Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Low end big data

Some people ask where lowendtalk host but I think no one ask about the size of lowend data base

So what the size of database of the lowendtalk forum

What the size of database of the lowendtalk forum
  1. What you think the size of database of the lowendtalk forum75 votes
    1. Less than 500 GB
      77.33%
    2. More than 500 GB
      22.67%

Comments

  • Database is probably below 5GB you way far off on 500GB

    Thanked by 1Ahmad_
  • @btchost said:
    Database is probably below 5GB you way far off on 500GB

    Not so far I think it is more than 50 GB

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited November 2024

    I would think, not more than 50gb , including the log files

    Thanked by 1Ahmad_
  • Ahmad_Ahmad_ Member
    edited November 2024

    @dev_vps said:
    I would think, not more than 50gb , including the log files

    More than 103000 discussions and a lot of discussion have hundred of pages and every page have wall of texts

    I think it is big big database

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited November 2024

    @Ahmad_ said:

    @dev_vps said:
    I would think, not more than 50gb , including the log files

    More than 103000 discussions and every discussion have hundred of pages and every page have wall of texts

    I think it is big big database

    I would still stick to my 50gb guestimate

    Thanked by 1Ahmad_
  • Less than 100Gb

  • @dev_vps said:

    @Ahmad_ said:

    @dev_vps said:
    I would think, not more than 50gb , including the log files

    More than 103000 discussions and every discussion have hundred of pages and every page have wall of texts

    I think it is big big database

    I would still stick to my 50gb guestimate

    Basis for my guesstimate-

    Assuming an average record size of 5 KB, daily data for 10 million transactions can reach 50 GB

    This would scale up to around 1.5 TB per month and 18 TB per year for transactional data alone.

  • @Ahmad_ said:

    @dev_vps said:
    I would think, not more than 50gb , including the log files

    More than 103000 discussions and a lot of discussion have hundred of pages and every page have wall of texts

    I think it is big big database

    text doesn't really take up much storage and LET doesn't even have image uploads

  • @szymonp said:

    @Ahmad_ said:

    @dev_vps said:
    I would think, not more than 50gb , including the log files

    More than 103000 discussions and a lot of discussion have hundred of pages and every page have wall of texts

    I think it is big big database

    text doesn't really take up much storage and LET doesn't even have image uploads

    What the size for one page you think

    suppose every discussions have 25 page

    103000x25=2575000 x the size of page = ?????

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker
    edited November 2024

    Very crude napkin guesstimate: 100k threads with avg 25 comments each and avg 250 chars each -> about 23 GB (plus, of course DB overhead) so. 25 GB guesstimates sound like about in the ballpark.

    From what (little) I feel to know, @FAT32 is the "tech admin" and should know. Care to tell us, FAT32 (if it's not considered sensitive information) whether we're about right or totally off?

    Thanked by 2dev_vps 0xC7
  • For sure is under 500GB.

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    Bruh

    Imagine voting for "More than 500 GB" :D

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    No no.
    With all the images, gifs, videos embedded, it's gotta take some space, right?

    /s

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @plumberg said:
    No no.
    With all the images, gifs, videos embedded, it's gotta take some space, right?

    /s

    Don't forget the markdown

  • plumbergplumberg Veteran, Megathread Squad

    @emgh said:

    @plumberg said:
    No no.
    With all the images, gifs, videos embedded, it's gotta take some space, right?

    /s

    Don't forget the markdown

    Oh and thr every alternate posts of yabs and gb scores, that out to weigh out the db

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @plumberg said:

    @emgh said:

    @plumberg said:
    No no.
    With all the images, gifs, videos embedded, it's gotta take some space, right?

    /s

    Don't forget the markdown

    Oh and thr every alternate posts of yabs and gb scores, that out to weigh out the db

    Yeah, I have a small SSD for games and other smaller stuff and a big 8TB HDD for my text files

    Thanked by 1lothos
  • The interesting question is how big is the data of the Domain Awareness System.

    Can someone do some napkin math and then we'll have fun comparing and voting on the stupidest results?

  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @davide said:
    The interesting question is how big is the data of the Domain Awareness System.

    Can someone do some napkin math and then we'll have fun comparing and voting on the stupidest results?

    More than 500 GB

    Thanked by 1davide
  • emghemgh Member, Megathread Squad

    @emgh said:

    @davide said:
    The interesting question is how big is the data of the Domain Awareness System.

    Can someone do some napkin math and then we'll have fun comparing and voting on the stupidest results?

    More than 500 GB

    Sorry, I meant over 6 inches

  • FAT32FAT32 Administrator, Deal Compiler Extraordinaire

    @jsg said:
    Very crude napkin guesstimate: 100k threads with avg 25 comments each and avg 250 chars each -> about 23 GB (plus, of course DB overhead) so. 25 GB guesstimates sound like about in the ballpark.

    From what (little) I feel to know, FAT32 is the "tech admin" and should know. Care to tell us, FAT32 (if it's not considered sensitive information) whether we're about right or totally off?

    It is actually lower than that... let's just say about 10GB. Why? Because for some reason Vanilla forum cleaned up some old stuff from time to time and I have no idea why... (It might be some old cronjob set by previous admin but I need time to take a look)

  • @emgh said:
    Bruh

    Imagine voting for "More than 500 GB" :D

    I know it is exaggeration but I was think it is more than 50 GB

    Thanked by 1emgh
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @FAT32 said:

    @jsg said:
    Very crude napkin guesstimate: 100k threads with avg 25 comments each and avg 250 chars each -> about 23 GB (plus, of course DB overhead) so. 25 GB guesstimates sound like about in the ballpark.

    From what (little) I feel to know, FAT32 is the "tech admin" and should know. Care to tell us, FAT32 (if it's not considered sensitive information) whether we're about right or totally off?

    It is actually lower than that... let's just say about 10GB. Why? Because for some reason Vanilla forum cleaned up some old stuff from time to time and I have no idea why... (It might be some old cronjob set by previous admin but I need time to take a look)

    Thank you, @FAT32! How kind of you to provide some insight.

  • @FAT32 said:

    @jsg said:
    Very crude napkin guesstimate: 100k threads with avg 25 comments each and avg 250 chars each -> about 23 GB (plus, of course DB overhead) so. 25 GB guesstimates sound like about in the ballpark.

    From what (little) I feel to know, FAT32 is the "tech admin" and should know. Care to tell us, FAT32 (if it's not considered sensitive information) whether we're about right or totally off?

    It is actually lower than that... let's just say about 10GB. Why? Because for some reason Vanilla forum cleaned up some old stuff from time to time and I have no idea why... (It might be some old cronjob set by previous admin but I need time to take a look)

    that interesting I was think it more than 50 GB

Sign In or Register to comment.