Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Provider Poll 2024 - Choose your favorite providers and win from our prizes worth more than $5,000!

12526272931

Comments

  • @CharityHost_org said:
    Who has the best Yabs/performance best bang for buck? Not just lowest cheapest. Bring it on and we will take that on! That and top notch swift support. Let's go!

    Sorry, but I can't believe you fell into the trap of asking for YABS for deals that were extremely limited and not generally available. Really, that's just completely pointless - it's just the way how your competitors do marketing (that's the only reason for these deals and has nothing to do with performance per buck of regular deals).

  • @pipijin said:
    1.Contabo
    2.RackNerd
    3.RoyaleHosting

    Most Stable:RackNerd

    You don't qualify to vote (independently of the exact deadline)

  • @velezkirsten said:
    1.RackNerd
    2.IncogNet
    3.BuyVM

    You don't qualify to vote (independently of the exact deadline)

  • @dav848 said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dav848 said: 6c/6r/60gb /gb6 around 1400 (flash deal ) usd12/y

    Genoa M – €4.95/month/4 C/16R/200 GB gb6 around 2k
    Saw some good stuff Ryzen with low quantity but around $16-25/y
    Hard to compete
    Who? Share yabs. I bet those are overloaded hosts 1:10 or 1:15.
    But could be a good surprise and see something with value.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/197455/amd-genoa-starting-at-4c-16gb-200gb-4-95-vps-deal-at-ph24/p1

    May be new hosts, even so these are 4 cores, lololol.

    The network send looks substandard a bit as well. Given, that could be network anywhere from edge to endpoint. Ok I will share some yabs, but will share new hosts to start.

    $6/mo regular price before discounts - look for promos soon as this is a new product for us. And giving away for this poll as prizes

    Ryzen 9 7950x3d Tier 1
    (I use tier 1 because it's 1 core and most dont want/need more than 1 core for VPN and what not, extrapolate from there)

    woot. look at the IOPS! and the GeekBench. Feedback?

    root@ryzen9-yabs:~# curl -sL https://yabs.sh | bash -s -- -r -9 -6
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-01-01                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Feb  4 06:20:11 AM EST 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 4192.048 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 961.0 MiB
    Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk       : 19.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-9-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corp / Oplink.net
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : NeoTechAdmin LLC
    Location   : Spring, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 543.71 MB/s (135.9k) | 4.33 GB/s    (67.8k)
    Write      | 545.14 MB/s (136.2k) | 4.36 GB/s    (68.1k)
    Total      | 1.08 GB/s   (272.2k) | 8.70 GB/s   (135.9k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 3.97 GB/s     (7.7k) | 3.80 GB/s     (3.7k)
    Write      | 4.18 GB/s     (8.1k) | 4.05 GB/s     (3.9k)
    Total      | 8.16 GB/s    (15.9k) | 7.85 GB/s     (7.6k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 341 Mbits/sec   | 813 Mbits/sec   | 105 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 326 Mbits/sec   | 592 Mbits/sec   | --
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 833 Mbits/sec   | 835 Mbits/sec   | 36.2 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 683 Mbits/sec   | 801 Mbits/sec   | 105 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 319 Mbits/sec   | 564 Mbits/sec   | 199 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 816 Mbits/sec   | 839 Mbits/sec   | 36.6 ms
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 10858
    Multi Core      | 9242
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/18497062
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2093
    Multi Core      | 2151
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23315882
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2617
    Multi Core      | 2127
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10294690
    

    https://looking-glass.charityhost.org
    South East TX US (Houston/Spring)
    Launching at North East US (Ohio) this week.

  • @cmeerw said:

    @CharityHost_org said:
    Who has the best Yabs/performance best bang for buck? Not just lowest cheapest. Bring it on and we will take that on! That and top notch swift support. Let's go!

    Sorry, but I can't believe you fell into the trap of asking for YABS for deals that were extremely limited and not generally available. Really, that's just completely pointless - it's just the way how your competitors do marketing (that's the only reason for these deals and has nothing to do with performance per buck of regular deals).

    It's good to compare and have healthy competition. All learn from each other. Be sustainble and stay sustainable my friends!

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @CharityHost_org said: $6/mo regular price before discounts

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2617
    Multi Core      | 2127
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10294690
    

    I'll stick with my $3 per year 2.7k GB6 VPS that doesn't have a constantly changing AUP and a limit of 25% CPU usage, thanks

  • dav848dav848 Member
    edited February 2025

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dav848 said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @dav848 said: 6c/6r/60gb /gb6 around 1400 (flash deal ) usd12/y

    Genoa M – €4.95/month/4 C/16R/200 GB gb6 around 2k
    Saw some good stuff Ryzen with low quantity but around $16-25/y
    Hard to compete
    Who? Share yabs. I bet those are overloaded hosts 1:10 or 1:15.
    But could be a good surprise and see something with value.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/197455/amd-genoa-starting-at-4c-16gb-200gb-4-95-vps-deal-at-ph24/p1

    May be new hosts, even so these are 4 cores, lololol.

    The network send looks substandard a bit as well. Given, that could be network anywhere from edge to endpoint. Ok I will share some yabs, but will share new hosts to start.

    $6/mo regular price before discounts - look for promos soon as this is a new product for us. And giving away for this poll as prizes

    Ryzen 9 7950x3d Tier 1
    (I use tier 1 because it's 1 core and most dont want/need more than 1 core for VPN and what not, extrapolate from there)

    woot. look at the IOPS! and the GeekBench. Feedback?

    root@ryzen9-yabs:~# curl -sL https://yabs.sh | bash -s -- -r -9 -6
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    # Yet-Another-Bench-Script #
    # v2025-01-01 #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

    Tue Feb 4 06:20:11 AM EST 2025

    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores : 1 @ 4192.048 MHz
    AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM : 961.0 MiB
    Swap : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk : 19.6 GiB
    Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel : 6.1.0-9-amd64
    VM Type : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP : The Optimal Link Corp / Oplink.net
    ASN : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host : NeoTechAdmin LLC
    Location : Spring, Texas (TX)
    Country : United States

    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 543.71 MB/s (135.9k) | 4.33 GB/s (67.8k)
    Write | 545.14 MB/s (136.2k) | 4.36 GB/s (68.1k)
    Total | 1.08 GB/s (272.2k) | 8.70 GB/s (135.9k)
    | |
    Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
    ------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
    Read | 3.97 GB/s (7.7k) | 3.80 GB/s (3.7k)
    Write | 4.18 GB/s (8.1k) | 4.05 GB/s (3.9k)
    Total | 8.16 GB/s (15.9k) | 7.85 GB/s (7.6k)

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
    ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 341 Mbits/sec | 813 Mbits/sec | 105 ms
    Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 326 Mbits/sec | 592 Mbits/sec | --
    Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 833 Mbits/sec | 835 Mbits/sec | 36.2 ms

    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider | Location (Link) | Send Speed | Recv Speed | Ping
    ----- | ----- | ---- | ---- | ----
    Clouvider | London, UK (10G) | 683 Mbits/sec | 801 Mbits/sec | 105 ms
    Leaseweb | Singapore, SG (10G) | 319 Mbits/sec | 564 Mbits/sec | 199 ms
    Leaseweb | NYC, NY, US (10G) | 816 Mbits/sec | 839 Mbits/sec | 36.6 ms

    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 10858
    Multi Core | 9242
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/18497062

    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2093
    Multi Core | 2151
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23315882

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test | Value
    |
    Single Core | 2617
    Multi Core | 2127
    Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10294690


    https://looking-glass.charityhost.org
    South East TX US (Houston/Spring)
    Launching at North East US (Ohio) this week.

    1 core Ryzen 9 with 1ram/20gb is nonsense
    Also, Its Provider Poll Thread better keep it clean

  • @beanman109 said:

    @CharityHost_org said:
    @beanman109 wish you best luck with that. I would not bank on it for real compute and data. Be careful.

    That being said, only one thing better we offer than that, and it's real. FREE GIVE AWAY VPS and Account Credits. Yes it's Lovely raffle, you have to win, but you can't lose.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/202392/free-credit-vps-gold-e5-2699v4-nvme-100s-usd-give-away-wheel-of-fortune-love-raffle

    Don't see any reason I shouldn't? It's a limited sale deal intended to drum up business - loss leader.

    If Enzonix is doing things right then absolutely no issue with selling some VPS at $3 p/yr.

    I also have a 6 core 6gb VPS from @SilverCreek for $10 per year if you want to try your hand at that

    Yeah, I think a few low cost promos should be fine. Both providers have also done other promos that didn’t go nearly as hard on the saving. Those super good deals were also super limited, but there was page after page of people discussing both Terabit and Enzonix when they offered those promo. In Enzonix’s case the games etc they had around it had people engaged for a few days. They both got some mindshare out of it.

    Also got the Terabit promo. I’ve also subsequently purchased some more expensive plans at about $5 a month with both those two providers too. Still cheap but certainly not $3yr crazy.

    Both companies seem like they wanted to do a bit of community engagement here and there, but also keep the volume in check.

  • edited February 2025

    @beanman109 said: I'll stick with my $3 per year 2.7k GB6 VPS that doesn't have a constantly changing AUP and a limit of 25% CPU usage, thanks

    Sure beanman, then check what happens later like uptime and rate limiting and all that. Keep me posted. Our aup is adjusted to balance the needs of all on shared resources and it's 100% burst with us, we only rate limit to 35% when they overuse the burst.

    Just like @cmeerw said, a disfavor for your kind host, that may later change of attitude. Best luck making them pay for your service. Feel sorry for both of you! lol

  • @dav848 said: Launching at North East US (Ohio) this week.

    1 core Ryzen 9 with 1ram/20gb is nonsense

    Nonsense to you if you think you can get better support, uptime, reliability, and stability otherwise. But I doubt it.

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad
    edited February 2025

    @CharityHost_org said: then check what happens later like uptime and rate limiting and all that.

    Similar to how you "Refactored" your VPS HDD Storage services recently yeah?

  • @beanman109 said:

    @CharityHost_org said: then check what happens later like uptime and rate limiting and all that.

    Similar to how you "Refactored" your VPS HDD Storage services recently yeah?

    No not similar WORSE! If hosts dont adapt offerings, they fail. If they cannot sustain your offer you bought, you and them fail. And that is the case, they cannot sustain it. You just got lucky on a penny deal you are costing them 10x what you pay. Thank you! Be part of the sustainable solution for your partner host

  • Bottom line, selling a 4c VPS at $3/yr is the same as a give away. Limited to 4 to 12 units, drum up some brand notes, ok. You just got lucky to have them pay it for you. Pay up when the time comes, or find another host/deal-at-loss offer, right? Thanks!

    Now on to the poll. Keep poll voting!

  • @FAT32 said:

    @noob404 said: Only if you vote for noob404. BTW, let me know if you need help in counting the votes :lol:

    Thank you, vote counting is in progress actually... but I am at work and will only be able to design the graphics when I reach home

    Curious about the process. Is validating the ‘5 years of business’ for the most stable provider a large time sink or did you have something in place to make that easier? Seems like the bit that could be most tedious to me?

    I looked at one company and it was hard to pin down an exact start date. Some will be easier than other, assume some might be hard to isolate?

  • truemagictruemagic Member
    edited February 2025

    Ok when I see all the replies I thought there were some flash sales going on

    Thanked by 2admax emgh
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad
    edited February 2025

    @CharityHost_org said:
    Who has the best Yabs/performance best bang for buck? Not just lowest cheapest. Bring it on and we will take that on! That and top notch swift support. Let's go!

    you're serious?

    I've got a 6 vCPU with 6 GB RAM and 66 GB of storage with IPv4 for less than a coffee at a café per year. Price match?

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @CharityHost_org said: then check what happens later like uptime and rate limiting and all that.

    Similar to how you "Refactored" your VPS HDD Storage services recently yeah?

    No not similar WORSE! If hosts dont adapt offerings, they fail. If they cannot sustain your offer you bought, you and them fail. And that is the case, they cannot sustain it. You just got lucky on a penny deal you are costing them 10x what you pay. Thank you! Be part of the sustainable solution for your partner host

    Maybe LET is not the right place for you then. The overall mood here is focusing on getting biggest bang for the buck. Some corners may be cut but that doesn't necessarily mean providers are not sustainable.

    I have a $1.11/ year vps and it's chugging along fine since 2023. A definite loss leaders but provider has still maintained the service quality as day 1 and still not dead.

    It's a bit harsh to critique some providers without knowing how their Financials look like and make a blatant assumption that a few loss leaders mean nothing but doom.

    There is always an inherent risk with providers that could deadpool with even "sustainable" deals.

    On the other hand, You are a part of the problem by luring users to post their order number to gain something extra (additional memory/ disk/ bandwidth).

    How? There is NO way anyone would willfully offer extra resources without factoring in the price of the addon. It's a psychological move to make the end users feel they get a "good" deal but it's customers who are paying for that additional bonus. It may infact work in your favor as not many people may end up posting their order details to claim allowing you to profit a few extra cents

    Talk about being sustainable without deceptive marketing.

  • @truemagic said:
    Ok when I see all the replies I thought there were some flash sales going on

    Nah. Just late votes and internet arguments :)

    Thanked by 2emgh truemagic
  • 亲爱的 CharityHost

    You should stop bashing every merchant and accusing them for overselling if a merchant is doing a better job than you.

    You have a bad reputation with MJJ because you logged in a customer chicken without the authorization of the owner. This is serious misconduct. 您能否认这一点吗?Can you deny this?

  • BlembimBlembim Member
    edited February 2025

    I hope this isnt the case of someone getting furious all of sudden because gettin sunny'ed

    Thanked by 1admax
  • @martin_hetz said:
    亲爱的 CharityHost

    You should stop bashing every merchant and accusing them for overselling if a merchant is doing a better job than you.

    You have a bad reputation with MJJ because you logged in a customer chicken without the authorization of the owner. This is serious misconduct. 您能否认这一点吗?Can you deny this?

    Wts a customer chicken 🤔

    Thanked by 2admax barbaros
  • lukast__lukast__ Member, Megathread Squad
    edited February 2025

    @CharityHost_org said:
    Who has the best Yabs/performance best bang for buck? Not just lowest cheapest. Bring it on and we will take that on! That and top notch swift support. Let's go!

    Layer.ae $1/yr Singapore with 7950X:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-01-01                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Feb  4 12:38:28 CET 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 18 days, 19 hours, 21 minutes
    Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 7950X 16-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 4499.948 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 435.1 MiB
    Swap       : 3.4 GiB
    Disk       : 9.9 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-30-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : IPvX.Solutions LLC
    ASN        : AS216382 LAYER MARKETING SERVICES L.L.C
    Host       : Layer
    Location   : Singapore, North West (03)
    Country    : Singapore
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 244.72 MB/s  (61.1k) | 1.94 GB/s    (30.3k)
    Write      | 245.37 MB/s  (61.3k) | 1.95 GB/s    (30.4k)
    Total      | 490.10 MB/s (122.5k) | 3.89 GB/s    (60.7k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.95 GB/s     (3.8k) | 2.26 GB/s     (2.2k)
    Write      | 2.06 GB/s     (4.0k) | 2.41 GB/s     (2.3k)
    Total      | 4.01 GB/s     (7.8k) | 4.68 GB/s     (4.5k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 811 Mbits/sec   | 581 Mbits/sec   | 157 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 746 Mbits/sec   | 547 Mbits/sec   | 184 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.16 Gbits/sec  | 780 Mbits/sec   | 187 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 5.88 Gbits/sec  | 9.30 Gbits/sec  | 1.42 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 704 Mbits/sec   | 512 Mbits/sec   | 174 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 466 Mbits/sec   | 374 Mbits/sec   | 236 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 355 Mbits/sec   | 249 Mbits/sec   | 326 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 795 Mbits/sec   | 581 Mbits/sec   | 157 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 742 Mbits/sec   | 547 Mbits/sec   | 184 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 663 Mbits/sec   | 458 Mbits/sec   | 187 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 6.17 Gbits/sec  | 9.01 Gbits/sec  | 1.39 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 746 Mbits/sec   | 553 Mbits/sec   | 174 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 434 Mbits/sec   | 379 Mbits/sec   | 236 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 247 Mbits/sec   | 326 ms
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 8328
    Multi Core      | 7540
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/18497096
    
    YABS completed in 10 min 30 sec
    

    Enzonix $5/yr:

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-01-01                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Feb  4 13:07:49 CET 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 17 hours, 23 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC-Milan Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 3799.936 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 1.9 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 34.9 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-30-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Interserver, Inc
    ASN        : AS19318 Interserver, Inc
    Host       : Interserver, Inc
    Location   : Secaucus, New Jersey (NJ)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 225.22 MB/s  (56.3k) | 429.05 MB/s   (6.7k)
    Write      | 225.82 MB/s  (56.4k) | 431.31 MB/s   (6.7k)
    Total      | 451.04 MB/s (112.7k) | 860.37 MB/s  (13.4k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 793.65 MB/s   (1.5k) | 943.98 MB/s    (921)
    Write      | 835.82 MB/s   (1.6k) | 1.00 GB/s      (983)
    Total      | 1.62 GB/s     (3.1k) | 1.95 GB/s     (1.9k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.06 Gbits/sec  | 176 Mbits/sec   | 67.6 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.07 Gbits/sec  | 887 Mbits/sec   | 77.4 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 718 Mbits/sec   | 536 Mbits/sec   | 161 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 580 Mbits/sec   | 667 Mbits/sec   | 219 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.06 Gbits/sec  | 967 Mbits/sec   | 64.0 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.15 Gbits/sec  | 1.00 Gbits/sec  | 2.39 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.00 Gbits/sec  | 180 Mbits/sec   | 111 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 329 Mbits/sec   | 67.6 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 964 Mbits/sec   | 858 Mbits/sec   | 77.5 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 911 Mbits/sec   | 280 Mbits/sec   | 161 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 310 Mbits/sec   | 656 Mbits/sec   | 219 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 956 Mbits/sec   | 63.9 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.14 Gbits/sec  | 988 Mbits/sec   | 2.38 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.05 Gbits/sec  | 131 Mbits/sec   | 110 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2558
    Multi Core      | 2575
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10296233
    
    YABS completed in 12 min 43 sec
    

    ProHosting24 (around $3.5/mo with top-up bonus) (19% VAT included):

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2025-01-01                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Tue Feb  4 01:18:30 PM CET 2025
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 11 days, 20 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2800.000 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 15.6 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 196.8 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-30-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    ASN        : AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
    Host       : Prohosting24
    Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 244.61 MB/s  (61.1k) | 3.27 GB/s    (51.2k)
    Write      | 245.25 MB/s  (61.3k) | 3.29 GB/s    (51.4k)
    Total      | 489.87 MB/s (122.4k) | 6.57 GB/s   (102.7k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 11.22 GB/s   (21.9k) | 14.92 GB/s   (14.5k)
    Write      | 11.82 GB/s   (23.0k) | 15.91 GB/s   (15.5k)
    Total      | 23.04 GB/s   (45.0k) | 30.84 GB/s   (30.1k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 2.08 Gbits/sec  | 1.96 Gbits/sec  | 12.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.09 Gbits/sec  | 1.97 Gbits/sec  | 7.78 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.26 Gbits/sec  | 1.86 Gbits/sec  | 85.2 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 778 Mbits/sec   | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 158 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 1.04 Gbits/sec  | 142 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.50 Gbits/sec  | 1.87 Gbits/sec  | 83.0 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 539 Mbits/sec   | 526 Mbits/sec   | 197 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 2.07 Gbits/sec  | 1.92 Gbits/sec  | 12.2 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.08 Gbits/sec  | 1.95 Gbits/sec  | 7.84 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.38 Gbits/sec  | 1.83 Gbits/sec  | 83.9 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 940 Mbits/sec   | 1.12 Gbits/sec  | 158 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 701 Mbits/sec   | 839 Mbits/sec   | 142 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 1.31 Gbits/sec  | 1.85 Gbits/sec  | 81.9 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 714 Mbits/sec   | 890 Mbits/sec   | 197 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1304
    Multi Core      | 4022
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10296571
    
    YABS completed in 13 min 25 sec
    

    But I think @emgh has the cheapest, his 6/6/66 was reduced multiple times IIRC, can't remember what the final cost was though.

    And I agree with @beanman109; IMHO it isn't nice to ask what good deals there were and then, when someone replies with a YABS of a good, limited and obviously unprofitable deal, instantly accuse the provider of overselling or suggest that the provider is unreliable.

  • @emgh said:

    @CharityHost_org said:
    Who has the best Yabs/performance best bang for buck? Not just lowest cheapest. Bring it on and we will take that on! That and top notch swift support. Let's go!

    you're serious?

    I've got a 6 vCPU with 6 GB RAM and 66 GB of storage with IPv4 for less than a coffee at a café per year. Price match?

    Ur vietNAAM 3 Dollah trumps that :)

    Thanked by 2emgh admax
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @raza19 said:

    @emgh said:

    @CharityHost_org said:
    Who has the best Yabs/performance best bang for buck? Not just lowest cheapest. Bring it on and we will take that on! That and top notch swift support. Let's go!

    you're serious?

    I've got a 6 vCPU with 6 GB RAM and 66 GB of storage with IPv4 for less than a coffee at a café per year. Price match?

    Ur vietNAAM 3 Dollah trumps that :)

    Maybe, but he likely can't provide that. This is better specs per dollar excluding the location aspect.

    Thanked by 3admax raza19 DeusVult
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @lukast__ said: But I think @emgh has the cheapest, his 6/6/66 was reduced multiple times IIRC, can't remember what the final cost was though.

    Just below 3 freedom bucks IIRC

  • @emgh said:

    @lukast__ said: But I think @emgh has the cheapest, his 6/6/66 was reduced multiple times IIRC, can't remember what the final cost was though.

    Just below 3 freedom bucks IIRC

    That’s nuts. It was (and is) an amazing deal at $12.

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @beanman109 said: IPv6 is available I'll just never turn that shit on.

    chad status confirmed

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @cmeerw said:

    @CharityHost_org said:
    Who has the best Yabs/performance best bang for buck? Not just lowest cheapest. Bring it on and we will take that on! That and top notch swift support. Let's go!

    Sorry, but I can't believe you fell into the trap of asking for YABS for deals that were extremely limited and not generally available. Really, that's just completely pointless - it's just the way how your competitors do marketing (that's the only reason for these deals and has nothing to do with performance per buck of regular deals).

    It could work though, I see Enzonix mentioned again and again and from what I know they didn't even sell that many at the lowest priced deal. Sure, it's a recurring loss, which sucks, but only as long as the buyers keep paying, and if they keep paying, they likely keep mentioning the deal.

    Thanked by 1admax
This discussion has been closed.