Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Which do you prefer: Hetzner, OVH, or Netcup?

24

Comments

  • Netcup.

  • @EthanZou said:

    @FederalCocoJhon said: In general, I prefer AWS, but from this list I would take OVH.

    How about OVHcloud vps?

    Vps ovh is a topic in general, one of the best TCP defenses in antiddos, yes it may be more expensive than hetzner, but in some aspects it will be better. Maybe you know they even had a data center on fire, but they kind of learn from their mistakes. Take it from them, give it a try. All of their locations are good, not like hetzner with Finland and Germany are great

  • I usualy prefer BlackFriday, Flash Sale and same offers so I compare them, with regular I have too few experience.

    • netcup: Started with them in 2022. Pro is root server for this insane price, excellent network. Con is support and their contract times. Used for 1,5 years and I found a better deal at OVH. No nested virtualization.
    • OVH: I found KS-LE-1 in 2022. As a lottery I got 960 GB SSDs and 1/1 Gbps over IPv6 which was better for my reqs so RS transfered on LET. OVH Kimsufi absolut positive side are the dedicated resources and absolut negative is the network however near 10--15 euro dedi 300 Mbps much better than 100.
    • Hetzner: Good performance, excellent network but very expensive and thei're increasing their prices so they less and more less competitors for OVHcloud. Used an auction server but too expensive for my requirements and canceled it. And there was a high price increase, I rented i7-6700, 960 GB X 2 and 32 GB for 26 euros without VAT, currently it is more than 32 euros...

    As I use primarily for hobby, home lab, the lottery Kimsufis (LE-B, LE-1) performs better for me with the dedicated resources than netcup. However I operate production cPanel WHM server with 20--30 sites on a netcup RS and for this usage it is excellent, no downtime or problems.

    So Hetzner, netcup and OVH are great but which better depends on the requirements, especialy the price, resources and network.

  • netcup and hetzner, ovh will cancel my order indefinitely and even delete the account

  • @adns said: I operate production cPanel WHM server with 20--30 sites on a netcup RS and for this usage it is excellent, no downtime or problems.

    So, Netcup is stable too, right? Just like Hetzner Cloud.

  • Netcup - not my cup
    Hetzner - too red
    Ovh - fuck Ovh

  • I need UK location and "eco", so OVH is best for me at he moment. SYS-1 for under 40 GBP a month... is there better in the UK?

  • @EthanZou said:

    @adns said: I operate production cPanel WHM server with 20--30 sites on a netcup RS and for this usage it is excellent, no downtime or problems.

    So, Netcup is stable too, right? Just like Hetzner Cloud.

    I don't have experience with Hetzner Cloud. Yes, in my opinion netcup is stable. The only one negative point that cPanel sends an email that MariaDB restarts once or twice a week at night but in real use it is not seeable at visitor side, I got the mail when I browsed one of our sites and did not experience slower load or db problem.

  • itsTomHarperitsTomHarper Member, Megathread Squad

    Netcups cyber Monday deal is still up btw. Double the nvme

    https://www.netcup.com/en/server/vps/vps-1000-g11-iv-se-vie-adv24

  • Hetzner because only they are able to provide me thousands of Cloud servers and hundreds of Dedicated servers at the cheapest prices that I could find.

    So two main reasons for me to use Hetzner is;
    1. Scalability (most important one for me)
    2. Price

    Others here are either unable to provide scalability or good prices. Only Hetzner covers the two aspects at the same time.

  • ArkasArkas Member, Retired Moderator

    @itsTomHarper said: Netcups cyber Monday deal is still up btw. Double the nvme

    It's a very good offer for a great provider. Unfortunately, their 'Root servers' are not included. Those are the better ones.

  • @adns said:

    @EthanZou said:

    @adns said: I operate production cPanel WHM server with 20--30 sites on a netcup RS and for this usage it is excellent, no downtime or problems.

    So, Netcup is stable too, right? Just like Hetzner Cloud.

    I don't have experience with Hetzner Cloud. Yes, in my opinion netcup is stable. The only one negative point that cPanel sends an email that MariaDB restarts once or twice a week at night but in real use it is not seeable at visitor side, I got the mail when I browsed one of our sites and did not experience slower load or db problem.

    Thanks a lot!
    So, whether it's Hetzner, Netcup, or OVH, they’re all stable and suitable for production, right?

    @anbelevebel said: 1. Scalability (most important one for me)

    What's your use case? Online shop?

    Thanked by 1adns
  • @EthanZou said:

    @anbelevebel said: 1. Scalability (most important one for me)

    What's your use case? Online shop?

    LET2 forum

  • I am seeing the IO speed not fast enough.
    Since this is US nodes, I could see the performance of SingleCore could top of and pass over 2000 score

    Try Nuremberg or Vienna, 1800 - 1900 is the existing.
    I am seeing decrease of performance..

    For the Upstream Speed,
    in Nuremberg you will get 2Gbps ++ Upstream Speed all over Europe, also to US around 2Gbps.
    I am seeing this is also decrease of performance

    Well, if the Netcup provide like this
    and this is considered to be "Good"
    Then maybe the value "Good" would be too low for me :smiley:

    @network said:

    @EthanZou said:

    @Cabbage said:
    I have used both Hetzner few years ago and currently using Netcup. Hetzner has (at least had, since I don't know what they're like now) better support response time, admin panel, and better payment policy. But with their pricing nowadays, I don't think they are as competitive as they used to be.

    In terms of value, Netcup feels like they're now ahead of Hetzner, but Hetzner offers really big servers which Netcup doesn't have. But I don't need those gigantic servers, which is why I am with Netcup. OVH sounds too good to be true, especially that KS-A, but I'm planning on trying them out soon.

    Few things I would watch out for:
    OVH has somewhat limited bandwidth. Low end KS lines have 300Mbps, so it may not be suitable for some file-sharing stuffs.
    Hetzner is currently on a constant price increase. Additionally, although I doubt many people will hit it, their unlimited traffic isn't really unlimited. But then again, this applies to a lot of hosts. Make sure to read the abuse policy.
    Netcup KYC is known to be bad. Also look out for their contract period.

    @NetPIMP said:
    none of the 3 ... overpriced, overrated ...

    I can see why some people don't like them but overpriced is definitely a stretch.

    How about Hetzner's Shared vCPU AMD and Netcup's Root Server in comparison?
    Which one is more powerful?

    YABS for RS1000 (4 core) (ran yesterday):

    $ curl -sL https://yabs.sh | bash -s
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fr 29. Nov 19:30:42 CET 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 9634 84-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2246.624 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 7.7 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 503.8 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-28-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : netcup GmbH
    ASN        : AS214996 netcup GmbH
    Host       : netcup GmbH
    Location   : Manassas, Virginia (VA)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 231.39 MB/s  (57.8k) | 469.29 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Write      | 232.00 MB/s  (58.0k) | 471.76 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Total      | 463.40 MB/s (115.8k) | 941.05 MB/s  (14.7k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 506.03 MB/s    (988) | 752.80 MB/s    (735)
    Write      | 532.92 MB/s   (1.0k) | 802.94 MB/s    (784)
    Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.55 GB/s     (1.5k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.25 Gbits/sec  | 961 Mbits/sec   | 76.0 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.41 Gbits/sec  | 2.19 Gbits/sec  | 82.8 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 733 Mbits/sec   | 746 Mbits/sec   | 192 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.80 Gbits/sec  | 578 Mbits/sec   | 225 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.37 Gbits/sec  | 1.65 Gbits/sec  | 55.7 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.71 Gbits/sec  | 2.38 Gbits/sec  | 7.33 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 954 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.42 Gbits/sec  | 348 Mbits/sec   | 76.0 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.81 Gbits/sec  | 2.16 Gbits/sec  | 83.1 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 913 Mbits/sec   | 554 Mbits/sec   | 192 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 777 Mbits/sec   | 1.29 Gbits/sec  | 225 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.68 Gbits/sec  | 1.73 Gbits/sec  | 55.7 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.73 Gbits/sec  | 2.35 Gbits/sec  | 7.37 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.19 Gbits/sec  | 904 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2031
    Multi Core      | 6800
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9143601
    
    YABS completed in 12 min 39 sec
    

    I don't have a 4 shared core Hetzner to compare, maybe you can find a YABS on this forum or someone else could post.

    Thanked by 1EthanZou
  • Ovh only its stable and ddos is top notch

  • @diwakerd said:
    Ovh only its stable and ddos is top notch

    ovh is very bad in terms of protection against DDoS attacks, there are a huge number of ovh bypass. i prefer hetzner or DO

    Thanked by 1EthanZou
  • ArkasArkas Member, Retired Moderator

    @diwakerd said: Ovh only its stable and ddos is top notch

    For lowendddos maybe it's good, but calling it top notch? :lol:

  • stefemanstefeman Member
    edited December 2024

    OVH for least amount of hassle after you get your server.

    Netcup is crazy german host with zero flexibility and Hetzner might just one day fuck you over without any reason and terminate everything cuz you used too much bandwidth.

    OVH is hardest to order from though. Confusing website, possible identity verification slowdowns, lack of stock.

    Thanked by 2loay EthanZou
  • Any of them are fine for dev or testing or idling. But none of them fit well to host production environment.

    There are way better providers out there for US.

    Thanked by 1EthanZou
  • @Arkas said:

    @diwakerd said: Ovh only its stable and ddos is top notch

    For lowendddos maybe it's good, but calling it top notch? :lol:

    Yes ovh @OVH_APAC is top notch provider we are using them from last 10 years for production websites some of them more than 100k users daily but its a unmanaged provider and if you know how to do everything then ovh is good , if hardware fails they do quick replacement and even if you get abuse complaints by compromised websites they do not suspend server and kick you out instead they ask you to fix the issue and regarding ddos its good enough to run your websites and they do not null route the ip

    Another good unmanaged provider in usa is colocrossing @ColoCrossing using them from last 1 year

    I only contact unmanaged provider support is for hardware issues or sometimes os reloads

    Thanked by 2EthanZou adns
  • AlyxAlyx Member, Host Rep

    Generally, I try to avoid large providers and opt for smaller ones whenever possible.

    However, I currently need an ARM VPS, and in this case, I prefer Netcup over Hetzner.
    Primarily due to the locations they offer and, more recently, their higher bandwidth limits.

    Thanked by 1EthanZou
  • @Hetzner_OL said:

    @FederalCocoJhon said: Well, look, at the moment, there's no Hetzner in the U.S., only in Europe

    For which products? We have Cloud products on both the US East and West Coasts. --Katie

    Why didn't you prepare deals for this community?

  • I find OVH to be the best if you want a lot of bandwidth other than that, I would go with others mentioned. You can use full gigabit (330TB of BW) for only 10 eur

    Thanked by 1EthanZou
  • I've been with OVH for about 20 years. During that time, I have also gained experience with other providers, but ultimately, I find OVH to be the provider I am most comfortable with. I know what to expect and what not to expect, so there are no surprises. Their offers cover a very wide range of uses for all kinds of budgets. I can't complain about the network connectivity; they are quick to replace broken parts. However, you need to know what you are doing since these are unmanaged servers.

    It doesn't mean they are the best, but they are fine for me.

    Thanked by 2EthanZou adns
  • @EthanZou said:

    @adns said:

    @EthanZou said:

    @adns said: I operate production cPanel WHM server with 20--30 sites on a netcup RS and for this usage it is excellent, no downtime or problems.

    So, Netcup is stable too, right? Just like Hetzner Cloud.

    I don't have experience with Hetzner Cloud. Yes, in my opinion netcup is stable. The only one negative point that cPanel sends an email that MariaDB restarts once or twice a week at night but in real use it is not seeable at visitor side, I got the mail when I browsed one of our sites and did not experience slower load or db problem.

    Thanks a lot!
    So, whether it's Hetzner, Netcup, or OVH, they’re all stable and suitable for production, right?

    @anbelevebel said: 1. Scalability (most important one for me)

    What's your use case? Online shop?

    I’m running a SaaS business since 2018 which requires thousands of VMs and dedicated machines. Obviously each one is running a customer’s said SaaS app.

    Thanked by 1EthanZou
  • @riomartin said:
    I am seeing the IO speed not fast enough.
    Since this is US nodes, I could see the performance of SingleCore could top of and pass over 2000 score

    Try Nuremberg or Vienna, 1800 - 1900 is the existing.
    I am seeing decrease of performance..

    For the Upstream Speed,
    in Nuremberg you will get 2Gbps ++ Upstream Speed all over Europe, also to US around 2Gbps.
    I am seeing this is also decrease of performance

    Well, if the Netcup provide like this
    and this is considered to be "Good"
    Then maybe the value "Good" would be too low for me :smiley:

    YABS for RS1000 (4 core) (ran yesterday):

    $ curl -sL https://yabs.sh | bash -s
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fr 29. Nov 19:30:42 CET 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 9634 84-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2246.624 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 7.7 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 503.8 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-28-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : netcup GmbH
    ASN        : AS214996 netcup GmbH
    Host       : netcup GmbH
    Location   : Manassas, Virginia (VA)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 231.39 MB/s  (57.8k) | 469.29 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Write      | 232.00 MB/s  (58.0k) | 471.76 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Total      | 463.40 MB/s (115.8k) | 941.05 MB/s  (14.7k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 506.03 MB/s    (988) | 752.80 MB/s    (735)
    Write      | 532.92 MB/s   (1.0k) | 802.94 MB/s    (784)
    Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.55 GB/s     (1.5k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.25 Gbits/sec  | 961 Mbits/sec   | 76.0 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.41 Gbits/sec  | 2.19 Gbits/sec  | 82.8 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 733 Mbits/sec   | 746 Mbits/sec   | 192 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.80 Gbits/sec  | 578 Mbits/sec   | 225 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.37 Gbits/sec  | 1.65 Gbits/sec  | 55.7 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.71 Gbits/sec  | 2.38 Gbits/sec  | 7.33 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 954 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.42 Gbits/sec  | 348 Mbits/sec   | 76.0 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.81 Gbits/sec  | 2.16 Gbits/sec  | 83.1 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 913 Mbits/sec   | 554 Mbits/sec   | 192 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 777 Mbits/sec   | 1.29 Gbits/sec  | 225 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.68 Gbits/sec  | 1.73 Gbits/sec  | 55.7 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.73 Gbits/sec  | 2.35 Gbits/sec  | 7.37 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.19 Gbits/sec  | 904 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2031
    Multi Core      | 6800
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9143601
    
    YABS completed in 12 min 39 sec
    

    I don't have a 4 shared core Hetzner to compare, maybe you can find a YABS on this forum or someone else could post.

    Still not good enough?

    @mrclown said:
    Any of them are fine for dev or testing or idling. But none of them fit well to host production environment.

    There are way better providers out there for US.

    Digitalocean or AWS?

    @diwakerd said: Yes ovh @OVH_APAC is top notch provider we are using them from last 10 years for production websites some of them more than 100k users daily but its a unmanaged provider and if you know how to do everything then ovh is good , if hardware fails they do quick replacement and even if you get abuse complaints by compromised websites they do not suspend server and kick you out instead they ask you to fix the issue and regarding ddos its good enough to run your websites and they do not null route the ip

    How about OVHcloud vps?

    @Alyx said: However, I currently need an ARM VPS, and in this case, I prefer Netcup over Hetzner.

    Will Netcup be as stable as Hetzner cloud?

  • Netcup Faces User Riot Over Throttling Supposedly Dedicated Cores
    https://lowendbox.com/blog/netcup-faces-user-riot-over-throttling-supposedly-dedicated-cores/

  • @EthanZou said:

    @riomartin said:
    I am seeing the IO speed not fast enough.
    Since this is US nodes, I could see the performance of SingleCore could top of and pass over 2000 score

    Try Nuremberg or Vienna, 1800 - 1900 is the existing.
    I am seeing decrease of performance..

    For the Upstream Speed,
    in Nuremberg you will get 2Gbps ++ Upstream Speed all over Europe, also to US around 2Gbps.
    I am seeing this is also decrease of performance

    Well, if the Netcup provide like this
    and this is considered to be "Good"
    Then maybe the value "Good" would be too low for me :smiley:

    YABS for RS1000 (4 core) (ran yesterday):

    $ curl -sL https://yabs.sh | bash -s
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Fr 29. Nov 19:30:42 CET 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 3 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 9634 84-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2246.624 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ❌ Disabled
    RAM        : 7.7 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 503.8 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-28-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : netcup GmbH
    ASN        : AS214996 netcup GmbH
    Host       : netcup GmbH
    Location   : Manassas, Virginia (VA)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda3):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 231.39 MB/s  (57.8k) | 469.29 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Write      | 232.00 MB/s  (58.0k) | 471.76 MB/s   (7.3k)
    Total      | 463.40 MB/s (115.8k) | 941.05 MB/s  (14.7k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 506.03 MB/s    (988) | 752.80 MB/s    (735)
    Write      | 532.92 MB/s   (1.0k) | 802.94 MB/s    (784)
    Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.55 GB/s     (1.5k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.25 Gbits/sec  | 961 Mbits/sec   | 76.0 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.41 Gbits/sec  | 2.19 Gbits/sec  | 82.8 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 733 Mbits/sec   | 746 Mbits/sec   | 192 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.80 Gbits/sec  | 578 Mbits/sec   | 225 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 2.37 Gbits/sec  | 1.65 Gbits/sec  | 55.7 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.71 Gbits/sec  | 2.38 Gbits/sec  | 7.33 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.02 Gbits/sec  | 954 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.42 Gbits/sec  | 348 Mbits/sec   | 76.0 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 1.81 Gbits/sec  | 2.16 Gbits/sec  | 83.1 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 913 Mbits/sec   | 554 Mbits/sec   | 192 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 777 Mbits/sec   | 1.29 Gbits/sec  | 225 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 1.68 Gbits/sec  | 1.73 Gbits/sec  | 55.7 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 2.73 Gbits/sec  | 2.35 Gbits/sec  | 7.37 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 1.19 Gbits/sec  | 904 Mbits/sec   | 123 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 2031
    Multi Core      | 6800
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9143601
    
    YABS completed in 12 min 39 sec
    

    I don't have a 4 shared core Hetzner to compare, maybe you can find a YABS on this forum or someone else could post.

    Still not good enough?

    @mrclown said:
    Any of them are fine for dev or testing or idling. But none of them fit well to host production environment.

    There are way better providers out there for US.

    Digitalocean or AWS?

    @diwakerd said: Yes ovh @OVH_APAC is top notch provider we are using them from last 10 years for production websites some of them more than 100k users daily but its a unmanaged provider and if you know how to do everything then ovh is good , if hardware fails they do quick replacement and even if you get abuse complaints by compromised websites they do not suspend server and kick you out instead they ask you to fix the issue and regarding ddos its good enough to run your websites and they do not null route the ip

    How about OVHcloud vps?

    @Alyx said: However, I currently need an ARM VPS, and in this case, I prefer Netcup over Hetzner.

    Will Netcup be as stable as Hetzner cloud?

    ovh cloud vps highly stable and least oversold but price is high compare to other providers here on low end talk

    Thanked by 1EthanZou
  • @stefeman said:
    Hetzner might just one day fuck you over without any reason and terminate everything cuz you used too much bandwidth.

    So with a valid reason then

  • Never had issues with Hetzner.

    Storage box is very performant and stable. Storage share is performant too. Both are very good value for money.

    I have created some VPS a few times, and was impressed by the admin interface and speed of the VPS, even the lowest spec ones.

    Thanked by 1EthanZou
Sign In or Register to comment.