Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

FameSystems.de | UTB-SALE | AMD EPYC 9754 | DDR5 RAM | NVMe | 9,00€ /Monthly | 90,00€ /Annually

145791012

Comments

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited October 2024

    @thoiht said:

    @gemini90 said:

    I tried other servers and found that the upload speed are never as good as you mentioned (except London and Amsterdam). Above are some example, can I assume that it's the server issue?

    No, you can't expect the speed from Germany to another country in Europe is the same as to countries in different continents.

    The speed test result depends on the speed and location of the server you choose. You should choose servers with good internet speed to test.

    I'm just comparing to what @dev_vps has shown above, not comparing among server locations.
    Thanks anyway.

    I am based in Texas .... here is speed test for Dallas Texas
    image

    an here is speed test with server at Port Blair, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India
    image

    Bombay / Mumbai, India
    image

    Singapore

    image

    Thanked by 1thoiht
  • @thoiht said:

    There will be any problem with the unlicensed Window Server in the future?
    And will it affect the performance?

    I always recommend having proper licensing or use in Evaluation mode

    Thanked by 1thoiht
  • @FameSystems said:

    More than half of the packages have already been sold and there are not many left.
    So if you want to get one before they are out of stock, you should hurry.

    https://famesystems.de/product/rootserver/unleash-the-beast-sale

    Running VS Code, SQl Server DB Server Engine, and SSMS
    basically Windows RDP with dev machine

    Thanked by 2thoiht Frameworks
  • FameSystemsFameSystems Member, Patron Provider

    @dev_vps said:

    @FameSystems said:

    More than half of the packages have already been sold and there are not many left.
    So if you want to get one before they are out of stock, you should hurry.

    https://famesystems.de/product/rootserver/unleash-the-beast-sale

    Running VS Code, SQl Server DB Server Engine, and SSMS
    basically Windows RDP with dev machine

    Are you satisfied with the server so far?

  • @FameSystems said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @FameSystems said:

    More than half of the packages have already been sold and there are not many left.
    So if you want to get one before they are out of stock, you should hurry.

    https://famesystems.de/product/rootserver/unleash-the-beast-sale

    Running VS Code, SQl Server DB Server Engine, and SSMS
    basically Windows RDP with dev machine

    Are you satisfied with the server so far?

  • @FameSystems said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @FameSystems said:

    More than half of the packages have already been sold and there are not many left.
    So if you want to get one before they are out of stock, you should hurry.

    https://famesystems.de/product/rootserver/unleash-the-beast-sale

    Running VS Code, SQl Server DB Server Engine, and SSMS
    basically Windows RDP with dev machine

    Are you satisfied with the server so far?

    Running query to pull in 10 million rows and displaying all the rows in the data grid in SSMS. I think, the screenshot explains the rest very well pictorially

  • @egoror said:
    It's a bit weird your numbers are lower than yabs, are you running speedtest directly on server or you are running it locally via e.g. vpn to server?

    Yes, I ran the test directly from my vps, via IE explorer. I'm confused about the result :s

  • @thoiht said:

    @egoror said:
    It's a bit weird your numbers are lower than yabs, are you running speedtest directly on server or you are running it locally via e.g. vpn to server?

    Yes, I ran the test directly from my vps, via IE explorer. I'm confused about the result :s

    Use speedtest windows app ... do not take browser based results as 100% as there are other factors involved

    The other option to run speedtest in WSL.

    Thanked by 1thoiht
  • @thoiht said: IE explorer

    I hope you mean Edge

    Thanked by 2Frameworks thoiht
  • @FameSystems
    Phantom was a while ago 14,90€ if i remember correct.
    Could you change it, cause right now its 17,90€

  • FameSystemsFameSystems Member, Patron Provider
    edited October 2024

    @gbzret4d said:
    @FameSystems
    Phantom was a while ago 14,90€ if i remember correct.
    Could you change it, cause right now its 17,90€

    was a completely different CPU and DDR4 RAM from an old offer. This here is the AMD EPYC™ 9004 SERIES with DDR5 RAM and PCie 5.0 NVMe. That's why it's more „expensive“.

    Thanked by 1gbzret4d
  • ehabehab Member
    edited October 2024

    @FameSystems said:

    @gbzret4d said:
    @FameSystems
    Phantom was a while ago 14,90€ if i remember correct.
    Could you change it, cause right now its 17,90€

    was a completely different CPU and DDR4 RAM from an old offer. This here is the AMD EPYC™ 9004 SERIES with DDR5 RAM and PCie 5.0 NVMe. That's why it's more „expensive“.

    do it just for @gbzret4d

    she he is our dancer

  • gbzret4dgbzret4d Member
    edited October 2024

    @ehab said:

    @FameSystems said:

    @gbzret4d said:
    @FameSystems
    Phantom was a while ago 14,90€ if i remember correct.
    Could you change it, cause right now its 17,90€

    was a completely different CPU and DDR4 RAM from an old offer. This here is the AMD EPYC™ 9004 SERIES with DDR5 RAM and PCie 5.0 NVMe. That's why it's more „expensive“.

    do it just for @gbzret4d

    she he is our dancer

    the size of my titties and my belly are inverted compared to this picture here

    Thanked by 2ehab egoror
  • @FameSystems said:

    @gbzret4d said:
    @FameSystems
    Phantom was a while ago 14,90€ if i remember correct.
    Could you change it, cause right now its 17,90€

    was a completely different CPU and DDR4 RAM from an old offer. This here is the AMD EPYC™ 9004 SERIES with DDR5 RAM and PCie 5.0 NVMe. That's why it's more „expensive“.

    Thanks! I wasn't aware of that anymore. Are the vps stackable?


  • Still going strong on zero cpu steal, but gb6 performance took a hit in comparison as server gets more noisy neighbours )

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1628                          
    Multi Core      | 10752                         
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8389280
    
  • @egoror said:

    Still going strong on zero cpu steal, but gb6 performance took a hit in comparison as server gets more noisy neighbours )

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1628                          
    Multi Core      | 10752                         
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8389280
    

    GB6 score is average of many tests and it is just to get overall idea, and will vary at various times.

    Thanked by 1Frameworks
  • @dev_vps said: GB6 score is average of many tests and it is just to get overall idea, and will vary at various times.

    Not the case.

  • shootergut938shootergut938 Member
    edited October 2024

    @egoror said:

    Still going strong on zero cpu steal, but gb6 performance took a hit in comparison as server gets more noisy neighbours )

    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1628                          
    Multi Core      | 10752                         
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8389280
    
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sun Oct 20 09:34:06 CST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 5 days, 54 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core Processor
    CPU cores  : 6 @ 2246.624 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 23.5 GiB
    Swap       : 5.0 GiB
    Disk       : 294.2 GiB
    Distro     : Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS
    Kernel     : 6.8.0-45-generic
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value
                    |
    Single Core     | 1506
    Multi Core      | 6375
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8393239
    
    YABS completed in 6 min 21 sec
    

    gb6 only 1500 now :'(

  • @egoror said:

    @dev_vps said: GB6 score is average of many tests and it is just to get overall idea, and will vary at various times.

    Not the case.

    Tests Run in Geekbench 6

    The tests in GB6 focus on simulating real-world tasks, both CPU-intensive and memory-related. These are grouped into different workloads:

    1.  Image Processing:
    •   Blur: Applying Gaussian blurs to images.
    •   Face Detection: Detecting faces in images using machine learning algorithms.
    •   Image Compression: Compressing and decompressing image files (JPEG).
    •   Image Scaling: Resizing images.
    2.  Machine Learning:
    •   Object Detection: Identifying objects within images.
    •   Style Transfer: Applying artistic styles to images, like using a neural network to transfer a painting style to an image.
    3.  Data Compression:
    •   Text Compression: Compressing and decompressing large text files.
    •   SQLite: Performing database queries and operations.
    4.  Physics Simulation:
    •   Rigid Body Physics: Simulating objects interacting with each other under physical constraints.
    5.  Encryption:
    •   AES Encryption: Performing AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) encryption and decryption tasks, simulating real-world data security scenarios.
    6.  Ray Tracing:
    •   Rendering: Simulating light reflection and refraction in a virtual scene (this relates to graphical rendering tasks).
    7.  Video Processing:
    •   Background Blur: Simulating background blur effects like the bokeh effect seen in photos and videos.
    8.  PDF Rendering:
    •   Rendering PDF documents and testing how quickly a system can process and display them.
    
  • @dev_vps said: The tests in GB6 focus on simulating real-world tasks, both CPU-intensive and memory-related. These are grouped into different workloads:

    You can see in the screenshot I am also using sysbench (and several other benches behind the scenes). So your remarks about gb are irrelevant, all benchmarks show slight degradation, gb results are in line with the rest.

  • Hello I can't register on your website

  • @egoror said:

    @dev_vps said: The tests in GB6 focus on simulating real-world tasks, both CPU-intensive and memory-related. These are grouped into different workloads:

    You can see in the screenshot I am also using sysbench (and several other benches behind the scenes). So your remarks about gb are irrelevant, all benchmarks show slight degradation, gb results are in line with the rest.

    I think you will be keep looking for that magical VPS that has consistent performance as of dedicated server.

    I have mentioned before and let me repeat one more time — it is expected to have a bit of performance variance.

    So, if you need perfect consistent performance, you need a dedicated server.

    Thanked by 1thoiht
  • @egoror said:

    @thoiht said: IE explorer

    I hope you mean Edge

    Yes, it is, just my habit. I only used IE 6,7,8 simulator for testing purpose long time ago and never used Edge before.

  • @dev_vps said:
    The other option to run speedtest in WSL.

    I ran speed test in wsl and the result is just similar: about 8x Mbps (better) from Dallas and 7.x - 4x Mbps from India, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam...Still much different from yours. The difference is the much better latency.
    Can you explain me this case @FameSystems?

  • @dev_vps said:
    So, if you need perfect consistent performance, you need a dedicated server.

    Same opinion here. Except the weird difference in upload speed (which ignored by @FameSystems till now), I think the rest is so good so far. Hope that I can go long with this provider.

  • CPU Information
      Name                          AMD EPYC 9754
      Topology                      1 Processor, 6 Cores
      Identifier                    AuthenticAMD Family 25 Model 160 Stepping 2
      Base Frequency                2.25 GHz
      Maximum Frequency             0 MHz
      L1 Instruction Cache          64.0 KB x 6
      L1 Data Cache                 64.0 KB x 6
      L2 Cache                      512 KB x 6
      L3 Cache                      16.0 MB
    
    Memory Information
      Size                          24.0 GB
      Type                          RAM
    
    Benchmark Summary
      Single-Core Score             1402
      Multi-Core Score              5863
    

    hmm. ;)

  • @Strike112 said:
    I received DDR3 RAM instead, which is quite Eehh. Now I'm waiting for their response since they had promised DDR5...

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8396765

    Me too! I believe that no one will build EPYC 9754 with DDR3, but can not understand the reason why it show DDR3 in this case.
    Can you make it clear @FameSystems?

  • SilvestSilvest Member
    edited October 2024

    @thoiht said:

    @Strike112 said:
    I received DDR3 RAM instead, which is quite Eehh. Now I'm waiting for their response since they had promised DDR5...

    https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8396765

    Me too! I believe that no one will build EPYC 9754 with DDR3, but can not understand the reason why it show DDR3 in this case.
    Can you make it clear @FameSystems?

    Epyc Genoa cannot operate with DDR3.

    Why are you responding to something that has already been investigated and made clear by @FameSystems

  • Epyc 9754 is Bergamo not Genoa

  • egororegoror Member
    edited October 2024

    @dev_vps said: I think you will be keep looking for that magical VPS that has consistent performance as of dedicated server.
    I have mentioned before and let me repeat one more time — it is expected to have a bit of performance variance.
    So, if you need perfect consistent performance, you need a dedicated server.

    Why do you have to respond with something obvious to the question no one asked. No, I am not "looking for magical VPS", I just stated the fact.

    Thanked by 1thoiht
Sign In or Register to comment.