Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

[2024 EXTENDED] Black Friday / Cyber Monday: FLASH SALE & MEGATHREAD

16926936956976981337

Comments

  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @risharde said:
    @Zyra @Saragoldfarb @doobydoe @Savvy oh yeah we're getting somewhere. If only @FAT32 would put my offer up on the main page so I don't need to keep spamming people >:)

    @FAT32 wish you were here, sweet dreams though <3

  • @risharde said:
    One thanks, thank you @Zyra! Calling on others to be ready or else my post will just get lost with all this chattering

    It seems you are aiming to post your deal on Cyber Tuesday?

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @maverick said: failover ip is only for the incoming traffic, and it has no additional mac

    I can do curl --interface [failover ip]

    and it sends from the failover ip

    Thanked by 2maverick r3k
  • risharderisharde Host Rep, Veteran

    @barbaros said:

    @risharde said:
    One thanks, thank you @Zyra! Calling on others to be ready or else my post will just get lost with all this chattering

    It seems you are aiming to post your deal on Cyber Tuesday?

    It's still Monday here but why not, if Tuesday rocks the boat, why not! >:)

    Thanked by 3Saragoldfarb Savvy r3k
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @barbaros said:

    @risharde said:
    One thanks, thank you @Zyra! Calling on others to be ready or else my post will just get lost with all this chattering

    It seems you are aiming to post your deal on Cyber Tuesday?

    Still Monday in England.

    Thanked by 1r3k
  • @risharde said:
    Are you ready?

    for what ?

    Thanked by 1r3k
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @beanman109 said:

    @emgh said:

    @Yarmeli said:

    @emgh said:
    Ok I’ll be here for 30 minutes

    Help me help you help me

    If anyone solves the issue, he/she gets to choose if he/she wants a steam key in DM’s or if I should post one here

    In memory of @beanman109

    It'll be a decent one

    worth a try - any quick tl;dr of what the issue is?

    Alright, let me summarize

    I've got a EX44

    I bought this: https://docs.hetzner.com/robot/dedicated-server/ip/failover/

    I have this Wireguard container:

      wireguard:
        image: linuxserver/wireguard
        container_name: wireguard
        cap_add:
          - NET_ADMIN
        environment:
          - PUID=1000
          - PGID=1000
          - TZ=Europe/London
          - SERVERURL=[failover_ip]
          - SERVERPORT=51821
          - PEERS=1
          - PEERDNS=auto
          - INTERNAL_SUBNET=10.13.14.0/24
          - LOG_CONFS=true
        volumes:
          - ../data/config/wireguard:/config # WireGuard configuration
        ports:
          - "51821:51820/udp"
        sysctls:
          - net.ipv4.conf.all.src_valid_mark=1
        restart: unless-stopped
    

    I can connect to it just fine, but traffic is routed though the primary IP, not my failover one.

    From the host:

    root@xxx ~ # ip route
    default via [primary ip's gateway] dev enp5s0 proto static onlink
    [failover ip] via [failover ip] dev enp5s0 proto static
    --bunch of docker stuff--

    netplan:

    network:
      version: 2
      renderer: networkd
      ethernets:
        enp5s0:
          addresses:
            - [primary ip]/32
            - My i m it s hate ipv6
            - [failover ip]/32
          routes:
            - on-link: true
              to: 0.0.0.0/0
              via: [primary ip's gateway]
            - to: default
              via: My i m it s hate ipv6
            - to: [failover ip]/32
              via: [failover ip]
          nameservers:
            addresses:
              .....
    

    The wg0.conf:

    [Interface]
    Address = 10.13.14.1
    ListenPort = 51820
    PrivateKey = xxx
    PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -o %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o eth+ -j MASQUERADE
    PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -D FORWARD -o %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o eth+ -j MASQUERADE
    

    I highly suspect I need to do some --to-source magic instead of masquerade in the above, but as soon as I try something in regards to the PostUp & PostDown, I fuck up everything

    does setting the INTERFACE variable in the wg docker-compose work?

    As an envirement variable? Yes, but what would I put? The failover IP as I do with curl?

    Thanked by 1r3k
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @barbaros said:

    @emgh said:

    @barbaros said:
    I keep forgetting the server passwords and having to reinstall them. Done like 3 times already :(

    ehm

    ssh

    keys

    ?

    Just focus on your own problem instead of ssh key shaming me okay? :(

    <3

    Thanked by 3barbaros maverick r3k
  • @Saragoldfarb said:

    @barbaros said:

    @risharde said:
    One thanks, thank you @Zyra! Calling on others to be ready or else my post will just get lost with all this chattering

    It seems you are aiming to post your deal on Cyber Tuesday?

    Still Monday in England.

    But not on Australia :(

    Thanked by 1r3k
  • risharderisharde Host Rep, Veteran

    RCLOUDSYSTEMS CYBERMONDAY MEGAPACK 2024 >:)

    20 APPS + WP PLUGINS (Worth AT LEAST $244!!!)

    ORDER HERE - $20 (yearly recurring)

    Apps:

    • EmailSync (win compatible)
    • EmailBackup (win compatible)
    • EmailArchiver
    • EmailWeb
    • Network Utilities
    • Speed Tester
    • Looking Glass
    • Uptime Checker
    • Mail IP Blacklist Checker
    • NAT KVM Manager

    WP plugins

    • RootWP Pro - Manage WP sites from a single parent Wordpress site
    • Backup Essentials - Simple format backups (FREE - not in cart)
    • WP Hide - Security plugin that can block scanners from detecting WP
    • WPVivid Backup - Powerful staging and backup plugin
    • Oxygen Builder - Powerful Visual Page builder plugin
    • BitApps Forms Builder - Powerful Form builder plugin
    • BitApps Integrations - Powerful Automation plugin
    • BitApps Social - Powerful scheduler and auto social poster plugin
    • Cost of Goods Pro - Simple net profit calculater per order
    • Edit Order Meta Pro - Simple meta editor to display custom fields to user's orders

    ORDER HERE - $20 (yearly recurring)

    Fine print:

    • WP plugins are legit (not nulled or tampered with) and comes with 1 year of free automatic updates
    • RootWPPro details page hasn't been released due to running late but this is a super powerful plugin I've been working on that allows you to administer unlimited Wordpress sites from a single Wordpress site (updates, mass install plugins, mass ip blocker, pull backups from a site back to RootWP, Whitelabel the RootWPSite plugin, simple support
  • @emgh said:

    @maverick said: failover ip is only for the incoming traffic, and it has no additional mac

    I can do curl --interface [failover ip]

    and it sends from the failover ip

    yeah, if you initiate connection from outside

    i actually am not sure that you can do that from inside, although you may try some SNAT, maybe you already have

    i'm lagging a bit, too sleepy... sry

    Thanked by 1r3k
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @emgh said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @emgh said:

    @Yarmeli said:

    @emgh said:
    Ok I’ll be here for 30 minutes

    Help me help you help me

    If anyone solves the issue, he/she gets to choose if he/she wants a steam key in DM’s or if I should post one here

    In memory of @beanman109

    It'll be a decent one

    worth a try - any quick tl;dr of what the issue is?

    Alright, let me summarize

    I've got a EX44

    I bought this: https://docs.hetzner.com/robot/dedicated-server/ip/failover/

    I have this Wireguard container:

      wireguard:
        image: linuxserver/wireguard
        container_name: wireguard
        cap_add:
          - NET_ADMIN
        environment:
          - PUID=1000
          - PGID=1000
          - TZ=Europe/London
          - SERVERURL=[failover_ip]
          - SERVERPORT=51821
          - PEERS=1
          - PEERDNS=auto
          - INTERNAL_SUBNET=10.13.14.0/24
          - LOG_CONFS=true
        volumes:
          - ../data/config/wireguard:/config # WireGuard configuration
        ports:
          - "51821:51820/udp"
        sysctls:
          - net.ipv4.conf.all.src_valid_mark=1
        restart: unless-stopped
    

    I can connect to it just fine, but traffic is routed though the primary IP, not my failover one.

    From the host:

    root@xxx ~ # ip route
    default via [primary ip's gateway] dev enp5s0 proto static onlink
    [failover ip] via [failover ip] dev enp5s0 proto static
    --bunch of docker stuff--

    netplan:

    network:
      version: 2
      renderer: networkd
      ethernets:
        enp5s0:
          addresses:
            - [primary ip]/32
            - My i m it s hate ipv6
            - [failover ip]/32
          routes:
            - on-link: true
              to: 0.0.0.0/0
              via: [primary ip's gateway]
            - to: default
              via: My i m it s hate ipv6
            - to: [failover ip]/32
              via: [failover ip]
          nameservers:
            addresses:
              .....
    

    The wg0.conf:

    [Interface]
    Address = 10.13.14.1
    ListenPort = 51820
    PrivateKey = xxx
    PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -o %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o eth+ -j MASQUERADE
    PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -D FORWARD -o %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o eth+ -j MASQUERADE
    

    I highly suspect I need to do some --to-source magic instead of masquerade in the above, but as soon as I try something in regards to the PostUp & PostDown, I fuck up everything

    does setting the INTERFACE variable in the wg docker-compose work?

    As an envirement variable? Yes, but what would I put? The failover IP as I do with curl?

    I thought you said the failover IP had it's own interface, maybe I'm getting mixed up

    Thanked by 2emgh r3k
  • Well after frustration of 15 minutes and rage re-install, I realized that default user in OVH is not root but debian. So I was trying to login with wrong user all this time FML

    Thanked by 4plumberg emgh Savvy r3k
  • ROAD-TO-3-MILLIONS!

    Thanked by 1r3k
  • @emgh said:

    @zakkuuno said:

    @emgh said:
    Ok I’ll be here for 30 minutes

    Help me help you help me

    If anyone solves the issue, he/she gets to choose if he/she wants a steam key in DM’s or if I should post one here

    In memory of @beanman109

    It'll be a decent one

    Are you trying to connect using both ips or you want to specify the outbound ip?

    specify outbound

    Yeah you need to do SNAT. But there's another layer of NAT from inside the container so doing SNAT in there will mess things up. The easy way is to just set network_mode: host and supply your own wg config which I remember the docker image supports.

    PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i <wireguard_interface> -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -o <outbound_interface> -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o <outbound_interface> -j SNAT --to-source <failover_ip>
    PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i <wireguard_interface> -j ACCEPT; iptables -D FORWARD -o <outbound_interface> -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o <outbound_interface> -j SNAT --to-source <failover_ip>

    Thanked by 3beanman109 maverick r3k
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @beanman109 said:

    @emgh said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @emgh said:

    @Yarmeli said:

    @emgh said:
    Ok I’ll be here for 30 minutes

    Help me help you help me

    If anyone solves the issue, he/she gets to choose if he/she wants a steam key in DM’s or if I should post one here

    In memory of @beanman109

    It'll be a decent one

    worth a try - any quick tl;dr of what the issue is?

    Alright, let me summarize

    I've got a EX44

    I bought this: https://docs.hetzner.com/robot/dedicated-server/ip/failover/

    I have this Wireguard container:

      wireguard:
        image: linuxserver/wireguard
        container_name: wireguard
        cap_add:
          - NET_ADMIN
        environment:
          - PUID=1000
          - PGID=1000
          - TZ=Europe/London
          - SERVERURL=[failover_ip]
          - SERVERPORT=51821
          - PEERS=1
          - PEERDNS=auto
          - INTERNAL_SUBNET=10.13.14.0/24
          - LOG_CONFS=true
        volumes:
          - ../data/config/wireguard:/config # WireGuard configuration
        ports:
          - "51821:51820/udp"
        sysctls:
          - net.ipv4.conf.all.src_valid_mark=1
        restart: unless-stopped
    

    I can connect to it just fine, but traffic is routed though the primary IP, not my failover one.

    From the host:

    root@xxx ~ # ip route
    default via [primary ip's gateway] dev enp5s0 proto static onlink
    [failover ip] via [failover ip] dev enp5s0 proto static
    --bunch of docker stuff--

    netplan:

    network:
      version: 2
      renderer: networkd
      ethernets:
        enp5s0:
          addresses:
            - [primary ip]/32
            - My i m it s hate ipv6
            - [failover ip]/32
          routes:
            - on-link: true
              to: 0.0.0.0/0
              via: [primary ip's gateway]
            - to: default
              via: My i m it s hate ipv6
            - to: [failover ip]/32
              via: [failover ip]
          nameservers:
            addresses:
              .....
    

    The wg0.conf:

    [Interface]
    Address = 10.13.14.1
    ListenPort = 51820
    PrivateKey = xxx
    PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -o %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o eth+ -j MASQUERADE
    PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -D FORWARD -o %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o eth+ -j MASQUERADE
    

    I highly suspect I need to do some --to-source magic instead of masquerade in the above, but as soon as I try something in regards to the PostUp & PostDown, I fuck up everything

    does setting the INTERFACE variable in the wg docker-compose work?

    As an envirement variable? Yes, but what would I put? The failover IP as I do with curl?

    I thought you said the failover IP had it's own interface, maybe I'm getting mixed up

    No, same enp5s0

    but I can run

    curl --interaface [failover ip] https://ifconfig.me/

    and I'll get the failover IP

    @maverick dosen't this contradict your point? Maybe it doesn't I'm not good with networking

    Thanked by 3beanman109 maverick r3k
  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @barbaros said:
    Well after frustration of 15 minutes and rage re-install, I realized that default user in OVH is not root but debian. So I was trying to login with wrong user all this time FML

    Haha. Went through that many moons ago

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @zakkuuno said:

    @emgh said:

    @zakkuuno said:

    @emgh said:
    Ok I’ll be here for 30 minutes

    Help me help you help me

    If anyone solves the issue, he/she gets to choose if he/she wants a steam key in DM’s or if I should post one here

    In memory of @beanman109

    It'll be a decent one

    Are you trying to connect using both ips or you want to specify the outbound ip?

    specify outbound

    Yeah you need to do SNAT. But there's another layer of NAT from inside the container so doing SNAT in there will mess things up. The easy way is to just set network_mode: host and supply your own wg config which I remember the docker image supports.

    PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i <wireguard_interface> -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -o <outbound_interface> -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o <outbound_interface> -j SNAT --to-source <failover_ip>
    PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i <wireguard_interface> -j ACCEPT; iptables -D FORWARD -o <outbound_interface> -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o <outbound_interface> -j SNAT --to-source <failover_ip>

    Hold on

    Will try

    If this works, key is yours

    Thanked by 2beanman109 r3k
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @barbaros said:
    Well after frustration of 15 minutes and rage re-install, I realized that default user in OVH is not root but debian. So I was trying to login with wrong user all this time FML

    usually you can log in with root but just get displayed a message to use the debian account right?

    Thanked by 2DeviousDev r3k
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:
    Well after frustration of 15 minutes and rage re-install, I realized that default user in OVH is not root but debian. So I was trying to login with wrong user all this time FML

    usually you can log in with root but just get displayed a message to use the debian account right?

    Nope.

    Thanked by 1r3k
  • @emgh said:
    Help me help you help me

    Can confirm this is something I have no experience with :s

    Buuuut surprisingly Claude can sometimes be helpful. This is what Claude said:

    I'll help you solve the routing issue with your Wireguard setup. It sounds like you want to ensure that outgoing traffic from the Wireguard clients uses the failover IP instead of the primary IP.

    Here's a refined approach to modify your Wireguard configuration:

    [Interface]
    Address = 10.13.14.1
    ListenPort = 51820
    PrivateKey = xxx
    PostUp = iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o eth+ -j SNAT --to-source [failover_ip]
    PostDown = iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o eth+ -j SNAT --to-source [failover_ip]
    

    The key changes are:
    1. Replace the MASQUERADE with SNAT
    2. Use --to-source [failover_ip] to explicitly set the source IP to your failover IP

    A few additional recommendations:

    • Replace [failover_ip] with your actual failover IP
    • Make sure your firewall and network settings allow this SNAT configuration
    • Verify the routing after making these changes

    To verify the routing after changes:
    1. Connect to the Wireguard VPN
    2. Run ip route show default
    3. Check curl ifconfig.me to confirm the IP is your failover IP

    Would you like me to elaborate on any of these steps or help you troubleshoot further?


    emgh: I can do curl --interface [failover ip] and it sends from the failover ip

    Claude:

    That's a good observation! If curl --interface [failover ip] works, it means the failover IP is correctly configured at the network interface level.

    Let's dig a bit deeper into your routing setup. The fact that you can explicitly bind to the failover IP suggests that the IP is correctly added to the network interface. The challenge is likely in getting your Wireguard traffic to consistently use this IP.

    Could you try the following modifications to your Wireguard configuration:

    [Interface]
    Address = 10.13.14.1
    ListenPort = 51820
    PrivateKey = xxx
    PostUp = ip route add default dev wg0 src [failover_ip] table 200
    PostUp = ip rule add from [failover_ip] table 200
    PostUp = iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o eth+ -j SNAT --to-source [failover_ip]
    PostDown = ip route del default dev wg0 src [failover_ip] table 200
    PostDown = ip rule del from [failover_ip] table 200
    PostDown = iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o eth+ -j SNAT --to-source [failover_ip]
    

    These additional ip route and ip rule commands create a separate routing table that specifically routes traffic from the Wireguard interface using the failover IP.

    A few questions to help diagnose:
    1. Can you confirm the exact commands you're using to test the IP source?
    2. Are you seeing any specific error messages when trying to route traffic?
    3. What does ip route show table all output?

    Thanked by 2maverick r3k
  • @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:
    Well after frustration of 15 minutes and rage re-install, I realized that default user in OVH is not root but debian. So I was trying to login with wrong user all this time FML

    usually you can log in with root but just get displayed a message to use the debian account right?

    yup that the default

    Thanked by 1r3k
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @emgh said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @emgh said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @emgh said:

    @Yarmeli said:

    @emgh said:
    Ok I’ll be here for 30 minutes

    Help me help you help me

    If anyone solves the issue, he/she gets to choose if he/she wants a steam key in DM’s or if I should post one here

    In memory of @beanman109

    It'll be a decent one

    worth a try - any quick tl;dr of what the issue is?

    Alright, let me summarize

    I've got a EX44

    I bought this: https://docs.hetzner.com/robot/dedicated-server/ip/failover/

    I have this Wireguard container:

      wireguard:
        image: linuxserver/wireguard
        container_name: wireguard
        cap_add:
          - NET_ADMIN
        environment:
          - PUID=1000
          - PGID=1000
          - TZ=Europe/London
          - SERVERURL=[failover_ip]
          - SERVERPORT=51821
          - PEERS=1
          - PEERDNS=auto
          - INTERNAL_SUBNET=10.13.14.0/24
          - LOG_CONFS=true
        volumes:
          - ../data/config/wireguard:/config # WireGuard configuration
        ports:
          - "51821:51820/udp"
        sysctls:
          - net.ipv4.conf.all.src_valid_mark=1
        restart: unless-stopped
    

    I can connect to it just fine, but traffic is routed though the primary IP, not my failover one.

    From the host:

    root@xxx ~ # ip route
    default via [primary ip's gateway] dev enp5s0 proto static onlink
    [failover ip] via [failover ip] dev enp5s0 proto static
    --bunch of docker stuff--

    netplan:

    network:
      version: 2
      renderer: networkd
      ethernets:
        enp5s0:
          addresses:
            - [primary ip]/32
            - My i m it s hate ipv6
            - [failover ip]/32
          routes:
            - on-link: true
              to: 0.0.0.0/0
              via: [primary ip's gateway]
            - to: default
              via: My i m it s hate ipv6
            - to: [failover ip]/32
              via: [failover ip]
          nameservers:
            addresses:
              .....
    

    The wg0.conf:

    [Interface]
    Address = 10.13.14.1
    ListenPort = 51820
    PrivateKey = xxx
    PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -A FORWARD -o %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o eth+ -j MASQUERADE
    PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -D FORWARD -o %i -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -s 10.13.14.0/24 -o eth+ -j MASQUERADE
    

    I highly suspect I need to do some --to-source magic instead of masquerade in the above, but as soon as I try something in regards to the PostUp & PostDown, I fuck up everything

    does setting the INTERFACE variable in the wg docker-compose work?

    As an envirement variable? Yes, but what would I put? The failover IP as I do with curl?

    I thought you said the failover IP had it's own interface, maybe I'm getting mixed up

    No, same enp5s0

    but I can run

    curl --interaface [failover ip] https://ifconfig.me/

    and I'll get the failover IP

    @maverick dosen't this contradict your point? Maybe it doesn't I'm not good with networking

    cringe ahh heztner

    Thanked by 2maverick r3k
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    tried but forgot to push the host mode to git to it never got applied

    that didn't work

    will try again and actually do it

    Thanked by 1r3k
  • SaragoldfarbSaragoldfarb Member, Megathread Squad

    So... Is it over yet? I mean, we're close to 700.

    Thanked by 2Zyra r3k
  • @beanman109 said:

    @barbaros said:
    Well after frustration of 15 minutes and rage re-install, I realized that default user in OVH is not root but debian. So I was trying to login with wrong user all this time FML

    usually you can log in with root but just get displayed a message to use the debian account right?

    I think root login is disabled with their Debian template. I even switch to rescue mode and changed root password and it still didn't work. I just need to switch my new servers to SSH key so it doesn't happen again -_-

    Thanked by 1r3k
  • ZappieZappie Member, Patron Provider, LIR

    Its lunchtime here in New Zealand (granted, on a tuesday...) but I feel a little hungry for another (last) round of 90% discount on our New Zealand based servers

    GL01U9RZ8U

    This will be our little 10 slots so get em while they're hot.

  • ZappieZappie Member, Patron Provider, LIR
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @emgh said:
    tried but forgot to push the host mode to git to it never got applied

    that didn't work

    will try again and actually do it

    Thanked by 3emgh maverick r3k
  • @beanman109 said:

    @emgh said: In memory of @beanman109

    did I die or something?

    Sorting out who gets the laptops gonna be a royal mess now. Your estate will be fighting with LET members as to who is the rightful recipient.

    Thanked by 1r3k
This discussion has been closed.