New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Recommend me tools preferably browser based to monitor/view server stats
Hello, I have 10+ vps needs to be monitored basic things (e.g. disk usage, bandwidth, memory usage), the info you'd expect from provider dashboard—but I need to view all of them in one single web based program, would be pretty nice if it had notification for disk threshold or memory usage too.
Thanked by 1Stationswift
Comments
netdata?
Use grafana with node exporter - https://grafana.com/grafana/dashboards/13978-node-exporter-quickstart-and-dashboard/
You can use mine for free. Bisa notif disk threshold juga.
Cannot selfhost kah om?
https://phpsysinfo.github.io/phpsysinfo/
Try above.
It has everything you mentioned.
Hetrixtools.com
You can. This is 66uptime.
hothost
hetrixtools
grafana+prometheus
currently using https://nezha.wiki/en_US/
Feel good about the simplicity of the app
Try Beszel, it's light weight, minimal and provides all necessary data.
Have installed this, great tools!
Eventually you will come to zabbix.
+1 hetrixtools
I vote for hetrixtools
Fivenines
I'm a true monitoring-geek but had never heard of this, so naturally I had to check it out and I must say I'm impressed.
Up and running in minutes, looks awesome and so easy to deploy and use. This is not a Nagios or Checkmk replacement but it's not trying to be either, this is a quick and easy way to get basic monitoring up and running in no time at all. Gives you basic data in a beautiful interface, it has all the settings you could ever need, it even comes with an api and this is more then enough for most users.
I had it up and running in literally under a minute, 2 minutes later I had added five of my docker hosts. The breakdown for cpu, memory and network used by each container is simply awesome.
For what it is and does, it's perfect!
How does it compares with hetrixtools?
It can do this??
A browser based SSH client?
After a bit of research a few weeks ago, I decided I want to try this but it looks like you need to put in a fair amount of effort to get started...
nezha
It's basically like a selfhosted hetrixtools, but with a bit less features.
The setup with an agent that reports to the server is the same, you add a server in the interface and you get a oneline install command (you can chose between sh or a docker container), run it on the node you wish to monitor, and you're done.
You can set notification thresholds globally or per node and it has a really nice dashboard.
I just started testing it today but so far I'm really impressed, it seems to be very well coded and everything looks really nice and finished. Since I'm from Sweden I tried to switch the language to Swedish just to see what kind of a mess that would be, but even the translation is flawless. That is not common.
If I'm not wrong this is a pretty new project and development is very active, so hopefully they keep up the good work.
Oh, I remember also looking at this, and didn't like that the agent exposes a pseudo SSH service for something that looks like it "should" be able to be done with just a ssh command in the
authorized_keys. But looking at the source, that doesn't seem to be an option (and the hub sends a hardcoded user of "u" too).But it sounds like I should probably still give it a try as it's been recommended by a few people now.
Grafana+prometheus+node exporter
Zabbix for Enterprise level stuffs (free)
Sadly the tool can't seem to list cpu process name, it only display graph for CPU process usage.
It's very new tool and is in active development, maybe you can request this feature in github.
I think it is meant to be used as a dashboard to give a quick overview, and that's how I use it.
If you need per-process stats it is probably not what you need.
Yeah, that bugged me a bit too. It's not difficult to protect that port, but still feels like a backward way of doing it.
It should be possible to make the agent push-only, or at least make it optional.