Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

HostBrr | BF Storage Deals - EPYC 10 Gbps Storage VPS - DirectAdmin Storage Boxes 500GB €7/year!

1202123252636

Comments

  • gksgks Member
    edited November 2024

    @labze By looking into comments, performance etc, StorageBox is not suitable for high frequency I/O operations, instead it will be good place for backup, low frequent access.

    In other way, it may not be linked to web app which serve content to users /static assets etc. Instead useful to dumb the Database, logs, personal photos etc.

    It was tempting for me, I am cooling down not to buy with misunderstanding and criticize later.

    Does Storage VPS would be better option for high performance, freq access? Curious to understand whether StorageBox Backend and Storage VPS storages are same architecture?

    I need a solid stuffs for Minio/https, which will be accessed by analytics engine, number of reads will be parallel.

    edit: not for production workload, just for me and my students while learning stuffs

    Thanked by 1ariq01
  • @gks said:
    @labze By looking into comments, performance etc, StorageBox is not suitable for high frequency I/O operations, instead it will be good place for backup, low frequent access.

    In other way, it may not be linked to web app which serve content to users /static assets etc. Instead useful to dumb the Database, logs, personal photos etc.

    It was tempting for me, I am cooling down not to buy with misunderstanding and criticize later.

    Does Storage VPS would be better option for high performance, freq access? Curious to understand whether StorageBox Backend and Storage VPS storages are same architecture?

    I need a solid stuffs for Minio/https, which will be accessed by analytics engine, number of reads will be parallel.

    edit: not for production workload, just for me and my students while learning stuffs

    HDD storage is probably not what you should be after then. Even if it's cached.
    Just go for NVMe servers at that point, those are literally made for high frequency and fast access.

    Thanked by 1gks
  • philwatcherphilwatcher Member
    edited November 2024

    @gks said:
    @labze By looking into comments, performance etc, StorageBox is not suitable for high frequency I/O operations, instead it will be good place for backup, low frequent access.

    In other way, it may not be linked to web app which serve content to users /static assets etc. Instead useful to dumb the Database, logs, personal photos etc.

    It was tempting for me, I am cooling down not to buy with misunderstanding and criticize later.

    Does Storage VPS would be better option for high performance, freq access? Curious to understand whether StorageBox Backend and Storage VPS storages are same architecture?

    I need a solid stuffs for Minio/https, which will be accessed by analytics engine, number of reads will be parallel.

    edit: not for production workload, just for me and my students while learning stuffs

    Short answer: the storage box (which is basically webhosting) is not the right tool for learning about minio etc, get a "proper" VPS with SSD storage for this.

    Long answer: you can technically run minio on the storage box, and it should work okay. However, it is not a full Linux system with services, package manager and background tasks like you normally know it, but a very limited Linux environment where you have to manually get all programs as binaries and take steps so that your programs don't get killed after a few minutes. Also you have no control over ports, no TLS termination and no sudo. So if you want to have fun solving tricky Linux puzzles, then you can run minio etc on the storage box, but if you want to get actually valuable real world experience, then please get a real VPS where you can run as root and just apt-get packages and have daemons run reliably.

    Edit: so I would suggest starting with a normal VPS, even SSD should be good enough to get started, and if you then want to go to the advanced level of tiered storage and caching, you can then still get the storage box, mount it with rclone mount and experiment with - - vfs-cache-mode, to have both fast and large storage.

    Thanked by 2gks 0xC7
  • @Cantello yes, you can sftp/scp/rsyc etc.

  • how much time are you guys taking for allocation, instant or manual approval?

  • @Cantello said:
    For the storage box account, is SFTP/rsync/etc. possible or is it just webspace/ftp space?

    it has

  • JamesOakleyJamesOakley Member
    edited November 2024

    @MikeIn said:
    how much time are you guys taking for allocation, instant or manual approval?

    They've said up to 24 hours. Manual.

    Thanked by 1MikeIn
  • Well, ordered mine (invoice 39655) on November 24th, and my storage box is still on pending. Unless I've been skipped it's definitely more than 24 hours. I wonder if I should start opening a ticket.

  • labzelabze Member, Patron Provider
    edited November 2024

    @holojondrew said:
    Well, ordered mine (invoice 39655) on November 24th, and my storage box is still on pending. Unless I've been skipped it's definitely more than 24 hours. I wonder if I should start opening a ticket.

    Hopefully should be setup today. Unfortunately I discovered too late that when a order is made in Blesta it already assigns it a specific DirectAdmin server and this cannot be changed. So I have to manually create every single pending order all over which were created before the new server was setup. This is very time consuming.

  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member
    edited November 2024

    @labze said:

    @holojondrew said:
    Well, ordered mine (invoice 39655) on November 24th, and my storage box is still on pending. Unless I've been skipped it's definitely more than 24 hours. I wonder if I should start opening a ticket.

    Hopefully should be setup today. Unfortunately I discovered too late that when a order is made in Blesta it already assigns it a specific DirectAdmin server and this cannot be changed. So I have to manually create every single pending order all over which were created before the new server was setup. This is very time consuming.

    Take care of yourself too brother. We all understand how hectic it can get so no worries. Take your time.

    Thanked by 1gjallarhorn
  • @cheapoVPS said:

    @labze said:

    @egoror said:
    It seems that 40-50 cores on my node are running at boost frequency. Has anyone figured out a way to mine using this as well? :D

    @adilolv said:
    @labze
    Why not just do a hard limit of CPU & I/O, at least first couple days, so that it can at least have some room to do normal things like SSH and stuff.

    The load issue is purely IO related. CPU haven't reached above 10% at any time.

    The load is caused by a kworker interrupt on the RAID array, causing temporary write halts. Diagnosing why this is happening.

    I hope you don't use SMR disks in RAID :)

    What's wrong with SMR? Just curious :)

    Thanked by 1sebkehl
  • Yes, @labze , take things easy, you're doing a good job. It sounds time consuming, and I hope people have and keep their patience, it's appreciated

  • @jon101011 said:
    @Cantello yes, you can sftp/scp/rsyc etc.

    Could anyone explain how? Have never used DirectAdmin and am a little bit stumped on how to enable SSH for SFTP or rsync... TA!

  • @Cantello said:
    Could anyone explain how? Have never used DirectAdmin and am a little bit stumped on >how to enable SSH for SFTP or rsync... TA!

    You have received an ssh port allocated to you in the email. Use it + ip + username...you can use WinSCP, Filezilla or any other SFTP client.

  • @BasToTheMax said:

    @cheapoVPS said:

    @labze said:

    @egoror said:
    It seems that 40-50 cores on my node are running at boost frequency. Has anyone figured out a way to mine using this as well? :D

    @adilolv said:
    @labze
    Why not just do a hard limit of CPU & I/O, at least first couple days, so that it can at least have some room to do normal things like SSH and stuff.

    The load issue is purely IO related. CPU haven't reached above 10% at any time.

    The load is caused by a kworker interrupt on the RAID array, causing temporary write halts. Diagnosing why this is happening.

    I hope you don't use SMR disks in RAID :)

    What's wrong with SMR? Just curious :)

    It is fine for single-user scenario until the disk is not too full. For example using for backups, or just archiving media from time to time.
    But if you hammer it with random writes in a multi-user RAID environment, the latency will be in the moon and the throughput will be unusably low too.

    Thanked by 2BasToTheMax sebkehl
  • I ordered today, waiting #6747039a40ee3

  • @labze is this stackable? Can i get double IOPS?

  • how long does the setup on the EPYC Storage VPS take?

    ordered Dec 24, #39638

    i tried to read about the post but its mostly on the DA space

    thanks

  • The boy's got his hands full now, have patience. ^

  • @ebony said:
    how long does the setup on the EPYC Storage VPS take?

    ordered Dec 24, #39638

    i tried to read about the post but its mostly on the DA space

    thanks

    For me its was instant

    Thanked by 1ebony
  • @JohnFilch123 said:

    You have received an ssh port allocated to you in the email. Use it + ip + username...you can use WinSCP, Filezilla or any other SFTP client.

    You are totally right, I should read emails until the end!

  • @philwatcher said:
    mount it with rclone mount and experiment with - - vfs-cache-mode, to have both fast and large storage.

    Thanks for the tip. I didn't know rclone mount integrated with the VFS cache so well. This convinced me to pull the trigger on the DA storage offer :)

    @ebony said:
    ordered Dec 24

    Holy cow, has it been that long?

  • StorageBox 500 GB

    Disk Space 0 B / 500 GB
    Bandwidth 0 B / 2.44 TB
    Inode 0 / Unlimited
    E-Mails 0 / 2
    FTP Accounts 0 / Unlimited
    Databases 0 / Unlimited

    Any specific reason to limit email id count?

  • @MikeIn said:
    StorageBox 500 GB

    Disk Space 0 B / 500 GB
    Bandwidth 0 B / 2.44 TB
    Inode 0 / Unlimited
    E-Mails 0 / 2
    FTP Accounts 0 / Unlimited
    Databases 0 / Unlimited

    Any specific reason to limit email id count?

    I can't find the comment, but @labze mentioned since e-mail wasn't an advertised feature of the service, it isn't even set-up in the server.
    I think since DA automatically creates a default email address, he just set it to 2 (1 for the default mail, 1 for just-in-case slot) to not break anything

    Thanked by 1MikeIn
  • Thanked by 2MikeIn sanvit
  • Is NextCloud the easiest and simplest replacement for Google Drive/Photos?

    Curious if people have any other preferences/experience with different providers

  • cy7cy7 Member
    edited November 2024

    @Yarmeli said:
    Is NextCloud the easiest and simplest replacement for Google Drive/Photos?

    Curious if people have any other preferences/experience with different providers

    immich would be closer to google photos

    Thanked by 1Yarmeli
  • @cy7 said: immich would be closer to google photos

    Can only be installed through docker tho. It's also got the scary header. Not really reassuring that even its makers aren't confident it won't break.

  • Seems the storage box is much stable now. o:)

  • @elliotc said:
    Seems the storage box is much stable now. o:)

    Probably need 1-2 more weeks before performance is restored, right now it takes me 10s to open a 1kb text file xD

Sign In or Register to comment.