.

    I'm sorry a thousand dollar transfer fee? For a 60~dollar a year vps? That's better than the current system with forbids transfers all together?

    $1000 transfer fee and you are forbidden from idling.

    Thanked by 1wadhah
  • @wadhah said:

    @pkr said:
    I > @plumberg said:

    @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    What other approaches you have in mind?

    I do not have domain expertise; GCV might have to handle such cases. However, heavy transfer fee (e.g. $1000) would have kept bots away. For resellers, they could monitor resource usage.

    I'm sorry a thousand dollar transfer fee? For a 60~dollar a year vps? That's better than the current system with forbids transfers all together?

    Some people buy these flash deals only for transferring it at regular price. Heavy transfer fee would discourage such people from buying flash deals; only needy ones will grab them.

  • @network said:

    @wadhah said:

    @pkr said:
    I > @plumberg said:

    @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    What other approaches you have in mind?

    I do not have domain expertise; GCV might have to handle such cases. However, heavy transfer fee (e.g. $1000) would have kept bots away. For resellers, they could monitor resource usage.

    I'm sorry a thousand dollar transfer fee? For a 60~dollar a year vps? That's better than the current system with forbids transfers all together?

    $1000 transfer fee and you are forbidden from idling.

    NO IDLING?! I'd lose all my servers

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @pkr said:
    I > @plumberg said:

    @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    What other approaches you have in mind?

    I do not have domain expertise; GCV might have to handle such cases. However, heavy transfer fee (e.g. $1000) would have kept bots away. For resellers, they could monitor resource usage.

    for GCV, there is literally 0 benefit to implement anything.
    Every purchase, bots/ scalper/ regular LET user - is money in the bank.

    They are just trying to help the community by trying to give the legit users a fair shot when bots take out the limited stocks in a fraction of a second.

    One of the options which seemed to be acceptable to give incentive to users that are active in this specific thread based on their participation.

    is it fair? Probably not.

    But, still a good start.

  • I was gonna write a long and serious reply, but I honestly cba

    So I leave this:

    reguards

  • wadhahwadhah Member, Host Rep

    @pkr said:

    @wadhah said:

    @pkr said:
    I > @plumberg said:

    @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    What other approaches you have in mind?

    I do not have domain expertise; GCV might have to handle such cases. However, heavy transfer fee (e.g. $1000) would have kept bots away. For resellers, they could monitor resource usage.

    I'm sorry a thousand dollar transfer fee? For a 60~dollar a year vps? That's better than the current system with forbids transfers all together?

    Some people buy these flash deals only for transferring it at regular price. Heavy transfer fee would discourage such people from buying flash deals; only needy ones will grab them.

    I agree, this is why these deals do not allow transfers AT ALL.

    Thanked by 1FAT32
  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @pkr said:

    @wadhah said:

    @pkr said:
    I > @plumberg said:

    @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    What other approaches you have in mind?

    I do not have domain expertise; GCV might have to handle such cases. However, heavy transfer fee (e.g. $1000) would have kept bots away. For resellers, they could monitor resource usage.

    I'm sorry a thousand dollar transfer fee? For a 60~dollar a year vps? That's better than the current system with forbids transfers all together?

    Some people buy these flash deals only for transferring it at regular price. Heavy transfer fee would discourage such people from buying flash deals; only needy ones will grab them.

    they have already implemented "No transfer" policy already.

    Thanked by 1FAT32
  • @wadhah said:

    @pkr said:

    @wadhah said:

    @pkr said:
    I > @plumberg said:

    @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    What other approaches you have in mind?

    I do not have domain expertise; GCV might have to handle such cases. However, heavy transfer fee (e.g. $1000) would have kept bots away. For resellers, they could monitor resource usage.

    I'm sorry a thousand dollar transfer fee? For a 60~dollar a year vps? That's better than the current system with forbids transfers all together?

    Some people buy these flash deals only for transferring it at regular price. Heavy transfer fee would discourage such people from buying flash deals; only needy ones will grab them.

    I agree, this is why these deals do not allow transfers AT ALL.

    Good to know that these deals do not allow transfers AT ALL.

    Thanked by 2wadhah FAT32
  • @pkr said:

    @wadhah said:

    @pkr said:
    I > @plumberg said:

    @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    What other approaches you have in mind?

    I do not have domain expertise; GCV might have to handle such cases. However, heavy transfer fee (e.g. $1000) would have kept bots away. For resellers, they could monitor resource usage.

    I'm sorry a thousand dollar transfer fee? For a 60~dollar a year vps? That's better than the current system with forbids transfers all together?

    Some people buy these flash deals only for transferring it at regular price. Heavy transfer fee would discourage such people from buying flash deals; only needy ones will grab them.

    They (GreenCloud) stopped allowing service transfers for these deals days ago.

    Thanked by 1FAT32
  • Morning, folks! Did you catch any great deals last night?

    Thanked by 1wadhah
  • @Smigit said:

    @pkr said:

    @wadhah said:

    @pkr said:
    I > @plumberg said:

    @pkr said:

    @JohnnySac said:

    @pkr said:
    Hu Lee Shit... I never knew LET has VIP concept :)
    F___K elitism, it's every where.

    It's being tried for the first time in this thread to combat bots and resellers.

    What if VIPs are corrupts and resellers; after all they are also humans. GCV should have adopted other approaches to combat bots.

    What other approaches you have in mind?

    I do not have domain expertise; GCV might have to handle such cases. However, heavy transfer fee (e.g. $1000) would have kept bots away. For resellers, they could monitor resource usage.

    I'm sorry a thousand dollar transfer fee? For a 60~dollar a year vps? That's better than the current system with forbids transfers all together?

    Some people buy these flash deals only for transferring it at regular price. Heavy transfer fee would discourage such people from buying flash deals; only needy ones will grab them.

    They (GreenCloud) stopped allowing service transfers for these deals days ago.

    Can't wait for the flood of LET posts saying they got scammed by GC

  • Can't wait for the flood of LET posts saying they got scammed by GC

    This is what I was thinking. In a few days, LET may have many such posts :)

    Thanked by 2nghialele Blembim
Sign In or Register to comment.