Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

GreenCloud | #1 TOP PROVIDER 2024 SALE | DOUBLE PROMOTIONS with GENOA/9950x | +$2000 GIVEAWAYS

1306307309311312810

Comments

  • crunchbitscrunchbits Member, Patron Provider, Top Host

    @muffin said:

    But then it would look like the worst gatekeeping. I would have not stuck around if I joined on 2017 BF, just to see that I am not eligible for any deals - only leftovers by other "elder" members. It'd be harder to get new people to feel welcome, so there should be skill and luck involved still.

    Yeah that's the balance that we need to strike. New people can/are welcome, that is the point.

    The flip side is that it is members here, all of you (many kisses), that push hosts that are active and contributing. You help with recommendations (on/off platform) to threads, help for SEO/search results, and generally just giving usually good and fair feedback when we (hosts) mess up or can improve something. You might not even realize how much a single comment or recommendation turns into a big project or update that ties in a lot of new features or even policy shaping. I see the flipside to that being fair crack at deals that otherwise never make it anywhere else.

    Problem? Those deals are sniped by people who make it their duty to take all stock and then resell (at a higher price) to non-target markets and there is a huge disconnect between what we sold and what they paid for it/think they bought. I can't speak for all hosts, but I don't want that. It's a bad deal for whoever the final buyer is and a bad deal for us. I love brainstorming prizes, a fun sale, a new niche-target product but then when only 1/30 people that attempt from this forum beats the litany of bots/scrapers/resellers nobody is happy and it just wears you down.

  • barbarosbarbaros Member
    edited February 2025

    @crunchbits said:

    @muffin said:

    But then it would look like the worst gatekeeping. I would have not stuck around if I joined on 2017 BF, just to see that I am not eligible for any deals - only leftovers by other "elder" members. It'd be harder to get new people to feel welcome, so there should be skill and luck involved still.

    Yeah that's the balance that we need to strike. New people can/are welcome, that is the point.

    The flip side is that it is members here, all of you (many kisses), that push hosts that are active and contributing. You help with recommendations (on/off platform) to threads, help for SEO/search results, and generally just giving usually good and fair feedback when we (hosts) mess up or can improve something. You might not even realize how much a single comment or recommendation turns into a big project or update that ties in a lot of new features or even policy shaping. I see the flipside to that being fair crack at deals that otherwise never make it anywhere else.

    Problem? Those deals are sniped by people who make it their duty to take all stock and then resell (at a higher price) to non-target markets and there is a huge disconnect between what we sold and what they paid for it/think they bought. I can't speak for all hosts, but I don't want that. It's a bad deal for whoever the final buyer is and a bad deal for us. I love brainstorming prizes, a fun sale, a new niche-target product but then when only 1/30 people that attempt from this forum beats the litany of bots/scrapers/resellers nobody is happy and it just wears you down.

    There is solution to that, but it will impact all the sales majorly so I doubt any provider would implement it. But it's free to voice your opinion.

    If you limit service transfers of "good deal servers" then people will start selling their account whoever to buyer is.

    You can prevent this by asking ID / card verification from customers, but then this would cause a lot of customers running away I guess. Only option coming to my mind is limiting how many "flash deal servers" a customer can buy, but again this would cost you sales or people having multiple accounts.

    The good old method of offering all the flash deals at once would be the most fair but that doesn't bring enough attention / interaction to thread.

    PS: I wouldn't mind getting some Crunchbit tshirt in return of my "valuable" feedback.

    Edit: I still can't believe people blamed @FAT32 for getting some deal too quick, or maybe I misread?

    There was some fight at the thread between members also (apart from mine)

  • @crunchbits said:

    @muffin said:

    But then it would look like the worst gatekeeping. I would have not stuck around if I joined on 2017 BF, just to see that I am not eligible for any deals - only leftovers by other "elder" members. It'd be harder to get new people to feel welcome, so there should be skill and luck involved still.

    Yeah that's the balance that we need to strike. New people can/are welcome, that is the point.

    The flip side is that it is members here, all of you (many kisses), that push hosts that are active and contributing. You help with recommendations (on/off platform) to threads, help for SEO/search results, and generally just giving usually good and fair feedback when we (hosts) mess up or can improve something. You might not even realize how much a single comment or recommendation turns into a big project or update that ties in a lot of new features or even policy shaping. I see the flipside to that being fair crack at deals that otherwise never make it anywhere else.

    Problem? Those deals are sniped by people who make it their duty to take all stock and then resell (at a higher price) to non-target markets and there is a huge disconnect between what we sold and what they paid for it/think they bought. I can't speak for all hosts, but I don't want that. It's a bad deal for whoever the final buyer is and a bad deal for us. I love brainstorming prizes, a fun sale, a new niche-target product but then when only 1/30 people that attempt from this forum beats the litany of bots/scrapers/resellers nobody is happy and it just wears you down.

    This puts the work on providers, but would it be hard to set promotional stock to be ineligible for service transfer? Appreciate that then creates support tickets and other queries that might make it not worth the trouble.

    For most goods I buy online I have no expectation that I can transfer the license when I no longer want it. Feel like hosting providers allowing plan transfers an exception.

    Thanked by 3FAT32 plumberg vr10
  • Another option might be to limit transfers until after so many days or months. That way someone can pass it on if they want to down the line because they used the service but need to re-size, but they will have had to commit for a period too such that buying to resell may be less appealing. Say, you can transfer after 6 or 12 months of ownership. That’d probably align with about 30-50% of most plans length but also caters for monthlies.

    I have no idea if the hosts commercial tools can track that but automatically and if not it might mean manual enforcement.

    Thanked by 1plumberg
  • morning bro

    Thanked by 2plumberg nghialele
  • Morning LET !!!

    Thanked by 1plumberg
  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    So....

    Whats the plan for Saturday?

    Thanked by 1nghialele
  • @plumberg said:
    So....

    Whats the plan for Saturday?

    Play LET!!!

    Thanked by 1nghialele
  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad
    edited February 2025

    @Smigit said:
    Another option might be to limit transfers until after so many days or months. That way someone can pass it on if they want to down the line because they used the service but need to re-size, but they will have had to commit for a period too such that buying to resell may be less appealing. Say, you can transfer after 6 or 12 months of ownership. That’d probably align with about 30-50% of most plans length but also caters for monthlies.

    I have no idea if the hosts commercial tools can track that but automatically and if not it might mean manual enforcement.

    I believe @NDTN did implement a cool down period of 30 days before a service can be transferred away. Not sure how much of a deterrent it is. Technically one is loosing 30 days of service but for the buyer, that opens up a way to still get a banger deal at a slight premium.

    @NDTN how has this action worked for GreenCloud?

    Thanked by 1ZachNuyek
  • What anything?

  • @plumberg said:

    @Smigit said:
    Another option might be to limit transfers until after so many days or months. That way someone can pass it on if they want to down the line because they used the service but need to re-size, but they will have had to commit for a period too such that buying to resell may be less appealing. Say, you can transfer after 6 or 12 months of ownership. That’d probably align with about 30-50% of most plans length but also caters for monthlies.

    I have no idea if the hosts commercial tools can track that but automatically and if not it might mean manual enforcement.

    I believe @NDTN did i plenwnt a cool down period of 30 days before a service can be transferred away. Not sure how much of a deterrent it is. Technically one is loosing 30 days of service but for the buyer, that opens up a way to still get a banger deal at a slight premium.

    @NDTN how has this action worked for GreenCloud?

    Would be interested to hear too.

    I went with 6-12 months on my post as the hits more significant, I think, and the longer turn around means people looking to resell are stuck with the inventory for some time.

    Might still be issues of people creating new accounts and selling the credentials though, so it’s not foolproof by any means. I’ve liked the ‘active users only’ in this instance, but does hamper legit first time buyers too.

    Thanked by 2JohnnySac plumberg
  • 100 pages later...

  • @JabJab said:

    My thing ended on SolusVM too, asked about VF to make sure I won't be hit with "We migrate node" next day after I setup the "idler" :D

    So, you didn't get message about migration from them earlier? Maybe that's why.

  • @FAT32 said:

    @nullnothere said:
    @NDTN - just to keep things going, care to drop a few stats on the deals and how quickly they were snagged (etc.).

    This thread has a wealth of information from the providers side that few of us get insights into and I think it'll be very interesting.

    Maybe you can even give us details like number of active logins on the WHMCS side, peak traffic/hits/reqs, seconds from posting on LET to OOS on WHMCS, race condition insights into actual stock vs consumed stock...

    The data junkies here would love such info... only to beat it for the next time.

    That Japan offer about 10-12 hours ago was one of those really fast ones as well.

    CC: @haodo just in case Boss is busy.

    I want to know whether I stand a chance against the MJJ if theres only a few quantity

    Update: Yes

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @Smigit said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Smigit said:
    Another option might be to limit transfers until after so many days or months. That way someone can pass it on if they want to down the line because they used the service but need to re-size, but they will have had to commit for a period too such that buying to resell may be less appealing. Say, you can transfer after 6 or 12 months of ownership. That’d probably align with about 30-50% of most plans length but also caters for monthlies.

    I have no idea if the hosts commercial tools can track that but automatically and if not it might mean manual enforcement.

    I believe @NDTN did i plenwnt a cool down period of 30 days before a service can be transferred away. Not sure how much of a deterrent it is. Technically one is loosing 30 days of service but for the buyer, that opens up a way to still get a banger deal at a slight premium.

    @NDTN how has this action worked for GreenCloud?

    Would be interested to hear too.

    I went with 6-12 months on my post as the hits more significant, I think, and the longer turn around means people looking to resell are stuck with the inventory for some time.

    Might still be issues of people creating new accounts and selling the credentials though, so it’s not foolproof by any means. I’ve liked the ‘active users only’ in this instance, but does hamper legit first time buyers too.

    Nice point about legit new users.

    Like @crunchbits said, it's the most challenging to strike the right balance.

    You become too loose and shit hits the fan.
    You make it too strict shit still hits the fan

    And no one is wiser/ happier .

  • SmigitSmigit Member
    edited February 2025

    @plumberg said:

    @Smigit said:

    @plumberg said:

    @Smigit said:
    Another option might be to limit transfers until after so many days or months. That way someone can pass it on if they want to down the line because they used the service but need to re-size, but they will have had to commit for a period too such that buying to resell may be less appealing. Say, you can transfer after 6 or 12 months of ownership. That’d probably align with about 30-50% of most plans length but also caters for monthlies.

    I have no idea if the hosts commercial tools can track that but automatically and if not it might mean manual enforcement.

    I believe @NDTN did i plenwnt a cool down period of 30 days before a service can be transferred away. Not sure how much of a deterrent it is. Technically one is loosing 30 days of service but for the buyer, that opens up a way to still get a banger deal at a slight premium.

    @NDTN how has this action worked for GreenCloud?

    Would be interested to hear too.

    I went with 6-12 months on my post as the hits more significant, I think, and the longer turn around means people looking to resell are stuck with the inventory for some time.

    Might still be issues of people creating new accounts and selling the credentials though, so it’s not foolproof by any means. I’ve liked the ‘active users only’ in this instance, but does hamper legit first time buyers too.

    Nice point about legit new users.

    Like @crunchbits said, it's the most challenging to strike the right balance.

    You become too loose and shit hits the fan.
    You make it too strict shit still hits the fan

    And no one is wiser/ happier .

    Maybe we just need everyone to crack a code

    42-PQFDA14TAF-SLAED-

    On a more serious point but, I wonder if there’s been any change once it was worked out people were scanning the location images here were being uploaded to.

    I do think this threads running pretty well on the whole? Certainly haven’t got everything I went after, but have got some good deals. There’s been a good flow of codes across the day that hopefully people wanting a plan and not being toooo specific about which one, got something. Some of the 50% Genoa codes hang around a bit too. I suspect my timezone is helping as a number of pickups I got were probably less convenient to other countries, but on the balance I usually miss stacks of flash sales around back Friday due to timezones too.

    Edit: I also think the ‘existing users only’ works pretty well when you concurrently have a sale that has $15yr stock available. Anyone wanting to participate don’t have too steep a barrier to participate.

  • One moar cloud resource deal and I'll stop.

    Thanked by 1ZachNuyek
  • @nghialele said:
    One moar cloud resource deal and I'll stop.

    one can only hope

    Thanked by 1nghialele
  • Deals where??

    Thanked by 1nghialele
  • It's saturday babe, @NDTN forgot his laptop password

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    Ho ho ho
    Merry Saturday

    Thanked by 2nghialele vr10
  • haodohaodo Member, Host Rep
    edited February 2025

    @plumberg said:

    @Smigit said:
    Another option might be to limit transfers until after so many days or months. That way someone can pass it on if they want to down the line because they used the service but need to re-size, but they will have had to commit for a period too such that buying to resell may be less appealing. Say, you can transfer after 6 or 12 months of ownership. That’d probably align with about 30-50% of most plans length but also caters for monthlies.

    I have no idea if the hosts commercial tools can track that but automatically and if not it might mean manual enforcement.

    I believe @NDTN did implement a cool down period of 30 days before a service can be transferred away. Not sure how much of a deterrent it is. Technically one is loosing 30 days of service but for the buyer, that opens up a way to still get a banger deal at a slight premium.

    @NDTN how has this action worked for GreenCloud?

    Our previous terms were a bit loose, with the 30 days period and $10 fee on top of that we believe it has deterred the "deal" gap. But yes, many of them sneaked around by changing the account email for resell purposes, which we ofc cannot ban this as there are clients who need to change the email for real. However, when the account is detected (and we can detect it) as have been resold, it would be terminated. So hopefully the buyers can keep the risk in mind and refrain from such transactions.

  • ha ha ha
    Merry Saturday

  • I think the code in image combined with the active user condition has helped a lot. Usually I have zero chance of getting a flash deal but the past couple days I have been able to a get a few.

    Also, I think the active user stipulation works especially well in this particular situation bc the barrier to entry is not too great, as GreenCloud is also having very good sales available on their website without a promo code. I was a new GreenCloud user a few days ago and purchased one of their storage VPS's which, even without a code, was still very good value. Gaining access to these flash deals was a nice bonus.

  • deals :)

  • You guys managed to grab the deals? 😯

  • @sliix said:
    You guys managed to grab the deals? 😯

    yes usually on mobile too

  • nghialelenghialele Member
    edited February 2025

    @JohnnySac said:
    I think the code in image combined with the active user condition has helped a lot. Usually I have zero chance of getting a flash deal but the past couple days I have been able to a get a few.

    Also, I think the active user stipulation works especially well in this particular situation bc the barrier to entry is not too great, as GreenCloud is also having very good sales available on their website without a promo code. I was a new GreenCloud user a few days ago and purchased one of their storage VPS's which, even without a code, was still very good value. Gaining access to these flash deals was a nice bonus.

    Being with them for (almost) a decade. Can prove the love at first sight deals.

    Thanked by 2JohnnySac FAT32
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @FAT32 said:

    @emgh said:
    @beanman109 @FAT32 @allthemtings

    My boss changed his profile picture on Slack:

    Your boss is now @beanman109

  • morning let <3

Sign In or Register to comment.