Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!


Shells Virtual Desktop
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Server.net
CPLicense.net
VPS Server
Buy VPN
Vultr
VMs for AI
HostDare
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
InterServer VPS
BMail.ag - Secure Email Service
Best VPN
High-Performance Bare Metal Server Solutions
Karvl.com
Server Mania Cloud Hosting
DataWagon Hosting
AlphaVPS Hosting
Evoxt.com
Clouvider
VPS Hosting with NVMe
Residential IPs in the US & 4G Mobile Proxies in EU & US with Unlimited Bandwidth
ReliableSite White-Label Dedicated Hosting for Resellers
Rabisu - Hosting Solutions
Shells Virtual Desktop
New on LowEndTalk? Please Register and read our Community Rules.

All new Registrations are manually reviewed and approved, so a short delay after registration may occur before your account becomes active.

CharityHost.org: USA Texas VDS 1 @ $5 usd/mo and VDS 2 @ $10 usd/mo: 1 Gbps unlimited

17810121315

Comments

  • @CharityHost_org said:

    @techdragon said: Your hardware is very old

    That's fine. We provide much more than an empty root VPS for $1 month. We provide extended support, and include monthly offsite full image backups. If you want raw performance unmanaged/no support VPS for $1, this is obviously not the offer.

    Thank you!

    Oh', so now you're a managed services provider too?

    I understand your pitch but you need to go and benchmark what's on offer in the industry before claiming your ancient Intel is going to take people out of business. You don't understand the current market demand at all.

    Ryzen VDS is available for less with better matched hardware. Once you are asking for $50 plus there is no value proposition compared to going dedicated (based on your offer).

    No point going back and forth. I wouldn't even use your master node as a webserver in 2024.

  • @techdragon said: Once you are asking for $50 plus there is no value proposition compared to going dedicated (based on your offer).

    There always is value in VDS vs dedicated. They are different. Trying getting monthly image backups of your dedicated server managed offsite included.

    Thank you!

  • @CharityHost_org said: Just putting this out there for feedback.

    What CPU and configuration would you prefer to use with a VDS? We are looking for feedback for the most preferred architecture and options.

    Between these 2 with same ddr4 ratio per vCPU (ddr5 and nvme are following gen when we scale more). Assume 1 vCPU 2 GB ram and HW RAID 10, but no specifics on the controller, I am probably going to double the IO on the disks with RAID 10, 8 x ssd, instead of 4 x ssd.

    Epyc 7351 vCPU

    SSD RAID 10 (6 Gbps SATA3 ports)

    E5-2699A v4 vCPU

    SSD RAID 10 (12 Gbps SAS ports)

    Gold 6248 vCPU

    SSD RAID 10 (12 Gbps SAS ports)

    I would like to start offering EPYC VDS, but the Gold does seem more attractive in my opinion.

    Let us know! Thanks

    I would like to post this as a poll, but seems you cannot unless you do this on the first post of a discussion.

    Open to feedback! Thank you!

  • @dev_vps you got trial! I dm you.

  • @CharityHost_org said:

    @dev_vps you got trial! I dm you.

    Thanks @CharityHost_org

    One suggestion, if I may, consider splitting managed and unmanaged VDS offers. Not every customer needs managed option.

    And not everyone needs unlimited bandwidth, either.

  • @dev_vps said: One suggestion, if I may, consider splitting managed and unmanaged VDS offers. Not every customer needs managed option.

    And not everyone needs unlimited bandwidth, either.

    Yes been considering VPS, looking to offer cheaper unmanaged VPS, and adding different hardware. Thank you.

  • TimboJonesTimboJones Member
    edited September 2024

    @CharityHost_org said:

    @TimboJones said: You're not going to get over 1.5GBps.

    You must be kidding me right? I said Gbps, not GBps. I was talking about 6 Gbps vs 12 Gbps ports. What is the difference between bit and byte? Please, multiply x 8, thank you. That is 1.3 GBps and that is the throughput of the drives on RAID 10. Hence I said, "the SSD are enterprise drives, so the bottleneck is not the 6 Gbps SATA3."

    The throughput of the ports is 3 GB/s but the drives are the bottleneck.

    Disk throughtput speeds are in bytes and interfaces are in bits. Interfaces don't reflect real world performance as there is overhead and correction bits eating into the interface speeds.

    You still don't understand that sata 6 is your bottleneck. And it'll get worse when they're filled up and no trim support. This what everyone had in 2014.

    Check the posted yabs and so on.

    Thank you for the support!

    What? Your yabs maxed at 1.09GBps. 1.09 is less than 1.5GBps. I have no idea what you're referring to.

    Thanked by 1Marx
  • @CharityHost_org said:

    @techdragon said: Once you are asking for $50 plus there is no value proposition compared to going dedicated (based on your offer).

    There always is value in VDS vs dedicated. They are different. Trying getting monthly image backups of your dedicated server managed offsite included.

    Thank you!

    Managed services for dedicated servers include off-site backup. At least for every time a company I've worked with has. But you're right about cost.

    But why are you talking about dedicated servers when you provide VDS?

  • @TimboJones follow the quotes, I was responding to someone else about dedicated vs VDS. You wont get offisite backups on unmanaged dedicated. We offer optional offsite backups from 1 rolling day up to 7 rolling days and 1 backup a month included with VDS.

    To be clear, we do not claimed to be fully managed, it is extended support, not the same as fully managed or unmanaged/unsupported.

  • edited September 2024

    @TimboJones said: What? Your yabs maxed at 1.09GBps. 1.09 is less than 1.5GBps. I have no idea what you're referring to.

    Base line is different when idle vs under workload. Yabs says 1.09 GB/s but under load that is. The theoretical technical throughput of the 4 x SSD @ 500 MB/s in HW RAID 10 is 1.333 GB/s per the raid calculators online. That is 10.664 Gbps. Indeed there are losses in performance depending on the amount and frequency of data read and write ops, the RAID controller having cache or not, the different throughput of the drives and other things not related to this configuration (such as how many drives in the RAID 10).

    So we have 1.333 GB/s io average max with 4 drives @ HW RAID 10, the ports are not the bottleneck at 6 Gbps x 4 = 24 Gbps (give or take correction and saturation if you wish, but 10.664 Gbps that the drives are capable of is less than 1/2 the sata3 6 Gbps x 4 or x 2 for the RAID 1 bandwidth, however you want to see it, it's complicated because it's also stripped and depends where the read or write is ocurring on the volume blocks across the array). The RAID 1+0 (2x RAID 1 mirrored RAID 0 striped) explained here There are a lot of factors that affect performance, like sequential r/w, random r/w. There is no perfect way to measure the exact IO of an idle system to test underload, and underload the performance is influence and dependent on the IO method and type. Essentially, IO testing is always assumptions in a general sense due to the unknowns about the IO that will be underload, and testing underload will vary on the load rw ratio at any time and the amount of rw ... under load, which is what the yabs showed, a hypervisor under load, but not overloaded by any means.

    For transparency, the HPE ssd drives have these claimed performance details:

    Performance
    Endurance DWPD (Drive Writes Per Day): 0.6
    Drive Transfer Rate: 600 MBps (external)
    MAX Seq. Reads Throughput (MiB/s): 530
    MAX Seq. Writes Throughput (MiB/s): 445
    Random Read Average Latency uSec (4KiB,Q1): 125
    Random Write Average Latency uSec (4KiB,Q1): 70
    Random Read IOPS (4KiB, Q=16): 55000
    Random Write IOPS (4KiB, Q=16): 15000
    MAX Random Read IOPS (4KiB): 65000@Q32
    MAX Random Write IOPS (4KiB): 15000@Q1
    4KiB Random 70% Read / 30% Write, Queue 32 Performance (IOPS) VI-1: 48500
    4KiB Random 50% Read / 50% Write, Queue 32 Performance (IOPS) VI-2: 27000
    

    As to TRIM our HW RAID supports it so do our HPE SSD.

  • @CharityHost_org
    Customized YABS on 2x vCPU VDS

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic System Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     CPU Model          : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
     CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2299.984 MHz
     CPU Cache          : 46080 KB
     AES-NI             : ✔ Enabled
     VM-x/AMD-V         : ✔ Enabled
     Total Disk         : 78.2 GB (1.1 GB Used)
     Total RAM          : 3.8 GB (321.9 MB Used)
     System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 2 min
     Load average       : 0.12, 0.03, 0.01
     OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 12
     Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
     Kernel             : 6.1.0-25-amd64
     Virtualization     : KVM
     TCP Control        : cubic
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic Network Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Primary Network    : IPv4
     IPv4 Access        : ✔ Online
     ISP                : The Optimal Link Corporation
     ASN                : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
     Location           : Katy, Texas-TX, United States
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
     fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
     ---------------------------------
     Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
       ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
     Read       | 242.57 MB/s  (60.6k) | 437.85 MB/s   (6.8k)
     Write      | 243.21 MB/s  (60.8k) | 440.16 MB/s   (6.8k)
     Total      | 485.78 MB/s (121.4k) | 878.02 MB/s  (13.7k)
                |                      |
     Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
       ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ----
     Read       | 505.78 MB/s    (987) | 527.29 MB/s    (514)
     Write      | 532.66 MB/s   (1.0k) | 562.41 MB/s    (549)
     Total      | 1.03 GB/s     (2.0k) | 1.08 GB/s     (1.0k)
    
     iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
     ---------------------------------
     Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
     -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
     Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | busy            | 873 Mbits/sec   | 105 ms
     Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 863 Mbits/sec   | 755 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms
     Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 734 Mbits/sec   | 674 Mbits/sec   | 207 ms
     Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 698 Mbits/sec   | 813 Mbits/sec   | 198 ms
     Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 918 Mbits/sec   | 204 Mbits/sec   |  36.3 ms
     Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 507 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec   |  34.1 ms
     Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 357 Mbits/sec   | 862 Mbits/sec   | 137 ms
    
     iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
     ---------------------------------
     Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping
     -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----
     Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 851 Mbits/sec   | 870 Mbits/sec   | 105 ms
     Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 852 Mbits/sec   | 745 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms
     Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 687 Mbits/sec   | 698 Mbits/sec   | 205 ms
     Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 733 Mbits/sec   | 802 Mbits/sec   | 198 ms
     Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 906 Mbits/sec   | 222 Mbits/sec   |  36.3 ms
     Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 180 Mbits/sec   | 915 Mbits/sec   |  32.4 ms
     Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 21.5 Mbits/sec  | 308 Mbits/sec   | 137 ms
    
     Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
     ---------------------------------
     Test            | Value
                     |
     Single Core     |  923
     Multi Core      | 1769
     Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/22883902
    
     Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
     ---------------------------------
     Test            | Value
                     |
     Single Core     | 1136
     Multi Core      | 2023
     Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/7866585
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net 
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server
    
     ISP: The Optimal Link Corporation
    
     Nearest           1.41 ms    0.0%    944.42 Mbps    934.28 Mbps    Whitesky Communications LLC - Houston, TX
    
     Dallas, US        5.50 ms    0.0%    951.21 Mbps    939.83 Mbps    i3D.net - Dallas, TX
     Houston, TX       2.76 ms    0.0%    943.64 Mbps    938.62 Mbps    Ezee Fiber - Houston, TX
     Chicago, IL      27.51 ms    0.0%    946.36 Mbps    940.98 Mbps    Enzu.com - Chicago, IL
     Miami, US        26.88 ms    N/A     940.13 Mbps    940.59 Mbps    Dish Wireless - Miami, FL
     New York, NY     34.73 ms    0.0%    943.98 Mbps    940.71 Mbps    Surfshark Ltd - New York, NY
     Miami, FL        32.49 ms    0.0%    943.24 Mbps    940.99 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Miami, FL                    
     Spokane, WA      67.77 ms    0.0%    947.45 Mbps    927.67 Mbps    Crunchbits - Spokane, WA
     Seattle, WA      52.69 ms    0.0%    949.23 Mbps    922.67 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Seattle, WA
     Los Angeles, US  47.11 ms    0.0%    946.92 Mbps    939.57 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
     San Jose, CA     46.57 ms    0.0%    943.17 Mbps    939.61 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - San Jose, CA
    
     London, UK      101.64 ms    0.0%    973.05 Mbps    796.34 Mbps    VeloxServ Communications - London
     Amsterdam, NL   115.25 ms    0.0%    964.25 Mbps    694.73 Mbps    31173 Services AB - Amsterdam
     Paris, FR       109.21 ms    N/A     949.10 Mbps    773.94 Mbps    Axione - Paris
     Frankfurt, DE   113.01 ms    0.0%    949.22 Mbps    780.33 Mbps    Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main
     Warsaw, PL      133.07 ms    0.0%    995.44 Mbps    645.65 Mbps    Play - Warszawa
     Kyiv, UA        151.23 ms    0.0%    944.44 Mbps    246.23 Mbps    O3 - Kyiv
     Bucharest, RO   137.61 ms    0.0%    948.46 Mbps    642.79 Mbps    Vodafone Romania Fixed – Bucharest - Bucharest
    
     Bangalore, IN   240.10 ms    0.0%    925.50 Mbps    282.08 Mbps    Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
     Chennai, IN     254.10 ms    N/A     929.99 Mbps    373.11 Mbps    Jio - Chennai
     Mumbai, IN      253.30 ms    0.0%    936.79 Mbps    330.10 Mbps    i3D.net - Mumbai
     Mumbai, MH      255.78 ms    0.0%    941.73 Mbps    351.90 Mbps    Jio - Rajkot
     Delhi, IN       269.90 ms    0.0%    917.70 Mbps    282.89 Mbps    Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
    
     Jeddah, SA      169.07 ms    0.0%    949.87 Mbps    554.41 Mbps    Saudi Telecom Company
     Dubai, AE       214.13 ms    0.0%    932.85 Mbps    415.70 Mbps    du - Dubai
    
     Hong Kong       185.43 ms    0.0%    918.94 Mbps    327.40 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Hong Kong
     Sydney          183.10 ms    0.0%    963.43 Mbps    487.56 Mbps    Telstra - Sydney
     Perth           237.68 ms    0.0%    909.53 Mbps    372.83 Mbps    Aussie Broadband - Perth
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Avg DL Speed       : 944.64 Mbps
     Avg UL Speed       : 666.55 Mbps
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
     Speedtest by Ookla
    
     Server: i3D.net - Dallas, TX
     ISP: The Optimal Link Corporation
     Idle Latency:     5.45 ms   (jitter: 0.02ms, low: 5.42ms, high: 5.46ms)
         Download:   938.27 Mbps (data used: 831.2 MB)
                      55.56 ms   (jitter: 2.57ms, low: 5.31ms, high: 104.72ms)
           Upload:   933.88 Mbps (data used: 467.0 MB)
                      41.91 ms   (jitter: 2.72ms, low: 5.54ms, high: 46.75ms)
      Packet Loss:     0.0%
       Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/d3fb0807-18a1-4805-abbd-70c3773cd733
    
    
     Server: RETN - London (id: 31183)
     ISP: The Optimal Link Corporation
     Idle Latency:   101.81 ms   (jitter: 0.02ms, low: 101.79ms, high: 101.83ms)
         Download:   973.60 Mbps (data used: 1.6 GB)
                     229.76 ms   (jitter: 67.58ms, low: 101.50ms, high: 669.09ms)
           Upload:   832.17 Mbps (data used: 1.2 GB)
                     161.75 ms   (jitter: 54.24ms, low: 100.58ms, high: 261.05ms)
      Packet Loss:     0.0%
       Result URL: https://www.speedtest.net/result/c/4bd2aee6-35fc-45a0-b5f1-df1d276cc004
    
    
  • @CharityHost_org
    Installed and running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9.4

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic System Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     CPU Model          : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
     CPU Cores          : 2 @ 2299.984 MHz
     CPU Cache          : 46080 KB
     AES-NI             : ✔ Enabled
     VM-x/AMD-V         : ✔ Enabled
     Total Disk         : 79.9 GB (1.8 GB Used)
     Total RAM          : 3.8 GB (438.0 MB Used)
     System uptime      : 0 days, 0 hour 13 min
     Load average       : 0.05, 0.23, 0.12
     OS                 : Red Hat Enterprise Linux release 9.4 (Plow)
     Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
     Kernel             : 5.15.0-206.153.7.el9uek.x86_64
     Virtualization     : KVM
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
  • Running Windows 11 Enterprise OS.
    Windows RDP is actually pretty smooth.

    Thanked by 1CharityHost_org
  • @dev_vps looks good! Yes, the network latency and jitter is super low from/to any decent network globally. Great network at the colo. I tested windows but we are not offering it at least not yet but yes RDP is quite smooth here. Decent hardware and network will do that.

    Looking into scaling providing unmanaged VPS plan with nvme hosts using Silver/Gold/Platinum CPU's right now. As to EPYC/Ryzen with nvme and ddr5 would be for future commitment.

  • Hey all! VDS 2 plans now have 50% more vCPU power with 3 vCPU instead of 2 vCPU!

    We do accept custom requests for resources.

    Thank you!

  • VDS 1 now $4/mo with first order 50% discount
    1 vCPU
    2 GB RAM
    55 GB SSD

    VDS 2 now $7.50/mo with first order 50% discount
    3 vCPU
    4 GB RAM
    80 GB SSD

    Charities, ngo, nonprofits, school staff and school students always get 50% ongoing discount plus 25% first order discount on top.

    Both with 1 ipv4 and 1 ipv6 to start.

    Will be announcing cheaper VPS with more CPU power using Gold 2nd Gen. Scalable CPU.

    Visit this page and follow the ordering process for that automatic discount

    The Promo Code: 7UITJM8M4A

    https://charityhost.org/virtual-dedicated-servers

  • edited September 2024

    Attention: All VDS now have 75% recurring discount for LET specifically

    Use LowEndTalk specific promo code during cart checkout:

    LET-75-RIDE

    VDS 1 now $2/mo with discount
    1 vCPU
    2 GB RAM
    55 GB SSD
    1 Gbps unmetered

    VDS 2 now $3.75/mo with this discount
    3 vCPU
    4 GB RAM
    80 GB SSD
    1 Gbps unmetered

    https://charityhost.org/virtual-dedicated-servers

  • @CharityHost_org said:
    Attention: All VDS now have 50% recurring discount for LET specifically

    Use LowEndTalk specific promo code during cart checkout:

    LET-50-RIDE

    VDS 1 now $2/mo with discount
    1 vCPU
    2 GB RAM
    55 GB SSD

    VDS 2 now $7.50/mo with this discount
    3 vCPU
    4 GB RAM
    80 GB SSD

    I used the code and it says VDS1 50% discount $8 to $4, not $2

  • @mw said: I used the code and it says VDS1 50% discount $8 to $4, not $2

    I'm checking. Will brb

  • edited September 2024

    @mw Sorry I had to correct it. Please use theLET-75-RIDE code now.

    The VDS 2 is $3.75 with this code as well!

  • @CharityHost_org said:
    @mw Sorry I had to correct it. Please use theLET-75-RIDE code now.

    The VDS 2 is $3.75 with this code as well!

    I tried for the VDS 2:

    The promotion code you entered has been applied to your cart but no items qualify for the discount yet - please check the promotion terms

  • @mw thanks for your patience. Was a toggle I needed to do. Try refreshing the cart now.

  • @CharityHost_org said:
    @mw thanks for your patience. Was a toggle I needed to do. Try refreshing the cart now.

    Order placed, thank you. VDS/VPS, call it what you want, this is a deal!

    Thanked by 1sucre13
  • @mw said:

    @CharityHost_org said:
    @mw thanks for your patience. Was a toggle I needed to do. Try refreshing the cart now.

    Order placed, thank you. VDS/VPS, call it what you want, this is a deal!

    Appreciated @mw

  • root@charity:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sun Sep 29 02:21:24 AM EDT 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 2 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 2 @ 2299.984 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 78.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-9-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corporation
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : The Optimal Link Corporation
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/vda1):
    ---------------------------------
    Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 220.67 MB/s  (55.1k) | 459.80 MB/s   (7.1k)
    Write      | 221.25 MB/s  (55.3k) | 462.22 MB/s   (7.2k)
    Total      | 441.92 MB/s (110.4k) | 922.02 MB/s  (14.4k)
               |                      |                     
    Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
      ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
    Read       | 511.48 MB/s    (998) | 404.78 MB/s    (395)
    Write      | 538.66 MB/s   (1.0k) | 431.73 MB/s    (421)
    Total      | 1.05 GB/s     (2.0k) | 836.51 MB/s    (816)
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv4):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 862 Mbits/sec   | 881 Mbits/sec   | 102 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 864 Mbits/sec   | 744 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 747 Mbits/sec   | 668 Mbits/sec   | 209 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 648 Mbits/sec   | 809 Mbits/sec   | 204 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 919 Mbits/sec   | 926 Mbits/sec   | 43.6 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 920 Mbits/sec   | 928 Mbits/sec   | 33.6 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 831 Mbits/sec   | 850 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    iperf3 Network Speed Tests (IPv6):
    ---------------------------------
    Provider        | Location (Link)           | Send Speed      | Recv Speed      | Ping           
    -----           | -----                     | ----            | ----            | ----           
    Clouvider       | London, UK (10G)          | 850 Mbits/sec   | 863 Mbits/sec   | 102 ms         
    Eranium         | Amsterdam, NL (100G)      | 852 Mbits/sec   | 733 Mbits/sec   | 113 ms         
    Uztelecom       | Tashkent, UZ (10G)        | 721 Mbits/sec   | 678 Mbits/sec   | 208 ms         
    Leaseweb        | Singapore, SG (10G)       | 740 Mbits/sec   | 800 Mbits/sec   | 204 ms         
    Clouvider       | Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | 905 Mbits/sec   | 912 Mbits/sec   | 43.4 ms        
    Leaseweb        | NYC, NY, US (10G)         | 907 Mbits/sec   | 915 Mbits/sec   | 32.0 ms        
    Edgoo           | Sao Paulo, BR (1G)        | 824 Mbits/sec   | 839 Mbits/sec   | 132 ms         
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1040                          
    Multi Core      | 1868                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8037165
    
    YABS completed in 16 min 2 sec
    

    I opened a ticket because it seems I was assigned 2 cores when 3 were advertised. YABS looks good otherwise!

  • Fixed YABS

    root@charity:~# curl -sL yabs.sh | bash -s -- -d -i
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    #              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
    #                     v2024-06-09                    #
    # https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
    # ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
    
    Sun Sep 29 02:50:18 AM EDT 2024
    
    Basic System Information:
    ---------------------------------
    Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes
    Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
    CPU cores  : 3 @ 2299.984 MHz
    AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
    VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
    RAM        : 3.8 GiB
    Swap       : 0.0 KiB
    Disk       : 78.6 GiB
    Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
    Kernel     : 6.1.0-9-amd64
    VM Type    : KVM
    IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online
    
    IPv6 Network Information:
    ---------------------------------
    ISP        : The Optimal Link Corporation
    ASN        : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
    Host       : The Optimal Link Corporation
    Location   : Houston, Texas (TX)
    Country    : United States
    
    Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
    ---------------------------------
    Test            | Value                         
                    |                               
    Single Core     | 1166                          
    Multi Core      | 2784                          
    Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/8037378
    
    YABS completed in 7 min 35 sec
    
    Thanked by 1CharityHost_org
  • @CharityHost_org

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic System Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     CPU Model          : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2696 v3 @ 2.30GHz
     CPU Cores          : 3 @ 2299.984 MHz
     CPU Cache          : 46080 KB
     AES-NI             : ✔ Enabled
     VM-x/AMD-V         : ✔ Enabled
     Total Disk         : 78.6 GB (3.0 GB Used)
     Total RAM          : 3.8 GB (73.8 MB Used)
     OS                 : Debian GNU/Linux 11
     Arch               : x86_64 (64 Bit)
     Kernel             : 5.10.0-22-amd64
     Virtualization     : KVM
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Basic Network Info
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Primary Network    : IPv6
     IPv6 Access        : ✔ Online
     IPv4 Access        : ✔ Online
     ISP                : The Optimal Link Corporation
     ASN                : AS40156 The Optimal Link Corporation
     Host               : The Optimal Link Corporation
     Location           : Houston, Texas-TX, United States
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Speedtest.net
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server
    
     Nearest           1.28 ms    0.0%    929.70 Mbps    925.78 Mbps    Whitesky Communications LLC - Houston, TX
    
     Dallas, US        5.44 ms    0.0%    926.93 Mbps    926.79 Mbps    i3D.net - Dallas, TX
     Houston, TX       2.81 ms    0.0%    925.96 Mbps    925.90 Mbps    Ezee Fiber - Houston, TX
     Chicago, IL      27.15 ms    0.0%    930.19 Mbps    927.13 Mbps    Enzu.com - Chicago, IL
     Miami, US        26.89 ms    N/A     943.44 Mbps    938.24 Mbps    Dish Wireless - Miami, FL
     New York, NY     32.20 ms    0.0%    942.24 Mbps    941.03 Mbps    Surfshark Ltd - New York, NY
     Miami, FL        31.42 ms    0.0%    932.82 Mbps    928.14 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Miami, FL
     Spokane, WA      67.31 ms    0.0%    937.73 Mbps    916.74 Mbps    Crunchbits - Spokane, WA
     Seattle, WA      54.91 ms    0.0%    927.16 Mbps    920.10 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Seattle, WA
     Los Angeles, US  38.30 ms    0.0%    929.76 Mbps    927.71 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA
     San Jose, CA     44.73 ms    0.0%    937.94 Mbps    929.13 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - San Jose, CA
    
     London, UK       101.64 ms   0.0%    968.44 Mbps    830.10 Mbps    VeloxServ Communications - London
     Amsterdam, NL    115.30 ms   0.0%    969.61 Mbps    755.66 Mbps    31173 Services AB - Amsterdam
     Paris, FR        110.76 ms   N/A     996.65 Mbps    659.19 Mbps    Axione - Paris
     Frankfurt, DE    116.52 ms   0.0%    929.54 Mbps    758.53 Mbps    Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main
     Warsaw, PL       138.00 ms   0.0%    955.07 Mbps    660.11 Mbps    Play - Warszawa
     Kyiv, UA         151.30 ms   1.3%    944.52 Mbps    5.98 Mbps      O3 - Kyiv
     Bucharest, RO    136.62 ms   0.0%    948.69 Mbps    651.96 Mbps    Vodafone Romania Fixed – Bucharest - Bucharest
    
     Bangalore, IN    296.49 ms   0.0%    917.06 Mbps    192.38 Mbps    Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore
     Chennai, IN      304.96 ms   N/A     914.13 Mbps    327.07 Mbps    Jio - Chennai
     Mumbai, IN       232.79 ms   0.0%    924.88 Mbps    367.23 Mbps    i3D.net - Mumbai
     Mumbai, MH       311.04 ms   0.0%    910.57 Mbps    294.63 Mbps    Jio - Rajkot
     Delhi, IN        274.22 ms   0.0%    922.66 Mbps    219.28 Mbps    Tata Play Fiber - New Delhi
    
     Jeddah, SA       162.22 ms   0.0%    975.98 Mbps    552.98 Mbps    Saudi Telecom Company
     Dubai, AE        210.92 ms   0.0%    944.11 Mbps    412.39 Mbps    du - Dubai
    
     Hong Kong        178.04 ms   0.0%    697.14 Mbps    382.03 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Hong Kong
     Sydney           313.91 ms   0.0%    957.86 Mbps    294.16 Mbps    Telstra - Sydney
     Perth            218.05 ms   0.0%    926.04 Mbps    402.25 Mbps    Aussie Broadband - Perth
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Avg DL Speed       : 930.96 Mbps
     Avg UL Speed       : 641.89 Mbps
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Thanked by 1CharityHost_org
  • edited September 2024

    @mw Yes. There was a remaining artifact of the 2 vCPU on the VDS 2 order settings. Thats now fixed to 3 vCPU for all VDS 2 orders

    For quick reference the recurring 75% LET discount code for VDS and Optimal Web Hosting here to replace the non LET default promo code in the cart:

    LET-75-RIDE

  • For reference. There is an adjustment to the latest offer. The promo code is valid for all VDS with the exception of VDS 1 (which is not the most interesting or attractive VDS per resources). We changed this to focus on VDS 2 and above so that we are able to sustain the costs of the deliverables. VDS 1 will have the promo code LET-50-RIDE available to it, but not the LET-75-RIDE. This is due to the incurred costs of ip addressing as well as all other costs. It just makes sense to go with VDS 2 or above in that sense for LET LEB users.

This discussion has been closed.