Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

FameSystems.de | UTB-SALE | AMD EPYC 9754 | DDR5 RAM | NVMe | 9,00€ /Monthly | 90,00€ /Annually

1246712

Comments

  • @hyperblast said: you recommend it for windows?

    I think I can! I'm using it as my personal desktop since almost all websites are blocked in the office. The CPU is at 16-28% when I'm using YT (720-1024p). I'm also playing a very old MMORPG inside.

  • @Frameworks said:

    @hyperblast said: you recommend it for windows?

    I think I can! I'm using it as my personal desktop since almost all websites are blocked in the office. The CPU is at 16-28% when I'm using YT (720-1024p). I'm also playing a very old MMORPG inside.

    Which plan are you using?

  • @dev_vps said: Which plan are you using?

    The Rootserver Holo.

    Thanked by 1dev_vps
  • @Frameworks said:

    @hyperblast said: you recommend it for windows?

    I think I can! I'm using it as my personal desktop since almost all websites are blocked in the office. The CPU is at 16-28% when I'm using YT (720-1024p). I'm also playing a very old MMORPG inside.

  • Disable ambient mode smh, it's a cpu hog.
    And show "Stats for nerds" (right click youtube video) to see skipped frames.

  • @egoror said:
    Disable ambient mode smh, it's a cpu hog.
    And show "Stats for nerds" (right click youtube video) to see skipped frames.

    without the ambient mode

  • @dev_vps said:

    @Frameworks said:

    @hyperblast said: you recommend it for windows?

    I think I can! I'm using it as my personal desktop since almost all websites are blocked in the office. The CPU is at 16-28% when I'm using YT (720-1024p). I'm also playing a very old MMORPG inside.

    Maybe because i'm using NM...

  • guppgupp Member
    edited October 2024

    Thanked by 1loay
  • I received DDR3 RAM instead, which is quite Eehh. Now I'm waiting for their response since they had promised DDR5...

    Thanked by 1thoiht
  • btw, 3 cores is bad for privacy, if you use windows.

    sites will think you are a bot / fraud, because 3 cores is rare case.
    2 4 8 cores is good

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited October 2024

    @gupp said:

    view frame is 955 x 537. This is not even 720p.
    1080p == 1920 x 1080

  • @Gulf said:
    btw, 3 cores is bad for privacy, if you use windows.

    sites will think you are a bot / fraud, because 3 cores is rare case.
    2 4 8 cores is good

    AMD A6-3500: Am i joke to you?

    Thanked by 1gupp
  • How do you even put Windows on it. ) Dashboard lets me only pick between Debians and Ubuntus.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited October 2024

    @Gulf said:
    btw, 3 cores is bad for privacy, if you use windows.

    sites will think you are a bot / fraud, because 3 cores is rare case.
    2 4 8 cores is good

    How would sites know if the client machine is 3 vCores or 4 vCores?

    This is not accurate, just how much is available to the browser session

    console.log(navigator.hardwareConcurrency);
    
    Thanked by 1ralf
  • GulfGulf Member
    edited October 2024

    @dev_vps said:

    console.log(navigator.hardwareConcurrency);

    Yes, this is a strong signal. If you have 3 cores, then you are probably from a virtual server.

    How many cores does it show on this server?
    Maybe Chrome has implemented a privacy fix.

  • FameSystemsFameSystems Member, Patron Provider

    @Strike112 said:
    I received DDR3 RAM instead, which is quite Eehh. Now I'm waiting for their response since they had promised DDR5...

    I want to clarify that we do not offer any servers with DDR3 RAM in our portfolio. We exclusively use DDR4 and DDR5 host systems.

    It’s possible that there was a misunderstanding and you might mean a DDR4 server instead? If there was an error that caused you to be directed to a DDR4 server instead of a DDR5 server, someone from our team will promptly address the issue in the ticketing system.

  • How much for additional IPv4 ?

  • FameSystemsFameSystems Member, Patron Provider

    @Caztiel said:
    How much for additional IPv4 ?

    1,00 € /Mo.

  • FameSystemsFameSystems Member, Patron Provider

    @FameSystems said:

    @Strike112 said:
    I received DDR3 RAM instead, which is quite Eehh. Now I'm waiting for their response since they had promised DDR5...

    I want to clarify that we do not offer any servers with DDR3 RAM in our portfolio. We exclusively use DDR4 and DDR5 host systems.

    It’s possible that there was a misunderstanding and you might mean a DDR4 server instead? If there was an error that caused you to be directed to a DDR4 server instead of a DDR5 server, someone from our team will promptly address the issue in the ticketing system.

    Our team has checked it. I don't know where you got your information from, but you are on the correct host system...

    Memory Device
    Array Handle: 0x003E
    Error Information Handle: 0x0079
    Total Width: 80 bits
    Data Width: 64 bits
    Size: 96 GB
    Form Factor: DIMM
    Set: None
    Locator: DIMM_P0_L1
    Bank Locator: BANK 1
    Type: DDR5
    Type Detail: Synchronous Registered (Buffered)
    Speed: 4800 MT/s
    Manufacturer: Samsung
    Serial Number: 0466F883
    Asset Tag: Not Specified
    Part Number: M321RYGA0BB0-CQKBH
    Rank: 2
    Configured Memory Speed: 4800 MT/s
    Minimum Voltage: 1.1 V
    Maximum Voltage: 1.1 V
    Configured Voltage: 1.1 V
    Memory Technology: DRAM
    Memory Operating Mode Capability: Volatile memory
    Firmware Version: Unknown
    Module Manufacturer ID: Bank 1, Hex 0xCE
    Module Product ID: Unknown
    Memory Subsystem Controller Manufacturer ID: Unknown
    Memory Subsystem Controller Product ID: Unknown
    Non-Volatile Size: None
    Volatile Size: 96 GB
    Cache Size: None
    Logical Size: None

    This is DDR5 RAM and not DDR3. The AMD EPYC 9754 CPU cannot be operated with DDR3 RAM as it is designed exclusively for DDR4 or DDR5 memory. Therefore, the information you have received is incorrect.

  • Is the/64-IPv6 subnet routed?

  • @FameSystems
    Can I still install Windows if I've picked "Linux" on purchase and how? Dashboard only gives a choice of Debian/Ubuntu.

  • @FameSystems Are you going to address the CPU related questions? Or selectively ignoring those?

  • FameSystemsFameSystems Member, Patron Provider

    @remy said:

    @FameSystems said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @dev_vps @emgh @ehab @Mumbly famesystems recommended?

    It is NOT in my recommended list yet.

    We noticed your message in the forum and wanted to address it directly. We’re a bit surprised by your post since you’ve been a customer with us for a while and haven’t raised any issues with our support team so far.

    If you’re disappointed that we couldn’t upgrade your server to a completely different system for free, we understand that frustration. However, we’d like to clarify that our offers are based on the terms agreed upon. It seems more like an attempt to pressure us into providing services outside of what was originally discussed.

    We also want to point out that our ticket system is always open for you to ask questions or make special requests. We’re happy to assist if you approach us in a respectful and cooperative way. Trying to push us into making decisions through a forum post like this isn’t the right path.

    We value your business and would like to resolve this. Please reach out through the proper channels, and we’ll do our best to find a fair solution.

    Your answer here makes perfect sense
    Too bad you didn't give a clear answer about the CPU usage policy.
    Knowing that there are complaints here about CPU steal from previous offers

    Does this mean that:
    No limit on CPU usage, but it's quite possible that CPU steal is present and we won't do anything about it? (And that’s fine for some)

    Do you still take action against important abuses such as mining?

    In my opinion, it would give a better image to answer these questions rather than ignoring and would help those who wish to install a somewhat legitimate workload on these plans

    That's just my opinion. 🙂

    We want to clarify some misconceptions about the CPU usage policy.

    The limit for the CPU usage is 100% which should be obvious. As mentioned on our last thread, our KVM servers use shared CPU cores. But we have a load balance system, that ensures an even distribution across all our Host systems. This System ensures that every customer gets the adequate performance they pay for, because we avoid overselling.

    The load balancer monitors the load on every Host system. If the load on a host system is too high, the load balancer migrates the server that need more resources to a host system with less load (live migration). This guarantees that all customers receive the resources they pay for.

    The threshold here is around 50% CPU usage per host system, so that the right performance is also available during peaks.

    We definitely take actions against important abuses. In Cybr's case, we saw a CPU usage of over 100% (regularly around 110%) over a period of multiple days. Our current policy states, that we will suspend users that use that much over a longer period of time. But in the case of Cybr we didn't want to suspend him, without knowing why he uses 110%. So we just limited his server. He opened a ticket, and we asked him why he uses that much, but he couldn't give us a reason. We rarely limit/suspend someone, but using 110% over a longer period is not fair.

    We know that our terms and conditions currently do not include that we limit servers in case of too high utilization, and that our current statement about blocking is too vague. Since we want our policies to be transparent, we will adapt our T&Cs to describe the case of limiting and specify at what usage exactly.

    We want our customers to have an environment where they can use all the resources they pay for, without affecting others. Excessive overuse, particularly without justification, is nothing we can support. We encourage open communication, and if Cybr had given a clear reason for this excessive use, we would have been willing to find a solution.

    We appreciate your understanding, and we will continue to work on improving our transparency. If you have any further questions, please feel free to reach out to us directly.

  • German dedicated (v)Cores strikes again.

    Thanked by 2loay BigDongLong
  • @FameSystems said:

    @remy said:

    @FameSystems said:

    @dev_vps said:

    @hyperblast said:

    @dev_vps @emgh @ehab @Mumbly famesystems recommended?

    It is NOT in my recommended list yet.

    We noticed your message in the forum and wanted to address it directly. We’re a bit surprised by your post since you’ve been a customer with us for a while and haven’t raised any issues with our support team so far.

    If you’re disappointed that we couldn’t upgrade your server to a completely different system for free, we understand that frustration. However, we’d like to clarify that our offers are based on the terms agreed upon. It seems more like an attempt to pressure us into providing services outside of what was originally discussed.

    We also want to point out that our ticket system is always open for you to ask questions or make special requests. We’re happy to assist if you approach us in a respectful and cooperative way. Trying to push us into making decisions through a forum post like this isn’t the right path.

    We value your business and would like to resolve this. Please reach out through the proper channels, and we’ll do our best to find a fair solution.

    Your answer here makes perfect sense
    Too bad you didn't give a clear answer about the CPU usage policy.
    Knowing that there are complaints here about CPU steal from previous offers

    Does this mean that:
    No limit on CPU usage, but it's quite possible that CPU steal is present and we won't do anything about it? (And that’s fine for some)

    Do you still take action against important abuses such as mining?

    In my opinion, it would give a better image to answer these questions rather than ignoring and would help those who wish to install a somewhat legitimate workload on these plans

    That's just my opinion. 🙂

    We want to clarify some misconceptions about the CPU usage policy.

    The limit for the CPU usage is 100% which should be obvious. As mentioned on our last thread, our KVM servers use shared CPU cores. But we have a load balance system, that ensures an even distribution across all our Host systems. This System ensures that every customer gets the adequate performance they pay for, because we avoid overselling.

    The load balancer monitors the load on every Host system. If the load on a host system is too high, the load balancer migrates the server that need more resources to a host system with less load (live migration). This guarantees that all customers receive the resources they pay for.

    The threshold here is around 50% CPU usage per host system, so that the right performance is also available during peaks.

    We definitely take actions against important abuses. In Cybr's case, we saw a CPU usage of over 100% (regularly around 110%) over a period of multiple days. Our current policy states, that we will suspend users that use that much over a longer period of time. But in the case of Cybr we didn't want to suspend him, without knowing why he uses 110%. So we just limited his server. He opened a ticket, and we asked him why he uses that much, but he couldn't give us a reason. We rarely limit/suspend someone, but using 110% over a longer period is not fair.

    We know that our terms and conditions currently do not include that we limit servers in case of too high utilization, and that our current statement about blocking is too vague. Since we want our policies to be transparent, we will adapt our T&Cs to describe the case of limiting and specify at what usage exactly.

    We want our customers to have an environment where they can use all the resources they pay for, without affecting others. Excessive overuse, particularly without justification, is nothing we can support. We encourage open communication, and if Cybr had given a clear reason for this excessive use, we would have been willing to find a solution.

    We appreciate your understanding, and we will continue to work on improving our transparency. If you have any further questions, please feel free to reach out to us directly.

    Thanks for the detailled explanation
    Seems more legit now

  • MorphmasterMorphmaster Member
    edited October 2024

    @FameSystems said: The limit for the CPU usage is 100% which should be obvious. As mentioned on our last thread, our KVM servers use shared CPU cores. But we have a load balance system, that ensures an even distribution across all our Host systems. This System ensures that every customer gets the adequate performance they pay for, because we avoid overselling.

    @FameSystems said:

    @Gulf said:
    custom iso supported? cpu usage limits?

    CPU limit is 100% :wink:

    So, we can't actually use 100% as we will be suspended per your policy? It pains me to jump on the band wagon here - but would appreciate some clarity.

    Performance so far as been great, I use BOINC to avoid excessive idling and to do some good, so my CPU use is 80% ish.

    "Dedicated resources (KVM Virtualization)"

  • @Morphmaster said: "Dedicated resources (KVM Virtualization)"

    It's not dedicated. No idea why they keep calling it that when it's already a solid offer as is.

  • Agreed - I'm not mad, but I will be if I am suspended for using too many of my dedicated resources when they are not actually dedicated.

  • @dev_vps said:

    @remy said:

    Too bad you didn't give a clear answer about the CPU usage policy.
    Knowing that there are complaints here about CPU steal from previous offers

    Does this mean that:
    No limit on CPU usage, but it's quite possible that CPU steal is present and we won't do anything about it? (And that’s fine for some)

    I believe, the cpu resource is not dedicated, but unmetered.

    @FameSystems , please correct me if I am wrong here.

    @FameSystems has confirmed in his post, what I mentioned yesterday.

  • dev_vpsdev_vps Member
    edited October 2024

    @gupp said:

    Here is a proper 1080p video test.

    1440p video test

    2160p (aka 4k) video test

    Thanked by 2gupp Frameworks
Sign In or Register to comment.