Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

3 disks Performance? RAID-1 vs RAID-5

jmginerjmginer Member, Host Rep

With 3 disks, what is better for IO ?
Thanks!

Comments

  • MCHPhilMCHPhil Member
    edited December 2013

    Removed - To be in line with my signature, as that's more important than educating or assisting someone.

  • MCHPhil said: No longer posting here. Submit ticket if you need assistance.

    Then wtf are you doing here?

    OT:
    RAID 5

  • charliecharlie Member, Host Rep

    @MCHPhil said:
    You can only use two drives with RAID 1.

    you can use any hdd in raid-1 with mdraid on Linux.

  • johnlth93johnlth93 Member, Host Rep

    @charlie said:
    you can use any hdd in raid-1 with mdraid on Linux.

    Actually i think it's "you can't use raid5 with 2 disk"

    AFAIK, not 100% sure though =D

  • RAID1 is with 2 disks, you cannot use 3 disks. With 4 disks it would be RAID10.

  • @johnlth93 said:
    AFAIK, not 100% sure though =D

    RAID5 needs 3 or more disks.

  • @jmginer said:
    With 3 disks, what is better for IO ?
    Thanks!

    RAID 1E. Falta que el software/hardware lo soporte, claro.

  • @mikeg said:
    RAID1 is with 2 disks, you cannot use 3 disks. With 4 disks it would be RAID10.

    Are you sure what have you said ?

  • @Zen said:

    Simply said, RAID1 is a mirror. Even number is required to have mirror.

    RAID1 = Min 2

    RAID5 = Min 3

    RAID6 = Min 4

    RAID10 = Min 4

    RAID50 = Min 6

    RAID60 = Min 8

  • @Zen said:
    Yes, raid 1 implies an even number due to the technicality of it. You cannot have 3, simple. Closest thing would be using the third as a hot spare or backup drive for extra safety. I would personally recommend RAID 5 tho.

    www.techrepublic.com/article/non-standard-raid-levels-primer-raid-1e/

  • CharlesACharlesA Member
    edited December 2013

    @albertdb said:
    www.techrepublic.com/article/non-standard-raid-levels-primer-raid-1e/

    That's a new one. Never heard of that level before. I think I would just stick to RAID 6 or RAID 10 if I had 4 or more disks, RAID 5 with 3 disks. RAID 5 and 6 would kill your throughput, depending on how many disks you have, though.

    What would be the overhead of RAID1e vs RAID5 on a 3 disk setup?

  • jebat_ks said: RAID1 = Min 2

    RAID5 = Min 3

    RAID6 = Min 4

    RAID10 = Min 4

    RAID50 = Min 6

    RAID60 = Min 8

    +1 Raid 0 = Min 2 ;)

  • charliecharlie Member, Host Rep

    @mikeg said:
    RAID1 is with 2 disks, you cannot use 3 disks. With 4 disks it would be RAID10.

    But, yes, you can create RAID1 with more than two hdd, using mdraid, in Linux. Off course, this is not a standard raid level, but you can do this: https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Introduction#The_RAID_levels

    In this case every write and read is going to all of these disk.

Sign In or Register to comment.