Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Solidseovps - Production

Are you using Solidseovps for production (bunch of small-mid traffic websites, including ecommerce)? If so, how has your experience been so far? I've been testing for a month now, and their VPSs have been pretty stable and fast, but I wanted to ask if people have been using them for longer periods.

Thanks!

Comments

  • Tagging the account. @SolidSeoVPS

    Uptime.

    From picture.

    Solid Cheap IPv6.
    Note IPv6 only BF deal. Only downtime I had was from when they upgraded to /64 IPv6 for free (1hr 40min downtime). They gave an email saying they will be doing it starting Feb 2nd. They did it yesterday without warning or telling me when it finished. IPv6 changed since it was a /112 before. Also the /etc/resolv.conf was reset to one without any IPv6 nameservers. So I had to randomly notice when the VPS IP upgrade was done and reboot it and also fix (again, default install does the same) the nameservers. Otherwise this was the only downtime.

    Solid Ryzen.
    This is a VDS. Has maybe 5-10 mins total of random network 1-2 min outage of just being dead. Hetrix and my friend both confirms this. Other downtime was Feb 2 (49min), really not sure why but I guess it got hit with the migration script even tho it had an /64 already assigned to it. IP didn't change for it either. Mainly used to host game servers or random stuff for my friends and I.

    Solid BF Cheap.
    I mean 100% uptime. Not sure what else to say. IPv4 only VPS with great uptime.

    All these machines run really well and a lot of there servers come with 10 Gbps and you can easily get close to that. Even the servers with 1 Gbps limit you will really easily hit that. So far node don't look oversold as the CPU steal is very little or next to none. VDS shown like 1% steal during YABs when first gotten, however I strongly believe this is the host machine stealing it and not another machine on it as the VDS has 12 vcores (Pretty sure 6 cores, 6 hyper-threaded cores) So half of the 7900X CPU to it. Funny enough Hetrix doesn't even show this in timeline anymore, shows 0 at that spot.

    For support longest I waited for a ticket was around 5 minutes. Fastest was within the same minute. Some of the best support I've seen tbh. First found and tried them in May. When BF hit I switched what I had from them over to BF deals they had.

    Would I recommend them? Yes, 100%. Network is stable (VDS is in Florida, IPv6 only in Canada, BF Cheap in NL), nodes aren't oversold/packed, and support is great.

  • Vote. Bought on BF 2024, It's my main vps now.

    Thanked by 1SolidVPS
  • SolidVPSSolidVPS Member, Patron Provider

    @Kevinf100

    Thank you for your review! We truly appreciate your business. The upgrade began on February 2nd, but we could have phrased it differently, as it wasn’t a same-day completion due to the number of VPS instances and locations involved. However, the upgrade was successfully completed yesterday, and all nodes and VPS now come with /64 as the standard, even for new deployments. The one-hour downtime you experienced was likely due to this process.

    As for Solid Ryzen, we’ve upgraded all of them to EPYC now!

    @ktaog6
    Thank you for your business

  • @SolidSeoVPS said:
    @Kevinf100

    Thank you for your review! We truly appreciate your business. The upgrade began on February 2nd, but we could have phrased it differently, as it wasn’t a same-day completion due to the number of VPS instances and locations involved. However, the upgrade was successfully completed yesterday, and all nodes and VPS now come with /64 as the standard, even for new deployments. The one-hour downtime you experienced was likely due to this process.

    As for Solid Ryzen, we’ve upgraded all of them to EPYC now!

    @ktaog6
    Thank you for your business

    Wait, one, I was never told this and two isn't this a downgrade?

    Old YABS

    >! ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Yet-Another-Bench-Script

    v2024-06-09

    https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Thu Nov 28 12:35:24 AM UTC 2024

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 7 minutes
    Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 7900X 12-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 12 @ 4691.296 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 15.6 GiB
    Swap : 2.0 GiB
    Disk : 158.3 GiB
    Distro : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
    Kernel : 6.8.0-49-generic
    VM Type : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:

    ISP : Solid Systems LLC
    ASN : AS399275 Solid Systems LLC
    Host : Solid Systems LLC
    Location : Tampa, Florida (FL)
    Country : United States

    Running fio random mixed R+W disk test with 4k block size.Running fio random mixed R+W disk test with 64k block sizeRunning fio random mixed R+W disk test with 512k block sizRunning fio random mixed R+W disk test with 1m block size.fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 157.46 MB/s (39.3k) 2.33 GB/s (36.5k)
    Write 157.87 MB/s (39.4k) 2.35 GB/s (36.7k)
    Total 315.33 MB/s (78.8k) 4.69 GB/s (73.3k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 618.30 MB/s (1.2k) 595.53 MB/s (581)
    Write 651.15 MB/s (1.2k) 635.19 MB/s (620)
    Total 1.26 GB/s (2.4k) 1.23 GB/s (1.2k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt #1 Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (Attempt #Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (Attempt #Clouvider London, UK (10G) 1.66 Gbits/sec 904 Mbits/sec 95.9 ms
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Eranium (Attempt #1 ofPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Eranium (Attempt #1 Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 1.47 Gbits/sec 2.04 Gbits/sec 107 ms
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Uztelecom (Attempt #1 Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Uztelecom (Attempt #2 Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Uztelecom (Attempt #3 Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Uztelecom (Attempt #Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 594 Mbits/sec 442 Mbits/sec 202 ms
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Leaseweb (Attempt #1 oPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Leaseweb (Attempt #1Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 611 Mbits/sec 392 Mbits/sec 235 ms
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt #1 Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (Attempt #Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 1.77 Gbits/sec 1.60 Gbits/sec 58.9 ms
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Leaseweb (Attempt #1 oPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Leaseweb (Attempt #1Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 2.46 Gbits/sec 4.53 Gbits/sec 49.0 ms
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Edgoo (Attempt #1 of 3Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Edgoo (Attempt #2 of 3Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Edgoo (Attempt #3 of 3Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Edgoo (Attempt #1 ofPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Edgoo (Attempt #2 ofPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Edgoo (Attempt #3 ofEdgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) busy 1.16 Gbits/sec 129 ms

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt #1 Performing IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (Attempt #Clouvider London, UK (10G) 1.45 Gbits/sec 1.17 Gbits/sec 95.9 ms
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Eranium (Attempt #1 ofPerforming IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Eranium (Attempt #1 Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 1.57 Gbits/sec 1.45 Gbits/sec 107 ms
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Uztelecom (Attempt #1 Performing IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Uztelecom (Attempt #Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) 751 Mbits/sec 212 Mbits/sec 202 ms
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Leaseweb (Attempt #1 oPerforming IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Leaseweb (Attempt #1Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 640 Mbits/sec 616 Mbits/sec 235 ms
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt #1 Performing IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (Attempt #Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 2.43 Gbits/sec 1.53 Gbits/sec 58.9 ms
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Leaseweb (Attempt #1 oPerforming IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Leaseweb (Attempt #1Performing IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Leaseweb (Attempt #2Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 2.58 Gbits/sec 1.77 Gbits/sec 49.1 ms
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Edgoo (Attempt #1 of 3Performing IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Edgoo (Attempt #1 ofEdgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 1.08 Gbits/sec 966 Mbits/sec 129 ms

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2083
    Multi Core | 10110
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9109396

    New upgraded tabs.

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Yet-Another-Bench-Script

    v2025-01-01

    https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script

    ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ##

    Tue Feb 4 11:00:37 AM EST 2025

    Basic System Information:

    Uptime : 1 days, 20 hours, 59 minutes
    Processor : AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 12 @ 2399.998 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 15.6 GiB
    Swap : 2.0 GiB
    Disk : 158.3 GiB
    Distro : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
    Kernel : 6.8.0-52-generic
    VM Type : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:

    ISP : Solid Systems LLC
    ASN : AS399275 Solid Systems LLC
    Host : Solid Systems LLC
    Location : Tampa, Florida (FL)
    Country : United States

    Running fio random mixed R+W disk test with 4k block size.Running fio random mixed R+W disk test with 64k block sizeRunning fio random mixed R+W disk test with 512k block sizRunning fio random mixed R+W disk test with 1m block size.fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):

    Block Size 4k (IOPS) 64k (IOPS)
    Read 65.02 MB/s (16.2k) 1.30 GB/s (20.3k)
    Write 65.15 MB/s (16.2k) 1.31 GB/s (20.4k)
    Total 130.18 MB/s (32.5k) 2.61 GB/s (40.8k)
    Block Size 512k (IOPS) 1m (IOPS)
    ------ --- ---- ---- ----
    Read 3.89 GB/s (7.6k) 5.06 GB/s (4.9k)
    Write 4.10 GB/s (8.0k) 5.39 GB/s (5.2k)
    Total 8.00 GB/s (15.6k) 10.45 GB/s (10.2k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt #1 Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (Attempt #Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (Attempt #Clouvider London, UK (10G) 1.56 Gbits/sec 1.00 Gbits/sec 103 ms
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Eranium (Attempt #1 ofPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Eranium (Attempt #1 Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 6.68 Gbits/sec 6.18 Gbits/sec 109 ms
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Uztelecom (Attempt #1 Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Uztelecom (Attempt #2 Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Uztelecom (Attempt #3 Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Uztelecom (Attempt #Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Uztelecom (Attempt #Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) busy 1.10 Gbits/sec 456 ms
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Leaseweb (Attempt #1 oPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Leaseweb (Attempt #1Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Leaseweb (Attempt #2Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 3.08 Gbits/sec 4.25 Gbits/sec 244 ms
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt #1 Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt #2 Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (Attempt #Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (Attempt #Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 1.94 Gbits/sec 1.50 Gbits/sec 65.6 ms
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Leaseweb (Attempt #1 oPerforming IPv4 iperf3 send test to Leaseweb (Attempt #2 oPerforming IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Leaseweb (Attempt #1Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 6.25 Gbits/sec 6.94 Gbits/sec 37.4 ms
    Performing IPv4 iperf3 send test to Edgoo (Attempt #1 of 3Performing IPv4 iperf3 recv test from Edgoo (Attempt #1 ofEdgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 3.17 Gbits/sec 1.31 Gbits/sec 132 ms

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):

    Provider Location (Link) Send Speed Recv Speed Ping
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt #1 Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt #2 Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt #3 Performing IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (Attempt #Clouvider London, UK (10G) 1.84 Gbits/sec 1.32 Gbits/sec 98.7 ms
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Eranium (Attempt #1 ofPerforming IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Eranium (Attempt #1 Eranium Amsterdam, NL (100G) 6.88 Gbits/sec 6.49 Gbits/sec 109 ms
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Uztelecom (Attempt #1 Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Uztelecom (Attempt #2 Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Uztelecom (Attempt #3 Performing IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Uztelecom (Attempt #Performing IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Uztelecom (Attempt #Uztelecom Tashkent, UZ (10G) busy 203 Mbits/sec 396 ms
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Leaseweb (Attempt #1 oPerforming IPv6 iperf3 send test to Leaseweb (Attempt #2 oPerforming IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Leaseweb (Attempt #1Performing IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Leaseweb (Attempt #2Leaseweb Singapore, SG (10G) 3.32 Gbits/sec 4.45 Gbits/sec 244 ms
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Clouvider (Attempt #1 Performing IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (Attempt #Performing IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (Attempt #Performing IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Clouvider (Attempt #Clouvider Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) 2.81 Gbits/sec 3.33 Gbits/sec 65.7 ms
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Leaseweb (Attempt #1 oPerforming IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Leaseweb (Attempt #1Leaseweb NYC, NY, US (10G) 5.64 Gbits/sec 6.57 Gbits/sec 37.2 ms
    Performing IPv6 iperf3 send test to Edgoo (Attempt #1 of 3Performing IPv6 iperf3 recv test from Edgoo (Attempt #1 ofEdgoo Sao Paulo, BR (1G) 3.73 Gbits/sec 1.00 Gbits/sec 152 ms

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:

    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 1084
    Multi Core | 6300
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10303953

    YABS completed in 14 min 43 sec

  • Wait, one, I was never told this and two isn't this a downgrade?

    Yeah, same with the one I was testing, the score went down by a lot. Thanks for your initial response!

  • Flash deal! We kept your invoice amount the same and halved your server performance!

  • @barbaros said:
    Flash deal! We kept your invoice amount the same and halved your server performance!

    Mine wasn't a flash deal. To be honest I've heard a lot of good stuff about this provider. I'm not sure why they decided to make this change without telling their customers.

  • SolidVPSSolidVPS Member, Patron Provider
    edited February 2025

    @Piki said:

    @barbaros said:
    Flash deal! We kept your invoice amount the same and halved your server performance!

    Mine wasn't a flash deal. To be honest I've heard a lot of good stuff about this provider. I'm not sure why they decided to make this change without telling their customers.

    @Piki Please send us a private message with your server IP or open a support ticket. Your performance should always improve, not decline. We notify our clients in advance, or in rare cases, on the same day if there’s an emergency maintenance. @Kevinf100, we're actively working on correcting this for you—your performance should be increasing, not decreasing.

    Thanked by 2Kevinf100 admax
  • @SolidSeoVPS I just sent a pm. Thanks for looking into this.

    Thanked by 1SolidVPS
  • SolidVPSSolidVPS Member, Patron Provider

    @Piki said:
    @SolidSeoVPS I just sent a pm. Thanks for looking into this.

    You are most welcome, please check your PM

    Thanked by 1admax
  • I have a VDS with them for past 1 year. It has been rock solid. Also support ticket response times where also very good.

    Thanked by 1SolidVPS
  • Kevinf100Kevinf100 Member
    edited February 2025

    If anyone is curious, they bump the core count from 12 Dedi -> 12 Dedi and 12 Shared. So yeah I'll never have to worry about multi-threaded loads! XD
    Will say they responded fast on LET with a quick solution.

  • @Kevinf100 said:
    If anyone is curious, they bump the core count from 12 Dedi -> 12 Dedi and 12 Shared. So yeah I'll never have to worry about multi-threaded loads! XD
    Will say they responded fast on LET with a quick solution.

    So what did they do? You had 12 vCores and after the upgrade to EPYC your gb results went down. And you now got 12 Dedi+12 shared? So potentially 24 vCores? I'm just wondering why gb results went down in the first place, is the newly used EPYC so much slower?

  • Kevinf100Kevinf100 Member
    edited February 2025

    @b00n said:

    @Kevinf100 said:
    If anyone is curious, they bump the core count from 12 Dedi -> 12 Dedi and 12 Shared. So yeah I'll never have to worry about multi-threaded loads! XD
    Will say they responded fast on LET with a quick solution.

    So what did they do? You had 12 vCores and after the upgrade to EPYC your gb results went down. And you now got 12 Dedi+12 shared? So potentially 24 vCores? I'm just wondering why gb results went down in the first place, is the newly used EPYC so much slower?

    Before it was Ryzen, they are removing there Ryzens VPS and switch over to EPYC.
    Wait I just realized. Hey @SolidSeoVPS since you have EPYC at all locations can you tell me the models at them (US ones please)? Might be one closer to Ryzen performance.

  • SolidVPSSolidVPS Member, Patron Provider

    LA - AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core Processor
    Kansas - AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core Processor
    NY - AMD EPYC 7642 48-Core Processor
    Dallas - AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core Processor
    Tampa - AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core Processor
    Phoenix - AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor

    a Ryzen processor generally performs slightly better than an EPYC processor, as Ryzen CPUs are designed specifically for desktop performance with a focus on single-core speed, while EPYC processors prioritize high core counts for heavy multi-threaded workloads, often sacrificing a bit of single-core performance in favor of overall multi-core power, this is why we provided more cores we hope this helps however in terms of all other aspects EPYC is king

    Thanked by 3admax vicaya Kevinf100
  • @SolidSeoVPS said:
    LA - AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core Processor
    Kansas - AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core Processor
    NY - AMD EPYC 7642 48-Core Processor
    Dallas - AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core Processor
    Tampa - AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core Processor
    Phoenix - AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor

    a Ryzen processor generally performs slightly better than an EPYC processor, as Ryzen CPUs are designed specifically for desktop performance with a focus on single-core speed, while EPYC processors prioritize high core counts for heavy multi-threaded workloads, often sacrificing a bit of single-core performance in favor of overall multi-core power, this is why we provided more cores we hope this helps however in terms of all other aspects EPYC is king

    AMD EPYC 7713 is closest to the other to the Ryzen 7900X in terms of single core (About 500 points away in GB). The Single core speed is kind of what I wanted as it was hosting game servers. The extra cores I was using to host anything else random/small.
    BTW, are the plans that switched from Ryzen to EPYC attach to a real and hyperthreaded cores or only real cores?

  • SolidVPSSolidVPS Member, Patron Provider

    @Kevinf100 said:

    @SolidSeoVPS said:
    LA - AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core Processor
    Kansas - AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core Processor
    NY - AMD EPYC 7642 48-Core Processor
    Dallas - AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core Processor
    Tampa - AMD EPYC 7532 32-Core Processor
    Phoenix - AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor

    a Ryzen processor generally performs slightly better than an EPYC processor, as Ryzen CPUs are designed specifically for desktop performance with a focus on single-core speed, while EPYC processors prioritize high core counts for heavy multi-threaded workloads, often sacrificing a bit of single-core performance in favor of overall multi-core power, this is why we provided more cores we hope this helps however in terms of all other aspects EPYC is king

    AMD EPYC 7713 is closest to the other to the Ryzen 7900X in terms of single core (About 500 points away in GB). The Single core speed is kind of what I wanted as it was hosting game servers. The extra cores I was using to host anything else random/small.
    BTW, are the plans that switched from Ryzen to EPYC attach to a real and hyperthreaded cores or only real cores?

    Depends on the plan, please if you can open a ticket and we will move the vps to the location you want if needed

    Thanked by 1Kevinf100
  • DrNutellaDrNutella Member
    edited February 2025

    No issues with dedicated server. Support is the most patient and nicest with my stupidity that they take the time to serve me like I matter.

    I stay with @SolidSeoVPS forever. I hope they take my money.

    You know I was so impressed I turned my idler off. I never do that but I had to for them.

    Thanked by 1SolidVPS
  • SolidVPSSolidVPS Member, Patron Provider

    @DrNutella said:
    No issues with dedicated server. Support is the most patient and nicest with my stupidity that they take the time to serve me like I matter.

    I stay with @SolidSeoVPS forever. I hope they take my money.

    You know I was so impressed I turned my idler off. I never do that but I had to for them.

    Thank you for your support and business

    Thanked by 1admax
Sign In or Register to comment.