Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

[2024 EXTENDED] Black Friday / Cyber Monday: FLASH SALE & MEGATHREAD

15415425445465471337

Comments

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @emgh said:

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:
    Which one is better?

    Mostly comes down whatever location is more convenient for you at that point, they both are pretty damn good for what you're paying for. Maybe the SolidSeoVPS one because they've been in business for a decade at this point, but so has MassiveGrid so who knows :/ .

    I haven't followed MassiveGRID drama at all.

    Was I wrong in my prediction? If so, I'll stand for being wrong :)

    Prediciton: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4043824/#Comment_4043824

    Quote:

    I might have to eat this up later, but I’m fairly confident that this provider isn’t going anywhere for at least a few years.

    They have been around for long already.

    It’s not like this is super high end hardware either. The main cost for them here is probably the IPv4 honestly.

    Edit: not saying it will keep the same performance etc, my prediction is solely about MassiveGRID being around or not.

    My servers are back online but I still want out

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @Zyra said:

    @beanman109 said: How does $3 a year for an IPv4 not speak for itself

    he's just trying to rub it in atp.

    yes

    Thanked by 3Zyra r3k lovelyserver
  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad
    edited December 2024

    @emgh said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @emgh said: Which one is better?

    How does $3 a year for an IPv4 not speak for itself

    in Vietnam

    My parents love Vietnam

  • tinokuntinokun Member
    edited December 2024

    @emgh said:

    @emgh said:
    GUYS - NEW YABS COMING UP FOR THE TWO DEALS BELOW

    Deal 1 (SolidSeoVPS):

    • 2 EPYC core
    • 1 GB RAM
    • 21 GB NVMe
    • 1 IPv4
    • Haarlem
    • $6.95/yr

    Deal 2 (Onidel):

    • 1 EPYC core
    • 1 GB RAM
    • 20 GB NVMe
    • 1 IPv4
    • Ho Chi Minh
    • $3.32/yr

    Okay, so here are the YABS'es

    Note: Some copy pasting going on, I ran the Onidel YABS with no SWAP. Geekbench failed. Therefore, I reran it with SWAP, but, I ONLY reran it with CPU testing. I didn't think there was any point in putting load to the network and disk since I've just done that and the effect SWAP has on that should be minimal (I want to say zero, but probably it somehow affects it in some weird way). Therefore, the Onidel YABS is actually two YABS in one. I used the system info from the second YABS, with SWAP.

    SolidSeoVPS

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Dec  2 09:36:47 UTC 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 2 days, 19 hours, 18 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC-Milan Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2445.406 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 961.3 MiB
    Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk       : 20.6 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-31-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : Solid Systems LLC
    ASN        : AS399275 Solid Systems LLC
    Host       : SOLID-GERMANY
    Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 51.59 MB/s   (12.8k) | 738.05 MB/s  (11.5k)
    Write      | 51.67 MB/s   (12.9k) | 741.93 MB/s  (11.5k)
    Total      | 103.26 MB/s  (25.8k) | 1.47 GB/s    (23.1k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.69 GB/s     (5.2k) | 3.46 GB/s     (3.3k)
    Write      | 2.84 GB/s     (5.5k) | 3.70 GB/s     (3.6k)
    Total      | 5.54 GB/s    (10.8k) | 7.16 GB/s     (7.0k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 2.91 Gbits/sec  | 3.52 Gbits/sec  | 8.48 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 5.79 Gbits/sec  | 5.88 Gbits/sec  | 0.880 ms       
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 1.22 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 87.5 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 714 Mbits/sec   | 117 Mbits/sec   | 157 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 754 Mbits/sec   | 365 Mbits/sec   | 142 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 839 Mbits/sec   | 1.10 Gbits/sec  | 81.0 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 719 Mbits/sec   | 393 Mbits/sec   | 206 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1009                          
    Multi Core      | 1135                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9197641
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 41 sec
    

    Onidel

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon Dec  2 09:48:14 UTC 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 13 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 1 @ 2894.562 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 924.5 MiB
    Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
    Disk       : 19.3 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-49-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : HYPERCORE
    ASN        : AS135932 Viet Storage Technology Joint Stock Company
    Host       : Hypercore Technology Joint Stock Company
    Location   : Quận Mười Một, Ho Chi Minh (SG)
    Country    : Vietnam
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 134.86 MB/s  (33.7k) | 758.66 MB/s  (11.8k)
    Write      | 135.21 MB/s  (33.8k) | 762.66 MB/s  (11.9k)
    Total      | 270.07 MB/s  (67.5k) | 1.52 GB/s    (23.7k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.10 GB/s     (4.1k) | 2.90 GB/s     (2.8k)
    Write      | 2.21 GB/s     (4.3k) | 3.09 GB/s     (3.0k)
    Total      | 4.31 GB/s     (8.4k) | 6.00 GB/s     (5.8k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 721 Mbits/sec   | 569 Mbits/sec   | 192 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 622 Mbits/sec   | 665 Mbits/sec   | 233 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | busy            | 246 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.05 Gbits/sec  | 995 Mbits/sec   | 30.0 ms        
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 790 Mbits/sec   | 750 Mbits/sec   | 187 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 515 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 256 ms         
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 264 Mbits/sec   | 361 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 491                           
    Multi Core      | 517                           
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9197904
    
    YABS completed in 20 min 18 sec
    

    Which one is better?

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Thu Nov 28 14:19:17 UTC 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 9 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 7542 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2894.562 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 40.0 GiB
    Distro     : AlmaLinux 9.5 (Teal Serval)
    Kernel     : 6.12.1-1.el9.elrepo.x86_64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : HYPERCORE
    ASN        : AS135932 Viet Storage Technology Joint Stock Company
    Host       : Hypercore Technology Joint Stock Company
    Location   : Quận Mười Một, Ho Chi Minh (SG)
    Country    : Vietnam
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda4):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 383.65 MB/s  (95.9k) | 4.04 GB/s    (63.2k)
    Write      | 384.67 MB/s  (96.1k) | 4.06 GB/s    (63.5k)
    Total      | 768.32 MB/s (192.0k) | 8.11 GB/s   (126.7k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 9.12 GB/s    (17.8k) | 7.83 GB/s     (7.6k)
    Write      | 9.60 GB/s    (18.7k) | 8.35 GB/s     (8.1k)
    Total      | 18.72 GB/s   (36.5k) | 16.19 GB/s   (15.8k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 577 Mbits/sec   | 41.9 Mbits/sec  | 197 ms
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | busy            | 517 Mbits/sec   | 332 ms
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | busy            | 343 Mbits/sec   | 259 ms
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 1.05 Gbits/sec  | 1.00 Gbits/sec  | 29.3 ms
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 720 Mbits/sec   | 826 Mbits/sec   | 176 ms
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 540 Mbits/sec   | 798 Mbits/sec   | 257 ms
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | busy            | 443 Mbits/sec   | 349 ms
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:                                                                                                                                                                           >!---------------------------------                                                                                                                                                                     >!Test            | Value                                                                                                                                                                                               |                                                                                                                                                                                    
    Single Core     | 1146                                                                                                                                                                               
    Multi Core      | 2095
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/9120554
    
    YABS completed in 14 min 51 sec
    
    

    Weird, this is my YABS in a machine but with 2 vCores and 4 GiB or ram, surely the SWAP ruined the benchmark results

    Edited: forgot to paste it LOL

    Thanked by 2r3k lovelyserver
  • @emgh said:

    @Zyra said:

    @beanman109 said: How does $3 a year for an IPv4 not speak for itself

    he's just trying to rub it in atp.

    yes

  • @emgh said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @emgh said: Which one is better?

    How does $3 a year for an IPv4 not speak for itself

    in Vietnam

  • @emgh said:

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:
    Which one is better?

    Mostly comes down whatever location is more convenient for you at that point, they both are pretty damn good for what you're paying for. Maybe the SolidSeoVPS one because they've been in business for a decade at this point, but so has MassiveGrid so who knows :/ .

    I haven't followed MassiveGRID drama at all.

    Was I wrong in my prediction? If so, I'll stand for being wrong :)

    You're not wrong, I don't think they're going out of business or anything. It's just that people have been complaining a ton about downtime in certain locations, hell even their client panels were down for a few hours. I'm just going to assume it's going to be a Virmach situation. :)

    Thanked by 3emgh r3k lovelyserver
  • MOARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR

    Thanked by 3ariq01 r3k lovelyserver
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @Zyra said:

    @emgh said:

    @Zyra said:

    @beanman109 said: How does $3 a year for an IPv4 not speak for itself

    he's just trying to rub it in atp.

    yes

    My version was better

    Remember it?

    Thanked by 2r3k lovelyserver
  • @beanman109 said:

    @emgh said:

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:
    Which one is better?

    Mostly comes down whatever location is more convenient for you at that point, they both are pretty damn good for what you're paying for. Maybe the SolidSeoVPS one because they've been in business for a decade at this point, but so has MassiveGrid so who knows :/ .

    I haven't followed MassiveGRID drama at all.

    Was I wrong in my prediction? If so, I'll stand for being wrong :)

    Prediciton: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4043824/#Comment_4043824

    Quote:

    I might have to eat this up later, but I’m fairly confident that this provider isn’t going anywhere for at least a few years.

    They have been around for long already.

    It’s not like this is super high end hardware either. The main cost for them here is probably the IPv4 honestly.

    Edit: not saying it will keep the same performance etc, my prediction is solely about MassiveGRID being around or not.

    My servers are back online but I still want out

    From something I read somewhere (here abouts), it looks like only their DHCP server crapped out. Infra was all OK - so for those of you who had (sensibly) configured the IPs to be static, you wouldn't have noticed anything (infact maybe great network because everyone else was offline!).

  • @emgh said: My version was better

    post it again

    Thanked by 2r3k lovelyserver
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:
    Which one is better?

    Mostly comes down whatever location is more convenient for you at that point, they both are pretty damn good for what you're paying for. Maybe the SolidSeoVPS one because they've been in business for a decade at this point, but so has MassiveGrid so who knows :/ .

    I haven't followed MassiveGRID drama at all.

    Was I wrong in my prediction? If so, I'll stand for being wrong :)

    You're not wrong, I don't think they're going out of business or anything. It's just that people have been complaining a ton about downtime in certain locations, hell even their client panels were down for a few hours. I'm just going to assume it's going to be a Virmach situation. :)

    Was support at least responsive?

    If so, not quite a Virmach situation :D

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @nullnothere said: (sensibly)

    good joke, I don't even change the default password providers send me 90% of the time

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @Zyra said: post it again

    how would I go about finding it, we've got 544 pages hahaha

    Thanked by 2r3k lovelyserver
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    I'll just upload it again

    Thanked by 2r3k lovelyserver
  • @emgh said:

    @Zyra said: post it again

    how would I go about finding it, we've got 544 pages hahaha

    BF Ambassador get to work.

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad
  • @emgh said:
    @Zyra

    THANKED AND SAVED

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @Zyra said:

    @emgh said:
    @Zyra

    THANKED AND SAVED

    THANK YOU

  • Who got the laptop?

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @emgh said:

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:
    Which one is better?

    Mostly comes down whatever location is more convenient for you at that point, they both are pretty damn good for what you're paying for. Maybe the SolidSeoVPS one because they've been in business for a decade at this point, but so has MassiveGrid so who knows :/ .

    I haven't followed MassiveGRID drama at all.

    Was I wrong in my prediction? If so, I'll stand for being wrong :)

    You're not wrong, I don't think they're going out of business or anything. It's just that people have been complaining a ton about downtime in certain locations, hell even their client panels were down for a few hours. I'm just going to assume it's going to be a Virmach situation. :)

    Was support at least responsive?

    If so, not quite a Virmach situation :D

    I opened a ticket at Sunday 1pm AEST and got a response Monday 4am AEST, I can't complain too much

    Hello,

    If you're still facing issues, can you please make a complete stop, leave it stopped for 1 min and then start your server again.

    After that please let us know if your server is stable and is working properly on your end.

    The root cause of the recent instabilities is that faced a bug in the mac addresses fdb of the hypervisor that caused this in some nodes in our clusters. We've updated all nodes in all our clusters during the weekend to avoid our customers to face such issues in the future.

    We've also added more capacity so the performance should be better now.

    In case you still want a refund, please do open a ticket to our billing department.

  • @beanman109 said: default password

    I've been dutifully setting it as part of the order process (to a nice genuine random password EVERY time). It takes time... and that also explains WHY I don't get any of the gatecrashing deals. Heck, even my hostnames typed.

    No wonder... I'm where I am.

    On the bright side, I have saved at least $5 because I DID NOT GET A HCM VN IDLER FOR $3.5 / YEAR

    I can now buy something with that (hopefully).

    Thanked by 3FAT32 r3k lovelyserver
  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    Nothing can disturb me during BF and CM.
    https://9gag.com/gag/aZZ08RW

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @beanman109 said: I opened a ticket at Sunday 1pm AEST and got a response Monday 4am AEST, I can't complain too much

    Yeah, that's not Virmach level :D

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @raza19 said:
    Who got the laptop?

    22 hours and 30 minutes until thats drawn

  • allthemtingsallthemtings Member, Megathread Squad

    @Neoon said:
    Nothing can disturb me during BF and CM.
    https://9gag.com/gag/aZZ08RW

  • beermachinebeermachine Member
    edited December 2024

    @emgh said:

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:
    Which one is better?

    Mostly comes down whatever location is more convenient for you at that point, they both are pretty damn good for what you're paying for. Maybe the SolidSeoVPS one because they've been in business for a decade at this point, but so has MassiveGrid so who knows :/ .

    I haven't followed MassiveGRID drama at all.

    Was I wrong in my prediction? If so, I'll stand for being wrong :)

    You're not wrong, I don't think they're going out of business or anything. It's just that people have been complaining a ton about downtime in certain locations, hell even their client panels were down for a few hours. I'm just going to assume it's going to be a Virmach situation. :)

    Was support at least responsive?

    If so, not quite a Virmach situation :D

    It seems like they've been replying to quite a few of the posts within their thread, I haven't really been paying close attention despite owning a MassiveGrid VPS (just idling). Seems like they've been handling everything pretty well but it's just the downtime that's a pretty bad look.

    @nullnothere said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @emgh said:

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:
    Which one is better?

    Mostly comes down whatever location is more convenient for you at that point, they both are pretty damn good for what you're paying for. Maybe the SolidSeoVPS one because they've been in business for a decade at this point, but so has MassiveGrid so who knows :/ .

    I haven't followed MassiveGRID drama at all.

    Was I wrong in my prediction? If so, I'll stand for being wrong :)

    Prediciton: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4043824/#Comment_4043824

    Quote:

    I might have to eat this up later, but I’m fairly confident that this provider isn’t going anywhere for at least a few years.

    They have been around for long already.

    It’s not like this is super high end hardware either. The main cost for them here is probably the IPv4 honestly.

    Edit: not saying it will keep the same performance etc, my prediction is solely about MassiveGRID being around or not.

    My servers are back online but I still want out

    From something I read somewhere (here abouts), it looks like only their DHCP server crapped out. Infra was all OK - so for those of you who had (sensibly) configured the IPs to be static, you wouldn't have noticed anything (infact maybe great network because everyone else was offline!).

    Interesting but having days of downtime is not too good of a look for a "HA" VPS, granted I can't expect AWS-tier uptime for a $0.49/month vps.

  • THANKS-FOR-EVERYTHING-FAT32

  • @raza19 said:
    Who got the laptop?

    @FAT32 - he rigged the backend so that all the thanks @emgh got was accounted against @FAT32's credit.

    Can't beat that.

    He may finesse it a little so that any thanks that @beanman109 gets also goes to his credit.

    There is no hope.

    THANKS-FOR-EVERYTHING-FAT32

    If he wins, he gets to

    FAT32-REPLACE-THE-POTATO

  • beanman109beanman109 Member, Host Rep, Megathread Squad

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:
    Which one is better?

    Mostly comes down whatever location is more convenient for you at that point, they both are pretty damn good for what you're paying for. Maybe the SolidSeoVPS one because they've been in business for a decade at this point, but so has MassiveGrid so who knows :/ .

    I haven't followed MassiveGRID drama at all.

    Was I wrong in my prediction? If so, I'll stand for being wrong :)

    You're not wrong, I don't think they're going out of business or anything. It's just that people have been complaining a ton about downtime in certain locations, hell even their client panels were down for a few hours. I'm just going to assume it's going to be a Virmach situation. :)

    Was support at least responsive?

    If so, not quite a Virmach situation :D

    It seems like they've been replying to quite a few of the posts within their thread, I haven't really been paying close attention despite owning a MassiveGrid VPS (just idling). Seems like they've been handling everything pretty well but it's just the downtime that's a pretty bad look.

    @nullnothere said:

    @beanman109 said:

    @emgh said:

    @beermachine said:

    @emgh said:
    Which one is better?

    Mostly comes down whatever location is more convenient for you at that point, they both are pretty damn good for what you're paying for. Maybe the SolidSeoVPS one because they've been in business for a decade at this point, but so has MassiveGrid so who knows :/ .

    I haven't followed MassiveGRID drama at all.

    Was I wrong in my prediction? If so, I'll stand for being wrong :)

    Prediciton: https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4043824/#Comment_4043824

    Quote:

    I might have to eat this up later, but I’m fairly confident that this provider isn’t going anywhere for at least a few years.

    They have been around for long already.

    It’s not like this is super high end hardware either. The main cost for them here is probably the IPv4 honestly.

    Edit: not saying it will keep the same performance etc, my prediction is solely about MassiveGRID being around or not.

    My servers are back online but I still want out

    From something I read somewhere (here abouts), it looks like only their DHCP server crapped out. Infra was all OK - so for those of you who had (sensibly) configured the IPs to be static, you wouldn't have noticed anything (infact maybe great network because everyone else was offline!).

    Interesting but having days of downtime is not too good of a look for a "HA" VPS, granted I can't expect AWS-tier uptime for a $0.49/month vps.

    For the price, yeah not as bad as I thought, although we all know that any downtime here in LET costs us millions per minute

This discussion has been closed.