Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Sign In Register

Quick Links


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop

Categories

In this Discussion

Home › General
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Have you ever seen cpu steal=geek bench score?

ArirangArirang Member
in General

Hi.

My vm is so slow that I can barely use it, so I left a question ticket.
But they say there's no problem on the node.
So I do geekbench.
I'm surprised and never seen this score...and the same...even cpu steal is much than single score.

2024-10-22-9-22-39.png

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value
                |
Single Core     | 88
Multi Core      | 94

I'm not telling you with a provider name before the provider and me reach to the conclusion. I'm still in the ticket system.

How much worst score have you ever seen cpu steal/geek score each?

Thanked by 5egoror vovler SLMob JasonM ACKS

Comments

  • cybertechcybertech Member

    i bet its @c1vhosting

    Thanked by 5loay xvps yoursunny CheepCluck anzepintar
  • egororegoror Member

    Oh man.. how long did you wait for gb6 to finish

  • ArirangArirang Member

    @egoror said:
    Oh man.. how long did you wait for gb6 to finish

    Almost 2 hours.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @cybertech said:

    i bet its @c1vhosting

    YABS for c1v VPS

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 CPU Model          : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697A v4 @ 2.60GHz
 CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2596.992 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 16384 KB
 AES-NI             : ✔ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✔ Enabled
 Total Disk         : 78.7 GB (2.5 GB Used)
 Total RAM          : 7.6 GB (376.1 MB Used)
 System uptime      : 0 days, 3 hour 45 min
 Load average       : 0.00, 0.30, 0.56
 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 12
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 6.1.0-13-amd64
 Virtualization     : KVM
 TCP Control        : htcp
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Primary Network    : IPv6
 IPv6 Access        : ✔ Online
 IPv4 Access        : ✔ Online
 ISP                : Cinzia Tocci trading as C1V
 ASN                : AS212271 Cinzia Tocci trading as C1V
 Location           : Milan, Lombardy-25, Italy
 Location (IPv4)    : Pomezia, Lazio, IT
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda1):
 ---------------------------------
 Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
 Read       | 79.99 MB/s   (19.9k) | 1.31 GB/s    (20.5k)
 Write      | 80.20 MB/s   (20.0k) | 1.32 GB/s    (20.6k)
 Total      | 160.20 MB/s  (40.0k) | 2.63 GB/s    (41.2k)
            |                      |
 Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
 Read       | 1.64 GB/s     (3.2k) | 1.83 GB/s     (1.7k)
 Write      | 1.73 GB/s     (3.3k) | 1.95 GB/s     (1.9k)
 Total      | 3.37 GB/s     (6.5k) | 3.78 GB/s     (3.6k)

 iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
 ---------------------------------
 Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
 -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
 Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 21.6 Mbits/sec  | 541 Mbits/sec   | 33.6 ms
 Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 21.0 Mbits/sec  | 891 Mbits/sec   | 29.7 ms
 Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 11.2 Mbits/sec  | 363 Mbits/sec   | 82.8 ms
 Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 3.84 Mbits/sec  | 464 Mbits/sec   | 330 ms
 Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 6.59 Mbits/sec  | 372 Mbits/sec   | 163 ms
 Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 11.0 Mbits/sec  | 488 Mbits/sec   | 103 ms
 Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 9.36 Mbits/sec  | 350 Mbits/sec   | 221 ms

 iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
 ---------------------------------
 Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
 -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
 Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 32.1 Mbits/sec  | 524 Mbits/sec   | 33.2 ms
 Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 21.0 Mbits/sec  | 862 Mbits/sec   | 29.9 ms
 Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 9.28 Mbits/sec  | 323 Mbits/sec   | 82.3 ms
 Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 4.88 Mbits/sec  | 176 Mbits/sec   | 326 ms
 Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 15.0 Mbits/sec  | 349 Mbits/sec   | 163 ms
 Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 10.3 Mbits/sec  | 533 Mbits/sec   | 103 ms
 Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 7.97 Mbits/sec  | 240 Mbits/sec   | 222 ms

 Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
 ---------------------------------
 Test            | Value
                 |
 Single Core     | 462
 Multi Core      | 959
 Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22974995

 Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
 ---------------------------------
 Test            | Value
                 |
 Single Core     |  586
 Multi Core      | 1004
 Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8373218

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Speedtest.net 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server

 Nearest           10.74 ms   0.3%    825.21 Mbps    51.84 Mbps     Uniconnect - Rome

 Dallas, Texas    137.12 ms   0.4%    382.81 Mbps    14.33 Mbps     i3D.net - Dallas, TX
 Houston, Texas   138.99 ms   0.0%    639.18 Mbps    15.44 Mbps     Ezee Fiber - Houston, TX
 Chicago, IL      117.48 ms   1.2%    612.55 Mbps    13.69 Mbps     Enzu.com - Chicago, IL
 Miami, FL        133.85 ms   N/A     603.34 Mbps    12.89 Mbps     Dish Wireless - Miami, FL
 New York, NY     148.68 ms   0.3%    401.15 Mbps     8.94 Mbps     Surfshark Ltd - New York, NY
 Spokane, WA      209.32 ms   0.3%    535.79 Mbps     9.03 Mbps     Crunchbits - Spokane, WA
 Seattle, WA      172.95 ms   0.7%    525.32 Mbps    14.98 Mbps     Misaka Network, Inc. - Seattle, WA
 Los Angeles, US  164.50 ms   1.3%    507.85 Mbps    15.33 Mbps     ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
 San Jose, CA     163.69 ms   0.0%    546.38 Mbps    14.41 Mbps     Misaka Network, Inc. - San Jose, CA

 London, UK       33.18 ms    0.0%    882.64 Mbps    28.28 Mbps     VeloxServ Communications - London
 Amsterdam, NL    30.09 ms    0.5%    931.55 Mbps    33.46 Mbps     31173 Services AB - Amsterdam
 Paris, FR        31.87 ms    N/A     913.93 Mbps    23.76 Mbps     Axione - Paris
 Frankfurt, DE    23.00 ms    0.7%    731.86 Mbps    34.88 Mbps     Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main
 Warsaw, PL       44.15 ms    0.0%    925.48 Mbps    25.17 Mbps     Play - Warszawa
 Kyiv, UA         45.31 ms    4.5%    665.69 Mbps     0.90 Mbps     O3 - Kyiv
 Bucharest, RO    43.73 ms    34.4%   787.21 Mbps     0.40 Mbps     Vodafone Romania Fixed – Bucharest

 Chennai, IN      156.56 ms   N/A     596.61 Mbps     3.26 Mbps     Jio - Chennai
 Mumbai, IN       157.70 ms   3.7%    653.38 Mbps     9.41 Mbps     i3D.net - Mumbai
 Mumbai, MH       161.70 ms   N/A     590.67 Mbps     8.06 Mbps     Jio - Rajkot
 Delhi, IN        157.36 ms   1.0%    616.94 Mbps     4.54 Mbps     Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi

 Jeddah, SA       96.72 ms    1.7%    944.80 Mbps     5.19 Mbps     Saudi Telecom Company
 Dubai, AE        191.69 ms   1.4%    957.36 Mbps     8.74 Mbps     du - Dubai

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Avg DL Speed   : 670.88 Mbps
 Avg UL Speed   :  14.47 Mbps
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  • Petey_LongPetey_Long Barred

    Outside of YABS not being able to run at all, this is by far the lowest score I have ever seen.

    If the provider says everything is good and they're not willing to fix it, why the secrecy on the provider name? They're obviously proud of said results and wouldn't mind you posting them.

    What's the worst that can happen? They cancel your VPS? lol

    Thanked by 3emgh Arirang SLMob
  • BasToTheMaxBasToTheMax Member

    How much are you paying for that vps? 😳😬

  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @cybertech said:

    i bet its @c1vhosting

    Nuh, processor performance is actually quite OK on the @c1vhosting storage VPS. Sadly the rest is utterly crappy. But not the processor & memory.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @jsg said:

    @cybertech said:

    i bet its @c1vhosting

    Nuh, processor performance is actually quite OK on the @c1vhosting storage VPS. Sadly the rest is utterly crappy. But not the processor & memory.

    c1v vps fails miserably even in 360p youtube video test

  • ArirangArirang Member

    @BasToTheMax said:
    If the provider says everything is good and they're not willing to fix it

    I asked for them to investigate in detail.
    If it were another provider, I would have canceled without even submitting the ticket. One of my favorite providers, will wait for a reply

    @BasToTheMax said:
    How much are you paying for that vps? 😳😬

    5$/month

  • Petey_LongPetey_Long Barred

    @Arirang said: If it were another provider, I would have canceled without even submitting the ticket. One of my favorite providers, will wait for a reply

    I thought this was already settled?

    @Arirang said: 5$/month

    Thanked by 1sillycat
  • VoidVoid Member

    @Arirang said:

    @BasToTheMax said:
    If the provider says everything is good and they're not willing to fix it

    I asked for them to investigate in detail.
    If it were another provider, I would have canceled without even submitting the ticket. One of my favorite providers, will wait for a reply

    @BasToTheMax said:
    How much are you paying for that vps? 😳😬

    5$/month

    lol

  • egororegoror Member

    @Arirang said: 5$/month

    Sounds fair, whole lot of eighteen PREMIUM performance points per dollar.

    Thanked by 1gbzret4d
  • jsgjsg Member, Resident Benchmarker

    @dev_vps said:

    @jsg said:

    @cybertech said:

    i bet its @c1vhosting

    Nuh, processor performance is actually quite OK on the @c1vhosting storage VPS. Sadly the rest is utterly crappy. But not the processor & memory.

    c1v vps fails miserably even in 360p youtube video test

    [image]

    Sorry, I care neither about Windows nor about youtube windows tests, among other reasons because complex testing (e.g. processor/memory + some video stuff + networking) tends to provide very little information other than for one specific use case.

    Fact is that my @c1vhosting VPS's CPU performance is not bad (for the price) and better than e.g. on my @Calin VPS (also cheap).

  • bdspicebdspice Member

    @Arirang said:
    5$/month

    are you time travelling from 90's ?

  • NeoonNeoon Community Contributor, Veteran

    @Arirang said:

    @BasToTheMax said:
    How much are you paying for that vps? 😳😬

    5$/month

    I expected at least that he gonna put his 5$/m costumers on less crowded nodes.
    Instead he puts them on the same overcrowded nodes with the people that pay him 9€/y.

    Ask for a refund.

  • suutsuut Member

    This should not be a score of $5 per month for VPS. Reinstall the system and run yabs.sh

  • defaultdefault Veteran

    @Arirang - please tell us who that provider is. Black Friday is coming soon and that provider might advertise around here soon.

  • ArirangArirang Member
    edited October 2024

    With my detail information, they admit this is not right thing and offer to migration to another node.
    Before migration I just reinstall os then performance is back to normal, even disk speed getting better. I have the exact same vm on different hypervisor with them which is okay since I bought. Two vms have been idling for 2 month. It is weird that only one of the two devices performed poorly.

    Anyway it's okay now. Let me see how things go. I may later mention providers name if the same thing happens.

  • BigDongLongBigDongLong Member

    boomer host

  • JasonMJasonM Member

    massivegrid? or ihostart?

  • egororegoror Member

    @Arirang said: Two vms have been idling for 2 month. It is weird that only one of the two devices performed poorly.

    I sometimes experiment on my idlers and forget about it. Might be the case.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member

    @Arirang said:

    I may later mention providers name if the same thing happens.

    is it Shockhosting 
2gb/30gb ssd/2TB 
5$ / month
  • gbzret4dgbzret4d Member

    @Arirang Now it's later. Please tell us the provider

Sign In or Register to comment.