Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

Kimsufi/Soyoustart/OVH Rise New Price

13233353738662

Comments

  • KrisKris Member
    edited October 2024

    @Neoon said: Plus the Kimsufi has a 1gig pyhsical link, instead of some up to maybe is the weather is good 500Mbit shared with 100 people.

    1 Gig link limited to 300Mbps, on a good day. OVH oversells hard.

    Please learn what 5G UWB, 5G UC is and what QCI levels are. Did you really just equate weather to 5G service?

    I've never seen someone so confidently wrong, but goes with the LET angle. I push close or higher than 1TB on these and neither care. You both again missed the fact that 300Mbps is 'showing it's age' with speeds nowadays.

    Sure it can power your small chess website, no one said otherwise. Does my cell constantly get 3x the download speed your server can upload? Yep.

    YMMV in flyover states where DSL is the best you can get. Perhaps NYC Metro is different.

  • @freeneter said:
    You guys are sticking to the old atom servers?
    I got lucky at a disk replacment and got a 4TB instead of 1TB , so for 4.99€ with atom n2800 cpu, 2 gig ram and 4 TB Disk is not too bad. i just renewed it for a year

    I'm in a similar position – my old atom got upgraded from 0.5 to 2T when the old drive started falling apart. If it were still 0.5 I'd have probably dropped it immediately, but at 2 I might keep it around for a while as extra redundancy for some off-site backups and ahem Linux ISOs. We'll see if the 100mbps connection starts to feel limiting.

  • allthemtingsallthemtings Member, Megathread Squad

    @TomasSystems said:

    @allthemtings said:
    Did anyone go for the SYS range? It’ll be interesting to see the comparison with Kimsufi

    I picked up 2x SYS-1s mainly for vRack, both delivered with E-2236s, one in London is 10G down, and Gravelines is 1G down.

    Any chance you could post yabs from sys1 and ks4?

  • @anda said:

    @TomasSystems said:
    I picked up 2x SYS-1s mainly for vRack, both delivered with E-2236s, one in London is 10G down, and Gravelines is 1G down.

    I was wondering if we can enable intel SGX in SYS?

    No option to, but I can't remember if these CPUs had the option when they were on Advance.

  • @adns said:

    @bbn12 said:
    new offers, probably, coming soon?

    I hoppe OVH will celebrate the 25th anniversary with unbeatable offers...

    I wonder if the A in KS-A is not for Anniversary already?

  • @allthemtings said:

    @TomasSystems said:

    @allthemtings said:
    Did anyone go for the SYS range? It’ll be interesting to see the comparison with Kimsufi

    I picked up 2x SYS-1s mainly for vRack, both delivered with E-2236s, one in London is 10G down, and Gravelines is 1G down.

    Any chance you could post yabs from sys1 and ks4?

    All of these are running in prod, so have other loads on them :)

    SYS-1, 64GB, 2x 512GB - London

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon  7 Oct 13:09:16 BST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 14 days, 21 hours, 16 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) E-2236 CPU @ 3.40GHz
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 4501.092 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 62.6 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 936.7 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.8.12-2-pve
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : OVH SAS
    ASN        : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host       : OVH Ltd
    Location   : London, England (ENG)
    Country    : United Kingdom
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md0):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 627.06 MB/s (156.7k) | 1.66 GB/s    (25.9k)
    Write      | 628.71 MB/s (157.1k) | 1.67 GB/s    (26.1k)
    Total      | 1.25 GB/s   (313.9k) | 3.33 GB/s    (52.0k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.11 GB/s     (4.1k) | 2.21 GB/s     (2.1k)
    Write      | 2.22 GB/s     (4.3k) | 2.36 GB/s     (2.3k)
    Total      | 4.33 GB/s     (8.4k) | 4.57 GB/s     (4.4k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | busy            | 1.22 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 484 Mbits/sec   | 7.55 Gbits/sec  | 12.9 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 446 Mbits/sec   | 1.50 Gbits/sec  | 102 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 414 Mbits/sec   | 1.38 Gbits/sec  | 169 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 434 Mbits/sec   | 1.52 Gbits/sec  | 139 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 462 Mbits/sec   | 3.19 Gbits/sec  | 69.1 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 407 Mbits/sec   | 1.27 Gbits/sec  | 177 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1532                          
    Multi Core      | 6328                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8186673
    
    YABS completed in 9 min 2 sec
    

    SYS-1, 128GB, 2x 512GB, 2x 4TB - Gravelines

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon  7 Oct 13:09:06 BST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 21 days, 21 hours, 39 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) E-2236 CPU @ 3.40GHz
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 4500.048 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 125.6 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 8.1 TiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.8.12-1-pve
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : OVH SAS
    ASN        : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host       : OVH
    Location   : Gravelines, Hauts-de-France (HDF)
    Country    : France
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md0):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 550.86 MB/s (137.7k) | 1.49 GB/s    (23.2k)
    Write      | 552.31 MB/s (138.0k) | 1.49 GB/s    (23.4k)
    Total      | 1.10 GB/s   (275.7k) | 2.98 GB/s    (46.7k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.07 GB/s     (4.0k) | 2.28 GB/s     (2.2k)
    Write      | 2.18 GB/s     (4.2k) | 2.43 GB/s     (2.3k)
    Total      | 4.25 GB/s     (8.3k) | 4.72 GB/s     (4.6k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 490 Mbits/sec   | 940 Mbits/sec   | 3.76 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 489 Mbits/sec   | 939 Mbits/sec   | 6.67 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 461 Mbits/sec   | 886 Mbits/sec   | 101 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 379 Mbits/sec   | 739 Mbits/sec   | 247 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 265 Mbits/sec   | 846 Mbits/sec   | 142 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 411 Mbits/sec   | 852 Mbits/sec   | 78.2 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 391 Mbits/sec   | 789 Mbits/sec   | 192 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1384                          
    Multi Core      | 5282                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8186681
    
    YABS completed in 9 min 50 sec
    

    KS-4, 16GB, 2x 4TB HDD - Strasbourg

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon  7 Oct 13:11:44 BST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 28 days, 20 hours, 12 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v6 @ 3.50GHz
    CPU cores  : 8 @ 3735.276 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 15.3 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 7.2 TiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.8.12-1-pve
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : OVH SAS
    ASN        : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host       : OVH
    Location   : Strasbourg, Grand Est (GES)
    Country    : France
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md0):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.73 MB/s      (434) | 26.12 MB/s     (408)
    Write      | 1.76 MB/s      (440) | 26.61 MB/s     (415)
    Total      | 3.49 MB/s      (874) | 52.73 MB/s     (823)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 85.80 MB/s     (167) | 85.83 MB/s      (83)
    Write      | 90.36 MB/s     (176) | 91.55 MB/s      (89)
    Total      | 176.16 MB/s    (343) | 177.39 MB/s    (172)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 295 Mbits/sec   | 937 Mbits/sec   | 14.9 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 295 Mbits/sec   | 934 Mbits/sec   | 18.8 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 259 Mbits/sec   | 866 Mbits/sec   | 95.8 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 239 Mbits/sec   | 776 Mbits/sec   | 247 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 264 Mbits/sec   | 837 Mbits/sec   | 150 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 268 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 84.6 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 246 Mbits/sec   | 802 Mbits/sec   | 193 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1329                          
    Multi Core      | 4459                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8186739
    
    YABS completed in 11 min 33 sec
    
    Thanked by 1allthemtings
  • allthemtingsallthemtings Member, Megathread Squad

    @TomasSystems said:

    @allthemtings said:

    @TomasSystems said:

    @allthemtings said:
    Did anyone go for the SYS range? It’ll be interesting to see the comparison with Kimsufi

    I picked up 2x SYS-1s mainly for vRack, both delivered with E-2236s, one in London is 10G down, and Gravelines is 1G down.

    Any chance you could post yabs from sys1 and ks4?

    All of these are running in prod, so have other loads on them :)

    SYS-1, 64GB, 2x 512GB - London

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon  7 Oct 13:09:16 BST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 14 days, 21 hours, 16 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) E-2236 CPU @ 3.40GHz
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 4501.092 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 62.6 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 936.7 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.8.12-2-pve
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : OVH SAS
    ASN        : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host       : OVH Ltd
    Location   : London, England (ENG)
    Country    : United Kingdom
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md0):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 627.06 MB/s (156.7k) | 1.66 GB/s    (25.9k)
    Write      | 628.71 MB/s (157.1k) | 1.67 GB/s    (26.1k)
    Total      | 1.25 GB/s   (313.9k) | 3.33 GB/s    (52.0k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.11 GB/s     (4.1k) | 2.21 GB/s     (2.1k)
    Write      | 2.22 GB/s     (4.3k) | 2.36 GB/s     (2.3k)
    Total      | 4.33 GB/s     (8.4k) | 4.57 GB/s     (4.4k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | busy            | 1.22 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 484 Mbits/sec   | 7.55 Gbits/sec  | 12.9 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 446 Mbits/sec   | 1.50 Gbits/sec  | 102 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 414 Mbits/sec   | 1.38 Gbits/sec  | 169 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 434 Mbits/sec   | 1.52 Gbits/sec  | 139 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 462 Mbits/sec   | 3.19 Gbits/sec  | 69.1 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 407 Mbits/sec   | 1.27 Gbits/sec  | 177 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1532                          
    Multi Core      | 6328                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8186673
    
    YABS completed in 9 min 2 sec
    

    SYS-1, 128GB, 2x 512GB, 2x 4TB - Gravelines

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon  7 Oct 13:09:06 BST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 21 days, 21 hours, 39 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) E-2236 CPU @ 3.40GHz
    CPU cores  : 12 @ 4500.048 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 125.6 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 8.1 TiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.8.12-1-pve
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : OVH SAS
    ASN        : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host       : OVH
    Location   : Gravelines, Hauts-de-France (HDF)
    Country    : France
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md0):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 550.86 MB/s (137.7k) | 1.49 GB/s    (23.2k)
    Write      | 552.31 MB/s (138.0k) | 1.49 GB/s    (23.4k)
    Total      | 1.10 GB/s   (275.7k) | 2.98 GB/s    (46.7k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 2.07 GB/s     (4.0k) | 2.28 GB/s     (2.2k)
    Write      | 2.18 GB/s     (4.2k) | 2.43 GB/s     (2.3k)
    Total      | 4.25 GB/s     (8.3k) | 4.72 GB/s     (4.6k)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 490 Mbits/sec   | 940 Mbits/sec   | 3.76 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 489 Mbits/sec   | 939 Mbits/sec   | 6.67 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 461 Mbits/sec   | 886 Mbits/sec   | 101 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 379 Mbits/sec   | 739 Mbits/sec   | 247 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 265 Mbits/sec   | 846 Mbits/sec   | 142 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 411 Mbits/sec   | 852 Mbits/sec   | 78.2 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 391 Mbits/sec   | 789 Mbits/sec   | 192 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1384                          
    Multi Core      | 5282                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8186681
    
    YABS completed in 9 min 50 sec
    

    KS-4, 16GB, 2x 4TB HDD - Strasbourg

    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Mon  7 Oct 13:11:44 BST 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 28 days, 20 hours, 12 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1230 v6 @ 3.50GHz
    CPU cores  : 8 @ 3735.276 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 15.3 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 7.2 TiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.8.12-1-pve
    VM Type    : NONE
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
    
    IPv4 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : OVH SAS
    ASN        : AS16276 OVH SAS
    Host       : OVH
    Location   : Strasbourg, Grand Est (GES)
    Country    : France
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/md0):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 1.73 MB/s      (434) | 26.12 MB/s     (408)
    Write      | 1.76 MB/s      (440) | 26.61 MB/s     (415)
    Total      | 3.49 MB/s      (874) | 52.73 MB/s     (823)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 85.80 MB/s     (167) | 85.83 MB/s      (83)
    Write      | 90.36 MB/s     (176) | 91.55 MB/s      (89)
    Total      | 176.16 MB/s    (343) | 177.39 MB/s    (172)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 295 Mbits/sec   | 937 Mbits/sec   | 14.9 ms        
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 295 Mbits/sec   | 934 Mbits/sec   | 18.8 ms        
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 259 Mbits/sec   | 866 Mbits/sec   | 95.8 ms        
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 239 Mbits/sec   | 776 Mbits/sec   | 247 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 264 Mbits/sec   | 837 Mbits/sec   | 150 ms         
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 268 Mbits/sec   | busy            | 84.6 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 246 Mbits/sec   | 802 Mbits/sec   | 193 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1329                          
    Multi Core      | 4459                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8186739
    
    YABS completed in 11 min 33 sec
    

    Perfect! Thank you

  • Worth mentioning, E-2236 also turned up in Germany as well (was 1G down though), I just swapped it out for the 64GB in London since there is only around £10 difference between 32GB and 64GB.

  • @Kris said:
    OVH oversells hard.

    Mobile bandwidth is massively oversold too, by its very nature. Everyone in the same cell as you right now are in the same collision domain. If a couple of others are running high throughput stuff you rates will decrease, and at a certain point it'll fall off much more rapidly as the frequency sharing & hopping algorithms get towards the limit of what can be done.

    I've never seen someone so confidently wrong

    That is a very nice mirror you are looking at there!

    Stating that your apples are more appley then an orange does not make the orange a bad choice for people who like oranges.

    but goes with the LET angle.

    Can't disagree with you there though.

    I push close or higher than 1TB on these and neither care.

    In bursts, yes. Try transferring that much, or even 300mbps, for a significant part of a day regularly, and see what happens. I expect you'll either be throttled down to a much slower rate until your next billing period or be asked to go forth and fornicate.

    Of course if you are running a site/app intended for users who will be pulling that sort of data frequently (something involving high quality streaming or significant downloads, for instance) then you don't want a KS server, but I don't see anyone claiming that they are good for that.

  • @MeAtExampleDotCom said: Stating that your apples are more appley then an orange does not make the orange a bad choice for people who like oranges.

    Oh man.

    OVH servers are great. I said 300Mbps is showing its age when I can push 1TB/month.

    I routinely watch Neflix at 4K on Wireguard on it @MeAtExampleDotCom without getting tossed off.

    This may be different in other areas, not NYC metro.

    I'll stream this afternoon and tonight's movie for you in 4K on wireguard total wireless (tracfone rebranded verizon) in your honor.

    I dunno where I said OVH and Kimsufi servers weren't just fine. So many jumping at the wrong point.

  • @MeAtExampleDotCom said: In bursts, yes. Try transferring that much, or even 300mbps, for a significant part of a day regularly, and see what happens. I expect you'll either be throttled down to a much slower rate until your next billing period or be asked to go forth and fornicate.

    I do, often. The point of these carriers is it's unmetered UWB as long as it's not mobile hotspot.

    Just don't try that in a small town, that's where you'll stick out.

  • @Kris said:
    I dunno where I said OVH and Kimsufi servers weren't just fine. So many jumping at the wrong point.

    So what is your point? That it is impractical to run a high performance high volume service that normally requires fairly expensive infrastructure to be practical, on a budget server?

    Because that point really doesn't need making. Or if it does, anyone it needs making too⁰ isn't going to be listening.


    [0] the “your $0.03/mo service was down for five minutes, I could have lost millions in that time! I demand reparations!!11!!!!!one!” crowd perhaps

    Thanked by 1LeftR
  • @MeAtExampleDotCom said: Because that point really doesn't need making. Or if it does, anyone it needs making too⁰ isn't going to be listening.

    What the actual fuck are you on about?

    I merely said 300Mbps is showing it's age in a day when cell phone bandwidth is 3x and have a group of weird OVH shilling nerds going on about... I'm not even sure, or care.

    @MeAtExampleDotCom said: [0] the “your $0.03/mo service was down for five minutes, I could have lost millions in that time! I demand reparations!!11!!!!!one!” crowd perhaps

    You're the "I don't understand english so I'll just fight with myself about a non issue" crowd perhaps.

    @MeAtExampleDotCom said: Because that point really doesn't need making. Or if it does, anyone it needs making too⁰ isn't going to be listening.

    Apparently they will, and misconvey my point, possibly due to a lack of English language, and keep going on about it.

    Enjoy your OVH circlejerk, sorry to pop in!

  • @Kris said: possibly due to a lack of English language

    Or your lack of explaining yourself in a way people get…

    Thanked by 1Kris
  • @MeAtExampleDotCom said: Or your lack of explaining yourself in a way people get…

    Ill do my best. So, the original response that started all this was '300 Mbps is showing its age' - in a day when you can get 1Gbps on prepaid US cell service, 300Mbps wasn't impressive to me, especially after trying to use it.

    I got responses from 'it runs my chess site fine, you can't run that speed on 5G UWB, and general angriness.

    I never said these servers aren't good and serve their purpose. Rather when people on cell phones can push 1Gbps, 300Mbps isn't too enticing.

    This seems to have caused havoc, and I shall not sully another OVH thread by saying 300Mbps is ... eh - nowadays.

    I didn't say it without experience, rather I got a KS-1, tried syncing my ~1TB iOS with PhotoSync and from nload I realized I was bottlenecking my inbound, even when syncing via cell. I thought 300/300Mbps via FiOS was enough, but when I realized I uploaded ~3k photos in the same time 20k photos were uploaded to Wasabi, I threw in the towel and went back to Wasabi, cancelling the KS-1.

    Do these servers have very good use cases? Yes! Did I notice a slowdown backing up my photo collection even on SSD due to 300Mbps inbound... yeah. That was my only point.

    Not sure where it got into pissing matches, but I routinely use 400-800 GB per month without issue. They don't throttle in NYC metro area, they just drop you from QCI 6-7, depending on the provider to QCI 9, which.. if there's enough bandwidth doesn't matter.

    If you're in a less populus state with 1 5G tower for the town and start pushing serious bandiwdth, sure - you may get a call, or throttled. So far 5-6 months and zero slowdowns with 500GB+ / provider / month.

    If I've been de-prioritized to QCI 9, never noticed it because I haven't dropped below 250Mbps or use a rooted Android device which could show me the QCI level I'm on.

    Thanked by 1nghialele
  • @Kris said:

    @MeAtExampleDotCom said: Or your lack of explaining yourself in a way people get…

    Ill do my best. So, the original response that started all this was '300 Mbps is showing its age' - in a day when you can get 1Gbps on prepaid US cell service, 300Mbps wasn't impressive to me, especially after trying to use it.

    I got responses from 'it runs my chess site fine, you can't run that speed on 5G UWB, and general angriness.

    I never said these servers aren't good and serve their purpose. Rather when people on cell phones can push 1Gbps, 300Mbps isn't too enticing.

    This seems to have caused havoc, and I shall not sully another OVH thread by saying 300Mbps is ... eh - nowadays.

    I didn't say it without experience, rather I got a KS-1, tried syncing my ~1TB iOS with PhotoSync and from nload I realized I was bottlenecking my inbound, even when syncing via cell. I thought 300/300Mbps via FiOS was enough, but when I realized I uploaded ~3k photos in the same time 20k photos were uploaded to Wasabi, I threw in the towel and went back to Wasabi, cancelling the KS-1.

    Do these servers have very good use cases? Yes! Did I notice a slowdown backing up my photo collection even on SSD due to 300Mbps inbound... yeah. That was my only point.

    Not sure where it got into pissing matches, but I routinely use 400-800 GB per month without issue. They don't throttle in NYC metro area, they just drop you from QCI 6-7, depending on the provider to QCI 9, which.. if there's enough bandwidth doesn't matter.

    If you're in a less populus state with 1 5G tower for the town and start pushing serious bandiwdth, sure - you may get a call, or throttled. So far 5-6 months and zero slowdowns with 500GB+ / provider / month.

    If I've been de-prioritized to QCI 9, never noticed it because I haven't dropped below 250Mbps or use a rooted Android device which could show me the QCI level I'm on.

    You can't use it because your demand is too high, you can use a higher bandwidth server. You don't need it but others do, without you OVH will still develop normally. Little money but high demand.

  • @Kris said:

    @MeAtExampleDotCom said: Or your lack of explaining yourself in a way people get…

    Ill do my best. So, the original response that started all this was '300 Mbps is showing its age' - in a day when you can get 1Gbps on prepaid US cell service, 300Mbps wasn't impressive to me, especially after trying to use it.

    I got responses from 'it runs my chess site fine, you can't run that speed on 5G UWB, and general angriness.

    I never said these servers aren't good and serve their purpose. Rather when people on cell phones can push 1Gbps, 300Mbps isn't too enticing.

    This seems to have caused havoc, and I shall not sully another OVH thread by saying 300Mbps is ... eh - nowadays.

    I didn't say it without experience, rather I got a KS-1, tried syncing my ~1TB iOS with PhotoSync and from nload I realized I was bottlenecking my inbound, even when syncing via cell. I thought 300/300Mbps via FiOS was enough, but when I realized I uploaded ~3k photos in the same time 20k photos were uploaded to Wasabi, I threw in the towel and went back to Wasabi, cancelling the KS-1.

    Do these servers have very good use cases? Yes! Did I notice a slowdown backing up my photo collection even on SSD due to 300Mbps inbound... yeah. That was my only point.

    Not sure where it got into pissing matches, but I routinely use 400-800 GB per month without issue. They don't throttle in NYC metro area, they just drop you from QCI 6-7, depending on the provider to QCI 9, which.. if there's enough bandwidth doesn't matter.

    If you're in a less populus state with 1 5G tower for the town and start pushing serious bandiwdth, sure - you may get a call, or throttled. So far 5-6 months and zero slowdowns with 500GB+ / provider / month.

    If I've been de-prioritized to QCI 9, never noticed it because I haven't dropped below 250Mbps or use a rooted Android device which could show me the QCI level I'm on.

    It seems you’re truly an elite user. 300 Mbps is more than enough for most people. You should really stop constantly monitoring your upload processes; have you heard of automation? For 99% of people, 300 Mbps is sufficient. I upload 10TB of data a month with 100 Mbps, and I don’t even notice it—all at lightning speed, because I’m not watching it upload. Haha

  • edited October 2024

    @Kris said:

    @MeAtExampleDotCom said: Or your lack of explaining yourself in a way people get…

    I got responses from 'it runs my chess site fine, you can't run that speed on 5G UWB, and general angriness.

    The “my chess site” seems deliberately belittling, given that the site mention is a fairly significant chess site that sees a lot of activity.

    This seems to have caused havoc, and I shall not sully another OVH thread by saying 300Mbps is ... eh - nowadays.

    Probably a good plan!

    Not sure where it got into pissing matches

    Looking back, the discussion seems to have taken a drop in tone when someone by the username Kris said “You don't know what you talk of son.” when someone pointed out the different metrics being compared. I'm guessing that was said in a toung-in-cheek manner, but it can be read as far more actively dismissive. Also, referencing the same message, phrases like “I didn't bother reading the rest of your thread” don't tend to be a great choice if you are not trying to look like you are whopping it out on the table. Your original two-line “pfffft” message had none of the nuance that the longer messages since have done, so it seems reasonable that someone's response would be to point out some of the nuance they thought necessary for the discussion.

    Pissing matches seem to be the standard conversational practice in the race to the bottom that is online discussion, especially for places like here where it is essentially the local sport. If you don't want to be in pissing matches, you need to be more careful that your wording can't so easily be the catalyst that starts them.

    [Yes, I'm well aware that my own verbiage makes me sound like a condescending prick at times – there is a very good reason for this which I'm pretty much “at one with”, so I don't get surprised/offended when it is pointed out!]

    Thanked by 1LeftR
  • fredo1664fredo1664 Member
    edited October 2024

    I have a KS-4 in GRA with 2x4Tb HDD and 16Gb RAM paid until Nov 1st if anyone wants it. It has 1G download, 0.3G upload.
    I'll ask €20 for it which is basically what I've paid for this month of service.
    Just PM me your OVH handle, and if your LET account is not too new, you can send me the money once you get the server.

  • @fredo1664 said:
    I have a KS-4 in GRA with 2x4Tb HDD and 16Gb RAM paid until Nov 1st if anyone wants it. It has 1G download, 0.3G upload.
    I'll ask €20 for it which is basically what I've paid for this month of service.
    Just PM me your OVH handle, and if your LET account is not too new, you can send me the money once you get the server.

    And it's gone.

    Thanked by 1hypolit
  • but anybody got more than one ks-a ? :D

  • Gib KS-A to mie pls

  • Gib KS-A to mie pls

  • allthemtingsallthemtings Member, Megathread Squad

    They seem to be restocking a lot quicker/more regularly in the last 24/48 hours…still no sign of the KS-A though

  • @allthemtings said:
    They seem to be restocking a lot quicker/more regularly in the last 24/48 hours…still no sign of the KS-A though

    Is it re-stocking, or people dropping the service after a month having bought in the rush and letting them lapse after changing their minds, so the servers are automatically dropped back into the available pool?

  • @MeAtExampleDotCom said:

    @allthemtings said:
    They seem to be restocking a lot quicker/more regularly in the last 24/48 hours…still no sign of the KS-A though

    Is it re-stocking, or people dropping the service after a month having bought in the rush and letting them lapse after changing their minds, so the servers are automatically dropped back into the available pool?

    Checkservers.ovh sees the availability of available KS-1/KS-4 as "1H LOW" so I'd say it's the latter.
    Unless OVH decided to restock servers one by one, which I don't think they do (?).

    Thanked by 1ebietsy
Sign In or Register to comment.