New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Comments
最好的VPS！！
Popcorn?
It's a bit difficult
GG. i've only got 300+ comments
I have less than 10 comments
Good luck
lookup
Uh, on the road to get banned here, too, neat.
@CLAWCLOUD go go go
I’m not eligible due to post count, but for what appears to be a pretty slim VPS I think hosting something like UpTime Kuma might be a good use case for the hardware. Making some assumptions as to what the CPU may be. Haven’t compared the spec, but probably my slimmest VPS has that deployed and runs without issue.
Will struggle at that price here I assume but at $40 year. Assume people will be expecting 2-4x the ram, few TB data and a bit more storage. If the intended audience is elsewhere but, then that’ll be down to marketing that I can’t really comment on.
good luck
good luck
Good luck
good luck
good luck
Goodluck!!!
评论数不够。
Good luck
Good luck!
500 comments, which is double my current count.
As the question which processor is used came up, here is what I find on my VDS: "Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8269CY" - so, a very good and powerful CPU.
However, again, that's on the 2C, 4 GB VDS, not on the small VPS (CPU info on that will soon be vailable).
... and the processor on the small 1 vCore, 1 GB VDS is also a Xeon Platinum, however no model specified. But hey, it's a modern Xeon Scalable, even if (supposed) it were a Gen 1 Platinum that still would be a powerful CPU.
HtH
I'm happy to trial the CN2 package in HK even with IPv4 only. Pings look phenomenal.
Here are some first benchmark results of the small 1 vCore 2 GB mem. VPS with debian 12, location DE,FRA:
AES and HWrng flags: Yes
performance: about 300 MB/s (10% less in PM-MB mode)
Disk: decent 4KB performance (> 6 MB/s Wr. seq), decent 1 MB performance (1.17 GB/s Rd rnd), really decent for a small and cheap-ish VPS.
Network: Very decent but not top class. The announced bandwidth was achieved throughout pretty much all of Europe. Hell, even Mumbay is ca 160 Mb/s (!). SGP is only 40 Mb/s, but Hongkong is ca 100 Mb/s (!).
Good news also for the other side of the ocean. Dallas is ca 160 Mb/s (!), the west coast is ca. 125 Mb/s (!), but the east coast is slower (probably I need new and better targets; working on it).
Sao Paolo is almost 90 Mb/s and here's a kind of - positive - shocker: Kenya is 155 Mb/s.
First impression, TL;DR:
That thingy turns out to be a really nice surprise, in particular re connectivity! The processor is really performant indeed, the disk is, let's call it a decent SSD (in terms of performance), and/but the network connectivity not only is among the best I've seen so far on a LET class VPS but puts even some well-known highly regarded providers to shame. I'm impressed.
If your application load isn't too heavy and connectivity is priority number 1 then this VPS likely is a very attractive option.
Hint: of bloody course the 2 vCore, 4 GB memory VDS is much more performant; not so much in terms of CPU (which seems to be the same, but 2 vCores instead of one plus dedicated) but very much in terms of disk (about 3 to 5 times the speed) as well as in terms of connectivity which officially seems to be 1 Gb/s but actually I see a couple of high exception, e.g. 7+ Gb/s within DE, FRA.
But still, for many, especially connectivity bound tasks this small VPS thingy is a really positive surprise.
(More/full data to follow in a couple of days)
Good luck
Yeah, these two are both disappointing and surprisingly low.
It'd be interested to see whether from 2 of these packages whether it's rationed and you can get double with two packages, or whether they're actually at the saturation point with their connection.
I guess it also explains how they able to offer something which sounds unimaginably good for $7/y for the non-trial price.
A sincere word of caution:Stay away from unreliable Chinese provider.
Uhm, keep in mind that my VPS is in Frankfurt, Germany, and from there, yes, 40 Mb/s Download speed from SGP isn't exactly great but 100 Mb/s from Hongkong is really good!
Re "rationed": yes, I'm under the clear impression that both bandwidth and disk IO indeed are limited. But to be fair that's not at all uncommon with cheap VPS promos and besides the - openly announced - bandwidth limit still offering very good connectivity my only (mild) "concern" is the disk which "only" is a decent SSD (in terms of performance).
Ah, sorry, you did say that and I totally overlooked the DE,FRA part because I read too quickly, jumped ahead to the numbers and just assumed that everyone that wanted this only did so because of APAC.
So, I was assuming that the reason you seemed to have good connections to outside APAC but bad inside was because it was being saturated by people using it for that. Totally my misunderstanding, sorry.
Yeah, my plan would just be to run haproxy on this to forward stuff to my beefier server in HK. I just see noticeable packet loss from all my machines in both HK and SGP into China for obvious reasons and it's a crapshoot which mobile networks can access them at any given time. Running the ping.pe on their LG was the first time I've seen all green to everywhere in China at a (very) decent price point.
They haven't been around very long yet. Do you have experience with them?