Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Onidel Xmas & New Year Offers | $3.8/TB/mo Object Storage | 2 vCPU 4 GB RAM 60 GB NVMe for $2.5/mo

1356789

Comments

  • @febryanvaldo said:

    Ahh okay.

    Benchmark test, where?

  • Invoice #2633 please - thank you.

    Thanked by 1onidel
  • @donli said:

    @comXyz said:
    ideally $1/TB/mo for object storage biennially

    One provider had a $300 10TB for 3-years this BF ($0.83/TB/month).

    I only need 1TB

  • admaxadmax Member, Megathread Squad

    @FAT32 said:
    Somehow the 1C1G price is very attractive compare to this limited plan: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4125218/#Comment_4125218

    Already got the 512MB one... should I get more? :D

    More! ;)

  • trungkientrungkien Member
    edited December 2024

    Invoice - 2659
    Just paid for 3 years for x2 RAM & Storage. Will order more soon after testing. Thank you, @onidel !

    Thanked by 1onidel
  • @onidel do this object storage support static website with custom domain?

  • Available in: Vietnam
    1 vCPU (Intel Xeon Platinum 8171M)
    1 GBs of RAM
    20 GBs of NVMe (Ceph)
    1 TBs of Data Transfer @ 1Gbps
    
    $12.69/yr ~ A$20.4/yr
    
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-12-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri Dec 20 10:15:36 UTC 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 9 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8171M CPU @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2593.906 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔️ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔️ Enabled
    RAM        : 973.2 MiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 19.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-28-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔️ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : FIREFLY
    ASN        : AS135918 VIET DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIABILITY COMPANY
    Host       : Firefly Digital Technology Company Limited
    Location   : Thành Phố Tam Kỳ, Quảng Nam Province (27)
    Country    : Vietnam
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 236.06 MB/s  (59.0k) | 2.87 GB/s    (44.8k)
    Write      | 236.69 MB/s  (59.1k) | 2.88 GB/s    (45.1k)
    Total      | 472.75 MB/s (118.1k) | 5.76 GB/s    (90.0k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 7.02 GB/s    (13.7k) | 7.35 GB/s     (7.1k)
    Write      | 7.39 GB/s    (14.4k) | 7.84 GB/s     (7.6k)
    Total      | 14.41 GB/s   (28.1k) | 15.19 GB/s   (14.8k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 688 Mbits/sec   | 684 Mbits/sec   | 188 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 676 Mbits/sec   | 717 Mbits/sec   | 216 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | busy            | 250 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.04 Gbits/sec  | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 36.2 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 720 Mbits/sec   | 690 Mbits/sec   | 199 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 505 Mbits/sec   | 650 Mbits/sec   | 259 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 351 Mbits/sec   | 370 ms
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 4257
    Multi Core      | 4038
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/18361132
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 933
    Multi Core      | 798
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23183220
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 963
    Multi Core      | 717
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9522167
    
    YABS completed in 24 min 34 sec
    
    Thanked by 1navneetkk
  • @quangduuc said:

    Available in: Vietnam
    1 vCPU (Intel Xeon Platinum 8171M)
    1 GBs of RAM
    20 GBs of NVMe (Ceph)
    1 TBs of Data Transfer @ 1Gbps
    
    $12.69/yr ~ A$20.4/yr
    
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-12-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri Dec 20 10:15:36 UTC 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 9 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8171M CPU @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2593.906 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔️ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔️ Enabled
    RAM        : 973.2 MiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 19.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-28-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔️ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : FIREFLY
    ASN        : AS135918 VIET DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIABILITY COMPANY
    Host       : Firefly Digital Technology Company Limited
    Location   : Thành Phố Tam Kỳ, Quảng Nam Province (27)
    Country    : Vietnam
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 236.06 MB/s  (59.0k) | 2.87 GB/s    (44.8k)
    Write      | 236.69 MB/s  (59.1k) | 2.88 GB/s    (45.1k)
    Total      | 472.75 MB/s (118.1k) | 5.76 GB/s    (90.0k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 7.02 GB/s    (13.7k) | 7.35 GB/s     (7.1k)
    Write      | 7.39 GB/s    (14.4k) | 7.84 GB/s     (7.6k)
    Total      | 14.41 GB/s   (28.1k) | 15.19 GB/s   (14.8k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 688 Mbits/sec   | 684 Mbits/sec   | 188 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 676 Mbits/sec   | 717 Mbits/sec   | 216 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | busy            | 250 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.04 Gbits/sec  | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 36.2 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 720 Mbits/sec   | 690 Mbits/sec   | 199 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 505 Mbits/sec   | 650 Mbits/sec   | 259 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 351 Mbits/sec   | 370 ms
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 4257
    Multi Core      | 4038
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/18361132
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 933
    Multi Core      | 798
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23183220
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 963
    Multi Core      | 717
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9522167
    
    YABS completed in 24 min 34 sec
    
    bash <(curl -L -s check.unlock.media) -M 4
    

    Select 0 . Please

  • Are adult websites accepted?

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @onidel said:

    @gemini90 said:
    For object storage, what's the fair use term?

    And if I purchase 1TB now, can I upgrade later keeping the same price?

    During the promotion you can upgrade with the same discounted price.
    For fair use policy, please see - https://docs.onidel.com/policies/acceptable-usage-policy#bandwidth-usages

    The fair use terms are very vague, in the sense what is considered is excessive is not defined clearly and yet it is put in the terms as a means of enforcement

    • Excessive bandwidth consumption that impacts the service quality of other users is not permitted.
      ___ what usage is going to impact service quality for everyone?

    • hosting excessively trafficked platforms
      ___ how does onidel determine excessively trafficked

    Thanked by 1mandala
  • @onidel said:

    100% SLA

    No certainty but our infra is built on top of that goal. Perhaps we will update it to 99.99% instead to be more realistic.

    Not to be a dick, but the SLA figures shouldn't just be tossed around without actually considering the impact to your business.

    For instance - if it's a guaranteed SLA, then what happens if you break it? Give a free month? Give a fixed amount rebate? etc...

    If you're attaching any compensation for breaking the SLA, it'd be incredibly easy for you to end up making a massive loss, possibly on something you have no control over, e.g. your upstream goes down, power surge in your DC that takes out multiple nodes, etc.

    If you're not attaching any compensation to the SLA then, it's meaningless and you shouldn't even be mentioning it. In business, an SLA isn't an aspirational goal - it's something that has direct financial consequences if you miss it.

    And it's important to get it right because even 99.99% is hard to achieve - to put it into context, that's less than an hour's downtime per year. Are you really sure that if a fault happens in any of your locations, that you can even notice the fault, track down and identify the cause and fix the issue within an hour, assuming you only have one fault in a year? Honestly, that kind of response level is something only the biggest providers can really manage. For those on a monthly contract with you, you'd be failing the SLA after only 5 minutes of downtime.

    Even 99.9% reliability is hard to guarantee - do you really want to start compensating customers after 45 minutes of downtime in a month? And that's already at the point where the figures don't look that good written down, because customers don't wan't any downtime.

    Obviously, every provider strives to hit 100% availability, but the SLA should be realistic if it's going to be offered at all.

  • lukast__lukast__ Member, Megathread Squad

    @ralf said: For instance - if it's a guaranteed SLA, then what happens if you break it? Give a free month? Give a fixed amount rebate? etc...

    They actually have that in their docs:

    But yeah, 100%/99.99% availability is unrealistic.

    Thanked by 3ralf navneetkk admax
  • Just ordered Vietnam 1G RAM plan!!

  • Annual for 4GB RAM is A$60.00, 3 years = A$180.00. Is it correct? It is different from the post

  • @ralf said:

    @onidel said:

    100% SLA

    No certainty but our infra is built on top of that goal. Perhaps we will update it to 99.99% instead to be more realistic.

    Not to be a dick, but the SLA figures shouldn't just be tossed around without actually considering the impact to your business.

    For instance - if it's a guaranteed SLA, then what happens if you break it? Give a free month? Give a fixed amount rebate? etc...

    If you're attaching any compensation for breaking the SLA, it'd be incredibly easy for you to end up making a massive loss, possibly on something you have no control over, e.g. your upstream goes down, power surge in your DC that takes out multiple nodes, etc.

    If you're not attaching any compensation to the SLA then, it's meaningless and you shouldn't even be mentioning it. In business, an SLA isn't an aspirational goal - it's something that has direct financial consequences if you miss it.

    And it's important to get it right because even 99.99% is hard to achieve - to put it into context, that's less than an hour's downtime per year. Are you really sure that if a fault happens in any of your locations, that you can even notice the fault, track down and identify the cause and fix the issue within an hour, assuming you only have one fault in a year? Honestly, that kind of response level is something only the biggest providers can really manage. For those on a monthly contract with you, you'd be failing the SLA after only 5 minutes of downtime.

    Even 99.9% reliability is hard to guarantee - do you really want to start compensating customers after 45 minutes of downtime in a month? And that's already at the point where the figures don't look that good written down, because customers don't wan't any downtime.

    Obviously, every provider strives to hit 100% availability, but the SLA should be realistic if it's going to be offered at all.

    0.01% downtime translates to 52.56 minutes to be exact 😬

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    Finally a worthy deal, 12$/y in VIETNAM.

  • ralfralf Member
    edited December 2024

    @lukast__ said:

    @ralf said: For instance - if it's a guaranteed SLA, then what happens if you break it? Give a free month? Give a fixed amount rebate? etc...

    They actually have that in their docs:
    But yeah, 100%/99.99% availability is unrealistic.

    Oh good that they're explicit about their levels. I hadn't actually checked, I just had a knee-jerk reaction to the offhand "maybe we'll drop it to 99.99%" comment.

    EDIT: Also, I should add that it's not about them as a provider, this applies to everyone who offers an SLA.

    But their SLA definitely isn't 99.99%. If the SLA doesn't kick in until an hour, then it's not even meeting 99.9%.

    EDIT 2: Also, their compensation levels seem pretty decent and fair.

  • have windows template eol or not?

  • @raymond said:
    have windows template eol or not?

    Have windows trial

  • This would be my minimum recommended plan for Windows Server OS

    Available in: Vietnam, Singapore & Sydney
    4 vCPU (Intel Xeon Platinum 8171M in Vietnam, AMD EPYC Milan in SG & SYD)
    8 GBs of RAM
    120 GBs of NVMe Block Storage (Ceph)
    4 TBs of Data Transfer @ 1Gbps
    /64 Routed IPv6 in Singapore & Sydney
    
    $60/yr ~ A$96/yr
    
    x2 RAM and storage for 3 years payment
    
  • quangduucquangduuc Member
    edited December 2024

    @RichardGrant said:

    @quangduuc said:

    Available in: Vietnam
    1 vCPU (Intel Xeon Platinum 8171M)
    1 GBs of RAM
    20 GBs of NVMe (Ceph)
    1 TBs of Data Transfer @ 1Gbps
    
    $12.69/yr ~ A$20.4/yr
    
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-12-20                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fri Dec 20 10:15:36 UTC 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 9 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8171M CPU @ 2.60GHz
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2593.906 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔️ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔️ Enabled
    RAM        : 973.2 MiB
    Swap       : 4.0 GiB
    Disk       : 19.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-28-cloud-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔️ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : FIREFLY
    ASN        : AS135918 VIET DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY LIABILITY COMPANY
    Host       : Firefly Digital Technology Company Limited
    Location   : Thành Phố Tam Kỳ, Quảng Nam Province (27)
    Country    : Vietnam
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 236.06 MB/s  (59.0k) | 2.87 GB/s    (44.8k)
    Write      | 236.69 MB/s  (59.1k) | 2.88 GB/s    (45.1k)
    Total      | 472.75 MB/s (118.1k) | 5.76 GB/s    (90.0k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 7.02 GB/s    (13.7k) | 7.35 GB/s     (7.1k)
    Write      | 7.39 GB/s    (14.4k) | 7.84 GB/s     (7.6k)
    Total      | 14.41 GB/s   (28.1k) | 15.19 GB/s   (14.8k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 688 Mbits/sec   | 684 Mbits/sec   | 188 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 676 Mbits/sec   | 717 Mbits/sec   | 216 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | busy            | 250 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.04 Gbits/sec  | 1.01 Gbits/sec  | 36.2 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 720 Mbits/sec   | 690 Mbits/sec   | 199 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 505 Mbits/sec   | 650 Mbits/sec   | 259 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 351 Mbits/sec   | 370 ms
    
    Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 4257
    Multi Core      | 4038
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/18361132
    
    Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 933
    Multi Core      | 798
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23183220
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 963
    Multi Core      | 717
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9522167
    
    YABS completed in 24 min 34 sec
    
    bash <(curl -L -s check.unlock.media) -M 4
    

    Select 0 . Please

    Sorry, I'm not comfortable running that. You can order one to check it yourself.

  • onidelonidel Member, Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    @ralf said:

    @onidel said:

    100% SLA

    No certainty but our infra is built on top of that goal. Perhaps we will update it to 99.99% instead to be more realistic.

    Not to be a dick, but the SLA figures shouldn't just be tossed around without actually considering the impact to your business.

    For instance - if it's a guaranteed SLA, then what happens if you break it? Give a free month? Give a fixed amount rebate? etc...

    If you're attaching any compensation for breaking the SLA, it'd be incredibly easy for you to end up making a massive loss, possibly on something you have no control over, e.g. your upstream goes down, power surge in your DC that takes out multiple nodes, etc.

    If you're not attaching any compensation to the SLA then, it's meaningless and you shouldn't even be mentioning it. In business, an SLA isn't an aspirational goal - it's something that has direct financial consequences if you miss it.

    And it's important to get it right because even 99.99% is hard to achieve - to put it into context, that's less than an hour's downtime per year. Are you really sure that if a fault happens in any of your locations, that you can even notice the fault, track down and identify the cause and fix the issue within an hour, assuming you only have one fault in a year? Honestly, that kind of response level is something only the biggest providers can really manage. For those on a monthly contract with you, you'd be failing the SLA after only 5 minutes of downtime.

    Even 99.9% reliability is hard to guarantee - do you really want to start compensating customers after 45 minutes of downtime in a month? And that's already at the point where the figures don't look that good written down, because customers don't wan't any downtime.

    Obviously, every provider strives to hit 100% availability, but the SLA should be realistic if it's going to be offered at all.

    @ralf said:

    @lukast__ said:

    @ralf said: For instance - if it's a guaranteed SLA, then what happens if you break it? Give a free month? Give a fixed amount rebate? etc...

    They actually have that in their docs:
    But yeah, 100%/99.99% availability is unrealistic.

    Oh good that they're explicit about their levels. I hadn't actually checked, I just had a knee-jerk reaction to the offhand "maybe we'll drop it to 99.99%" comment.

    EDIT: Also, I should add that it's not about them as a provider, this applies to everyone who offers an SLA.

    But their SLA definitely isn't 99.99%. If the SLA doesn't kick in until an hour, then it's not even meeting 99.9%.

    EDIT 2: Also, their compensation levels seem pretty decent and fair.

    Appreciated your feedback mate. Nothing better than direct, reasonable and constructive feedback :)

    We're all agree that 100% SLA is an aspirational goal that, in hindsight, is unrealistic for any provider. When we initially set this figure, it was a reflection of our commitment to reliability and a belief in striving for perfection. We didn't scope in the inevitable variables outside of our control into this figure, which we should have.

    We do provide SLA credit levels to back our commitments. As mentioned above, we will revisit our SLA to make it more realistic and grounded. It will be a balance between ambition and practicality, providing reliability that our customers can depend on without setting expectations that could lead to disappointment. At the end of the day, our goal remains unwavering: to provide a reliable and high-performance service to all our customers.

    Thanked by 3lukast__ ralf zGato
  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited December 2024

    @onidel said:

    We do provide SLA credit levels to back our commitments. As mentioned above, we will revisit our SLA to make it more realistic and grounded. It will be a balance between ambition and practicality, providing reliability that our customers can depend on without setting expectations that could lead to disappointment. At the end of the day, our goal remains unwavering: to provide a reliable and high-performance service to all our customers.

    image

    Thanked by 2ralf onidel
  • @plumberg said:

    @onidel said:

    @gemini90 said:
    For object storage, what's the fair use term?

    And if I purchase 1TB now, can I upgrade later keeping the same price?

    During the promotion you can upgrade with the same discounted price.
    For fair use policy, please see - https://docs.onidel.com/policies/acceptable-usage-policy#bandwidth-usages

    The fair use terms are very vague, in the sense what is considered is excessive is not defined clearly and yet it is put in the terms as a means of enforcement

    • Excessive bandwidth consumption that impacts the service quality of other users is not permitted.
      ___ what usage is going to impact service quality for everyone?

    • hosting excessively trafficked platforms
      ___ how does onidel determine excessively trafficked

    Yeah, a bit more details on this would be great. Also, does the object storage have any technical limits? Like requests per seconds, etc...

  • Much better than Black Friday. I really regret buying on Black Friday. I'm paying more for half specs except the traffic.

  • about object storage has some questions, are there any limits on the number of read and write operations? What is the monthly bandwidth limit? Is disaster backup and recovery available? If other regions are added in the future, can user freely choose multiple regions to establish storage buckets?

  • onidelonidel Member, Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    @tebrau said:
    Invoice #2633 please - thank you.

    @trungkien said:
    Invoice - 2659
    Just paid for 3 years for x2 RAM & Storage. Will order more soon after testing. Thank you, @onidel !

    Done. Please perform a hard reboot to get additional RAM. Thank you for your orders B)

    Thanked by 1trungkien
  • onidelonidel Member, Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    @Dazzle said:
    @onidel do this object storage support static website with custom domain?

    It does support static website with custom domain, but with HTTP only. You can use Cloudflare proxied DNS if you want to have HTTPS.

    Thanked by 1Dazzle
  • emengwebemengweb Member
    edited December 2024

    Invoice #2680
    Got one object storage for test, hope it could surprise me :D

  • onidelonidel Member, Patron Provider, Top Host, Megathread Squad

    @companypatch said:
    Are adult websites accepted?

    No

Sign In or Register to comment.