Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Need RAM, bandwidth or storage? Introducing new plans from ServerPoint!

2456789

Comments

  • @serverpoint

    order #8244983

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • serverpointserverpoint Member, Patron Provider

    @kenn021 said:
    dont over selling please :D

    We don't. :) We pay close attention to the CPU resources in our hypervisors and stop adding clients to any hypervisor once we see an average 30-40% usage. Certainly, we never allow it to get to 100%.

    All RAM is a dedicated resource though, thus, RAM can't be oversold.

    Thanked by 2eb1995 nghialele
  • invoice #823151

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • serverpointserverpoint Member, Patron Provider
    edited January 2025

    @rudysi said:
    Why geekbench not display on YABS?

    No particular reason; it just takes a long time to run Yabs with the geekbench test enabled. :)

    We also have hypervisors with Xeon Gold processors running at 3.4Ghz, which are not part of this offer.

    But I just ran the geekbench test on the three types of CPUs we use. I'll include these in our next posts.

    E5-2699Av4 (VM with 8 vCPUs)

    Single Core     | 802
    Multi Core      | 3962
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10147797
    

    E5-2683v4 (VM with 8 vCPUs)

    Single Core     | 672
    Multi Core      | 3192
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10147898
    

    Xeon Gold 6144 (VM with 4 vCPUs)

    Single Core     | 1022
    Multi Core      | 2952
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10147859
    
    Thanked by 2rudysi nghialele
  • Order #6403000
    Please double. @serverpoint

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • Just to double check, if I order LET-RAM1, can I upgrade to the next package LET-RAM2 if I need more ram?

  • Order #2969547, thanks!

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • serverpointserverpoint Member, Patron Provider

    @heycloud said:
    Just to double check, if I order LET-RAM1, can I upgrade to the next package LET-RAM2 if I need more ram?

    Yes, but it would have to be something that we'd have to manually do on our side, as the upgrade interface in our portal will not show plans related to special deals. Just reach out to our team via our ticket system. :)

  • Invoice #823203

    double bw please.
    thanks

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • invoice# > @serverpoint said:

    @sitss said:
    3-year term option returns "Error! undefined" @serverpoint

    Try it now. It is corrected. It seems one of the servers in the load balanced server pool was having some issues sending proper data to Stripe...

    We took the bad server out of the pool and the other servers are now handling the orders fine.

    @serverpoint the cc charge was made, yet the portal is not acknowledging the purchase. I've already raised a ticket for it.

  • order #7128769,Double BW please thanks

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • @serverpoint said:

    @Noct said:
    Great offers. Nice one for posting all the YABSs and looking glasses so that we can make properly informed decisions.

    Thank you! We've been learning about what is important to you all. :) And that includes ipv6... :)

    Evidently you have. That ipv6 part, though, so far as I've noticed, is important to just the one ubiquitous fanatic.

  • serverpointserverpoint Member, Patron Provider

    @sitss said:
    invoice# > @serverpoint said:

    @sitss said:
    3-year term option returns "Error! undefined" @serverpoint

    Try it now. It is corrected. It seems one of the servers in the load balanced server pool was having some issues sending proper data to Stripe...

    We took the bad server out of the pool and the other servers are now handling the orders fine.

    @serverpoint the cc charge was made, yet the portal is not acknowledging the purchase. I've already raised a ticket for it.

    We found the order. :) A bug somehow made the order incomplete. We've manually fixed it and approved it. We'll be investigating tomorrow what caused it... sorry about that!

  • serverpointserverpoint Member, Patron Provider
    edited January 2025

    @Noct said:

    @serverpoint said:

    @Noct said:
    Great offers. Nice one for posting all the YABSs and looking glasses so that we can make properly informed decisions.

    Thank you! We've been learning about what is important to you all. :) And that includes ipv6... :)

    Evidently you have. That ipv6 part, though, so far as I've noticed, is important to just the one ubiquitous fanatic.

    That's what we've been wondering about... :)

  • @serverpoint said:

    @Noct said:

    @serverpoint said:

    @Noct said:
    Great offers. Nice one for posting all the YABSs and looking glasses so that we can make properly informed decisions.

    Thank you! We've been learning about what is important to you all. :) And that includes ipv6... :)

    Evidently you have. That ipv6 part, though, so far as I've noticed, is important to just the one ubiquitous fanatic.

    That's what we've been wondering about... :)

    :D :D :D

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/192023/chrome-extension-let-no-sunny/p1

  • @serverpoint said: https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/10147859

    @serverpoint said:

    @sitss said:
    invoice# > @serverpoint said:

    @sitss said:
    3-year term option returns "Error! undefined" @serverpoint

    Try it now. It is corrected. It seems one of the servers in the load balanced server pool was having some issues sending proper data to Stripe...

    We took the bad server out of the pool and the other servers are now handling the orders fine.

    @serverpoint the cc charge was made, yet the portal is not acknowledging the purchase. I've already raised a ticket for it.

    We found the order. :) A bug somehow made the order incomplete. We've manually fixed it and approved it. We'll be investigating tomorrow what caused it... sorry about that!

    all good sweet! thank you.
    Invoice# 823238 for extra bw. TIA again.

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • Invoice #823237

    Thanks!

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • Invoice #823239 :)

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • Invoice #823144

    Double please thanks

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • Invoice #823224
    Double please!

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • Invoice #823264

    Double bandwidth please

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • jndjnd Member

    @Noct said:

    @serverpoint said:

    @Noct said:
    Great offers. Nice one for posting all the YABSs and looking glasses so that we can make properly informed decisions.

    Thank you! We've been learning about what is important to you all. :) And that includes ipv6... :)

    Evidently you have. That ipv6 part, though, so far as I've noticed, is important to just the one ubiquitous fanatic.

    Not true, not having IPv6 connectivity in 2025 is kinda strange. Some countries already have majority of traffic over IPv6 so why not offer it, why stay in the stone age?

  • jndjnd Member

    @serverpoint

    excessive outgoing UDP/ICMP as well as HTTP/HTTPS is automatically throttled and blocked

    What's the threshold? Let's say I have NTP server (ntppool.org contribution) which uses roughly 90 byte packets and at peak there's 100k packets per second, 9MB/s, does it get blocked? I rather ask because there are some providers offering high bandwidth but when I start using some fraction of it I find they are already throttling way below my official quota.

  • invoice #823220
    thanks!

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • Invoice #823279

    Thank you

    Thanked by 1serverpoint
  • @jnd said:

    @Noct said:

    @serverpoint said:

    @Noct said:
    Great offers. Nice one for posting all the YABSs and looking glasses so that we can make properly informed decisions.

    Thank you! We've been learning about what is important to you all. :) And that includes ipv6... :)

    Evidently you have. That ipv6 part, though, so far as I've noticed, is important to just the one ubiquitous fanatic.

    Not true, not having IPv6 connectivity in 2025 is kinda strange. Some countries already have majority of traffic over IPv6 so why not offer it, why stay in the stone age?

    Please, don't be so basic.

    Economics aside for now, here's one pertinent reason: https://www.tomsguide.com/news/home-gateway-geolocation-bh21

  • Great offer!
    What's your CPU AUP?
    Any VDS plans?

  • jndjnd Member

    @Noct said:

    @jnd said:

    @Noct said:

    @serverpoint said:

    @Noct said:
    Great offers. Nice one for posting all the YABSs and looking glasses so that we can make properly informed decisions.

    Thank you! We've been learning about what is important to you all. :) And that includes ipv6... :)

    Evidently you have. That ipv6 part, though, so far as I've noticed, is important to just the one ubiquitous fanatic.

    Not true, not having IPv6 connectivity in 2025 is kinda strange. Some countries already have majority of traffic over IPv6 so why not offer it, why stay in the stone age?

    Please, don't be so basic.

    Economics aside for now, here's one pertinent reason: https://www.tomsguide.com/news/home-gateway-geolocation-bh21

    One niche issue from 3 years old article about legacy IPv6 addressing that doesn't even apply to server use. It's not hard to distribute routed /64 or /56 or even better /48 prefix and let client use simple and short address without embedding it's MAC address there. What else do you have?

    Thanked by 1OpaqueRegistrant
  • @jnd said:

    @Noct said:

    @jnd said:

    @Noct said:

    @serverpoint said:

    @Noct said:
    Great offers. Nice one for posting all the YABSs and looking glasses so that we can make properly informed decisions.

    Thank you! We've been learning about what is important to you all. :) And that includes ipv6... :)

    Evidently you have. That ipv6 part, though, so far as I've noticed, is important to just the one ubiquitous fanatic.

    Not true, not having IPv6 connectivity in 2025 is kinda strange. Some countries already have majority of traffic over IPv6 so why not offer it, why stay in the stone age?

    Please, don't be so basic.

    Economics aside for now, here's one pertinent reason: https://www.tomsguide.com/news/home-gateway-geolocation-bh21

    One niche issue from 3 years old article about legacy IPv6 addressing that doesn't even apply to server use. It's not hard to distribute routed /64 or /56 or even better /48 prefix and let client use simple and short address without embedding it's MAC address there. What else do you have?

    I've got plenty, thanks. An observant reader would have seen "Economics aside for now, here's one pertinent reason" an inferred from there. Regardless, I'll help you digest the point and realize that that alone defeats your ill-conceived blanket question "why stay in the stone age?".

    More importantly, here, is what I don't have: Any desire to turn ServerPoint's excellent offer that proactively included all the YABSs and looking glasses, which most people on LET care about, into some IPv4 versus IPv6 debate, which just some people ( :D ) on LET care about.

  • serverpointserverpoint Member, Patron Provider

    @jnd said:
    @serverpoint

    excessive outgoing UDP/ICMP as well as HTTP/HTTPS is automatically throttled and blocked

    What's the threshold? Let's say I have NTP server (ntppool.org contribution) which uses roughly 90 byte packets and at peak there's 100k packets per second, 9MB/s, does it get blocked? I rather ask because there are some providers offering high bandwidth but when I start using some fraction of it I find they are already throttling way below my official quota.

    Hello :) No, 90-100mbps of traffic should not trigger any issues over here. But, say, 500mbps or more, specially from multiple servers of the same client, then that would trigger some alarms over here, as it's usually indication of a DDoS attack...

    Thanked by 1jnd
Sign In or Register to comment.