Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › Offers
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

[Black Friday] ★ FameSystems.de | AMD Ryzen 9 9900x | AMD EPYC 9654 | DDR5 RAM | @ 2.99 € ★

13567…20

Comments

  • cevdarcevdar Member

    sylink datacenter is not good today downed

  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member

    @dev_vps said:

    @cevdar said:

    @egoror said:
    It's 1:1 copy of berohost birthday deals. If those were worth it to you, this one will be great too.
    Not sure about final performance though, but if it'll stay around 3000-3100 single-core, it's very good. We'll see.

    WHİCH ONE is good ? bero host or this ? what was the bero host datacenter

    BeroHost offer $45/14 months much better for me

    For others it could be different.

    Berohost $45/14 months? Where?

    I am waiting for their vps.

  • momwiomomwio Member

    @egoror said:
    It's 1:1 copy of berohost birthday deals. If those were worth it to you, this one will be great too.
    Not sure about final performance though, but if it'll stay around 3000-3100 single-core, it's very good. We'll see.

    Haha, I want to say this too, it’s almost exactly the same, but berohost is 9950x.

  • egororegoror Member

    @dev_vps said: You are an arrogant ba*****

  • egororegoror Member

    @cevdar said: sylink datacenter is not good today downed

    it's a different one, SYNLINQ vs. skylink

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    Stop tagging me, you are definitely not smart

  • egororegoror Member

    @dev_vps said: Stop tagging me, you are definitely not smart
    @egoror said: Don't respond then lol. You can't tell people what they can and can't do.

  • radexradex Member

    @dev_vps said:
    Stop tagging me, you are definitely not smart

    You sit 24/7 in this forum, keep sitting in your basement boy.

  • momwiomomwio Member

    @FameSystems said: KVM Virtualization

    4x AMD EPYC 9654 Cores
    16 GB DDR5 RAM
    240 GB NVMe RAID 10 storage
    1 IPv4 address
    /64-IPv6 subnet
    Fair Use Traffic 2TB @ 2 Gbps shared
    Premium Arbor DDoS Protection
    3 Backup Slots
    Price: €6.00/month (€ 60.00/yr)

    Will there be this package?

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited November 2024

    @egoror said:
    Don't respond then lol. You can't tell people what they can and can't do.

    https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4044237/#Comment_4044237

    @egoror said:
    Thanks for clarification, i am not an "idiot" and I immediately cease communication after name-calling.
    Please don't comment on my messages anymore.

    I am asking you the same that you were asking me.

    please don’t comment on my message anymore

  • egororegoror Member

    @dev_vps said: I am asking you the same that you were asking me.

    You're demanding. Also you keep on answering me without tagging me lol, putting me into an awkward situation when for some unobvious reason I can't use "Reply".
    Can you stop spamming? No one cares about your personal vendetta, you are interfering with sales.

  • egororegoror Member

    Btw it also seems like this 9654 will be cannibalizing into previous 9754 deal?.. 9654 is a slightly faster CPU and price seems lower.

  • maverickmaverick Member

    @egoror said: Geekbench 6

    Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 3382                          
Multi Core      | 12851

    On this occasion, more than ever, looking forward to your graphs of GB scores progression through time @egoror

  • cevdarcevdar Member

    @egoror said:
    Btw it also seems like this 9654 will be cannibalizing into previous 9754 deal?.. 9654 is a slightly faster CPU and price seems lower.

    can you advice vps avarage 10 euro

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    All I asking you that you were asking me to do.
    Rule must be same for both of us.

    please don’t comment on my message anymore

  • egororegoror Member

    @maverick said: On this occasion, more than ever, looking forward to your graphs of GB scores progression through time @egoror

    Sure, after I get at least couple weeks of data

    Thanked by 1maverick
  • maverickmaverick Member

    @egoror said:
    Btw it also seems like this 9654 will be cannibalizing into previous 9754 deal?.. 9654 is a slightly faster CPU and price seems lower.

    That is correct!

    But, eventually they will sell all stock, I'm sure. It's still quite a bit of resources for a very good price.

  • egororegoror Member 
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server      

 ISP: GB Residential Services 

 Nearest          0.21 ms     N/A     1941.25 Mbps   2079.51 Mbps   SYNLINQ - Frankfurt am Main 

 Kochi, IN        166.20 ms   0.0%    1916.78 Mbps   142.85 Mbps    Asianet Broadband - Cochin 
 Bangalore, IN    145.57 ms   0.0%    1938.66 Mbps   231.16 Mbps    Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore 
 Chennai, IN      140.62 ms   N/A     1944.89 Mbps   217.26 Mbps    Jio - Chennai 
 Mumbai, IN       110.15 ms   0.0%    1951.67 Mbps   151.76 Mbps    i3D.net - Mumbai 
 Delhi, IN        156.86 ms   0.3%    1970.18 Mbps   203.43 Mbps    Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi 

 Seattle, US      151.31 ms   N/A     1953.13 Mbps   104.93 Mbps    Comcast - Seattle, WA 
 Los Angeles, US  138.41 ms   0.0%    1928.89 Mbps   88.56 Mbps     ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA 
 Dallas, US       116.15 ms   0.0%    1952.31 Mbps   158.85 Mbps    i3D.net - Dallas, TX 
 Miami, US        110.59 ms   N/A     1933.82 Mbps   272.87 Mbps    Dish Wireless - Miami, FL 
 New York, US     77.45 ms    0.0%    1874.82 Mbps   228.68 Mbps    GSL Networks - New York, NY 
 Toronto, CA      92.84 ms    0.0%    1959.96 Mbps   210.88 Mbps    Rogers - Toronto, ON 
 Mexico City, MX  169.00 ms   N/A     1959.65 Mbps   169.61 Mbps    INFINITUM - Ciudad de México 

 London, UK       11.14 ms    0.0%    1905.83 Mbps   1465.81 Mbps   VeloxServ Communications - London 
 Amsterdam, NL    7.64 ms     0.0%    1947.99 Mbps   1610.37 Mbps   31173 Services AB - Amsterdam 
 Paris, FR        10.85 ms    N/A     1946.73 Mbps   1371.93 Mbps   Axione - Paris 
 Frankfurt, DE    0.63 ms     0.0%    1953.37 Mbps   2081.43 Mbps   Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main 
 Warsaw, PL       19.94 ms    0.0%    1931.08 Mbps   937.17 Mbps    Play - Warszawa 
 Bucharest, RO    27.12 ms    0.0%    1934.00 Mbps   555.95 Mbps    Vodafone Romania Fixed – Bucharest - Bucharest 
 Moscow, RU       44.51 ms    0.0%    1928.66 Mbps   508.31 Mbps    RETN - Moscow 

 Jeddah, SA       78.39 ms    0.0%    1978.15 Mbps   176.53 Mbps    Saudi Telecom Company 
 Dubai, AE        183.63 ms   0.0%    1710.36 Mbps   178.46 Mbps    du - Dubai  
 Fujairah, AE     116.62 ms   0.0%    1831.58 Mbps   224.29 Mbps    e& UAE - Fujairah 
 Istanbul, TR     38.46 ms    0.0%    1931.00 Mbps   570.26 Mbps    Turkcell - Istanbul 
 Tehran, IR       92.51 ms    0.0%    1886.58 Mbps   286.99 Mbps    Asiatech - Tehran 

 Tokyo, JP        217.22 ms   N/A     1694.62 Mbps   56.07 Mbps     GSL Networks - Tokyo 
 Wu Xi, CU-CN     162.66 ms   1.9%    1455.80 Mbps   32.58 Mbps     China Unicom - Wu Xi 
 Nanjing, CT-CN   252.10 ms   15.7%   1345.55 Mbps   0.31 Mbps      China Telecom JiangSu 5G - Nanjing 
 Hong Kong, CN    165.08 ms   N/A     1997.82 Mbps   3.64 Mbps      STC - Hong Kong 
 Singapore, SG    585.06 ms   23.0%   1945.16 Mbps   217.02 Mbps    i3D.net - Singapore 
 Jakarta, ID      FAILED - IP has been rate limited. Try again after 1 hour.                                                  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Avg DL Speed       : 1885.01 Mbps
 Avg UL Speed       : 484.59 Mbps

 Total DL Data      : 78.41 GB
 Total UL Data      : 16.35 GB
 Total Data         : 94.77 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Duration           : 14 min 10 sec
 System Time        : 19/11/2024
 Total Script Runs  : 88524
    Thanked by 2maverick gbzret4d
  • FameSystemsFameSystems Member, Patron Provider

    @NET18 said:
    I noticed that your configuration includes the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X. However, on the SYNLINQ website, I found that the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, which offers more cores, has a price difference of only €20 compared to the AMD Ryzen 9 9900.

    In this case, why not opt for the more powerful Ryzen 9 9950X? Is this choice based on specific considerations, such as compatibility, stability, or other factors? I would appreciate more details on this matter.

    We want to say something regarding the selection of the CPU. Firstly, the Ryzen 9 9900x has a lower TDP in comparison to the 9950x. Secondly, the 9900x has a much lower price than the 9950x (over €200 difference). And Thirdly, the Ryzen 9900x has a higher availability, so we can order new ones fast. With all that in mind, we can build more servers with the 9900x than with the 9950x. There would obviously be a difference in performance, but we think it would be a difference, that is not too high. And we would rather be able to offer more server nodes, than paying way more and having only a few servers more per node in the end.

    Thanked by 1nick_
  • samzamsamzam Member

    @FameSystems can you check PM :)

  • FameSystemsFameSystems Member, Patron Provider

    @cevdar said:
    sylink datacenter is not good today downed

    We are in the same datacenter as BeroHost which would be the Maincubes FRA01 in Frankfurt. SYNLINQ provides our uplinks, which would be the same with BeroHost.

  • hyperblasthyperblast Member
    edited November 2024

    geekbench:

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @FameSystems
    A suggestion for the 4x 9900x plan

    Storage of 160gb along with 5 TB bandwidth will be better offer, in my opinion

  • cevdarcevdar Member

    @FameSystems delete tax
    6917
    Support pin

  • suyadi92suyadi92 Member

    @dev_vps said:

    @egoror

    stop tagging me
    I have no interest in having conversation with you.

    Dude freaks out, wth 🤣

  • egororegoror Member 
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2024-06-09                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Tue Nov 19

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 4 hours, 43 minutes
Processor  : AMD Ryzen 9 9900X 12-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 6 @ 4391.728 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 15.6 GiB
Swap       : 1024.0 MiB
Disk       : 155.4 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.1.0-27-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
ASN        : AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \"SYNLINQ\"
Host       : FameSystems GmbH \u0026 Co. KG
Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
Country    : Germany

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda3):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 520.73 MB/s (130.1k) | 2.77 GB/s    (43.2k)
Write      | 522.10 MB/s (130.5k) | 2.78 GB/s    (43.5k)
Total      | 1.04 GB/s   (260.7k) | 5.55 GB/s    (86.8k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 3.39 GB/s     (6.6k) | 3.06 GB/s     (2.9k)
Write      | 3.57 GB/s     (6.9k) | 3.26 GB/s     (3.1k)
Total      | 6.96 GB/s    (13.6k) | 6.32 GB/s     (6.1k)

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | busy            | 11.4 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | busy            | 1.95 Gbits/sec  | 7.17 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 442 Mbits/sec   | 1.85 Gbits/sec  | 75.0 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 370 Mbits/sec   | 657 Mbits/sec   | 155 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | 1.20 Gbits/sec  | 146 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 199 Mbits/sec   | 1.87 Gbits/sec  | 81.9 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 275 Mbits/sec   | 866 Mbits/sec   | 198 ms         

iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
---------------------------------
Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
-----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.93 Gbits/sec  | busy            | 11.4 ms        
Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.05 Gbits/sec  | 1.93 Gbits/sec  | 7.15 ms        
Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 124 Mbits/sec   | 368 Mbits/sec   | 74.8 ms        
Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 295 Mbits/sec   | 1.13 Gbits/sec  | 155 ms         
Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 303 Mbits/sec   | 1.23 Gbits/sec  | 146 ms         
Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 279 Mbits/sec   | 1.71 Gbits/sec  | 81.8 ms        
Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 307 Mbits/sec   | 899 Mbits/sec   | 198 ms         

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 3357                          
Multi Core      | 12818                         
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8951492

YABS completed in 10 min 8 sec
  • nepeusnepeus Member

    @FameSystems I’m unable to perform iperf3 tests using the address provided on the looking glass page.

  • Hyp0901Hyp0901 Member

    The bandwidth is really too small for my linking 😔😔

  • ZZ1269UZZ1269U Member
    1. How much is the cpu ryzen 9900x vcore fair use limit? have any specific limit? How long does one processes allow which are permanently using 80~100% of high utilization?
    2. Default enable or disable virtIO memory ballooning on guest VM?
  • itachikonohaitachikonoha Member
    edited November 2024

    the only reason stopped me to buy one in this case is the bandwith.....

    2 TB is too low.

Sign In or Register to comment.