Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › Offers
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

RackNerd's OFFICIAL LET BLACK FRIDAY! HUNDREDS OF GIVEAWAYS + CRAZY DEALS, MASSIVE (come see)

1…140141143145146…953

Comments

  • FrobsyFrobsy Member

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @codelock said:
    wireguard machine..

    use openvpn :lol:

    I don't like that one bro

    yea, I've also felt WG is better than OpenVPN after using both.
    Now a big fan of shadowsocks and VLESS

    I gotta try shadowsocks since you like that much bro!
    Thanks for sharing!

    Its much more faster, I will share a few results soon (wireguard vs SS)

    Please tag me once you do that, in the mean time I'll try it myself as well!

    Sure thing.

    This a Racknerd VPS in France.
    My ping to it is 120-125ms, and home connection is 500Mbps.

    Using Nyrs wireguard:
    100Mbps down / 125Mbps up

    Using ShadowSocks
    390Mbps down / 340Mbps up

    Woaah, that's quite a difference.
    I'm missing out big on that one

  • codelockcodelock Member

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @codelock said:
    wireguard machine..

    use openvpn :lol:

    I don't like that one bro

    yea, I've also felt WG is better than OpenVPN after using both.
    Now a big fan of shadowsocks and VLESS

    I gotta try shadowsocks since you like that much bro!
    Thanks for sharing!

    Its much more faster, I will share a few results soon (wireguard vs SS)

    Please tag me once you do that, in the mean time I'll try it myself as well!

    Sure thing.

    This a Racknerd VPS in France.
    My ping to it is 120-125ms, and home connection is 500Mbps.

    Using Nyrs wireguard:
    100Mbps down / 125Mbps up

    Using ShadowSocks
    390Mbps down / 340Mbps up

    So shadowsocks is faster ?

  • codelockcodelock Member

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:
    Ok, I see I have missed a CPU upgrade :( I don't have a need for new VMs so these GAs are not something I miss too much, but resource upgrade GA... :(

    Remember how were just talking yesterday about why companies might financially feel more comfortable giving more RAM than cores and you corrected me about the ability to share cores but not RAM? And, today, we have a core GA.

    I do remember. Having more cores is ok, but currently my ratio cores:ram is 1.5, so I would prefer RAM over cores, but would take it anyways for the future :)

    I see. The preferred ratio for cores to RAM is 1:2, right?

    That's just my personal preference. It really depends on your usecase, but my usecase is general purpose, and I see this as best ratio for me.

    I prefer 1:4 with 8gb + ram

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @Frobsy said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:
    @MrEd, you got 1 similar comment. I guess once the thread catches momentum, it's really hard to avoid.

    That one was the image I posted for the GA... The ClientExec logo... :( I lost my cleanliness... :D

    Can always hardcode things if you want to: 😂

    I try to be fair, even if it hurts myself :) The only hardcoded thing for myself is the messages per day amount in the bottom chart. If I am not in the top3 of the day, I have "all" :D BUT if I happen to be in the top3, I show the correct amount :) You can see in some archived columns my correct amount :) Didn't happen to get to top3 in this thread yet :D

    Good morning Ed
    How does that comment similarity thing work, I got three and I'm not sure how and when was it.

    Similarity is calculated by Levenstein Distance. If your distance is 3 or less (hardcoded for short messages like "Page 142" and "Page 143" the distance would be 1, but by length it would be 87.5% similar), or if your messages are more than 90% similar, then they are considered similar. Posting images, youtube links and so on are immediatelly similar to previous such message. Only text in the message is compared.

    I can confirm that your "similar" posts are the ones where you posted plain images and youtube links :)

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4075770/#Comment_4075770
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4072741/#Comment_4072741
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4075797/#Comment_4075797
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4078809/#Comment_4078809

    Thanked by 1Frobsy
  • hzwillhzwill Member

    @dustinc double bandwidth for Order Number: 2281159407 Thanks

  • codelockcodelock Member

    @MrEd said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:
    @MrEd, you got 1 similar comment. I guess once the thread catches momentum, it's really hard to avoid.

    That one was the image I posted for the GA... The ClientExec logo... :( I lost my cleanliness... :D

    Can always hardcode things if you want to: 😂

    I try to be fair, even if it hurts myself :) The only hardcoded thing for myself is the messages per day amount in the bottom chart. If I am not in the top3 of the day, I have "all" :D BUT if I happen to be in the top3, I show the correct amount :) You can see in some archived columns my correct amount :) Didn't happen to get to top3 in this thread yet :D

    Good morning Ed
    How does that comment similarity thing work, I got three and I'm not sure how and when was it.

    Similarity is calculated by Levenstein Distance. If your distance is 3 or less (hardcoded for short messages like "Page 142" and "Page 143" the distance would be 1, but by length it would be 87.5% similar), or if your messages are more than 90% similar, then they are considered similar. Posting images, youtube links and so on are immediatelly similar to previous such message. Only text in the message is compared.

    I can confirm that your "similar" posts are the ones where you posted plain images and youtube links :)

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4075770/#Comment_4075770
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4072741/#Comment_4072741
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4075797/#Comment_4075797
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4078809/#Comment_4078809

    Damn so much work :lol:

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:
    Ok, I see I have missed a CPU upgrade :( I don't have a need for new VMs so these GAs are not something I miss too much, but resource upgrade GA... :(

    Remember how were just talking yesterday about why companies might financially feel more comfortable giving more RAM than cores and you corrected me about the ability to share cores but not RAM? And, today, we have a core GA.

    I do remember. Having more cores is ok, but currently my ratio cores:ram is 1.5, so I would prefer RAM over cores, but would take it anyways for the future :)

    I see. The preferred ratio for cores to RAM is 1:2, right?

    That's just my personal preference. It really depends on your usecase, but my usecase is general purpose, and I see this as best ratio for me.

    I prefer 1:4 with 8gb + ram

    I can also agree with you here, but since most of the VMs are up to 4GB RAM, 1:2 ratio works best here.

  • noob404noob404 Member

    @Kevinf100 said:

    @noob404 said:

    @Kevinf100 said:

    @noob404 said:

    @Kevinf100 said:

    @noob404 said:

    @codelock said:

    @Kevinf100 said:
    Order# 7316159473 ¡ǝlqnop ǝlqnop ǝlqnop

    How do you type in reverse

    Try this - https://smallseotools.com/reverse-text-generator/

    I use https://www.upsidedowntext.com/

    Tag Dustin. He might just end up using that in the next GA challenge. :D

    @dustinc

    Oh man, I was JK.

    To late! It would be whoever can flip the damn screen, tilt there head, or just on phone giveaway!

    Phone. Not so much. If we do come to that, a tip: Ctrl + Alt + arrow keys

  • codelockcodelock Member

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:
    Ok, I see I have missed a CPU upgrade :( I don't have a need for new VMs so these GAs are not something I miss too much, but resource upgrade GA... :(

    Remember how were just talking yesterday about why companies might financially feel more comfortable giving more RAM than cores and you corrected me about the ability to share cores but not RAM? And, today, we have a core GA.

    I do remember. Having more cores is ok, but currently my ratio cores:ram is 1.5, so I would prefer RAM over cores, but would take it anyways for the future :)

    I see. The preferred ratio for cores to RAM is 1:2, right?

    That's just my personal preference. It really depends on your usecase, but my usecase is general purpose, and I see this as best ratio for me.

    I prefer 1:4 with 8gb + ram

    I can also agree with you here, but since most of the VMs are up to 4GB RAM, 1:2 ratio works best here.

    I have stopped buying low spec vms now , run everything in a single vm

  • noob404noob404 Member

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:
    Ok, I see I have missed a CPU upgrade :( I don't have a need for new VMs so these GAs are not something I miss too much, but resource upgrade GA... :(

    Remember how were just talking yesterday about why companies might financially feel more comfortable giving more RAM than cores and you corrected me about the ability to share cores but not RAM? And, today, we have a core GA.

    I do remember. Having more cores is ok, but currently my ratio cores:ram is 1.5, so I would prefer RAM over cores, but would take it anyways for the future :)

    I see. The preferred ratio for cores to RAM is 1:2, right?

    That's just my personal preference. It really depends on your usecase, but my usecase is general purpose, and I see this as best ratio for me.

    I prefer 1:4 with 8gb + ram

    I can also agree with you here, but since most of the VMs are up to 4GB RAM, 1:2 ratio works best here.

    Most VPSes, I see now are also sold by default at that ratio.

  • sh97sh97 Member, Host Rep

    @noob404 said:

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @codelock said:
    wireguard machine..

    use openvpn :lol:

    I don't like that one bro

    yea, I've also felt WG is better than OpenVPN after using both.
    Now a big fan of shadowsocks and VLESS

    I gotta try shadowsocks since you like that much bro!
    Thanks for sharing!

    Its much more faster, I will share a few results soon (wireguard vs SS)

    Please tag me once you do that, in the mean time I'll try it myself as well!

    Sure thing.

    This a Racknerd VPS in France.
    My ping to it is 120-125ms, and home connection is 500Mbps.

    Using Nyrs wireguard:
    100Mbps down / 125Mbps up

    Using ShadowSocks
    390Mbps down / 340Mbps up

    Any readymade scripts or tutorials on setting up Shadowsocks. That's almost a 4x improvement.

    Personally, I use Marzban. It's built by some Iranian chads to bypass censorship, but with lot of contributions from people around the World.
    I use it specifically as I need multi node support, as I do self hosted VPN services for friends and family.

    If you want easy setup and management, use 3X-UI. Supports a ton of protocols like Wireguard, xRay Core and more.

    Thanked by 3noob404 Frobsy dustinc
  • sh97sh97 Member, Host Rep

    @codelock said:

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @codelock said:
    wireguard machine..

    use openvpn :lol:

    I don't like that one bro

    yea, I've also felt WG is better than OpenVPN after using both.
    Now a big fan of shadowsocks and VLESS

    I gotta try shadowsocks since you like that much bro!
    Thanks for sharing!

    Its much more faster, I will share a few results soon (wireguard vs SS)

    Please tag me once you do that, in the mean time I'll try it myself as well!

    Sure thing.

    This a Racknerd VPS in France.
    My ping to it is 120-125ms, and home connection is 500Mbps.

    Using Nyrs wireguard:
    100Mbps down / 125Mbps up

    Using ShadowSocks
    390Mbps down / 340Mbps up

    So shadowsocks is faster ?

    In my experience, yes.

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:
    @MrEd, you got 1 similar comment. I guess once the thread catches momentum, it's really hard to avoid.

    That one was the image I posted for the GA... The ClientExec logo... :( I lost my cleanliness... :D

    Can always hardcode things if you want to: 😂

    I try to be fair, even if it hurts myself :) The only hardcoded thing for myself is the messages per day amount in the bottom chart. If I am not in the top3 of the day, I have "all" :D BUT if I happen to be in the top3, I show the correct amount :) You can see in some archived columns my correct amount :) Didn't happen to get to top3 in this thread yet :D

    Good morning Ed
    How does that comment similarity thing work, I got three and I'm not sure how and when was it.

    Similarity is calculated by Levenstein Distance. If your distance is 3 or less (hardcoded for short messages like "Page 142" and "Page 143" the distance would be 1, but by length it would be 87.5% similar), or if your messages are more than 90% similar, then they are considered similar. Posting images, youtube links and so on are immediatelly similar to previous such message. Only text in the message is compared.

    I can confirm that your "similar" posts are the ones where you posted plain images and youtube links :)

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4075770/#Comment_4075770
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4072741/#Comment_4072741
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4075797/#Comment_4075797
    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4078809/#Comment_4078809

    Damn so much work :lol:

    What do you mean, so much work? :)

  • codelockcodelock Member

    You know if you know 🤣

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:
    Ok, I see I have missed a CPU upgrade :( I don't have a need for new VMs so these GAs are not something I miss too much, but resource upgrade GA... :(

    Remember how were just talking yesterday about why companies might financially feel more comfortable giving more RAM than cores and you corrected me about the ability to share cores but not RAM? And, today, we have a core GA.

    I do remember. Having more cores is ok, but currently my ratio cores:ram is 1.5, so I would prefer RAM over cores, but would take it anyways for the future :)

    I see. The preferred ratio for cores to RAM is 1:2, right?

    That's just my personal preference. It really depends on your usecase, but my usecase is general purpose, and I see this as best ratio for me.

    I prefer 1:4 with 8gb + ram

    I can also agree with you here, but since most of the VMs are up to 4GB RAM, 1:2 ratio works best here.

    I have stopped buying low spec vms now , run everything in a single vm

    Well, I take VMs 2+GB, some things are split, some things are together :)

    But my personal stuff is running on my home server with offsite backup :)

  • codelockcodelock Member

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:
    Ok, I see I have missed a CPU upgrade :( I don't have a need for new VMs so these GAs are not something I miss too much, but resource upgrade GA... :(

    Remember how were just talking yesterday about why companies might financially feel more comfortable giving more RAM than cores and you corrected me about the ability to share cores but not RAM? And, today, we have a core GA.

    I do remember. Having more cores is ok, but currently my ratio cores:ram is 1.5, so I would prefer RAM over cores, but would take it anyways for the future :)

    I see. The preferred ratio for cores to RAM is 1:2, right?

    That's just my personal preference. It really depends on your usecase, but my usecase is general purpose, and I see this as best ratio for me.

    I prefer 1:4 with 8gb + ram

    I can also agree with you here, but since most of the VMs are up to 4GB RAM, 1:2 ratio works best here.

    I have stopped buying low spec vms now , run everything in a single vm

    Well, I take VMs 2+GB, some things are split, some things are together :)

    But my personal stuff is running on my home server with offsite backup :)

    Where is the offsite

  • noob404noob404 Member

    @sh97 said:

    @noob404 said:

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @sh97 said:

    @Frobsy said:

    @codelock said:
    wireguard machine..

    use openvpn :lol:

    I don't like that one bro

    yea, I've also felt WG is better than OpenVPN after using both.
    Now a big fan of shadowsocks and VLESS

    I gotta try shadowsocks since you like that much bro!
    Thanks for sharing!

    Its much more faster, I will share a few results soon (wireguard vs SS)

    Please tag me once you do that, in the mean time I'll try it myself as well!

    Sure thing.

    This a Racknerd VPS in France.
    My ping to it is 120-125ms, and home connection is 500Mbps.

    Using Nyrs wireguard:
    100Mbps down / 125Mbps up

    Using ShadowSocks
    390Mbps down / 340Mbps up

    Any readymade scripts or tutorials on setting up Shadowsocks. That's almost a 4x improvement.

    Personally, I use Marzban. It's built by some Iranian chads to bypass censorship, but with lot of contributions from people around the World.
    I use it specifically as I need multi node support, as I do self hosted VPN services for friends and family.

    If you want easy setup and management, use 3X-UI. Supports a ton of protocols like Wireguard, xRay Core and more.

    Thanks for the tips. Will look into it.

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:
    Ok, I see I have missed a CPU upgrade :( I don't have a need for new VMs so these GAs are not something I miss too much, but resource upgrade GA... :(

    Remember how were just talking yesterday about why companies might financially feel more comfortable giving more RAM than cores and you corrected me about the ability to share cores but not RAM? And, today, we have a core GA.

    I do remember. Having more cores is ok, but currently my ratio cores:ram is 1.5, so I would prefer RAM over cores, but would take it anyways for the future :)

    I see. The preferred ratio for cores to RAM is 1:2, right?

    That's just my personal preference. It really depends on your usecase, but my usecase is general purpose, and I see this as best ratio for me.

    I prefer 1:4 with 8gb + ram

    I can also agree with you here, but since most of the VMs are up to 4GB RAM, 1:2 ratio works best here.

    I have stopped buying low spec vms now , run everything in a single vm

    Well, I take VMs 2+GB, some things are split, some things are together :)

    But my personal stuff is running on my home server with offsite backup :)

    Where is the offsite

    AlphaVPS 750GB Special. Plenty of space for my critical stuff :)

  • codelockcodelock Member

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:
    Ok, I see I have missed a CPU upgrade :( I don't have a need for new VMs so these GAs are not something I miss too much, but resource upgrade GA... :(

    Remember how were just talking yesterday about why companies might financially feel more comfortable giving more RAM than cores and you corrected me about the ability to share cores but not RAM? And, today, we have a core GA.

    I do remember. Having more cores is ok, but currently my ratio cores:ram is 1.5, so I would prefer RAM over cores, but would take it anyways for the future :)

    I see. The preferred ratio for cores to RAM is 1:2, right?

    That's just my personal preference. It really depends on your usecase, but my usecase is general purpose, and I see this as best ratio for me.

    I prefer 1:4 with 8gb + ram

    I can also agree with you here, but since most of the VMs are up to 4GB RAM, 1:2 ratio works best here.

    I have stopped buying low spec vms now , run everything in a single vm

    Well, I take VMs 2+GB, some things are split, some things are together :)

    But my personal stuff is running on my home server with offsite backup :)

    Where is the offsite

    AlphaVPS 750GB Special. Plenty of space for my critical stuff :)

    Wish racknerd did storage vps

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:
    Ok, I see I have missed a CPU upgrade :( I don't have a need for new VMs so these GAs are not something I miss too much, but resource upgrade GA... :(

    Remember how were just talking yesterday about why companies might financially feel more comfortable giving more RAM than cores and you corrected me about the ability to share cores but not RAM? And, today, we have a core GA.

    I do remember. Having more cores is ok, but currently my ratio cores:ram is 1.5, so I would prefer RAM over cores, but would take it anyways for the future :)

    I see. The preferred ratio for cores to RAM is 1:2, right?

    That's just my personal preference. It really depends on your usecase, but my usecase is general purpose, and I see this as best ratio for me.

    I prefer 1:4 with 8gb + ram

    I can also agree with you here, but since most of the VMs are up to 4GB RAM, 1:2 ratio works best here.

    I have stopped buying low spec vms now , run everything in a single vm

    Well, I take VMs 2+GB, some things are split, some things are together :)

    But my personal stuff is running on my home server with offsite backup :)

    Where is the offsite

    AlphaVPS 750GB Special. Plenty of space for my critical stuff :)

    Wish racknerd did storage vps

    But... If you want to backup your RN VMs it wouldn't be wise to store the backups on RN VM :D That wouldn't count as offsite backup :D

  • codelockcodelock Member

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @codelock said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:

    @MrEd said:
    Ok, I see I have missed a CPU upgrade :( I don't have a need for new VMs so these GAs are not something I miss too much, but resource upgrade GA... :(

    Remember how were just talking yesterday about why companies might financially feel more comfortable giving more RAM than cores and you corrected me about the ability to share cores but not RAM? And, today, we have a core GA.

    I do remember. Having more cores is ok, but currently my ratio cores:ram is 1.5, so I would prefer RAM over cores, but would take it anyways for the future :)

    I see. The preferred ratio for cores to RAM is 1:2, right?

    That's just my personal preference. It really depends on your usecase, but my usecase is general purpose, and I see this as best ratio for me.

    I prefer 1:4 with 8gb + ram

    I can also agree with you here, but since most of the VMs are up to 4GB RAM, 1:2 ratio works best here.

    I have stopped buying low spec vms now , run everything in a single vm

    Well, I take VMs 2+GB, some things are split, some things are together :)

    But my personal stuff is running on my home server with offsite backup :)

    Where is the offsite

    AlphaVPS 750GB Special. Plenty of space for my critical stuff :)

    Wish racknerd did storage vps

    But... If you want to backup your RN VMs it wouldn't be wise to store the backups on RN VM :D That wouldn't count as offsite backup :D

    it can be a different dc :lol:

  • codelockcodelock Member

    who need backups anyways :lol:

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @codelock said: it can be a different dc

    Different DC but same provider is still risky :) You should distribute your risks :)

  • noob404noob404 Member

    How many of you guys have to work on Black Friday btw?

  • MrEdMrEd Member

    @noob404 said:
    How many of you guys have to work on Black Friday btw?

    It will be a normal work day for me. Nothing special. Development as daily :) I guess stress comes to the ones who work in some markets.

  • noob404noob404 Member

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:
    How many of you guys have to work on Black Friday btw?

    It will be a normal work day for me. Nothing special. Development as daily :) I guess stress comes to the ones who work in some markets.

    I see. I thought BF day would atleast be a holiday in Europe and US.

  • codelockcodelock Member

    @MrEd said:

    @noob404 said:
    How many of you guys have to work on Black Friday btw?

    It will be a normal work day for me. Nothing special. Development as daily :) I guess stress comes to the ones who work in some markets.

    yeah black friday has a lot of traffic

  • jcn50jcn50 Member

    RESOURCE-UPGRADE-GIVEAWAY-PLZ !!

  • noob404noob404 Member

    @jcn50 said:

    RESOURCE-UPGRADE-GIVEAWAY-PLZ !!

    Keep hyping. You just missed a Core upgrade GA. More to come. Let's keep the party going.

    Thanked by 1jcn50
  • SocheatSocheat Member

    @dustinc said:
    Who's ready to keep this party going?

    I can't keep up with these guys, but I'll try to. :)

    @harrison said:
    Hey @Socheat, you're gonna get a 1GB kvm vps in NY ;)

    @harrison Thanks man.

This discussion has been closed.