FameSystems.de | UTB-SALE | AMD EPYC 9754 | DDR5 RAM | NVMe | 9,00€ /Monthly | 90,00€ /Annually

seandev · October 2024

@remy said:

@FameSystems said:

@Gulf said:
custom iso supported? cpu usage limits?

CPU limit is 100%

If you say that, you'll attract crypto miners.
And I imagine that at that price, resources aren't dedicated.

So that means CPU steal for the others.

I think they already attracted some miners when I read Cybr's reply.

Morphmaster · October 2024

@Cybr said:

@Freek said:

@FameSystems said:

@Gulf said:
custom iso supported? cpu usage limits?

CPU limit is 100%

Hang on, so I can blast these 3 cores 24/7 at 100% load?

They say there's no CPU limit, but if you actually try to use even 50% of the "dedicated CPU", you get constant very high steal due to CPU limiting, and if you create a ticket about the steal, they simply ignore the ticket forever.

If you don't just want to idle with the CPU they are marketing as "100% dedicated" in both their LET sales threads, you will be very disappointed. I'd recommend any of the other German providers who have similar offers from the same data center over this one, as they don't falsely market resources as dedicated, and actually respond to tickets and make an effort to resolve issues.

Example 12 core server from them marketed as dedicated resources:

At this time I am not able to replicate any CPU steal, I am migrating primarily because of high steal from another provider

Cybr · October 2024

@seandev said:

@remy said:

@FameSystems said:

@Gulf said:
custom iso supported? cpu usage limits?

CPU limit is 100%

If you say that, you'll attract crypto miners.
And I imagine that at that price, resources aren't dedicated.

So that means CPU steal for the others.

I think they already attracted some miners when I read Cybr's reply.

It's possible my server was put on a node full of miners, but when building a linux kernel or doing literally anything that uses CPU, it's obvious that the CPU is being throttled and is not just a case of the node being overloaded.

My expectations of low end providers are not exactly high, but I've had more satisfactory experiences with even some of the worst providers that everyone knows to avoid, even they don't just ignore tickets.

seandev · October 2024

@Cybr said:

@seandev said:

@remy said:

@FameSystems said:

@Gulf said:
custom iso supported? cpu usage limits?

CPU limit is 100%

If you say that, you'll attract crypto miners.
And I imagine that at that price, resources aren't dedicated.

So that means CPU steal for the others.

I think they already attracted some miners when I read Cybr's reply.

It's possible my server was put on a node full of miners, but when building a linux kernel or doing literally anything that uses CPU, it's obvious that the CPU is being throttled and is not just a case of the node being overloaded.

My expectations of low end providers are not exactly high, but I've had more satisfactory experiences with even some of the worst providers that everyone knows to avoid, even they don't just ignore tickets.

It's unfair to other customers to use miners on a hosting service like this. I think you're just not the audience they're trying to reach.

Cybr · October 2024

@Morphmaster said:

@Cybr said:

@Freek said:

@FameSystems said:

@Gulf said:
custom iso supported? cpu usage limits?

CPU limit is 100%

Hang on, so I can blast these 3 cores 24/7 at 100% load?

They say there's no CPU limit, but if you actually try to use even 50% of the "dedicated CPU", you get constant very high steal due to CPU limiting, and if you create a ticket about the steal, they simply ignore the ticket forever.

If you don't just want to idle with the CPU they are marketing as "100% dedicated" in both their LET sales threads, you will be very disappointed. I'd recommend any of the other German providers who have similar offers from the same data center over this one, as they don't falsely market resources as dedicated, and actually respond to tickets and make an effort to resolve issues.

Example 12 core server from them marketed as dedicated resources:

At this time I am not able to replicate any CPU steal, I am migrating primarily because of high steal from another provider

Enjoy it while it lasts.

Seemed good for me at first too, though I did leave it idle for weeks when I first got it.

Cybr · October 2024

@seandev said:

@Cybr said:

@seandev said:

@remy said:

@FameSystems said:

@Gulf said:
custom iso supported? cpu usage limits?

CPU limit is 100%

If you say that, you'll attract crypto miners.
And I imagine that at that price, resources aren't dedicated.

So that means CPU steal for the others.

I think they already attracted some miners when I read Cybr's reply.

It's possible my server was put on a node full of miners, but when building a linux kernel or doing literally anything that uses CPU, it's obvious that the CPU is being throttled and is not just a case of the node being overloaded.

My expectations of low end providers are not exactly high, but I've had more satisfactory experiences with even some of the worst providers that everyone knows to avoid, even they don't just ignore tickets.

It's unfair to other customers to use miners on a hosting service like this. I think you're just not the audience they're trying to reach.

I'm not mining, not sure what would give you that impression.

If they are marketing their servers as "100% dedicated CPU", is it unreasonable to expect to be able to use more than 30% of the CPU?

seandev · October 2024

@Cybr said:

@seandev said:

@Cybr said:

@seandev said:

@remy said:

@FameSystems said:

@Gulf said:
custom iso supported? cpu usage limits?

CPU limit is 100%

If you say that, you'll attract crypto miners.
And I imagine that at that price, resources aren't dedicated.

So that means CPU steal for the others.

I think they already attracted some miners when I read Cybr's reply.

It's possible my server was put on a node full of miners, but when building a linux kernel or doing literally anything that uses CPU, it's obvious that the CPU is being throttled and is not just a case of the node being overloaded.

My expectations of low end providers are not exactly high, but I've had more satisfactory experiences with even some of the worst providers that everyone knows to avoid, even they don't just ignore tickets.

It's unfair to other customers to use miners on a hosting service like this. I think you're just not the audience they're trying to reach.

I'm not mining, not sure what would give you that impression.

If they are marketing their servers as "100% dedicated CPU", is it unreasonable to expect to be able to use more than 30% of the CPU?

I never really used more than 70% continuous for more than 5h, so my assumption came because I never got limited by them and I think, if you actually get limited by them that you had such a high continuous usage that they did this by hand.

momwio · October 2024

Very nice control panel, this is my first vps using ddr5 memory, it will replace some of my current vps!

remy · October 2024

@seandev said:

@Cybr said:

@seandev said:

@Cybr said:

@seandev said:

@remy said:

@FameSystems said:

@Gulf said:
custom iso supported? cpu usage limits?

CPU limit is 100%

If you say that, you'll attract crypto miners.
And I imagine that at that price, resources aren't dedicated.

So that means CPU steal for the others.

I think they already attracted some miners when I read Cybr's reply.

It's possible my server was put on a node full of miners, but when building a linux kernel or doing literally anything that uses CPU, it's obvious that the CPU is being throttled and is not just a case of the node being overloaded.

My expectations of low end providers are not exactly high, but I've had more satisfactory experiences with even some of the worst providers that everyone knows to avoid, even they don't just ignore tickets.

It's unfair to other customers to use miners on a hosting service like this. I think you're just not the audience they're trying to reach.

I'm not mining, not sure what would give you that impression.

If they are marketing their servers as "100% dedicated CPU", is it unreasonable to expect to be able to use more than 30% of the CPU?

I never really used more than 70% continuous for more than 5h, so my assumption came because I never got limited by them and I think, if you actually get limited by them that you had such a high continuous usage that they did this by hand.

Do you monitor CPU steal ?

tenpera · October 2024

RAM to +3 GB DDR5 RAM LIFETIME! is over now?

Cybr · October 2024

@seandev said:

@Cybr said:

@seandev said:

@Cybr said:

@seandev said:

@remy said:

@FameSystems said:

@Gulf said:
custom iso supported? cpu usage limits?

CPU limit is 100%

If you say that, you'll attract crypto miners.
And I imagine that at that price, resources aren't dedicated.

So that means CPU steal for the others.

I think they already attracted some miners when I read Cybr's reply.

It's possible my server was put on a node full of miners, but when building a linux kernel or doing literally anything that uses CPU, it's obvious that the CPU is being throttled and is not just a case of the node being overloaded.

My expectations of low end providers are not exactly high, but I've had more satisfactory experiences with even some of the worst providers that everyone knows to avoid, even they don't just ignore tickets.

It's unfair to other customers to use miners on a hosting service like this. I think you're just not the audience they're trying to reach.

I'm not mining, not sure what would give you that impression.

If they are marketing their servers as "100% dedicated CPU", is it unreasonable to expect to be able to use more than 30% of the CPU?

I never really used more than 70% continuous for more than 5h, so my assumption came because I never got limited by them and I think, if you actually get limited by them that you had such a high continuous usage that they did this by hand.

I read the terms of every provider that has compelling offers on LET, and avoid any with terms that are excessively restrictive, and terms like "we can arbitrarily decide to limit you at any time based on how we feel on that day".

Knowing what resources you are purchasing and what kinds of workloads are suitable for offers is essential in order to avoid any risk of breaching terms or having your servers throttled and the services you are hosting being impacted.

If usage was too high for some period, they should have said "Hey, I know we are marketing this server as '100% dedicated CPU', and don't have any terms dictating limits on CPU usage, but you actually aren't allowed to use more than 30% of the CPU."

Being dishonest with offers to get sales, then imposing limits and ignoring tickets when a customer actually uses the resources they purchased is simply not an acceptable way to conduct business.

Dasabo · October 2024

@Cybr said:

@seandev said:

@Cybr said:

@seandev said:

@Cybr said:

@seandev said:

@remy said:

@FameSystems said:

@Gulf said:
custom iso supported? cpu usage limits?

CPU limit is 100%

If you say that, you'll attract crypto miners.
And I imagine that at that price, resources aren't dedicated.

So that means CPU steal for the others.

I think they already attracted some miners when I read Cybr's reply.

It's possible my server was put on a node full of miners, but when building a linux kernel or doing literally anything that uses CPU, it's obvious that the CPU is being throttled and is not just a case of the node being overloaded.

My expectations of low end providers are not exactly high, but I've had more satisfactory experiences with even some of the worst providers that everyone knows to avoid, even they don't just ignore tickets.

It's unfair to other customers to use miners on a hosting service like this. I think you're just not the audience they're trying to reach.

I'm not mining, not sure what would give you that impression.

If they are marketing their servers as "100% dedicated CPU", is it unreasonable to expect to be able to use more than 30% of the CPU?

I never really used more than 70% continuous for more than 5h, so my assumption came because I never got limited by them and I think, if you actually get limited by them that you had such a high continuous usage that they did this by hand.

I read the terms of every provider that has compelling offers on LET, and avoid any with terms that are excessively restrictive, and terms like "we can arbitrarily decide to limit you at any time based on how we feel on that day".

Knowing what resources you are purchasing and what kinds of workloads are suitable for offers is essential in order to avoid any risk of breaching terms or having your servers throttled and the services you are hosting being impacted.

If usage was too high for some period, they should have said "Hey, I know we are marketing this server as '100% dedicated CPU', and don't have any terms dictating limits on CPU usage, but you actually aren't allowed to use more than 30% of the CPU."

Being dishonest with offers to get sales, then imposing limits and ignoring tickets when a customer actually uses the resources they purchased is simply not an acceptable way to conduct business.

I think it is even worse, to say that the resources are dedicated is a no small statement that must be respected, if this does not happen ‘it could’ and I use the conditional intentionally be fraud.

Ght · October 2024

LOL terms

"we can arbitrarily decide to limit you at any time based on how we feel on that day".

Comunist Web Hoster in Germany

concept · October 2024

After what happened with dataforest, I don't trust hosts that say that resources are dedicated. There is no way it can be dedicated with that low price.

dev_vps · October 2024

@FameSystems said:

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1645
Multi Core | 7161
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8310954

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Basic System Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 CPU Model          : AMD EPYC 7443 24-Core Processor
 CPU Cores          : 3 @ 2849.998 MHz
 CPU Cache          : 512 KB
 AES-NI             : ✔ Enabled
 VM-x/AMD-V         : ✔ Enabled
 Total Disk         : 145.5 GB (1.7 GB Used)
 Total RAM          : 11.7 GB (93.7 MB Used)
 Total Swap         : 1024.0 MB (0 Used)
 System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 29 min![](https://i.ibb.co/7pBCrfq/Screenshot-2024-10-14-045138.jpg "")
![](https://i.ibb.co/7pBCrfq/Screenshot-2024-10-14-045138.jpg "")

 OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
 Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
 Kernel             : 5.10.0-33-amd64
 Virtualization     : KVM
 TCP Control        : cubic
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Basic Network Info
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Primary Network    : IPv6
 IPv6 Access        : ✔ Online
 IPv4 Access        : ✔ Online
 ISP                : Oliver Horscht is trading as \
 ASN                : AS44486 Oliver Horscht is trading as \
 Host               : FameSystems GmbH & Co. KG
 Location           : Frankfurt am Main, Hesse-HE, Germany
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sda3):
 ---------------------------------
 Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
 Read       | 244.50 MB/s  (61.1k) | 1.96 GB/s    (30.7k)
 Write      | 245.14 MB/s  (61.2k) | 1.97 GB/s    (30.9k)
 Total      | 489.64 MB/s (122.4k) | 3.94 GB/s    (61.7k)
            |                      |
 Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
   ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
 Read       | 5.14 GB/s    (10.0k) | 6.15 GB/s     (6.0k)
 Write      | 5.41 GB/s    (10.5k) | 6.55 GB/s     (6.4k)
 Total      | 10.56 GB/s   (20.6k) | 12.71 GB/s   (12.4k)

 iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
 ---------------------------------
 Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
 -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
 Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.82 Gbits/sec  | 1.94 Gbits/sec  | 11.4 ms
 Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.05 Gbits/sec  | 1.98 Gbits/sec  | 7.70 ms
 Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 830 Mbits/sec   | 1.86 Gbits/sec  | 79.1 ms
 Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 287 Mbits/sec   | 834 Mbits/sec   | 156 ms
 Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 341 Mbits/sec   | 1.00 Gbits/sec  | 143 ms
 Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 441 Mbits/sec   | 1.48 Gbits/sec  | 81.9 ms
 Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 318 Mbits/sec   | 892 Mbits/sec   | 196 ms

 iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
 ---------------------------------
 Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
 -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
 Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 1.93 Gbits/sec  | 1.88 Gbits/sec  | 11.5 ms
 Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 2.04 Gbits/sec  | 1.86 Gbits/sec  | 7.35 ms
 Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 653 Mbits/sec   | 1.33 Gbits/sec  | 79.0 ms
 Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 372 Mbits/sec   | 1.08 Gbits/sec  | 156 ms
 Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | busy            | 1.09 Gbits/sec  | 142 ms
 Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 436 Mbits/sec   | 1.74 Gbits/sec  | 81.8 ms
 Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 355 Mbits/sec   | 877 Mbits/sec   | 195 ms

 Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
 ---------------------------------
 Test            | Value
                 |
 Single Core     | 1122
 Multi Core      | 3063
 Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22962808

 Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
 ---------------------------------
 Test            | Value
                 |
 Single Core     | 1391
 Multi Core      | 3390
 Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8312646

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server

 Frankfurt, DE      0.77 ms   0.0%    1891.77 Mbps  2080.49 Mbps   Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main
 Amsterdam, NL      7.93 ms   0.0%    1973.39 Mbps  1888.20 Mbps   31173 Services AB - Amsterdam
 Paris, FR         11.61 ms   N/A     1986.82 Mbps  1523.79 Mbps   Axione - Paris
 London, UK        11.28 ms   0.0%    1926.23 Mbps  1452.14 Mbps   VeloxServ Communications - London
 Warsaw, PL        22.37 ms   0.0%    1944.93 Mbps   746.02 Mbps    Play - Warszawa
 Kyiv, UA          33.19 ms   0.0%    1968.30 Mbps   583.77 Mbps    O3 - Kyiv
 Bucharest, RO     27.17 ms   0.0%    1955.97 Mbps   570.88 Mbps    Vodafone Romania Fixed – Bucharest

 Dallas, US       117.75 ms   0.0%    1892.94 Mbps   326.08 Mbps    i3D.net - Dallas, TX
 Houston, TX      121.55 ms   0.0%    1902.83 Mbps   320.17 Mbps    Ezee Fiber - Houston, TX
 Chicago, IL      108.12 ms   0.0%    1916.52 Mbps   274.59 Mbps    Enzu.com - Chicago, IL
 Miami, US        114.21 ms   N/A     1940.07 Mbps   337.73 Mbps    Dish Wireless - Miami, FL
 New York, NY     80.80 ms    0.0%    1920.38 Mbps   397.39 Mbps    Surfshark Ltd - New York, NY
 Miami, FL        105.83 ms   0.0%    1932.84 Mbps   369.58 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Miami, FL
 Spokane, WA      156.94 ms   0.0%    1902.52 Mbps   236.38 Mbps    Crunchbits - Spokane, WA
 Seattle, WA      157.25 ms   0.0%    1949.24 Mbps   250.84 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Seattle, WA
 Los Angeles, US  141.94 ms   0.0%    1888.61 Mbps   278.73 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
 San Jose, CA     141.24 ms   0.0%    1607.54 Mbps   234.17 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - San Jose, CA

 Bangalore, IN    126.12 ms   0.0%    1925.74 Mbps   300.46 Mbps    Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
 Chennai, IN      149.52 ms   N/A     1934.94 Mbps   289.60 Mbps    Jio - Chennai
 Mumbai, IN       115.75 ms   0.0%    1914.43 Mbps   342.69 Mbps    i3D.net - Mumbai
 Mumbai, MH       139.44 ms   N/A     1773.38 Mbps   276.11 Mbps    Jio - Rajkot
 Delhi, IN        158.66 ms   0.0%    1974.00 Mbps   247.99 Mbps    Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi

 Jeddah, SA       78.56 ms    0.0%    1996.79 Mbps   394.10 Mbps    Saudi Telecom Company
 Dubai, AE        180.55 ms   0.0%    1592.04 Mbps   273.77 Mbps    du - Dubai

 Hong Kong        203.87 ms   N/A     1952.04 Mbps   226.70 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Hong Kong
 Sydney           328.19 ms   0.0%    1705.86 Mbps   176.67 Mbps    Telstra - Sydney
 Perth            274.14 ms   0.0%    613.58 Mbps    143.39 Mbps    Aussie Broadband - Perth

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Avg DL Speed       : 1852.92 Mbps
 Avg UL Speed       :  530.51 Mbps
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is considerable difference in GB6 singel core score ...
@FameSystems -- are the vCores really dedicated?

Frameworks · October 2024

202416234

Additional ram, please! Thank you!

dev_vps · October 2024

@FameSystems
I see the reason for the GB6 score difference

 Processor  : AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core Processor
 CPU cores  : 3 @ 2246.624 MHz

versus

 CPU Model   : AMD EPYC 7443 24-Core Processor
 CPU Cores   : 3 @ 2849.998 MHz

@FameSystems
Can you move my VDS to AMD EPYC 9754 Node?
Thanks!

radex · October 2024

@dev_vps said:
@FameSystems
I see the reason for the GB6 score difference
 Processor  : AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core Processor
 CPU cores  : 3 @ 2246.624 MHz
versus
 CPU Model   : AMD EPYC 7443 24-Core Processor
 CPU Cores   : 3 @ 2849.998 MHz
@FameSystems
Can you move my VDS to AMD EPYC 9754 Node?
Thanks!

Please note that it is not possible to upgrade a purchased server from one of our other sales to this offer.

dev_vps · October 2024

@radex said:
@dev_vps said:
@FameSystems
I see the reason for the GB6 score difference
 Processor  : AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core Processor
 CPU cores  : 3 @ 2246.624 MHz
versus
 CPU Model   : AMD EPYC 7443 24-Core Processor
 CPU Cores   : 3 @ 2849.998 MHz
@FameSystems
Can you move my VDS to AMD EPYC 9754 Node?
Thanks!
Please note that it is not possible to upgrade a purchased server from one of our other sales to this offer.

The request (and the questions) was addressed to @FameSystems

radex · October 2024

@dev_vps said:
@radex said:
@dev_vps said:
@FameSystems
I see the reason for the GB6 score difference
 Processor  : AMD EPYC 9754 128-Core Processor
 CPU cores  : 3 @ 2246.624 MHz
versus
 CPU Model   : AMD EPYC 7443 24-Core Processor
 CPU Cores   : 3 @ 2849.998 MHz
@FameSystems
Can you move my VDS to AMD EPYC 9754 Node?
Thanks!
Please note that it is not possible to upgrade a purchased server from one of our other sales to this offer.
The request (and the questions) was addressed to @FameSystems

Doesn´t matter, you are not more special than other customers. Read first post "Please note that it is not possible to upgrade a purchased server from one of our other sales to this offer."

dev_vps · October 2024

radex · October 2024

@dev_vps said:

@radex said:

Doesn´t matter, you are not more special than other customers.
Read first post "Please note that it is not possible to upgrade a purchased server from one of our other sales to this offer."

I am on a special @dev_vps custom plan.

Facepalm emoji is missed

dev_vps · October 2024

@radex said:

Facepalm emoji is missed

You are right.
Hopefully this will make you happy and stop trolling the offer thread

radex · October 2024

@dev_vps said:

@radex said:

Facepalm emoji is missed

You are right.
Hopefully this will make you happy and stop trolling the offer thread

Facts are trolling, maybe go outside and take some oxygen instead sitting at home 24/7

Xrmaddness · October 2024

@dev_vps, how'd you get on a node with a EPYC 7443 anyway? The offer only lists EPYC 9754

radex · October 2024

@Xrmaddness said:
@dev_vps, how'd you get on a node with a EPYC 7443 anyway? The offer only lists EPYC 9754

it was the first offer from famesystems on LET

https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/196742/famesystems-de-summer-sale-amd-epyc-kvm-server-9-00-monthly-90-00-annually/p1

dev_vps · October 2024

@Xrmaddness said:
@dev_vps, how'd you get on a node with a EPYC 7443 anyway? The offer only lists EPYC 9754

Refer to this post.
https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3998145/#Comment_3998145
I am on a different plan. (I call it custom @dev_vps plan)

3x AMD EPYC 7443P/7763 cores
12 GB DDR4 ECC RAM
150 GB NVMe RAID 10 storage
€45/year

radex · October 2024

@dev_vps said:

@Xrmaddness said:
@dev_vps, how'd you get on a node with a EPYC 7443 anyway? The offer only lists EPYC 9754

Refer to this post.
https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3998145/#Comment_3998145
I am on a different plan. (I call it custom @dev_vps plan)
3x AMD EPYC 7443P/7763 cores
12 GB DDR4 ECC RAM
150 GB NVMe RAID 10 storage
€45/year

Doesn´t matter how the plan looks like, its still one from old offer.

dev_vps · October 2024

@radex said:
@dev_vps said:

@Xrmaddness said:
@dev_vps, how'd you get on a node with a EPYC 7443 anyway? The offer only lists EPYC 9754

Refer to this post.
https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3998145/#Comment_3998145
I am on a different plan. (I call it custom @dev_vps plan)
3x AMD EPYC 7443P/7763 cores
12 GB DDR4 ECC RAM
150 GB NVMe RAID 10 storage
€45/year
Doesn´t matter how the plan looks like, its still one from old offer.

Why are you responding the post that is not addressed to you?

radex · October 2024

@dev_vps said:
@radex said:
@dev_vps said:

@Xrmaddness said:
@dev_vps, how'd you get on a node with a EPYC 7443 anyway? The offer only lists EPYC 9754

Refer to this post.
https://lowendtalk.com/discussion/comment/3998145/#Comment_3998145
I am on a different plan. (I call it custom @dev_vps plan)
3x AMD EPYC 7443P/7763 cores
12 GB DDR4 ECC RAM
150 GB NVMe RAID 10 storage
€45/year
Doesn´t matter how the plan looks like, its still one from old offer.
Why are you responding the post that is not addressed to you?

little boy is mad just because facts are in first post of this thread.

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

FameSystems.de | UTB-SALE | AMD EPYC 9754 | DDR5 RAM | NVMe | 9,00€ /Monthly | 90,00€ /Annually

Comments

202416234

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

FameSystems.de | UTB-SALE | AMD EPYC 9754 | DDR5 RAM | NVMe | 9,00€ /Monthly | 90,00€ /Annually

Comments

202416234