Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Any infos about index-hosting.de?

13468911

Comments

  • mcsmcs Member
    edited November 2024

    @dev_vps said:
    @IndexHosting
    I don’t need test VPS anymore.

    Thanks for letting me test it out for couple of hours.

    @mcs @gbzret4d
    I didn’t complete my testing as the test vps was deleted.

    Highly unprofessional.

    Only scammers have such a scheme of work - when they launch a server for a few hours or days, show that it is working and then when the user does not pay attention, they secretly delete it and that's it. When contacting them further, they will write you need open a ticket, everything is fine with other users. This is standard practice and it sitution looks more and more like this, as I thought from the very beginning.

  • Of course we try not to make unnecessary excuses, but we are not responsible for a WHMCS error that did not save the cancellation time. The server has been deployed again as before.

  • @mcs said:

    @dev_vps said:
    @IndexHosting
    I don’t need test VPS anymore.

    Thanks for letting me test it out for couple of hours.

    @mcs @gbzret4d
    I didn’t complete my testing as the test vps was deleted.

    Highly unprofessional.

    thank you for your help and tips. As expected, in principle, it will be a waste of money on all this in a couple of weeks for many who use this service, since most likely they will disappear. Yes, such an approach is extremely unprofessional and I do not need such services, I thank you as always for immediately paying attention to important details.

    mistakes happen, but I look to see if vendor takes the responsibility that it was setup in error. That separates professionals from wanna-to-be-professionals.

    BTW, Test VPS was created again, but I lost the OS and data.

  • @gbzret4d said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @gbzret4d said:

    @alexvolk said:
    New provider comes here and people are begging for the test server. Haven't seen this type of shit on LET previously.

    @mcs @gbzret4d do you need some kind of a donation to taste a server that you won't ever purchase?

    Maybe my last posts were not completely clear, I would not have tested the server myself but made it available to @dev_vps and I think my last messages would show that I find this begging for free servers unbearable. Cant remember the last time i tested a server.

    I don't need another VPS.

    I use test VPS to share my benchmark results. And, in many cases, it helps LET folks to determine the quality of the VPS and if VPS is of decent quality, I would imagine it helps with their sales too.

    Yeah thats why i tried to get indexhosting to give you directly a test vps

    I had the same goal. So that the supplier would transparently show the work and reliability of the servers, and give the opportunity to test from the professional of this forum. But with this initial approach and with the continuation as now - everything becomes clear and no more attempts are needed here. Personally, I will never buy a server here again.

  • The data loss is, of course, unfortunate and definitely not something we planned. On the topic of scamming: it wouldn’t make any sense for us to provide a public test server for three days only to delete it afterwards. That would only create distrust, which is the last thing we want.

    Thanked by 1dev_vps
  • @IndexHosting said:
    The data loss is, of course, unfortunate and definitely not something we planned. On the topic of scamming: it wouldn’t make any sense for us to provide a public test server for three days only to delete it afterwards. That would only create distrust, which is the last thing we want.

    The point is that others will go and order as a professional tests, and then you can turn off both the professional and others who pay for this service after he provides good tests, which I am sure you will demonstrate to him for a while. Therefore, everything here smells like a complete deception and no more words are needed.

  • @IndexHosting said:
    The data loss is, of course, unfortunate and definitely not something we planned. On the topic of scamming: it wouldn’t make any sense for us to provide a public test server for three days only to delete it afterwards. That would only create distrust, which is the last thing we want.

    Just unprofessional, nothing else.

  • We understand your concerns and take them very seriously. Our goal is to build transparency and trust, and we are committed to demonstrating this through our actions.

    We have provided test servers for our new location so that you can experience the performance firsthand. If technical issues arise, we are actively working on solutions. Fraud is absolutely not in our interest; we have contract terms that bind us, for example, in the provision of domains and servers, so scamming is not possible.

  • @IndexHosting said: We understand your concerns

    Chill, don't you see you are being played.
    I agree with Mumbly, shouldn't give anything out for free in the first place.

  • @egoror said:

    @IndexHosting said: We understand your concerns

    Chill, don't you see you are being played.
    I agree with Mumbly, shouldn't give anything out for free in the first place.

    This means absolutely nothing. Here on the forum there were already providers who even after 5 years said that they cannot pay for the servers and we are leaving, and then no compensation to users and that's it. Although people even bought servers for a long term of 1-3 years paying in advance. There were also those who appeared for 1 month and also said that we have contractual obligations and we are not going anywhere, and we have paid for servers. In my memory, there were at least 10 of them - from the Netherlands, and from America, Romania and Turkey, and some others. But if you think that we do not check and do not treat any provider so carefully, then you are wrong. You read the thread with charityhost, which is from America and recently on the forum sells services, he also did not start smoothly, but he managed to explain and justify many aspects and then showed that he can provide quality services. I also changed my opinion about him and in private messages I determined that the person knows how to do what he took on. At the moment, he has expanded his product line on the forum and taken into account the nuances that I told him in personal messages and also wrote in detail on the forum. You do not have and do not provide any improvements either in terms of communication or in terms of actions - this does not look like a professional approach and a desire to do something in reality. For now, I am not changing my point of view, and I will look from the outside as this will happen here further. Since in this case, only time will help to really assess what will happen next

  • @IndexHosting said:
    We understand your concerns and take them very seriously. Our goal is to build transparency and trust, and we are committed to demonstrating this through our actions.

    We have provided test servers for our new location so that you can experience the performance firsthand. If technical issues arise, we are actively working on solutions. Fraud is absolutely not in our interest; we have contract terms that bind us, for example, in the provision of domains and servers, so scamming is not possible.

    Here no one talks about free at all, read the thread with charity and other new ones, they all offered the same bonuses and there is nothing wrong with that - if you give the simplest server for testing. But even if you sell - ok, you can buy, but not with such nuances and technical problems that are constantly described here for some time. Yes, again, we can say that you pay little money, therefore the service is provided as is - but the key here is that money is paid and the service must be provided qualitatively, if you are going to earn trust. But so far this is not the case on many points when people write every minute that even now they reinstall servers several times so that everything works qualitatively. Based on many nuances, it is not yet clear here that you are solving user problems and that you have a well-established work. And how long you will exist, we will see within a couple of weeks even on this forum

  • @mcs in case you haven't noticed, they didn't open this thread, and they don't even advertise here. So why are you talking about a completely unrelated charityhost that actually advertises on that forum?

    A few of us saw a potentially good offer, took a chance that may or may not pay off, and that's it. We're aware of the potential risk with relatively new hosts and it's up to each individual to either take the risk or pass on it. Discussion is okay, doubts are okay, but a few of you have started to act as if a host that doesn't even advertise on this forum owes you something.

    All this discussion, what do you expect them to do? You can try them or not, but there's no magic wand to eliminate the risk that comes with young hosts. It is what it is.

  • @IndexHosting said:
    We understand your concerns and take them very seriously. Our goal is to build transparency and trust, and we are committed to demonstrating this through our actions.

    Thank you and appreciated.

    We have provided test servers for our new location so that you can experience the performance firsthand.

    This test VPS is at new location. I will test it out tomorrow morning (US EST timezone).

  • @IndexHosting, what did I tell you?

    Thanked by 1IndexHosting
  • @Mumbly said:
    @mcs in case you haven't noticed, they didn't open this thread, and they don't even advertise here. So why are you talking about a completely unrelated charityhost that actually advertises on that forum?

    A few of us saw a potentially good offer, took a chance that may or may not pay off, and that's it. We're aware of the potential risk with relatively new hosts and it's up to each individual to either take the risk or pass on it. Discussion is okay, doubts are okay, but a few of you have started to act as if a host that doesn't even advertise on this forum owes you something.

    All this discussion, what do you expect them to do? You can try them or not, but there's no magic wand to eliminate the risk that comes with young hosts. It is what it is.

    Yes, I agree only with the fact that this provider is not advertised here on the forum and on the one hand there may not be close attention to it. Risk is risk - take the risk. I simply wrote an opinion - how this provider it can possible to develop your audience and get a really worthwhile customer base, which is needed by any young provider and this is interesting in any case and this provider, otherwise he would not even go to the forum and try to see if there is interest in these offers. Such observation from the outside also takes place - before thinking whether to get a provider tag for money and start advertising here. I will not write anything else, no problem if this is considered from the position of too much attention to this provider. I will look, as I said, from the outside, what will happen next. And yes, I do not need anything and I did not ask to allocate some free service to me, so that in this regard to be completely clear.

  • @Mumbly said:
    @mcs in case you haven't noticed, they didn't open this thread, and they don't even advertise here. So why are you talking about a completely unrelated charityhost that actually advertises on that forum?

    A few of us saw a potentially good offer, took a chance that may or may not pay off, and that's it. We're aware of the potential risk with relatively new hosts and it's up to each individual to either take the risk or pass on it. Discussion is okay, doubts are okay, but a few of you have started to act as if a host that doesn't even advertise on this forum owes you something.

    All this discussion, what do you expect them to do? You can try them or not, but there's no magic wand to eliminate the risk that comes with young hosts. It is what it is.

    hahaha. these last few pages is also pure cringe seeing those few people so thirsty for a 'trial server'

    imo for any new provider here, giving such trial freebies is a bad move due to some LET's member mentality. you probably better off with a one-month giveaway if you really have the resources to do that.

    Thanked by 2IndexHosting fendix
  • @ScreenReader said:

    @Mumbly said:
    @mcs in case you haven't noticed, they didn't open this thread, and they don't even advertise here. So why are you talking about a completely unrelated charityhost that actually advertises on that forum?

    A few of us saw a potentially good offer, took a chance that may or may not pay off, and that's it. We're aware of the potential risk with relatively new hosts and it's up to each individual to either take the risk or pass on it. Discussion is okay, doubts are okay, but a few of you have started to act as if a host that doesn't even advertise on this forum owes you something.

    All this discussion, what do you expect them to do? You can try them or not, but there's no magic wand to eliminate the risk that comes with young hosts. It is what it is.

    hahaha. these last few pages is also pure cringe seeing those few people so thirsty for a 'trial server'

    imo for any new provider here, giving such trial freebies is a bad move due to some LET's member mentality. you probably better off with a one-month giveaway if you really have the resources to do that.

    so pay money constantly in vain checking on yourself whether you will fly or not every time. This is done to save at least some way the money of the forum users, if at least one or two people check before, and not a whole crowd gets in the case of a bad provider. Such cases have happened many times, I say again I have never received a free server here in this way, except for winning in raffles. I always pay for all my servers and I have enough money to buy not one or two, from some providers I bought 20 or more pieces at once. So do what you want to continue writing I see there is no point here

  • 0x7c0x7c Member
    edited November 2024

    yabs, is getting slower..
    failed a few times to get an ipv4 and no ipv6 at all.

    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 4 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 9334 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2695.948 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 11.7 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 96.8 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-48-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : GHOSTnet GmbH
    ASN        : AS12586 GHOSTnet GmbH
    Host       : Ip Network
    Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 99.92 MB/s   (24.9k) | 709.75 MB/s  (11.0k)
    Write      | 100.19 MB/s  (25.0k) | 713.49 MB/s  (11.1k)
    Total      | 200.11 MB/s  (50.0k) | 1.42 GB/s    (22.2k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.91 GB/s     (3.7k) | 1.65 GB/s     (1.6k)
    Write      | 2.01 GB/s     (3.9k) | 1.77 GB/s     (1.7k)
    Total      | 3.92 GB/s     (7.6k) | 3.42 GB/s     (3.3k)
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1050
    Multi Core      | 2681
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8596882
    
  • @0x7c said:
    yabs, is getting slower..
    failed a few times to get an ipv4 and no ipv6 at all.

    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 4 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 9334 32-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 4 @ 2695.948 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 11.7 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 96.8 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-48-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : GHOSTnet GmbH
    ASN        : AS12586 GHOSTnet GmbH
    Host       : Ip Network
    Location   : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse (HE)
    Country    : Germany
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 99.92 MB/s   (24.9k) | 709.75 MB/s  (11.0k)
    Write      | 100.19 MB/s  (25.0k) | 713.49 MB/s  (11.1k)
    Total      | 200.11 MB/s  (50.0k) | 1.42 GB/s    (22.2k)
               |                      |
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
    Read       | 1.91 GB/s     (3.7k) | 1.65 GB/s     (1.6k)
    Write      | 2.01 GB/s     (3.9k) | 1.77 GB/s     (1.7k)
    Total      | 3.92 GB/s     (7.6k) | 3.42 GB/s     (3.3k)
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1050
    Multi Core      | 2681
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8596882
    

    You are comparing an AMD Ryzen 9 7950x3D host system with an AMD EPYC 9334 host system.

  • 0x7c0x7c Member
    edited November 2024

    @IndexHosting said:
    You are comparing an AMD Ryzen 9 7950x3D host system with an AMD EPYC 9334 host system.

    Compared to the other yabs in this thread for the same package seems slower.
    A switch to the Ryzen 9 can be done via ticket? Or do you have any refund policy? I was unable to find it on the website. Thanks.

  • For this type of request, a ticket must be opened. It is also difficult to compare two tests with each other, as there are several host systems. For this reason, you can also request a migration to a less loaded one at any time.

  • @mcs said:

    @dev_vps said:
    @IndexHosting
    I don’t need test VPS anymore.

    Thanks for letting me test it out for couple of hours.

    @mcs @gbzret4d
    I didn’t complete my testing as the test vps was deleted.

    Highly unprofessional.

    Only scammers have such a scheme of work - when they launch a server for a few hours or days, show that it is working and then when the user does not pay attention, they secretly delete it and that's it. When contacting them further, they will write you need open a ticket, everything is fine with other users. This is standard practice and it sitution looks more and more like this, as I thought from the very beginning.

    Yeah that's why so, many holsters give you free servers..........

  • @IndexHosting get the host REP tag it's free
    @DP

  • @gbzret4d said:
    @IndexHosting get the host REP tag it's free
    @DP

    How?

  • @0x7c said:
    yabs, is getting slower..

    I am the reason :D

  • @IndexHosting said:

    @gbzret4d said:
    @IndexHosting get the host REP tag it's free
    @DP

    How?

    https://support.lowendtalk.com/ open a ticket and ask for it

  • MumblyMumbly Member
    edited November 2024

    @IndexHosting said:

    @gbzret4d said:
    @IndexHosting get the host REP tag it's free
    @DP

    How?

    I linked it twice in this thread how :)

    Thanked by 1hyperblast
  • @IndexHosting said:
    For this type of request, a ticket must be opened. It is also difficult to compare two tests with each other, as there are several host systems.
    For this reason, you can also request a migration to a less loaded one at any time.

    What is the average cpu vCore resource utilization permitted over, say, 24 hours?
    20%, 30%, 40%, 50%

  • @mcs @gbzret4d @IndexHosting @Mumbly

    For 1080p video test, zero dropped frames and cpu utilization is in 50% range. This is extraordinary performance.

  • @dev_vps said:
    @mcs @gbzret4d @IndexHosting @Mumbly

    For 1080p video test, zero dropped frames and cpu utilization is in 50% range. This is extraordinary performance.

    win server you recommend on this machine?!

This discussion has been closed.