New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
Backblaze announces new rate limiting policy
perspective
Member
It was one of the best s3 providers but now it's dead.
This policy is limited to Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage usage. Backblaze Computer Backup usage is not within the scope of this policy.
Customers storing 10TB or below will initially be provisioned for uploads up to 3,000 requests per minute and 800 megabits per second, and for downloads up to 1,200 requests per minute and 200 megabits per second, all per account. Other API operations may also be limited to keep traffic flowing, but again, this won’t be noticeable to most customers.
Customers storing more than 10TB, including all sales assisted customers whom we’ve supported during implementation and/or renewal, will experience no change at this time.
Thanked by 1WyvernCo
Comments
use https://pixeldrain.com/ with rclone
and you will still be filled with their random 503 error lol.
Try: https://hidan.sh/pricing
You store less than 10TB but need to upload at speeds higher than 800 megabits per second or why is it dead exactly?
That's a shed load of requests and bandwidth seems pretty fair...
I'm confused with their offerings. The Pro plan does not have a storage limit according to their website. But the filesystem has a 2TB limit? I guess the rclone functionality does utilize the 2TB limit?
200Mbit/s is bad for restoring.
just use their prepaid plan?
use as you go
This indeed effectively breaks all applications with Amazon Athena-ish usage.
Never be have great experience their s3 solution always too slow on point sometimes not loaded.
I always thought competition makes the product better and cheaper, not worse and more expensive. Guess I was wrong.
As a Backblaze customer, somewhat disappointed. Though the frequent GET errors and cumbersome admin panel (still no way to do fine grained permissions other than via CLI/API) are much larger issues for me.
i agree. i used to store images on their b2 for my wordpress blog, and it took 2-3 seconds for image to download (display image on webpage). Backblaze is slowest among all providers. Right now I'm trying Cloudflare R2