New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.
All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Comments
For one day I can give you without problems, but 3 days is already too much.
ok.
I will take on that one day (24 hours) test VPS.
Please create the order on the link below, but do not pay and we will activate it.
After you create the order, please, open a ticket and mention your LET member name.
https://secure.avenacloud.com/cart/cloud-kvm-vps-vds/
Thank you.
Ticket Created! #507826
Seems like Avoro dedicated bullshit
If the Node has 45% load, you are not going to see 30% steal.
There is no shortage of cpu time that would explain the 30%.
Either the node is oversold, which is very likely or your hitting the hard cpu limits.
On page 1 it is already clear what was the problem with this server. No node is overloaded.
Why? If it's VDS, he has paid for 100% of those cores.
Maybe you can fix this with AI. Talk to @c1vhosting
/s
Hi,
sounds like you define the "dedication" of the resources as the fact that from the perspective of the virtual server noone else ( except the customer ) can use the resources. So "inside" the rented virtual server there is only the customer and noone else.
So you refer to the difference between a shared (web)hosting environment and your product.
The problem is that the general understanding of VDS in context to virtual servers is that the resources are exclusive from the perspective of the hostmachine. So noone else, except the customer can use the assigned cores and ram. As to disk, this is not the case, as real dedicated disks are currently not offered usually.
To prevent missunderstandings, maybe it wont be bad to write somewhere in your offers your definition of "dedicated" so there wont be any interpretation issues anymore.
Sorry bro, it's me..
VPS Plan
Customized YABS
VPS mentioned in this post is much better deal
https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/4050277/#Comment_4050277
cost -- $10/year
and performance is far better
Thank you very much for the review and I want to mention that we are now working on the storage for the node, to increase the speed 4-5 times. Maybe even more. I will come back with details when we finish the work on the storage.
The VPS was pretty stable in windows, however two key points
NO, that is not how it works. KVM vs. containers (like LXC) simply means that the guests (the stuff you sell) do have separate (well, kind of) resources that are not shared with others, so with KVM each guest has and runs their own kernel, etc. while container guests share pretty much everything.
Note though that 'dedicated VPS' (or 'VDS') means that in addition 1 vCore ~ 1 HWT that is, a guest has a full vCore (or multiples) for themselves, while a VPS vCore might actually be 1/2, 1/4, or even less of a HWT. Hence a VDS can not experience any steal (modulo very small hypervisor hiccups) but a VPS is bound to see some steal and in particular "bleed through" of neighbour (hard) usage.
So: Do NOT sell anything with shared cores as 'dedicated VPS' or 'VDS'!
If number of vCores > HTWs it's not dedicated, no matter what hypervisor you use, simple as that.
Node was accessed illegally and VPS used without notice?
It is possible. Question of competency.
Untested production env shows yet again lack of basic competency.
Will you torture them?