Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Do you really ned Varnish with CloudFlare?

netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

As title. I'm curious if I really need it or not.

Thanks!

Comments

  • Could be useful. That's why we have L1, L2 cache right?

  • Depends.

    Serve your cached content off a subdomain, and everything else with cf -- if you want to really 'put it to use'.

  • Yes! Cloudflare caches only static files. i.e. jpg's, png's, etc. etc. However they do not cache the page itself. As such varnish would be a benefit.

    Mun

  • netomxnetomx Moderator, Veteran

    Thanks :)

  • Honestly, everything helps.

  • i use CF only for hide my vps ip and cache img only

  • You could CF cache pages too but their Browser cache TTL minimum is too high (30 min)

  • ewwinkewwink Member
    edited December 2013

    cf -> varnish -> apache/nginx = more work and more memory used

    cf -> apache/nginx = more efficient

  • nginx+memcache+php+varnish works good for me. plus CF, double protection for syn+ack attack

    Thanked by 1Zen
Sign In or Register to comment.