Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Is this Bad I/O for this setup?

2»

Comments

  • FWIW, regarding "Green" drives:

    In terms of cost, using a green hard drive compared to a normal one makes very little difference. Assuming your drive spends 4 hours reading and writing and 20 hours idle per day, switching from the WD Black to Green saves you only 45 kilowatt-hours per year. The national average cost of a kilowatt-hour is 11.93 cents, netting you a whopping $5.38 per year for your sacrifice of 1800 RPM. For comparison, changing one 60-watt lightbulb used 4 hours a day to a 7-watt fluorescent one saves you more, about $9.23 per year.

  • MrDOSMrDOS Member
    edited March 2012

    I also know that once upon a time, WD Greens were highly disadvised for use in any form of RAID (I think due to some sort of aggressive write queuing, but I could be way off); I'm not sure if that's still the case or not.

  • JacobJacob Member

    @MrDOS
    You are right, Gren drives are not built to be put into RAID Arrays and doing so will cause bad I/O and the WD Ears series have problems syncing if using different models/makes of drives.

  • Well, for software RAID they are fine. They should not be used in hardware RAID configurations. But in any case the performance will be inconsistent even if you disable the power saving features.

  • MaouniqueMaounique Host Rep, Veteran
    edited March 2012

    @dmmcintyre3 said: Single WD green drive (250gb)

    dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16k count=64k conv=fdatasync;rm test

    65536+0 records in
    65536+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 12.5311 s, 85.7 MB/s

    root@debmain:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16k count=64k conv=fdatasync;rm test
    65536+0 records in
    65536+0 records out
    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 16.0442 s, 66.9 MB/s
    That is my machine with 2 TB green WD doing almost nothing regarding I/O. They arent too fast, still faster than Samsung, tho. SATA 2. My home server uses samsung EcoGreen because they are even quieter and cooler.
    M

Sign In or Register to comment.