Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

NEW MICRO VPS: $0.84 to $1.20 / mo VPS NVMe/SSD!! FREE Addons: Double Bandwidth/25% MORE RAM/DISK

edited February 2025 in Offers


VPS SSD and NVMe

New MICRO VPS

We now have a new entry level MICRO VPS tiers and FTP Accounts with LiteSpeed Server static file hosting offering unbeatable price and performance!

ONLY $0.84 usd / month on triennial plan

VPS NVMe .5

$1.20/month (with 40% discount)
$12/annual
$21/biannual
$30/triennial

  • 1 Intel Xeon Gold 6248 vCPU (50% share)
  • 512 MB DDR4 memory
  • 10 GB SSD RAID 10
  • 1 GbE Public
  • 10 GbE Private
  • 500 GB Bandwidth

ORDER VPS NVMe .5

VPS SSD .5

$1.20/month (with 40% discount)
$12/annual
$21/biannual
$30/triennial

  • 1 Intel Xeon E5-2699 v4 (50% share)
  • 512 MB DDR4 memory
  • 10 GB SSD RAID 10
  • 1 GbE Public
  • 10 GbE Private
  • 500 GB Bandwidth

ORDER VPS SSD .5

Promo CodeMICROVPS40

40% Discount monthly and quarterly

Renews 4 times for a total of up to 1 year, or choose 1 year or more for greater discounts:

  • 50% discount annually
  • 56% discount biennially
  • 58% discount triennially

Features:

  • KVM Virtualizor End User control panel dashboard
  • Intel Xeon Gold 6248 2nd Gen. Scalable 2.5 GHz
  • Samsung Enterprise NVMe RAID 10
  • Intel Xeon E5-2699v4 2.2Ghz to 3.5Ghz
  • Enterprise SSD RAID 10 Fast IO
  • Uncapped fair shared resources performance and speed: memory, disk, io, network speed
  • 1 GbE Public Network: Test Links
  • ipv6 ONLY included
  • High bandwidth limits
  • 10 GbE Private Network for VPS clustering
  • 100 Gbps Corero SmartWall Edge DDoS protection
  • Lumen primary and Cogent secondary backbones
  • Owned hardware colocation in Houston, TX in TRG datacenter
  • Control Panel auto-installers
  • ISO uploads to install any x86_64 compatible OS.
  • Custom resource VPS configurations available via support ticket.
  • Location: Houston TX
  • Backbones Lumen and Cogentco
  • 30 Day Money back guarantee

Get PLUS CHOOSE ONE FREE ADDON:

  • 25% MORE MEMORY
  • 25% MORE DISK
  • DOUBLE BANDWITH

Example request:

Invoice # abc777 DOUBLE BANDWIDTH

ipv6 ONLY with outbound ipv6 to ipv4 nat64 dns translation - control panels tested working - connectivity to ipv4 not guaranteed as it is dependent on nat64 dns and endpoint support.

NEW FTP STORAGE ACCOUNTS as well!

Pro tip!  Host your static files publicly from the FTP Account using LiteSpeed web server included!

Apply the same promo code for 40% discount on FTP Storage using CyberPanel hosting.

Promo Code: MICROVPS40 

FTP Storage accounts start at 500 GB for $2.40 / month and upgrade to 10 TB plus.

ORDER FTP STORAGE

Test IPv4: 216.230.228.150
Test IPv6: 2604:e880:0002:0010:0000:0000:949a:895c
Test file: https://looking-glass.charityhost.org/1000.mb
Looking glass: https://looking-glass.charityhost.org

Reach out anytime with any questions anytime!

Thanked by 2faleddo hidonny
«1

Comments

  • Doesn't look like the SSD link is going to the correct place.

    Thanked by 1CharityHost_org
  • @Xrmaddness said:
    Doesn't look like the SSD link is going to the correct place.

    Thank you! Fixed.

  • Nice deal

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    Buyer beware.
    This provider has changed their AUP to reduce the value of existing services.
    Link to previous AUP archived, updated AUP archived.
    In the previous AUP, every VPS is allowed 35% persistent CPU and mail ports are open.
    In the updated AUP, every discounted VPS is allowed 25% persistent CPU and mail ports require $25 fee (including encrypted mail ports to relay providers such as MXroute).
    As reported on OGF, this change is retroactively applied to existing services, reducing the value of active services during their contract period.
    This provider cannot be trusted.

  • edited February 2025

    @yoursunny said:
    Buyer beware.
    This provider has changed their AUP to reduce the value of existing services.
    Link to previous AUP archived, updated AUP archived.
    In the previous AUP, every VPS is allowed 35% persistent CPU and mail ports are open.
    In the updated AUP, every discounted VPS is allowed 25% persistent CPU and mail ports require $25 fee (including encrypted mail ports to relay providers such as MXroute).
    As reported on OGF, this change is retroactively applied to existing services, reducing the value of active services during their contract period.
    This provider cannot be trusted.

    That is true, so things do change for good reasons, to sustain and maintain. And in reality we are only enforcing 35% persistent CPU right now and are probably going to change the AUP again back to 35%. If anyone is limited to 25% they can contact us because that is not the current situation. Also 25% CPU persistent was supposed to be focused for huge discounted purchases to balance out the difference between discounted and going product prices, but that's not even the case anymore as I mentioned. And the cpu limits are fully automated by scripts that check persistent CPU AUP violation above 35% get rate limited to 35%, once the cpu rates go below 35% the full 100% burst is enabled again, no manual intervention involved. This is to protect all customers on the VPS hosts from negative impact from resources neighboring effects.

    Email sending fee is there to protect the network from spammers since there are many smtp services that do much better than a VPS ip that should be used via api. Ipv4 leasors charge $20 to $40 per abuse incident, we just pass that along to the customer.

    @yoursunny Instead of criticising without knowing why these AUP points have changed, why dont you post questions asking why it changed to provide more insight and value instead of calling out changes in a negative way that provide no value?

  • @CharityHost_org said:
    @yoursunny Instead of criticising without knowing why these AUP points have changed, why dont you post questions asking why it changed to provide more insight and value instead of calling out changes in a negative way that provide no value?

    How were those changes communicated to existing customers? Did you clearly communicate the reasons for those changes to customers?

    Thanked by 2DeusVult JohnnySac
  • edited February 2025

    @cmeerw said:

    @CharityHost_org said:
    @yoursunny Instead of criticising without knowing why these AUP points have changed, why dont you post questions asking why it changed to provide more insight and value instead of calling out changes in a negative way that provide no value?

    How were those changes communicated to existing customers? Did you clearly communicate the reasons for those changes to customers?

    They were emailed. Again, the 25% CPU rate is not the situation, it is fully automated to 35% now when AUP is violated, and return to 100% burst automated as well. It's a daily script. Currently updating the AUP again. The SMTP allowance is not going to change from this though to protect from abusive email spammers. Our ipv4 providers fine $20 to $40 per incident so we have to take preventative measure.

    Thanked by 1Cryptominer937
  • @yoursunny said:
    Buyer beware.
    This provider has changed their AUP to reduce the value of existing services.
    Link to previous AUP archived, updated AUP archived.
    In the previous AUP, every VPS is allowed 35% persistent CPU and mail ports are open.
    In the updated AUP, every discounted VPS is allowed 25% persistent CPU and mail ports require $25 fee (including encrypted mail ports to relay providers such as MXroute).
    As reported on OGF, this change is retroactively applied to existing services, reducing the value of active services during their contract period.
    This provider cannot be trusted.

    thanks for you advice. Would be buying but no more.

  • edited February 2025

    @DeusVult said:

    @yoursunny said:
    Buyer beware.
    This provider has changed their AUP to reduce the value of existing services.
    Link to previous AUP archived, updated AUP archived.
    In the previous AUP, every VPS is allowed 35% persistent CPU and mail ports are open.
    In the updated AUP, every discounted VPS is allowed 25% persistent CPU and mail ports require $25 fee (including encrypted mail ports to relay providers such as MXroute).
    As reported on OGF, this change is retroactively applied to existing services, reducing the value of active services during their contract period.
    This provider cannot be trusted.

    thanks for you advice. Would be buying but no more.

    If you were not intending to spam, then it would not be any different than before. So there is no difference there. Please read our responses in the comments. The AUP is being changed again because we are not rate limiting 25%, it's where it was before since it's now automated.

    Thanked by 1Cryptominer937
  • edited February 2025

    https://charityhost.org/acceptable-use-policy/

    Please see that the AUP is up to date now to reflect the current status. The CPU 25% sustained limit was changed prior, not recently, and was reverted but the AUP was not yet updated to reflect that it is automated and indeed 35%. The smtp clause will not change right now and was the most recent update prior to today

    Thanked by 1Cryptominer937
  • cmeerwcmeerw Member
    edited February 2025

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @DeusVult said:

    @yoursunny said:
    Buyer beware.
    This provider has changed their AUP to reduce the value of existing services.
    Link to previous AUP archived, updated AUP archived.
    In the previous AUP, every VPS is allowed 35% persistent CPU and mail ports are open.
    In the updated AUP, every discounted VPS is allowed 25% persistent CPU and mail ports require $25 fee (including encrypted mail ports to relay providers such as MXroute).
    As reported on OGF, this change is retroactively applied to existing services, reducing the value of active services during their contract period.
    This provider cannot be trusted.

    thanks for you advice. Would be buying but no more.

    If you were not intending to spam, then it would not be any different than before. So there is no difference there.

    But there is a $25 fee for being able to send any mail (for a $12/year VPS) - sounds like a difference to me.

    I really don't get the thing about ports 465, 587, and 2525 - are there any systems that accept mail on these ports without authentication? What next? A fee to unblock port 22 because someone might run an SSH server somewhere that doesn't require a password?

  • edited February 2025

    @cmeerw said:

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @DeusVult said:

    @yoursunny said:
    Buyer beware.
    This provider has changed their AUP to reduce the value of existing services.
    Link to previous AUP archived, updated AUP archived.
    In the previous AUP, every VPS is allowed 35% persistent CPU and mail ports are open.
    In the updated AUP, every discounted VPS is allowed 25% persistent CPU and mail ports require $25 fee (including encrypted mail ports to relay providers such as MXroute).
    As reported on OGF, this change is retroactively applied to existing services, reducing the value of active services during their contract period.
    This provider cannot be trusted.

    thanks for you advice. Would be buying but no more.

    If you were not intending to spam, then it would not be any different than before. So there is no difference there.

    But there is a $25 fee for being able to send any mail (for a $12/year VPS) - sounds like a difference to me.

    I really don't get the thing about ports 465, 587, and 2525 - are there any systems that accept mail on these ports without authentication? What next? A fee to unblock port 22 because someone might run an SSH server somewhere that doesn't require a password?

    Yes, that is to protect the reputation of our IP subnets. We already had issues with customers VPS abusing, it's sensible and you can use smtp2go.com or any smtp service by api as an alternative. If you really need smtp, and do not spam, then it's not a problem just pay the $25 fee to unblock, it is a placeholder in case there is spamming abuse. It's a good point though, that the fee could be and perhaps should be a retainer fee, and upon cancellation of services can be refunded, will consider this to be fair. And NO, ssh will not be blocked but brute force ssh attacks against other servers IS disallowed and will be flagged as abuse.

    Thanked by 1Cryptominer937
  • edited February 2025

    @cmeerw Appreciate the feedback and take it seriously. Changing the AUP to be $25 retainer fee that is refundable for SMTP enablement.

    Access to email ports 25, 465, 587, and 2525 requires a one-time activation retainer fee of $25.00. The $25 retainer fee is refundable by support ticket request once the service is cancelled if no abuse has been found. The $25 retainer refund will have a 30 day delay to make sure no abuse is reported in delay after cancellation.

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    Well done @CharityHost_org . Another day, another low-end ticket handled well :)

  • I received the email yesterday about the new AUP. Also new is:

    Swap Space: Permitted, but overuse (more than 25-30% of RAM) may lead to performance issues that can be flagged manually.

    Hopefully all these new restrictions (like closed email ports) don't apply to already purchased VPS's of customers who have no history of abuse.

    I understand trying to protect your assets and IP reputation from abusers, but existing customers who have not been a problem should be exempt.

  • @yoursunny said:
    Buyer beware.
    This provider has changed their AUP to reduce the value of existing services.
    Link to previous AUP archived, updated AUP archived.
    In the previous AUP, every VPS is allowed 35% persistent CPU and mail ports are open.
    In the updated AUP, every discounted VPS is allowed 25% persistent CPU and mail ports require $25 fee (including encrypted mail ports to relay providers such as MXroute).
    As reported on OGF, this change is retroactively applied to existing services, reducing the value of active services during their contract period.
    This provider cannot be trusted.

    Thank you for the alert!

    Thanked by 1DeusVult
  • edited February 2025

    @wholecake said: Thank you for the alert!

    Beware of FUD mongering.

    Please do check: https://charityhost.org/aup

  • @JohnnySac said: Hopefully all these new restrictions (like closed email ports) don't apply to already purchased VPS's of customers who have no history of abuse.

    I understand trying to protect your assets and IP reputation from abusers, but existing customers who have not been a problem should be exempt.

    Yes customers with a good standing following the acceptable use policy would not be affected. That's normal. I understand the concerns.

    Thanked by 1JohnnySac
  • @CharityHost_org said:

    @JohnnySac said: Hopefully all these new restrictions (like closed email ports) don't apply to already purchased VPS's of customers who have no history of abuse.

    I understand trying to protect your assets and IP reputation from abusers, but existing customers who have not been a problem should be exempt.

    Yes customers with a good standing following the acceptable use policy would not be affected. That's normal. I understand the concerns.

    Ok thanks for the clarification. For what it's worth, I do like CharityHost and think they are a really good provider!

  • edited February 2025

    Do you know why your services are throttled? If you sustain over 35% cpu ongoing average, the VPS is rate limited to 35%. Once you get that overuse under control, you will have 100% CPU burst again once the average sustained CPU historical is below 35%. The 35% CPU is a metric averaged out daily for all VPS historicals. It's an automated daily check.

    Feel free to send a support ticket to get help to resolve this as well. We are happy to help!

    Until we have VDS hosting back in the line up, this is the case for all VPS services with us. Fair share.

  • @CharityHost_org said:

    Do you know why your services are throttled? If you sustain over 35% cpu ongoing average, the VPS is rate limited to 35%. Once you get that overuse under control, you will have 100% CPU burst again once the average sustained CPU historical is below 35%. The 35% CPU is a metric averaged out daily for all VPS historicals.

    Feel free to send a support ticket to get help to resolve this as well. We are happy to help!

    Until we have VDS hosting back in the line up, this is the case for all VPS services with us. Fair share.

    That actually shows your throttling system is working pretty well, keeping the average right around 35%.

  • As a quick pivot.

    .5 plans will allow 100% burst instead of 50% burst, so you effectively get 1 core at burst 100% with 35% sustained max just like any other VPS.

  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    Another email from the provider regarding existing services devaluation.

    Refactoring of VPS HDD Storage services and limitations

    Dear [],
    We have created new VPS HDD Storage plans to focus on maintaining stability, reliability and performance for all VPS HDD Storage customers.

    Recently, we have had to take action on VPS HDD Storage service AUP violations. In order prevent these occurences we have refactored the VPS HDD Storage plans to accodomate all Storage and Backup use cases for VPS HDD Storage customers. These plans are intended for storage and backups, not for compute. The underlying host has IO and resource limitations that cannot accomodate excessive use of compute and IO for services on these VPS.

    Due to this, we kindly ask that you focus the use of your VPS HDD Storage service for actual data storage and backups, and not use these as primary compute for services.

    We have tried to keep your legacy resources as is, however, as we mentioned, when compute use is excessive, we have to act to protect your VPS as well as others on these hosts. Therefor we have had to align current VPS HDD Storage plans to the new model.

    Apologies for any inconveniences.

    We thank you for your understanding and cooperation.

  • edited February 2025

    @yoursunny Why do you insist in bashing web hosts? If you know anything about servers and HDD IO, you should know better that this is in order to provide better services and stability. Your bashing and FUD mongering is way out of line since it's not even related to this offer.

    Thanked by 2Saragoldfarb hidonny
  • yoursunnyyoursunny Member, IPv6 Advocate

    Mentally strong provider do not oversell CPU or I/O bandwidth.

    Thanked by 2barbaros Blembim
  • @yoursunny said:
    Mentally strong provider do not oversell CPU or I/O bandwidth.

    Mentally strong? What are you talking about, you make no sense.

  • Lol, mentally strong providers that's funny. Im pretty sure most providers on LET are quite crazy. :D

    Don't see a ton of vds offers on here. VPS = oversold lol.

    Thanked by 1yoursunny
  • barbarosbarbaros Member
    edited February 2025

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @yoursunny said:
    Mentally strong provider do not oversell CPU or I/O bandwidth.

    Mentally strong? What are you talking about, you make no sense.

    I'll be the devil's advocate here.

    He is calling you out for sneakingly changing AUP, then taking a backstep when called out for it.

    You sold services to people, either monthly or yearly payments, then after that you changed AUP or IO rules which also affect them.

    Example: I bought a storage service from you, considering to use it for primary services, because when I bought it, there was no limits / restrictions about it. And now after I paid for your services, you introduced new rules about IO limits.

    BTW, I am not your customer but heard good things about you on LET.

    Usually, if you sell someone a service as provider (ISP, Mobile operator etc etc.) and if you change rules during the contract period, then this is considered as breaking of contract and customer can walk out freely before waiting their contract term end. Because their service terms has changed against them, since they paid for it.

    It's like you buy a car, and a month later car company limits your max speed saying that we should watch out for carbon gas emissions.

    Edit: To add, @yoursunny is also calling you out for doing these changes because you oversold your resources (Disk IO, CPU etc.)

Sign In or Register to comment.